they're not just - it's different out there not the sort of intense castro and everybody wants walkable streets they drive a lot and have concerns about roads. their - they don't get the transportation they need i know we've got like a team out there but to where this project is going you need major transportation changes. and until you get that those people are going to out in the ear are going to be driving. i really need to get our transportation. and in sync as a driver i suggest somewhere out there

place a transit he metropolitan center capturing the people avenue off the 180 let them park and take the transit and use that as a hub to develop what bayview hunters point needs. thank you. >> thank you very much appreciate it. ms. hill son >> good afternoon. i deal a lot with land use issues not only for bayview hunters point and alice griffith park it's going to be a key thing for the entire city when the streets with widened to 26 feet i know in the planning code their relate to the height ever buildings and a lot of that height comes the bulk and

density and what you might get later than is an entitlement right with the additional weight of street going to lenar go they'll not lose the people that have testified didn't said they didn't know whether or not they'll be at the front or back it makes no difference they'll be additional rights granted. i'm getting worried about about the development. i understand about the safety of the firefighters i've learned bmw the jack's if you want a few of the trucks 26 won't suffice he need 34 and you can't go to anthony that's stretching

things. i'm beginning to one day suddenly after 2010, i thought that was done i didn't go to the hunters point shipyard and candle stick plans but this is odd. thank you >> next. >> good morning. welcome supervisor wiener and supervisor cowen and thank you for calling the meeting i'm lynda former planning commissioner and over 20 something years i was the chair of the land use planning and transportation for the bayview hunters point under the san francisco development agency. as my counterpart sister agencies the cac said earlier that the verona honeycutt we've had thousands and thousands and decades and decades of plan in

honor we talk about bayview hunters point it was a resident and any resident in the city you can attest to this we've come here over and over and over and over again to the construction of the shipyard and thank you for all the questions. i know and i want to put it on the record under chief joint and his wife san francisco has had the longest safety of any department in this country we give her a lot of accolades for that. we need to san francisco has an obligation for the performance for the obligation of the shipyard. 2010 were here and you need to think about the entitlement if you cause any public delay i think the san francisco will be

gookd and alice griffith has a deadline written into it that i hud you're going to stop the project and given climate of the economy with the republicans he lose an opportunity we have the infrastructure plan in place being approved by the planning department we should move forward with this project. thank you for your time >> thank you very much any is there any additional public comment on item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed first, i want to thank all the departments for being here today. we're this is a team of departments s it really works well together even though we don't see eye to eye on everything this is a one of the

strengths i thank you. this has been a useful hearing in terms of flagging this issue wherever one falls down after we announced that a few weeks ago i got passionate e-mails there are views on our - from our members of the public and staff it's an important issue to be discussing this our streets are the major topic of discussions and mr. jacobs said it's 28 landmass this is a twice as our park system this is how our city gets around whether the fire department or biking or walking we want it to

be safe and usable for everyone. as this process the concerns what the impact will be in the long run and people raising their children and grandchildren and having the liveable walkingable contact or streets that are overly wide and less safe and less inviting for the community tote. i don't agree that having a liveable what canable is for the castro or the other valley it's something that people that value in hunters point shipyard or other place deserve to have complete streets and i think that's incredibly important and be concerned about the precedent it sets. i disagree are some of the

perspectives that were expressed but agree we have a frank discussion. so with that said supervisors if there's nothing further >> no, thank you. >> and thank you to the public. so with that cohen i'll entertain a motion to continue to the call of the chair >> thank you we'll take that without objection. >> folks if you could clear the room we have item 3 through 6 to get through. thank you >> okay.

