supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. supervisor mar. there are 11 i's. those resolutions are adapted call that you items 19 and 20. the board of supervisors will convene a committee pursuant to a motion on items 19 and 20 for a public hamburger in persons who are interested in the board of supervisors acting in its capacity to the successor agency approving the agreements that relate to the affordable housing that has the block of 33 and 34 to the university of california for the future development of up to 5 hundred gross square feet for the mission bay project area >> supervisor kim. i want to make a continuance we have an item that is associated

with this set that's at the budget committee and continued on wednesday so i know there's a number of questions from colleagues, we certainly want the answers we need to hear public comment because this hearing has been noticed but after public comment i'll make a motion to continue those items my supervisor kim has made a motion to continue with that is there any public comment >> you might say thank goodness this is the late times i want to know before you meet on the 13 the community wants to know know about the city receiving fund from the 90s up until now when is the mayor's office of housing is hope money those funds were given to the community for the tenants of public housing to be

trained to be managers how did it money get into city hall you all are not listening to what i'm saying how long they been receiving those funds i've been asking another group where is my money i have to make it personal people need to know about the funds that the city has been receiving all outlines years and sending it in another direction and no one knows where the money is at you have accountants to do an audit from 1998 dealing with the mayor's office of housing as well as the hopes fund. mo cd all those funds starting

at the hunters point and got transferred to the city and nobody knows what's happening maybe i need to find out you can build they've got the money honey. they've got the money they've done with it >> thank you very much are are there any members of the public who wish to speak public comment on our motion to continue seeing none, public comment is closed. and colleagues, can we take the motion to continue to the 13 of the may we'll take that without objection.. i want to go to our fourth special items 21 through 24 >> complies is public hearing the decision of pngs dated march fourth for a parcel map on emission street and item it 2 is the decision by the public works and approving the tenant map for

the mission street and the next is disapproving is map supervisor kim. >> i'd like to make a motion to continue those items 21 through 24 there are a bunch of appeals and we want to hear all the appeals so my motion is continue those until may 20th i know this hearing is nos. >> supervisor kim has made a motion to continue those until the 20th of may and seconded by supervisor cowen. any. seeing none, public comment is closed. >> supervisor john gibner, deputy city attorney. i'd like recommend you keep the hearing open and continue the item to public comment will continue the public hearing is

not closed it will continue the 20th >> icing for closing that item i'll reopen this hearing so it continues until the 20th of may and if why not take a motion to resend closing the hearing. supervisor kim and supervisor campos the hearing has been rescinded and with that we will take supervisor kim's motion to continue those items until the 20th of may keeping the hearing open we'll take that without objection. that's the case now our final 3:00 p.m. special order items 25 through 28 >> are the public hearing of perm or persons who are interested in the public hearings approving a approving a tenant parcel matter and next is

the approving the tentative project map and item 27 is disapproving the parcel map and item 28 is the direction of the appropriation of understanding. >> colleagues, we have an appeal for the tentative map for those hearing we'll consider whether is map is consistent with the general plans that apply as far as our process we've first hear from the tenant and tank public comments then hear from representatives of dpw and the planning department that will have up to 10 minutes and following the departmental presentation we'll hear from the person's speaking open on behalf of the parties in interest and

finally the appellant will have 3 minutes up to a rebuttal agreement. supervisor breed in who's district if you have any comments n in not let's open it up to the appellant >> step forward you have up to 10 minutes you can use as much of that as you like. >> i'm jeremy i'm an a in the area i'm appealing this decision on and on on multiply grounds i'll start with the first, i was not notified in august and it

was not proven and filing that i was noticed and furthermore, there have on a number of surveillance that were granted for this subdivision and numerous of those surveillance directly and effect me as ass a contract with the builder the first is in the section of planning code requiring the rear yard to be of a certain size and it would decrease my background and personal space to 3 feet from 17. i would also like to note that the section 135 of the planning code requires 35 square feet for

each dwelling units it will be reduced to 86 square feet. something else the plan will reduce the building size by 6 feet rome part of my dwelling. and thereby breaching the kraekt contract that i have to rent the space. i've been in the space with my partner for i've been there personally with 10 years and my partner 6. the core argument is that the free space the private free space of the backyard which i've made you improvements to including presidential approximately two hundred and 50

