everybody has said everything i wanted to say. take a bite on out of that candy bar if you're not allergic to peanuts and that bite will represent what women endure everyday. being equal payday, what it means that today is the day that women on average will have earned the same as what it took men in all of last year to earn, so it takes us extra three months plus a few days so we're never catching up. that doesn't just effect women, but it affects family and it affects men and it affects our children and it affects businesses because the less money that women have, the less purchasing they have and women do make approximately 86 percent of all buying decisions across all

sectors. and as cathy noted, this booklet is full of information, and if you have a moments afterwards, you can go online and see the resources that aeg.org, the parent organization provides across all areas, not just on equal pay, but we want to thank you so much for acknowledging equal payday and acknowledging aew san francisco and helping us to continue to do our advocacy work on behalf of the women and girls and families, parents and our great city of san francisco. >> thank you very much.

>> colleagues, why don't we move to the regular part of our agenda. mad am clerk, can you call item 7. >> ordinance amending the planning and building codes to provide a process for granting legal status to existing dwelling units constructed without the required permits, temporarily suspending the code enforcement process for units in the process of receiving legal status, and prohibiting units from being legalized under the provisions of this ordinance of there have been no-fault evictions; amending the administrative code of prohibit the costs of legalization from being passed through to the tenant; amending the subdivision code to prohibit legalized units from being subdivided and separately sold; affirming the planning department's california environmental quality act determination; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the priority policies

of planning code, section 101.1; and directing the clerk of the board of supervisors to submit this ordinance to the california department of housing and community development in accordance with california government code, section 65852.2. >> ordinance amending the planning and building codes to provide a process for granting legal status to existing dwelling units constructed without the required permits, temporarily suspending the code enforcement process for units in the process of receiving legal status, and prohibiting units from being legalized under the provisions of this ordinance of there have been no-fault evictions; amending the administrative code of prohibit the costs of legalization from being passed through to the tenant; amending the subdivision code to prohibit legalized units from being subdivided and separately sold; affirming the planning department's california environmental quality act determination; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the priority policies of planning code, section 101.1; and directing the clerk of the board of supervisors to submit this ordinance to the california department of housing and community development in accordance with california government >> ordinance amending the planning and building codes to provide a process for granting legal status to existing dwelling units constructed without the required permits, temporarily suspending the code enforcement process for units in the process of receiving legal status, and prohibiting units from being legalized under the provisions of this ordinance of there have been no-fault evictions; amending the administrative code of prohibit the costs of legalization from being passed through to the tenant; amending the subdivision code to prohibit legalized units from being subdivided and separately sold; affirming the planning department's california environmental quality act determination; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the priority policies of planning code, section 101.1; and directing the clerk of the board of supervisors to submit this ordinance to the california department of housing and community development in accordance with california government code, section 65852.2. >> role call vote. >> supervisor cohen.

>> aye. >> farrell. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> no. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> no. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor chiu. >> aye. >> there are nine ayes and two no's. >> item 8. ordinance amending the administrative code, to designate the sheriff as the entity to assist county jail inmates with submitting an application for a health insurance affordability program consistent with federal requirements. >> item 8. ordinance amending the administrative code, to designate the sheriff as the entity to assist county jail inmates with submitting an application for a health insurance affordability program consistent with federal requirements. >> role call vote. >> item 8, cohen. >> aye. >> farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> supervisor breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor chiu. >> aye. >> there are 11 ayes. >> the ordinance passed. item 9. >> ordinance waiving the competitive solicitation requirement under administrative code, section 6.40, and authorizing the general manager of the recreation and park department to enter into a professional services agreement with aidlin darling design in the amount of $837,863, for the purpose of completing design development documents and partial completion of construction documents for the geneva car barn and powerhouse project, and to amend the agreement as necessary to complete final construction documents, to commence following board approval. >> ordinance waiving the competitive solicitation requirement under administrative code, section 6.40, and authorizing the general manager of the recreation and park department to enter into a professional services agreement with aidlin darling design in the amount of $837,863, for the purpose of completing design development documents and partial completion of construction documents for the geneva car barn and powerhouse project, and to amend the agreement as necessary to complete final

construction documents, to commence following board approval. >> supervisor avalos. >> thank you president chew. colleagues, i'm asking you to support the waiver of this competitive requirement for aidlin darling design. aidlin darling design done $205,000 of probono work and they're having designs ready to meet a 2015 deadline for gaining new market tax credits and historical tax credits that enable a campaign for their car barn to be successful. and we've actually last year had approved money leftover from the 2000 park bond that would go towards this project and the project also has about $437,000 it has to raise separate from city money in this ordinance. it makes sense to continue with the efforts that we have in place. if we bid for a new design and architect for this site, it would delay the project and way beyond to apply interest these tax credits. colleagues, i hope you can support this. it's something i don't do, but since there's been a great deal of work that they have already done on the