>> okay. thank you everyone madam clerk call 3, 4, 5 and 6. >> so coordinate the private property and right-of-way and item 4 is the mischievous of the

technical zoning district are that item 5 is the ordinance amending the ordinance code to establish a public right-of-way and the next is the amending of the police code. >> okay cohen is the author along with the mayor on those items. >> thank you for the folks that have remained for the discussion of item number 3 through 6. >> to today, we have a couple of proposals before us. the san francisco plaza program it's an excited not upper program that aims to build communicated efforts to have for innovative and liveable solutions that engage the port of san francisco most vibrant communities. i'm happy to support this legislation i believe it will

have positive benefits towards the plazas and open space. now the legislation gives the city a tool to activate plaza like farmer's market and limit live performance that will have partnerships with the community members and proposes to streamline the permitting process for standards of the plaza making activation easier and sustainable it establishes an inner agency group to incite the administration of the program. now we've got a couple of speakers first, i want to bring up ms. robin as well as another gentleman from the office of economic workforce development they'll give us a detailed description of the program and answer any questions you have.

colleagues you should have in front of you some non-sun active codes and the planning code that's some of the questions the public has. this clarifies privatization it addresses concerns about privatization noting identification of plaza stewards and private events we have anothers attorney here to discuss this matter. we're joined by john updyke and the department of real estate and the rec and park department staff are all present. so first robin and ken. thank you very much robin.

good afternoon, supervisors i'll change that to good evening. robin with the office of economic workforce development. thank you very much for the opportunity to addresses you today about the proposed plaza program you'll be considering four amendments that enable it process. allow me to start with the program mission and goals i'm sure you're aware of cities are dauptd proposals and san francisco should be a leader in the positive activities but currently the city department of motor vehicles doesn't have a system we're going to try to fix it so san francisco can be a initiative leader we want to support of vibrant community by creating and successfully managing san francisco's open spaces.

o e w d is launching the program and we've formed a plaza working group for agencies that have those issues at heart. here's a summary of how the program is structured it will streamline processes to encourage activation by dpw more tools forlogically the permit costs and this is the - some plaza like is that a have been clearly enhancing the goals but the plans are not clear. the city lacks the coordinations of the plans. each the individual programs will provide a stem tisk

approach mriment overlapping city efforts. the program aims to have the stewart's involved as well as the pavement to parks program. while san francisco partnership has the greening of sidewalks and transformation of the parklets the city has yet to develop the systemic plaza outside the jurisdiction. for the plaza program the the appealable the potential at the words warts obey robust

proposals to carry out the community support goals and include a scope of work and project letters of support. the plazas program is a program framework it didn't include specific plazas plazas will be adapted on a plaza a i plaza basis and also the program will design robust escalation robust programs to benefit everyone. directing the revenue this is a fundamental part of the program approach the program directs the monies back into the plaza and in addition when possible the revenues generated by the stewards could be directed back

to the other plaza. the program supports the maintenance goals by working closely with the at the warts for the sustainability of the plaza. an important part of the aspect it is designed to educate a long term management approach for plaza for the community processes like example on the left as you see from the diagram the plazas programs include the pavement to parks and plaza could emerge from the area programs and others programs in kind agreements. if a space emerges for one position and brldz the benefit to the community but the strategy is unclear and a potential for stewardship process the space will be looked

at. once it's dermdz that a project is developed could be sponsored by plaza program and the local stewardship is a good program first, the street placing that are plaza in the right-of-way they're still streets this is the best strategy for the vehicular traffic like a driveway they'll use an encroachment permit and over permits for streamlining their support the activation in the spaces the second type is a city plaza their city owned but not streets. agreement formed will be a license that will detail the plans are a term years as well

as the streamlining elements. many communities have expressed interests if the increased levels of activation this can help them to have transformative aspects we want to give you a demonstrates this is an example there are some examples in spaces in san francisco but we want to note that will allow unknown activations approaches as they emerge. this slides gives an illusion how a steward will act this represents the city initiatives where the plazas would emerge and dpw or the real estate division to administer one the processes so you see in the

process above the blue line the city releases an rfp and only eligible at the warts would be available including the documents for the orientational capacity now let's look at the particularly diagram above this this is the same but slightly different because of the regulatory process. this process also requires a detailed plan that all plazas will have a term years or less unless the stew wart is installing improvements. oewd has a outreach plan as

individuals plaza are proposed we brought various stakeholders to the table and made presentations to 40 stakeholders groups it helps us to create the new legislation. we'll like to thank all of those for meeting with us we believe their additional feedback has helped. oewd prepared to the small property owner commission and the planning commission. we also conducted an open house using the planning department list we comprised a list of one hundred and 15 questions theirs in your packet. based on the input from the list of questions we made changes to the legislation.