square feet of patio space and one hundred and 50 square feet of viable garden boxes and grilling area and an area for potted herbs and plants. and finally, i'd like to bring the point of surveillance made in section 1589 regarding parking. the back of the unit has a 3 car garage that will be removed and parking in my neighborhood is difficult to say the least. and this will cause greater problems to parking in the

neighborhood. which will go against the cities master plan rather than providing any additional spaces solving the issue of parking in our neighborhood or helping with the issue of parking in our neighborhood. it's might hope i find i'd like to point out that one of the reasons cited to give the answers there's a lot of adjacent to me that's been granted this subdivision in 2008, although they were no improvements made to the backyard of that property and no parking spaces at stake i hope you'll overturn this decision and thank you for your time >> supervisor kim. if you could turn our mike on >> i'm trying to get a better sense of the background so i saw

your handwritten letter our a tenant on fell street and 655 one building. >> yes. it is. >> how many units are in the building currently and what upstairs after the subdivision is approved. >> there are two units in the buckle although the back of the house will lose 6 feet losing square footage. >> what was the motivation and the sentiment of the other tenants. and the other tenants are difficult to talk to for things i won't go so what i informed them of the case but they have issues that keep them from showing up here today >> and what's the motivation as

the property owner in reducing the size of your unit by 6 feet in the rear. >> i'm not sorry. >> your unit will be reduced by 6 feet. >> 6 linear feet. >> did you have a discussion with the landlord. >> they've not contacted me. >> you've never had a discussion the reason you have a handwritten letter that's the day i was traveling to europe i had a half hour i was able to file the appeal before i left for europe and arrived after the 10 day period and hastily wrote the letter i had you don't, no

idea. >> are interest landlord issues outside of that. >> the landlord the current property owner acquired the owner at auction due to 15 foreclosure there are water bill issues that i've paid but this is the only issue so far. but in a sense i've have not been told about the subdivision or told my rent will be changed or even what will be the plan once it's divided >> thank you. >> supervisor cowen. you said you received a letter how did you receive the letter visiting i need to come and have an appeal >> i received it in the mail not certified from the planning department i assume.

i received no information from the owner >> thank you. supervisor breed >> thank you. can i have clarity to our last statement about a new landlord purchased the building how long ago. >> t i believe it was made in july of august of 2012. >> and then just last year they filed for a change in the property with the planning department. >> this is what i see from the planning departments decisions in august that was granted. >> so you've not talked to your landlord at all will be the plans but i've reached out to them. >> i haven't i don't have the only contract is the secretary i don't know who owns the property

aside from the corporation of a e w corporation. >> and you got a notice in the mail informing i have what was happening. >> only in the planning department that's correct. >> thank you. thank you very much any more questions colleagues. thank you very much to the appellant let me ask any members of the public that wishes to speak in support of the appellant >> no? okay seeing none let me turn it over to city staff to the dpw and planning department you'll have up to 3 minutes to describe >> good afternoon bruce city and county surveyor we got this application in april of 2013 and referred it out to the city

agencies got a conditional approval in june of 2013 and the conditional approval from the city planning and issued a senior conditional map approval on april 7th. we had up until we got this notice of appeal we had no idea there was no problem it's a through lot the subdivision proposes basically a lot that will front on hickory street. and demolition of a garage on hickory streets that's all the

information i have if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions and supervisor wiener. >> this was the first time i've come into an appeal hearing not really knowing what the issues of the appeal are. the appeal itself is one sentence and it only took an half hour to do it ideally you'll submit a supplemental afterwards i couldn't understand the city commissions understanding is it a condo conversion so after hearing all this i don't know what this project is i'll be honest it's a little bit frustrating so maybe you could start from the beginning and is what exactly is being done >> it's a two lot subdivision. >> that i need more detail than that. >> your gone to end up with the

applicant is going to end up with one lot with to buildings. >> they're trying to develop it. >> it's not required for the application. >> so mr. star looks like he wants to say something to the president. >> there the president aaron star planning department staff no place has been proposed but the intent to so build a single-family home on hickory street so the variance was for the existing was important lot size and rear yard and open space. so there's no proposal there's a pattern on the block where they