office building, car barn, i think it makes a lot of sense to go forward with the contractor. thank you. >> can we take this item. without objection. this item has passed in the reading. item 10. >> ordinance adopting and implementing the arbitration award amending amendment no. 2 to the 2012-2014 collective bargaining agreement between the city and the county of san francisco and the international brotherhood of electrical workers, local 6, by implementing special terms and >> ordinance adopting and implementing the arbitration award amending amendment no. 2 to the 2012-2014 collective bargaining agreement between the city and the county of san francisco and the international brotherhood of electrical workers, local 6, by implementing special terms and conditions of employment of fy2013-2014. >> colleagues, same house same call. this ordinance passed in the same reading. item 11. >> motion approving the budget and legislative analyst services work plan for 2014; allocating hours for calendar year 2014; authorizing the budget and legislative analyst to reallocate up to 20 percent of the hours between services categories based on board of supervisors service needs, and requiring board of supervisors approval of hours re-allocation greater than 20 percent; establishing performance goals; and setting a date for the 2014 annual performance evaluation of the budget and >> ordinance amending the planning code to allow the construction of an additional dwelling unit or units entirely within the existing built envelope as it existed three years prior to the time of the application of the residential building or auxiliary structure on the same lot on any parcel in the castro street neighborhood commercial district and within 1,750 feet of the district boundaries,

excluding any lot within an rh-1 zoning district or any lot with 500 feet of block no. 2623, lot nos. 116 through 154; authorizing the zoning administrator to waive density and other planning code requirements in order to create the in-law units, and requiring the department to monitor rents and publish a report evaluating >> ordinance amending the planning code to allow the construction of an additional dwelling unit or units entirely within the existing built envelope as it existed three years prior to the time of the application of the residential building or auxiliary structure on the same lot on any parcel in the castro street neighborhood commercial district and within 1,750 feet of the district boundaries, excluding any lot within an rh-1 zoning district or any lot with 500 feet of block no. 2623, lot nos. 116 through 154; authorizing the zoning administrator to waive density and other planning code requirements in order to create the in-law units, and requiring the department to monitor rents and publish a report evaluating the >> ordinance amending the planning code to allow the construction of an additional dwelling unit or units entirely within the existing built envelope as it existed three years prior to the time of the application of the residential building or auxiliary structure on the same lot on any parcel in the castro street neighborhood commercial district and within 1,750 feet of the district boundaries, excluding any lot within an rh-1 zoning district or any lot with 500 feet of block no. 2623, lot nos. 116 through 154; authorizing the zoning administrator to waive density and other planning code requirements in order to create the in-law units, and requiring the department to monitor rents and publish a report evaluating the effectiveness of the ordinance.. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, mr. president. colleagues, the legislation before us today will allow for the creation of new in-law units in the castro neighborhood. we passed legislation for the legalized units. the legislation for the first time in more than three decades, allow for the addition of new rent controlled units to the housing market. the legislation was support unanimously by the planning commission. it has received the endorsement of the castro eureka valley

neighborhood and the bay area reporter, the lbg d club, livable city, open health and a referral panel. colleagues as you know, we are in the mist of a housing crisis. in the castro with the exception of the new and fairly expensive units going along market street, very new housing is being built in the neighborhood. with he -- we know our population has grown by $70,000. there's many resident in the castro who are concerned about the extreme cost of housing in the neighborhood and whether they'll be priced out the neighborhood and they were wondering where they would go. castro has been neighboring. these new arrivals are having a difficult time finding housing. the legislation before about us will help of the construction of new in-law units. in-law units are more affordable than other types of housing units and they're the most affordable type of non subsidized housing according to various studies from hu d and larp and from universities. they tend to be smaller, they tend to be on the ground level. and they are frankly not as fancy as a lot of other units. in addition, they tend to be

more less expensive to built because they're being built with existing building with existing infrastructure. because they're on the ground floor tend to be more accessible for seniors, and for people who mobility challenges. in-law units add new housing to a neighborhood without changing the field or character of the neighborhood. they're built within the existing envelope of the building so we don't have height or bulk issues. the castro has a low car habitability. it makes sense to try this in the castro where there's so much transit where there are so many people who live alone. as i mentioned, this will allow for the creation of new rent control units in the area. the castro eureka neighborhood did a

