the things i'd like to submit to you and thereby would q request two weeks but i'll work to get it. >> so two weeks to get information. >> because of the surgery i have scheduled. >> let me scotland the real party of interest how much time to provide additional information. >> two weeks is fine with us we could possibly get you the information before that. i want to clarify the space that's a one story extension of the existing building is shared by the tenants above ate a laundry room as well it's my understanding they also use it. and if upper to see this portion

here there's a photograph let me show you the photograph. >> president chiu. >> sir why don't i suggest, sir. why don't i suggest rather than you trying to present this consider asking both parties to present the information and bring back the hearing three weeks from now to give the departments time to respond >> any only question who shall and i i direct this information to. >> this board of supervisors and actually we did that i don't know who screened them but we'll be happy to provide them again. >> okay. i i understand may 20th i want to give our city departments to review the information and give feedback

unfortunately, there's not a meeting over is 27 so it will be june 3rd so supervisor breed we transparence a motion to get the information by the 20th and the city departments can provide us with any analysis on the third make sense. yes >> seshtd by supervisor kim. any discussions >> i want to concur it will be significant to get more information from dpw when we're making decisions it is very difficult again given the limited amount of information you don't i know when we have an appeal i don't understand the facts and finding and just what was behind the subdivision

initially and think there is a higher level of the information that is needed. >> so okay. so supervisor breed is making a motion to direct the parties for written information by the 20th and back on june 3rd to continue with this hearing seconded by supervisor kim we'll take that without objection. that will be the order. >> question will this be a 3:00 p.m. >> yes. as our special orders are. okay. colleagues i believe we are at the end of our special orders if we can go to our adaptation calendar >> item 32 through 36 a single roll call vote can be considered.

>> colleagues anyone want to sever any of those. >> on item 3 it through 37. >> 36. >> okay supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. supervisor yee. supervisor avalos. supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen. supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. supervisor mar. there are 11 i's. those resolutions are adapted. supervisor mar do you understand you have an impart of item is interest >> madam clerk, call item 37

submitted by and their declaring may 9 in recognizing the fokt anniversary in the city and county of san francisco. >> colleagues, we have a resolution with the finding and supervisor mar has made an adoption any public comment on this item. >> okay. seeing none seeing none, public comment is closed. if webb we could took the resolution same house, same call? can you read the memoriams >> yes. mr. president, today's meeting will be adjourned in the following at the suggestion of supervisor kim and supervisor chiu on behalf of the entire board for stefan and added suggestion from the entire boards of supervisors for the late rubbing i didn't and i want

to thank sfgovtv crew jordanian madam clerk, any other business before this. >> that concludes our business for today. >> ladies and gentlemen, we're adjourned. >> good afternoon. everyone welcome to the san francisco transportation authority finance committee for tuesday, may 13, 2014.

my name is mark farrell i'm joined by supervisor chiu and supervisor tang and we'll be joined by supervisor wiener and supervisor cowen. madam clerk, any announcements?. no amendments okay. would we have roll call >> supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen absent. supervisor farrell. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. absent. we have quorum >> okay could we call item 2. >> the second item is the consent calendar items 2 to 3 are considered routine are considered routine all

matters listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine. >> do we have to open this up for public comment. >> no. >> can i have a motion to approve wojs. >> we'll need a roll call supervisor chiu. supervisor farrell. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. absent. the consent calendar is approved you >> item 4. >> it the state and elective update an action item. >> good afternoon, commissioners a quick report on sacramento last week, i was accompanied by executive director tilly chang and amber and met with the principle delegation in san francisco and in addition, we met with the start pro tem office to talk about cap and trade and push for more recreational decision

making and with the delegation members we focused on emerging the legislation that will establish form although, the boards roll as the t m a delegated by the board of supervisors and to include that in spectacular part of the protections to insure firewalls between the ta responsibilities. we had support from all quarters and the senator seems interested in helping us with the emerging legislation we're following up with his office it was a successful trip i enjoyed walking the hallways with the staff. yesterday the assembly installed assembly member tony as the speaker today, she gets to handle the budget from the

assembly side as accident mayor is giving his budget it's going on right now i can't give you highlights good or bad we'll be looking changes or embarrassed revenues in the cap and trade arena there's a small modest amount of an increase and what's emerging i'll did you at the end is kind of a strong debate between the legislation and the legislator how to proposition the cap and trade with the fuel distribution in 20015. turning to the bills of interest. that we've been tracking you'll notice if you flip through here there's a number of bills that we recommend those are the ones introduced for one reason or