they're listed in your 3 page table in your packets i'm going to do one slide. there was initial confusion this might include the property under the rec and park department that he amended it to state clearly no project shall be under here. we've heard the impact so we amended it for the weight addressed the concern through the add minute and planning code and do admin code we added the bulk decision requirement under unless the board of supervisors says that's not feasible for the

plaza. in the planning code additional language is included. and there are several new layers to address this continued. we amended the legislation including a 3 hundred foot marital to neighborhood groups and residents we'll draft the procedures to make sure that no neighborhoods are left out that will include those on the planning department's neighborhood notification system. in order to give the communities for sustainability tools the legislation will preoccupying propose up to 8 events that could restrict access if any are proposed will require the board of supervisors approval per plaza. we've not obey clear for the private events to last more than one day we clarified not more than one day and spread throughout the calendar years

and clarified the steward proposal any drafts for the directors orders to be filed. and since then we may lose quorum can we go to the elective summary >> so that's slide 11. so i showed you some of the tools. that will be used in the program i can tell you about the legislation palm it's a new chapter to establish chapter 94, 3 amendments to support the program. to delve into the legislation passage i'll start with the admin code to establish the goal and functions and prophesies for both the plazas for example, it

establishes the respiratory that each plaza can be established by board of supervisors and this is the criteria and going into the detail. for city plazas the admin code described the code i'm happy to go over all of them in detail. the function of the free supporting elements are listed in the site the planning code established the public use zone district without the update it's difficult to connect the non public access to the plazas like the farmer's markets. in addition the planning staff will explain the other part of the amendment that address much needed technical amendments to the p zone section. this establishes the plan force

is street plaza nate's that's in the public workings code the next encroachment permit is a new past that better encourages the underutilized spaces. there are fee wafrdz and noticing allow for the involvement of time stakeholders and lastly the police code amendment is is a type of lim l. if the plaza is adapted into the plan the stew ward could apply for the l lp and lower the fees. in conclusion. the plazas program supports the

stewardship and continues to strengthen >> thank you for the presentation i know that you unifying and dpw has spent on this and supervisor cowen i know has been through a planning commission and a lot of the neighborhood groups i really appreciate the thoughtful amendments that were made to the admin code and the supporting elements thank you for your presentation. >> cohen. >> thank you in the interest of time supervisor kim while you were away we've got a long line up and i'm going to go ahead and skip to our city attorney to discuss the amendments just briefly sir, and if the colleagues have questions for john unjohn gibner, deputy city

attorney or dpw staff we'll cover but no need for the formal presentation. >> john i'll keep this short i i think you inadequate described the amendments i could go into them in greater detail you there's things about additional public notice provisions were added and rob addressed the things in the presentation as well. >> perfect. mr. chair. maybe what i'll suggest is we take public comment on this item. >> okay. so we'll now proceed to public comment public comment will be two minutes. any public comment cards mr. clerk? and this is from before.

okay. i'll call the public comment cards. (calling names) >> good afternoon and thank you for giving me a chance to speak i'm paul i'm here on behalf of the telephone graft folks. we've been working recently to get comments recommending to notices primarily to residents and neighborhood groups and number 2 to create some quorum where interested persons could come prior to submission to the board of supervisors of a lease or license to give comments on the proposed use of the property, and, secondly, on the

proposed sewer. my understanding is i haven't seen the legislation but it was briefly subscribed that probability accommodates what we were getting at but the earliest will be tomorrow morning and get back to robin assuming those changes were made 10 telephone graft hill dwellers will not and a have at about objection >> for clarification you wanted to know about the clarification. >> to have a quorum i suggested the term public forum prior to submission to the board where the decision making department public works or planning will have a representative who's working on the