survey in the neighborhood which found 70 percent of resident that responded were in support or in strong support of the legislation. briefly this allows the -- this allows for in-law units to be contracted within 1750 feet of the castro neighborhood district. hill street on the south to 14th street on the north, church street on the east, to approximately market and clayton on the west. one in-law unit will be allowed for existing buildings having up to ten units and for larger buildings, they can add two. it must be contracted within the building envelope, in a garage or a large storage space, a basement, the legislation specifically prohibits creation of these units by carving up existing residential units. these must be created from space from the

beginning not being used for residential purposes. the unit will be subject to rent control. legislation is purely voluntary. so colleagues, i think that as supervisor campos mentioned earlier, there is no silver bullet in terms of our housing crisis, it will take a thur of different approaches and this is one solid step in providing new housing that tends to be more affordable. so colleagues, i ask for your support. >> colleagues, any additional discussion. i'd like to be asked if a co-sponsor to this ordinance. take a vote. >> cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> aye. >> supervisor mar. >> aye. >> tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye.

>> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> avalos. >> aye. >> breed. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> supervise chiu. >> aye. >> 11 ayes speaker: this ordinance has passed on the first reading. item 12. >> resolution granting revocable permission to kieran j. woods to occupy a portion of the public right-of-way to construct and maintain various improvements, including a driveway, associated retaining wall, a vehicular carousel to provide access to a proposed new single family dwelling at 1410 stanyan street landscaping, stairs leading to a public sitting area, and other related improvements within an existing unimproved portion of stanyan street between clarendon and mountain spring avenues; conditioning the permit; affirming the planning department's determination under the california environmental quality act; and making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section101.1. >> supervisor yee. >> yes, thank you president chiu. what i like to do today is request that we continue this on for another week to allow for the interested parties to continue havi their discussion and bring it back next week for a vote. >> supervisor has made a motion to continue this item and it has been seconded by breed. that's the case. why don't we go to our

first of three special orders. madam clerk, could you call items 13 and 14. >> hearing of person interested in or objecting to the ordinance ordering the vacation of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the hunters point shipyard phase ii development plan area, generally bounded the 1948 bulkhead line to the north, the 1941 bulkhead line to the east, bancroft avenue to the south, and griffith street to the west, including submerged areas; ordering the vacation of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the candlestick point redevelopment plan area, generally bounded by underwodd avenue, arelious walking drive, gilman avenue, donahue street, carroll avenue, alvord street, fitzgerald avenue, the city and county of san francisco county line, harney way, ingerson avenue, and hawes street, including submerged areas, ordering the conditional vacation of portions of griffith street, nichols way, cameron way, doublerock street, giants drive, hunters point expressway, jamestown avenue, >> hearing of person interested in or objecting to the ordinance ordering the vacation of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the hunters point shipyard phase ii development plan area, generally bounded the 1948 bulkhead line to the north, the 1941 bulkhead line to the east, bancroft avenue to the south, and griffith street to the west, including submerged areas; ordering the vacation of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the candlestick point redevelopment plan area, generally bounded by underwodd avenue, arelious walking drive, gilman avenue, donahue street, carroll avenue, alvord street, fitzgerald avenue, the city and county of san francisco county line, harney way, ingerson avenue, and hawes street, including submerged areas, ordering the conditional vacation of portions of griffith street, nichols way, cameron way, doublerock street, giants drive, hunters point expressway, jamestown avenue, gilman avenue, and crisp road. ordinance ordering the vacation

of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the hunters point shipyard phase 11 redevelopment plan area, generally bounded the 1948 bulkhead line to the north, the 1941 bulkhead line to the east, bancroft avenue to the south, and griffith street to the west, including submerged areas; ordering the vacation of portions of streets along with public service easements that may exist within the candlestick point redevelopment plan area, generally bounded by underwood avenue, arelious walker drive, gilman avenue, donahue street, carroll avenue, alvord street, fitzgerald avenue, the city and county of san francisco county line, harney way, ingerson ave, and hawes st, including submerged areas; ordering the conditional vacation of portions of griffith st, nichols way, cameron way, doublerock st, giants dr., hunters point expressway, jamestown ave, gilman av, and crisp rd for various purposes; reserving various easements rights in favor of the city >> with that, why don't we open up this hearing. and we ask supervisor cohen if you have questions. >> thank you for hearing this item. i'm excited to bring this item before you today because it's an important action that gets us one step closer to breaking ground and the rebuild of alice public housing. it helped implement the plan from the hunters plan shipyard and camel strict yard. one of the benefits associated with this project is the rebuilding and more importantly the revitalization of the alice public housing development and i recognize that few of you have probably had the opportunity to walk-through or drive-thru alice griffith, but most of you might recall passing it as you've driven past a niners game. this is a 256 unit development that has been neglected for decades and thanks to the cities most committed leaders, we're able to break ground on the rebuilding of this site later this year. the city has been successful in securing more than $30 million from hud and help revitalization. this grant has a strict timeline and require