another failed to move into a second reading so we have 3 bills we're recommending for support on the agenda the first one is a bit 2690 on page 23 of the matrix it reconciles language for the dui section of the penal code a reference to previous convictions and the language that's more up to date is separate so that you can take account for somethings that's going on concurly and we recommend the support to make the streets safer in san francisco. sb lovingly 83 an interesting measure we're recommending support it been carried on the

matrix before as a watch it was - >> what package it this on. >> i'm sorry page 22. and the bill was amended to change the funding source it allows the city and county to explores an up to $6 registration fees to fund the bicycle facilities. the prior version was a tax on bicycles and this is more important palatable and there's emerging technical issues over parks in the cities and counties we are combanls the funding for the opportunity of enhancing the opportunity for bikes and final intersection 17 on page 22

recommending support in bill will encourage or require the resources agency to develop climate resiliency collaborative with the cities and counties and others entities and produce an ongoing assessment and identification of measures to enhance climate resiliency and threatened areas of the state that's my presentation and to wrap up the cap and trade discussion the two conflicts between the governor has to do where we it will reside at the state or recreational level and the legislation uniformly is pushing it more locally and regionally a in some cases with

the funds provided to make the fund selection. the governor if he's had a change of heart but he opposes anything that put it on that level he wants the state agencies to make the product decisions and secondarily the distribution of the fund. the one major proposal that's out there but hadn't seen the light ofization day in terms of language we've seen the description is by senator performing steven beggar and he has recommended keeping the governors budget whole for 2014-2015 but placing something in the scheme going on. in his approach he'll treat the regulated industries that are subject to cap and trade the revenues from those industries

will fund a number of gvg productions but in 2015 the fuels production or motorists will be paying a higher amount because of the pass through of costs dedicated to transportation looking at several budget and high speed rail will receive a quarter of the money under the steven beggar proposal and rail and transit about half of that fuel distribution network funding and sustainable community will receive another quarter of that funding. under sustainable community a split going to affordable housing or infrastructure that facilitates affordable housing. so we'll see what the governor

comes up with either a new approach or reengaging in support of his own approach. with that, i conclude >> thank you, colleagues any questions or comments. okay madam clerk, do we need. open this up for public comment thrombin seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk, roll call >> supervisor chiu. supervisor farrell. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. absent that item passes >> item 5. >> the proposal for 2014-2015 and amending the program this is an action item. >> good afternoon cynthia this item starts on page 57 in your

pathways this guess your second looking at the 2014-2015 annual budget and work plan it was presented last week with a full presentation we would make one presentation change to attachment b an page 73 we're separating the treasure island mobility management agency program since the board of supervisors has recently designated the authority to handle the transportation plan for treasure island we have now separated that from the management go agency program and separated that to show revenues and expenditures on its own revenues to two hundred and 74 thousand as do expenditures. in addition since is last time we presented the last budget the

personnel committee amazing recommended the proposed restructuring to go before the board on may 27th. in addition, we're continuing to work on the with the project sponsor with the prop k strategic plan and the prioritization program updates in early summer. the sfmta in particular are preparing significant changes to the proposed california improvement plan and anticipate revenues from the proposed in front of 2014 ballot measures. both those changes will increase the proposed budget amendment but with we'll take those in a few months after the yuments or when they take it up at the time when we floerl bring the budget before this committee with that,

if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions. supervisor tang >> i didn't have a question but appreciate our presentation last time as well and happy to move forward. >> okay. if no further questions we'll open this up for public comment thrombin on item 5 seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk, a role >> supervisor chiu. supervisor cowen. absent. supervisor farrell. supervisor tang. supervisor wiener. absent. this item passes >> okay. thank you. madam clerk, call item 6 >> introduction to new items this is an informational item. >> colleagues, any additional items. okay. take public comment on number 6 seeing none, public comment is closed.

okay madam clerk, can you call item 7 >> item 7 general public comment. anyone wish to comment on general public comment is closed. >> item 8 adjournment. >> all right. we the meeting order. this is the tuesday, may 13,

