the 20th of 2013 and the tenant cancelled the appointment and the last time was 1129, 13 and the tenant cancelled once again. we've been working with that mr. wong for 10 years as the plumber and he's been trying to fix the situation to have two bath tubes together and we have to open up the wall and replace the piping. we need to gain access to the tenants place to open the wall to get even though piping done >> i have a question of clarification who you meant by the tenant the tenant underneath the tube.

>> the tenant with the tube. >> commissioner walker. >> what do you stimulate the time period. >> i can't stimulate until i open the wall. >> the worst-case scenario. >> a day. >> we'll be in and out in one die. >> okay. thanks. >> thank you. >> any public comment? >> i'm the tenant that has the bath tube stuffed up tube. >> your name. >> ilene. they have not made any appointments with me. i don't know what they're talking about. anyway.

that's all i have it is stuffed up the little plug that removes doesn't remove its stopped the water is stuck. you have to take that off and the handles don't work. anyway, the first plumber he brought charges $3,000 and he offered to do it for half the price and he refused. that was 5 months ago that he brought 5 plumbers and none have done the job. i've been waiting 5 months since november 2013 for that to be cleaned up and fixed. and he still hadn't done it.

this business about 19 i know he goes into everyone's apartment he has keys. i have a letter saying i don't have to give him a key and there's no law that says he has to have a key. i'm lessons there he only has to call me up and make an appointment we're there all the emit. i'm handicapped i can't work. >> so they say this plumber asking is going to do the job i give them my number he only has to make an appointment. mr. wong changes his number so i can't leaf him a question that's

why it's been 5 months he changed his phone number so you can't call him. >> commissioner walker. so you're saying i didn't have an appointment that you cancelled did you have an appointment with that plumber >> no. he said he had 5 appointments >> or something like that. not with me >> okay. >> not with me. that's the first time i've seen him >> today every call him. >> no. >> thank you. >> thank you. any public comment? questions by the commissioners commissioner walker >> i just think that ultimately we are interested in having the work done. i think it sounds like there's

different scenarios and the issue someone assumed there was going to be a continuous i feel the evidence establishes there are code violations and the notice of violation and the subsequent action is appropriate. i feel like it's been long-range this process that the tenant has had to live in those conditions so i would ask - i would move that we uphold the order of abatement and that we give them it's been discussed by the preliminaryer it only takes a day we give them a week to do this work and hold the abatement in awe bins for a week allowing them time to do it and assess

fees. before we entertain that may i ask could we have the landlord and tenant agree they can do the repairs within the timeframe of one week >> i thought you that's what rosemary said, yes. >> i just a question for the department. duo do we know if the plumbing permit has been applied for >> i was asking my staff i don't know if that's the case i suspect it's not been perhaps the property owner can attest it that. >> on the same day that's

normal. >> i would think that p&g could take care of the inspections. >> i think if there's an agreed timeframe it would be pulled a day before they go in that's normal and a twenty-four hours notice. >> yeah.. >> so moved. >> second. >> i'm a little bit i'm just obviously i echo commissioner walker's points here. i believe there was good faith by the owner to have the hearing continued. i'm trying to find out what's the overall value of the permit if he is granted that continuous >> are we speaking the statement? >> yes. >> i'd be happy to look at the costs with respect to that.

and see what we can do but he's accrued it beyond the violation notice the notice was in november even if it was a thirty days notification so we're way beyond that so the accrues beyond that. so from that standpoint he has accrued that amount of time. i'd be more than happy to look at it in the context he asking for the abstinence he's not gone or golden the work done so i'll look at that >> if i can finish. there's also the issue conflicting stories of whether or not he was trying to get the job done and wasn't. so in the e kwaks he was given

no consideration and the pier officer didn't know those are issues we need to look at. this would have been resolved if people were communicating directly. i'm not trying to point fingers but we are part of this as well because we didn't do our job with the hearing officer >> i was telling you that went to a hearing at least 60 days it wasn't immediate because we'll have exposure with this property owner in the past. >> i want to talk about what's in front of of us now. >> understand, i understand you want to have the assessment

costs waved. >> in this particular case. >> there's another motion on the floor though. >> there is a motion on the floor i understand i want to make a second motion but i think this is a case we could consider removing the costs as commissioner lee said to agree on a dead certain date to fix this and hopefully not have this situation again. i don't know if there's a motion >> there's a motion on the floor you can't make a motion before the other one is dealt with. >> i'd like the commissioners to hear my motion and they can vote it up and down in order. >> you can amend hers but not

make a motion on top of hers. >> and i think we all understand we can anticipate after this motion there will be a second motion i'm not sure about the motion to the question. >> i was wondering if i could jump in for the sake of communications i was going to propose if commissioner walker would accept a friendly amendment to her original motion before we jump into the acceptance which is not to assess the total costs but to modify the assessment of cost i want feedback on that from the staff if it's acceptable. >> okay. a couple of things. there have been plumbers out there that have looked at this

project two or three prior to this gentleman coming. so i feel like there has been adequate access and time to do this work. whether or not whatever those two say about this particular plumber coming out. it's been a long time that this person has had hocking to live with those conditions so i think that allowing time to complete this work with an end date is more than generous. i will for the same thing of moving forward something entertain a reduction but i will not amend my motion to delete the assessment completely. >> rosemary is there a way for

the clock to start ticking to reduce the fees or approach it differently? the commission sitting as the abatement of board of appeals you're sitting in the shoes of the hearing officer i can ask that be reduced it is how to direct. i can definitely like i said, we haven't calculated it but we were at $2,000 if we have a ballpark we can come up with something you have in mind >> i would be willing to amend it by half. and then allow for a week to get the permit, do the work and have the inspection