that we begin construction on them this summer. the street vacations before us is essential. essential to the building of rebuild of the community. i believe that we're going to hear from staff rgs both from dpw and ocii which is the former redevelopment agency, both of these departments are going to present to us in greater details about this item. so first to be presenting will be, i think it's dpw. great. >> good afternoon supervisor, i'm barbara with the department of public works. the proposed legislation before you today is a vacation of streets and public easements within the hunters point

area. and as supervisor cohen mentioned, this is a critical step that alice griffith has in the larger redevelopment of shipyard and candle stick yard. it's the bay pointers redevelopment plan. the ordinary thans that you're considering today is required to move forward with the project that the voters approved in 2008 through proposition j and the board adopted in 2010. the candle stick oint and hunters ship point is -- i'll draw your attention to a map. as i said, it was a complex network of streets which are visible and some which are paper and some are submerged. as you see from the dark outline, a good part of the

area is submerged. in turn, this is a pattern of ownership of easements and others. it was approved for the complete remapping of the blocks and streets and right away for this community. this reflects streets around alice griffith, candle stick and the shipyard, it won't limit to properties in the area. in fact the new streets that will be built by the master developer, lanar will increase the homes and the surrounding community. the office of community infrastructure and the successor has found a proposed actions to be considered by the board to be consistent with the hunters point shipyard plan and the bay view hunters

redevelopment plan. the planning department determined that the proposed vacation of the streets and easements includes with the plan. the survey and representers team are here if you have questions. >> thank you mrs. moy. >> supervisor cohen, do we have another presentation? >> yes, we do. we have one coming from ocii. >> good afternoon supervisor, my name is wells larson. i'm the president. thank you barbara for your presentation. we approved the shipyard candle stick point redevelopment plan in 2010. one of the actions that was noted in those documents at the time and in our conversations was the vacating of these streets that barbara

has discussed. so this is indeed the next step. it's required to move forward with the transfer of lands in furthering of the project. as supervisor cohen indicated, we have received a grant. an exceptionally win for the city of san francisco but it comes with strings. it requires that we move forward with this project to make sure that the existing resident are in their new homes by september of 2016. you can appreciate the tight timeline that we have been under and this is many steps we take to meet that deadline. that concludes our presentation. i'm available if you have questions and there's barbara and other members of the staff. >> thank you colleagues, any questions? if not, why don't we open up to public comment. any members of the public that wish to speak on this item? please step up.

>> good afternoon. i'm from alice griffith and al iks griffith community city has been working with this organization and they're in desperate need of repair and our residents are living in unacceptable conditions. at this meeting, community meetings and we are finally close to beginning construction on the rebuilding of ellis griffin housing. we connected ellis griffin tenants to a new street transit and park. as re

residents of ellis griffin, i support this action because it insures that the family we receive a new home within the next couple of years. please do not delay this project. thank you. >> good afternoon, my name is dr. veronica honeycut and i share the advisory committee and we have provided guidance and oversight of the shipyard development for nearly two decades. the ordinance that you are considering today is required to move forward with the project that the voters approved in 2008 through proposition g. we approved along with the bay view hunters in 2010. and that the board of adopted in august 2010. today's approval is absolutely

necessary for the city to deliver on the promises made as part of these approvals. and therefore, i am here today to hold you accountable to these historic approvals which has decades of planning. by approving these street vacations, you will in locking benefits including more than 3,000 units of new affordable housing starting first with the rebuilding of ellis griffith public housing. more than 12,000 permanent jobs and thousands of annual construction job opportunities throughout the build out of the project, and $83 million in community -- $83 million in community benefits package that we fought hard for to insure that this new development benefits the resident in bay

hunters viewpoint who live in this community. i'm asking you to up hold your commitment and show your support for all the work we have made and all the work we have put into this area by voting in support of the proposed ordinance. thank you very much. >> thank you. any other members of the public who wish to speak on this item. seeing none, public comment is closed on item. >> supervisor cohen. and thank you for sitting through this brief hearing on this item. every board meeting we have had this year and last year's conversation, we spent time talking about in one way or another, the need for affordable housing. one of the investments we can make is rebuild public housing and revitalize these communities. regardless of whether or not you support the project, we agree we have to move forward with ellis

