talk to you guys when you didn't do thing right but you got through it a lot of times you got through the touch times that's going to happen again but also remember where you came from what you've been through it was not easy and not spotted to be easy and not also going to be easy you've got to keep our head up and be proud because we believe in you. at this time i also want to say your children the babies you just had are now my grandchildren without further ado, i'd like to introduce the class historian anthony

(clapping.) >> good morning. my name is tony or called crew cut number 43 welcome to the san francisco fire departments one hundred and 16th academy congratulation. i want to started by thanking the chiefs gonzales and guzman for the incredible opportunity i'd like to welcome the members of the fire commission mayor ed lee and other distinguishes dignitaries here today while to thank our families for the support you without your love and support we couldn't have done it, it's been long days of

being in class and standardizing so thank you very much this is a commitment for you, too. the last 4 months has been an incredible opportunity being part of the san francisco fire department has been a lifelong dream and for my classmates coming from a family of firefighters i'm honored to service serve the citizens of the city center what makes this class unique we've come from backgrounds but standing here as members of the fire department from backgrounds from all branches of the military construction workers and business professionals we came in contact as individuals is diverse culture and now leaving as one team united by your passion for the job in this

great city there are momsz we won't forgot the bouncing push-up and the works out monday morning amazing works out and push the pace. there was one day us kruts felt sorry for the training they put us in advancing and made us sprint up and down the hill and they're eating do ins and outs and not spilling their coffee. thank you for your burdening users without that you i've saved a thank you to the last from the beginning you've been the most dedicated and influential officers any crew cut could ask for you stayed

late and came early to make sure we were needing help with a 50 foot lard and that's something all of us 39 kruts won't forget so thank you very much. i want to personally aggravated assault each one of my classrooms for the flishts is the beginning the foundation of what we went through with you're our fire department in san francisco congratulations to everyone we did it now, it's time for the real word to start some of us will be in fire homes less than twenty-four hours and real jobs we're ready leave i all with the wisdom take provide

in your work and walk quietly and carry a big stick congratulations again and enjoy your career andi. >> i. >> (repeated.) do solemnly swear. >> (repeated.) that i will support and codified. >> (repeated.) the constitution of the united states. >> (repeated.) and the constitution of the state of california. >> (repeated.) . against all enemies >> (repeated.) >> modern and domestic. >> (repeated.) that i will bear true faith. >> (repeated.) and alliance. >> (repeated.) to the constitution of the united states and the constitution. >> (repeated.) of the state of california.

>> (repeated.) >> under god. >> (repeated.) >> under god. >> thank you class you may be seated (clapping) question will now have the badges and the certificates present to the kruts.

marshall balancing la (clapping) can i please have everyone hold your applause until wire we're done. k kenth banning doneburg. timothy breed.

bryan kohlman. michael ca rot.

tir letter. jim fuller. mark. daryl hall.

joseph hanley. vincent hardy.

andrea johnson. nick will i. bryan lamb brick.

benjamin the third. steven may. kimberly martin.

jonathan matte. mark maul bureau even though. jacob mchenry.

michael maland fee. carlos melena did he see.

christian. andrea o'neill. deal o at the 51 he will.

marking could say. anthony pettirozelpetrozela. mark palasha.

david rabbit. anthony reyes.

ronald rottiherother. ignacio rubio. benny sanphony.

matthew silva. anthony suelay. awe depresszize azizes.

daren terraterral. ryan tacutttacutta. collin walker.

all right. good job guys.

116 can you rise please i know i've asked you this several times did you love this job >> i love this job. >> thank you very muc

>> hello, i'm nona along with the legacy of voters in san francisco i'm here to discuss 19th street only june 3rd the city and county of san francisco through it's port commission mfrtsz 3 and a half miles of waterfront along the bay and it currently regulates the maximum allowed heights they run from 40 to 84 feet they usually need approval by the planning commission and the board of supervisors those changes don't

currently require the voters to approve it prop b has height limits in effect unless the city voters approve the height limit any ballot question to there those must specific the proposed height limits in you vote yes. you want to prevent the city from port property to exceed the heightened limits unless the city voters have approved the vote limit increase in you vote no. you don't want to make the change. i'm here with lewis former city attorney and proponent of prop b 82 >> thank you. >> and joined by on opponent of the measure thank you. i'd like to start with opening comments that from each of you ms. renee your opening

statement. thank youo the league. i think we all agree the san francisco waterfront is a truly special place. and if you do we're asking the voters to, yes on b and, yes open b is support by is sierra club 78s be neighborhood alliance and affordable housing alliance and others citizens. prop b is simple and scared u straightforward it says waterfront height limits should be enforced and when the planner of the ports want to exceed those limits they should put the question to the voters. the yes on b campaign is really part of the out growth full only 8 washington we'll have a high-rise twice the size of the old embarcadero freeway and

fortunately over 67 of the voters said no, we don't want a wall on of the or high towers but proposition g or b says if the planners seek to exceed the height limits then the voters have a changing chance to say yes or no it's a vote and choice by the voters and mr. valenzuela 10 a statement >> thank you to the league for having you will say here today first of all, i'm a volunteer in and out a developer no are developers are involved in our support of the no on b campaign we're a coalition of community activists my environmentalists and small property owner and housing advocates. we're in the middle of our greatest affordability in san francisco and the problem with prop b is takes the complexities

of the balance and boils it down this is a concern we should be discussing how to build more affordable housing but we are talking heights limitsthanasia that's an important discussion but it leaves out the public benefits that may come out of the progress one or two tall buildings may gives a significant amount of affordable housing this proposition could kill 6 hundred affordable housing units and 20 millions of housing fees and cause significant problems for the ports so far as developing and fixing the problems with the port lands. we're in the enforcement of the nova valley club and the

indemnification and a host of others >> mr. valenzuela 10 bring up the perspectives of job how do you feel about that. >> there are 3 issues that were brought up first, the ballot box planning no, it isn't if the planners don't exceed the height limits no problem only if they do if you look at san francisco history since 19th street 68 when the bureau ton act there's been 18 other ballot measures effecting the front the ball was effected and the hunters point shipyard we're talking about port property that is owned by the public. and if you take a look at port property it's held in public trust and the housing agreement

is a red herring because as a matter of fact, if port property is held in publicly trust you can't build housing there and number 3 if that were done there's nothing in prop b that says you can't have a project being approved so the howard's altering argument is truly a red herring and we've seen the kind of housing the port as proposed high-rise luxury condo and now they're saying only building low income housing a i'd like to see it and b that's not going to happen >> mr. valenzuela 10 any comments. >> yes. the housing is not a red herring, in fact, if you look at what the port is considering and the project in the pipeline if you follow the

draft sheets that's inclusionary housing on site the problem is this is getting boiled down to if the voters like it that's great but developers can come to the ballot box with a specific or gentle thought and in the 0 voters sigh yes, no chance for mitigation under sequa or the planning process to hopefully get parts for example, an increase in affordable housing in exchange for heights when it the park going to be developed at the front of the process or backdoor back is the affordable housing going to be done in the beginning or at the at the end e end so there's quite a few of the challenges we're not talking about the of her building or them changing their bulk