2014. meeting of san francisco transportation authority plans & programs committee. our clerk is ms. ivory can chang. madam clerk, please call the roll. >> supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor kim. absent. supervisor mar. supervisor yee. we have quorum >> thank you. please call the next item. >> the serious committee report this is an informational item. >> we have bryan. good morning, committee members we shared 3 action items and passed them amazing it was our items 8, 9 and temple item 4 for a clean air program and peter in

the committee asked for the transit would cause spill over into parallel streets it was anna said there's a request to the transportation authority thirty to study the issue. item number 8 was a strategic action report for local and resemble bike sharing original models and there was some discussion of entity and the staff is working with the bicycle coalition to identify and get any issues item 9 was a request for 4 hundred and 6 i6r thousands of prop a fund pardon me prop k funded for the safety related requests and there was no discussion on that item which i think is a positive sign that

safety related issue transcend you culture and language barriers that's a good sign. with that, if there are no questions i have to take leave >> thank you, mr. a lawyer kin. open this up for public comment for anyone wishing to speak. >> thank you, supervisors i'd like to briefly elaborate on the item bottom of page 10. it's to share with you the transportation exclamations of closing the street bridge this bridge is actually the underpass for the future of the encountering station so looking at the station you can see the

park on the same side of the station so if in the morning you drive up there and heading south to silicon valley the issue is in the evening you're going to be on the other side of the tracks there's no good pathway. the next thing is the financial complications of closing the street. you basically going to lose $10 million of both state prop 1-b and fta funds that are not available they're not available for closing the have street. in closing i'd like to propose a compromise. caltrain basically wants to close the bridge all of it and

the enhancement and what i'm proposing to follow the 2005 study we suggested the bridge right now is 3 hundred and 25 feet and the 2005 study we only need 65 to 70 feet to fill up both sides and leave a package >> i'm hoping bryan larkin and the cac have you brought this to the cac. >> i didn't have any - >> thank you very much. seeing no other questions let's close. and ms. chang let's see call the next item. okay to approve the cac report can can we take that without objection? go colleagues, we should have a vote >> on item 2.

supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor kim absent. supervisor mar. supervisor yee. this item passes >> thank you. please call the consent calendar >> items 3 to 5 complies the consent calendar commission on matters that are within the commission's jurisdiction and are not on today's agenda. >> so i see no comments from the colleagues to sever items. let's open this up for public comment >> we don't need the public comment. >> okay roll call. >> sever an item. so there's a never mind so let's have a roll call often the consent calendar. supervisor breed. supervisor campos. supervisor kim absent. supervisor mar. supervisor yee. consent calendar is approved >> great, thank you.

please call the next and recommend appointment of two members to the advisory committee >> this is one of our transportation planners. >> chair mar and community members the transportation authority has an 11 member they serve a two year term and the committee recommends and the boards reports to the committee members neither the staff nor committee makes recommendations and our enclosure a list of folks who submitted applications for the advisory committee and you'll see the current members to quality to the committee you must be a san francisco resident for the committee to speak to your qualifications we currently have to vacancies on your

committee requiring your action one is the expiration of the terms in district 11 she's seeking reappoint and their 14 applicants to consider for all the vacancies. with that, we'll take questions >> i see no questions invite up the former applicant to give short remarks. thank you for your having me here today, i'm happy to be seeking reappointed to represent district 11. i found surveying on the cac extremely interesting and changing. in the last two years i've learned about policy and planning and how the pieces come together in the transportation world in the city and county of san francisco so it's great it

have another term to put that to work. i'm yes, ma'am interested in the pedestrian safety in district 11 as well as lighting as a strategy for both pedestrian safety and to serve san francisco as a transit first community. so thank you very much if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them >> i see no questions but supervisor avalos is in strong support of. >> candidacy. >> any other public comment? let's up this up for public comment are there any members of the public who wish to speak let's close. okay. >> good morning, commissioners i'd like to for you to really

when deciding who's going to be commissioners to look at like the pedestrian safety issues. that whoever you choose make sure that they include the whole package of pedestrian safety. not just when it comes down to the people walking down the streets in automobile they have to look at the bicyclists, too, and seeing when money is being allocated to different things and new projects being done they should put this bicycle stop signs up and i'm sure we have money somewhere that bicyclists must stop here. i understand we're trying to be a public transit first and bicyclist riding that's good but one day the money is going to dry up so that's all i