have been subdividing the lot >> the appellant is stating someone of his rented space see being reduced i don't understand that's maybe a rent board issue or a subdivision issue but so - >> yeah. i think the last 6 feet of the building is proposed to be removed that's ate a small edition but that's done to provide rear yard open space once it's subdivided. >> to no p pa has been filed. >> no, the promotions this size don't get that but no permit for it and no preapplication. >> how do you know that - >> it was part of the operation for the variance so what someone subdivides something we assume

they want to build something so they can only build a single-family home. >> i'm in the same position as commissioner lee the appellant hadn't done many outreach to my office and supervisor breed i don't know if so appellant has reached out to your office we have very little information is mr. chair mr. city attorney what exactly are our options here today, we want to make a decision to uphold the planning department understanding but. >> i don't believe you're up holding the planning department but the department of public works to uphold. john gibner, deputy city attorney you basically have 3 options one is fisherman the map option two is reject the map and

if you reject the map then there are certain finding you need to make and categories to justify rejecting the map and the third item is to keep the item open and continue it to a future date you'll might get more information from the appellant or the property owner or other participants. >> if we reject it what kind of findings and there are 7 different reasons for rejecting a map. one of them is the proposed map is inconsistent with the map in the general area the design or the improvement of the designed subdivision so the proposed development on the vacant lot is

inconsistently with the general plan and it's not suitable for the uses that are proposed by the owner. and not physically suitable for the density of the area would likely cause indisputable environmental damage or injury or hurt wildlife >> we don't have enough detail to know if this was try. >> that's how it sounds. >> as a point of order can we make a motion to keep it open or take public comment or - >> you should at this point the appellant still has 10 minutes to speak and public comment in support of the appellant at which point you can decide to continue the item to a date sure. >> perfect thank you very much. >> supervisor breed.

>> mr. gibner clarity as to the ability of a parcel map without a specific project is that appropriate? >> on that question i would defer to the departments on the standard process for - >> but we have in front of us the reason for i mean i described the reasons for recreation of the map i'm confused as to sequa what we reject the map on the basis of when we don't have a project to reject the map because we don't know what is practice writing project is. >> one point of classification it's not sequa that is setting the standard but the map another state law.

so mr. star described the variance application and that's the information you have before you as to the proposed use of the property. if the applicant is present and i don't know if he is that hearing from the applicant may further illuminate what the plan is. okay >> okay. so colleagues, i i'm not warrior aware of besides reaching out to my office i have real concerns there's no project meanwhile attached to the map i'm not certain if he wanted to continue it depends on but i guess we've move on to the hearing and hopefully, some of the questions will be answered. >> colleagues, any additional

questions to city staff either dpw or anyone else. >> at this time why not go to the real party interests you have up to 10 minutes to present. >> i'm geremo i work for r r w properties. mostly i did the filing of the application which includes the variance and they were approved during the planning commission hearing scheduled no october. prior to that when we filed in april of last year they were lists of addresses for and labels to mail within a 3 hundred foot radius and 2011 all the residents at the nearby the property including mr. hurting

log our tenants. we also posted i'd like to show this it's right here we posted the notice prior to the october hearing is there a way to zoom but we posted the notice sorry. we posted the notice on the rear detached garage as well as mr. herself logs window so he was e he was notified about the events that were going to occur you see his unit and it's facing outward our project manager checked to see mr. why there was something

about dethe courses but the rear portion that's the storage and rear area that's not part of his habitable unit we can resolve that if it impacts him but the issue is all the conditions that are listed here - here's the let me show you this. this is the parcel map showing where the line is going through. i don't know if you can see that and other properties in the area facing hickory in the past have been approved with the surveillance from the planning department and the public works mapping. as far as that is concerned he had every tint because we did invite him with not only the

mailings that were received by or sent to him by zoning unless zoning naild failed to mail him the original ones as well what we posted. let me see he mentioned that he has no notice until relevant but he had 80 feet affecting him which leads me to building he knew we sent him a letter and all this was forwarded to the persons who were corresponding with us from your board. and some of these, in fact, we've got right here this is the letter we forwarded to our departments we told him he could look at the plans and also able

to look at the plans in the public works department as well as planning as recently as april 9th when he decided to file the appeal. so in essence as far as the plan for the rear lot we filled the necessary restrictions that the planning commission and the planning department asked us to do. they are recorded and we preceded with the tentative parcel being approved by the folks over in mapping. most recently i believe you received a letter from the planning department indicating that all of the different conditions were mediating met for the