griffith. they have waited too long. >> can we take a role call on item 14. >> on item 14, supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. >> mar. >> aye. >> tang. >> aye. >> wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> avalos. >> aye. >> breed. >> aye. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor chiu. >> aye. >> there are 11 ayes. >> the ordinance passed in the first reading. madam, go to our second reading calling items 15 and 16. >> hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the proposed resolution of the board of supervisors, acting in its capacity as the successor agency to the former redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco, to conditionally approve a fifth amendment to the mission bay north owner participation agreement and to permit a feasible rental project with market rate and affordable moderate-income units available to households earning no more than 90% of the area median income on block no. n4p3, bound by

berry street to the south and the 1-280 off-ramp to the north, in the mission bay north redevelopment project area; and making environment findings under >> hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the proposed resolution of the board of supervisors, acting in its capacity as the successor agency to the former redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco, to conditionally approve a fifth amendment to the mission bay north owner participation agreement and to permit a feasible rental project with market rate and affordable moderate-income units available to households earning no more than 90% of the area median income on block no. n4p3, bound by berry street to the south and the 1-280 off-ramp to the north, in the mission bay north redevelopment project area; and making environment findings under the california environmental quality act. resolution of the board of supervisors, acting in its capacity as the successor agency to the former redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco, to conditionally approve a fifth amendment to the mission bay north owner participation agreement and to permit a feasible rental project with market rate and affordable moderate-income units available to households earning no more than 90% of the area median income on block no. n4p3, bound by berry street to the south and the i-280 off-ramp to the north, in the mission bay north redevelopment project area; and making environmental findings under the california environmental quality act. >> let's open up this hear and start with the district supervisor. supervisor kim. >> thank you supervisor chiu. >> i introduce item 16 which has mixed housing to be built at the final vacant parcel of mission bay north redevelopment area plan block n-4 p 3. the project includes 129 new rental housing units and 20 percent of the units on site or 26 units will be affordable to households making 90 percent of the meeting. for a family of tower, you're combined household is

$87,700. the development of this last site has had challenges of which you'll hear in the presentation on oci in which they can describe in more details. it's an oddly shaped parcel and wrapped by the freeway and there's height limitations on this site in conformities to the buildings that surround it. it's consistent with our city wide program and it produces horse housing. it's a discussion we have here constantly at the board of supervisor. i want to recognize the project sponsor for working really closely with our office, the staff of ocii and the commission on figuring out how to meet many of our different dwoels and priorities and to deliver a project which will be set to break bound this year in august of 2014. and we also

appreciate that this development fits within the policy framework that our city is building upon for below market rentals and below homeowner ship units. i do want to recognize that we do have the president of community development here, vicky who is here to answer questions am i want to thank her for her time and leadership on this issue and we have the assistant project manager of ocii lila and we have the director as well. i would like to hand over for a brief presentation from ocii. mission bay north met its housing goals so any units built on this height will help us exceed the goals we have made in terms of our commitment

to this development plan. >> hi, my name is lila and i'm assistant manager. thank you supervisor forgiving a great summary of the project. i'm going to go over a few points. the parcel we're talking about n 4p 3 is the last to be developed. this is the last remaining site and we've had very few developer interest in this sit partly due to the requirements for this site to have 62 percent inclusionary moderate income. so they have proposed an amendment to the owner participation agreement for mission bay north so we can have a feasible project that can build out and complete the mission bay north project area. and as

supervisor kim had stated, we have already exceeded the affordable housing requirement in mission bay north and with -- if we built the there, 4 p 3 with the amendment proposed, we would have exceeded the requirements by over 79 units so one of the things i would like to summarize, we have exceeded the requirements on mission bay north and we have met the requirements at 57 percent ami and the rehaning requirement is the 80 units at moderate income and the amendment will reduce that requirement which is 80 units out of 129. this is a market redevelopment that has no public subsidi. we have

done analysis. it would be infeasible to built without subsudi from another source. it's a requirement at 110 percent ami to 26 affordable units and there's clean up items related to the amendments that changes the percentages that follow once you make this amendment. we're available for any questions, both the development team as well as staff. thank you. >> supervisor wiener. >> i have questions for staff so thank you for the presentation and running down the thurs. that was helpful. can you go back and tell me, in the plan as