>> i will second that modified motion. >> okay. >> there is a motion to uphold the order of abatement hold it in awe bins for one week and to apply the assessment of costs at half the amount. so i'll do a role call on that motion. commissioner clinch. sxhaern. commissioner melgar. commissioner lee. commissioner mccray. (laughter) commissioner walker. okay 9 motion carries unanimously. >> item f general public comment it there general public comment

for any items not on the agenda. is there a second for adjournment >> yes. are we're now adjourned pastadjourned. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ hello and welcome to this presentation. i'm san francisco purrs since

that time we've helped people clean up their criminal records. we created this to help you understand how this worked. we'll plan or explain all the steps. after watching this program you'll know what to expect after completing the process. hi, there are i'm deputy and i'm part of the clean slate team. the first thing we will need to know whether your despicable to have our convictions dismissed can't be on parole or currently charged with a crime or serving a sentence and it must be from san francisco. while your colleagues will get to know your circumstances there are 3 steps.

getting the clean slate process started it simple you can get them done in the same day. first fill out an application and they can be opinioned on sf defender.org. next you'll obtain a copy of your rap sheet that's a rap sheet going 80 the hall of justice at 850 bryant street on the fourth floor. the bureau is open monday through friday from 8 to 5. it's located one block away from the public defender's office you'll need to bring our photo id. finally, there's your our own your rap sheet to the front

desk. you'll receive a letter from 2 to three weeks explaining the next steps. let's review the 3 steps if that fillist the police stations and on your police station and 3 deliver our rap sheet and application $0.40 to the defender. it can help with financial aid for colleagues. i want you to meet a client who did the clean slate program he refunds a nonprofit literary series. please meet joe. peep at the clean slate program worked with me today, i i am an author of 3 books a husband and

a father would you recommend clean slight to another person >> i would definitely recommend that. so, now you have a better understanding of the gibt address benefits of the clean slate program as well as highway to get started. let's hear some common questions. keep in mind those are general questions you'll you may be seated with an attorney who be provide more information based on our circumstances >> just to be clear i don't have to tell my employers will my ejections. >> yes. as well as convictions that have been dismissed. if someone runs a criminal background they'll see the charges but it's dismissed. you will be able to legally tell

your employers person never convicted >> i don't to tell anyone is there a way to rears them. >> there's some cases you can. maybe you're arrested because police thought you were someone else. wound our arrest record is sealed you can say you were never >> if i wanted to clear my record if i was convicted of a felon. >> it is also known as a one letter officer the clean stating hit. >> may be able to get it raersz but if i went to prisoner you

may quality for a correspondent certified document saying you're a lay abating citizen are. you had should be aware for some state jobs state agencies are allotted to consider our criminal history. those jobs are private security jobs health care workers and other careers involving the children the i can sick or elder. it will benefit you human resources here's some of the things clean slate can't do it doesn't prevent an old conviction to there the sense of a new criminal action. the court might connotes more sentences even if it been submit

you can't own or polgs possess a firearm. if it bars you from carrying an firearm eclipsing our record won't change that. submittal doesn't rove a sex ejection. if you're required to register as a sex offender that process will continue even if your record has been cleared, however, other forms of royalties maybe eligible. we look forward to helping you move forward with your life ♪ ♪ so, now you know a little bit more about the program we encourage you to apply go the sf purifyi purifying.org or stop by any

place for our clean slate program. our team looks forward to serving welcome to the san frao

land use & economic development committee i'm scott wiener the chairman of the committee to my

left is supervisor cowen and supervisor jane kim will be joining us momentary our clerk is andrea i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting the hearing. we do have overflow seating in room 250 dillon across the hall to folks who have to go into the offer flow please submit public comment cards so i can bring you into this room to make public comment at the appropriate time there's the yellow cards and indicate the item for which you wish to testify. so madam clerk, call item number

one and two together >> i'll read announcements first. >> please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. >> please call items 125e. >> this is the the streets of the easement within the one hundred shipyard place and item two is a resolution of the intent to order the vacation of streets along the shipyard development plan. >> supervisor cowen is the thorough of items one and two. >> thank you, we're going to go into the presentation from barbara. >> good afternoon public works.

the purpose is the vacation of streets and public easements within the hunters view shipyard redevelopment plan and candle stick and to vacant the streets and receiver the street rights within the plan area. >> got a graphic here. the street in vacation of easements will allow the configuration of the streets all in support of revitalized community. as noted in the large area we indicate in yellow the areas which include public easements vacations par they're also submerged streets that are noted 90 in pink and orange street

areas. a major component of this plan a the rebuilding of the alice grifshth development and it's important for the street lands to the city to allow us to constrict the alice griffith that allows the 2 hundred and 506 housing unit for a total of 4 hundred units plus. the office of community infrastructure the successor to the redevelopment agency is to be consistent with the hunters view shipyard plan and the bayview hunters point and candle stick shipyard development plan. those plans were approved by the board of supervisors in 2010. the planning department has vermd the proposed vacation of the easements are in empowerment with the general plan and

restores the county city surveyor i'm available for questions >> no thank you very much. >> okay. at this point weigh go to. i have two public comment cards (calling names) if you would please come forward planning commission. mranltsz >> i'm going to make the statement i hope you don't pass on this today everything in here is crap. i live one block and dollars homes in this areas this was tried to be passed when sizing was here and it failed. this has been rewritten it can't

be nobody but olsen lee. when i looked in the back here and i see tipping many who is the redevelopment agency also olsen lee redevelopment which is rewriting his trying to rewrite history. i'm asking you don't pass on this people will be going to jail i will file a lawsuit and not allow the city and mayor's office and i want to let him know what o citizen lee is not doing the right thing he's trying to rewrite everything in bayview hunters point over thirty years ago. and i read and i can unta