80 million and on the new location that's not been identified pending the new location to the board of supervisors for approval. our recommended reductions total money in 2015- 2016 and of that amount the ongoing savings will law allow an increase of 4 point go 89 percent in the 2015- 2016 budget thankful concur with the recommendations and the details supervisors are on pages 31 and 32 and we'll be happy to respond to questions >> colleagues, any questions for mr. rose at this time. >> okay once again to the library staff thank you. >> and that's one i want to ask for a recommendation after public comment today.

okay. we're on the airport mr. martin thank you for being here >> thank you supervisors. first most importantly we're in agreement with mr. roses recommendation and pleased to have reached an agreement just a quick overview to the presentation a few weeks ago our air traffic is strong we saw 7 percent domestic and 9 percent international and we'll see strong growth in the coming years our finance are strong we've been growing and that's continuing and we're investing 4.4 bloiltsdz in the 10 years to support that growth. from the point of view of the general fund we're delivering our annual service payment to the city that represents 15 percent of our concession

revenue is prengd or projected to be $39 million plus next year. the number of passengers handled open a per committee bases is up. this is both the revenue growth and concession and productivity has allowed us to keep our fees reasonable. we want the there in debt services as well as the costs. and the minimum increases in staff given the passenger growth we're expensing if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> colleagues, any questions for mr. martin right now. supervisor breed. >> i don't have any question but a comment there was a time many

years ago i'd fly out of oakdale that was cheaper and i know in years recently there are both competitive that makes a difference now any friends in oakdale are flying out of the san francisco and this has to do with the changes and keeping the prices at the certain level so people can find the best bargain and bart and sfo has made a difference i appreciate that. >> thank you, supervisor. the number one reason we'll have strong growth is the airfare and air service competition we're a competitive place the interesting fact every market in north america the fairs goes up and down we want to make sure we

provide new opportunities for carriers to start service >> colleague any other questions mr. rose on the airport. >> yes. mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 7 the recommended reductions to the budget or 9 hundred plus in 2015- 2016 of that amount on ongoing savings and 17 thousand plus are one time savings and the airport concur with our recommend reduction the reductions are on packages 8 through 11 of our report we'll be happy to respond to questions. >> thank you very much mr. rose. colleagues, any questions? okay mr. rose 3 for 3. by that time a to tell us it's a long season >> mr. chairman i've said this before you realize the fact that

the departments are in concurrence with us we haven't cut enough. >> that's one way to interpret it i'm keeping the bating average. any questions colleagues to the staff or mr. rose on those items >> i want to respond to mr. rose. if i had the ability to take away money from some of the departments and use it someplace else in the budget it would be a lot easier to go avenue larger amazes of money but particularly the port the money gets used in that particular area and make changes a ballot measure that allows us to use the money throughout the city i don't know is that stepping on toes that will make the difference in the

future >> i think we'll explore that later. colleagues, any questions on the port or airport and i library. okay open this up for public comment to items it through 4 any public comment on those items >> all right. any public comment on that item? now we can put those to bed so to speak taking them as a group analysts recommendation a motion to accept all the analysts recommendations a motion by supervisor breed and supervisor mar. thank you very much to the departments and can we go did we call item 5 can we speak that on prop j >> mr. chair would you, please

adapt a motion to continue 2, 3, 4 to next week's meeting. >> just to check with the city attorney we've taken the public comment do we need to continue those items. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney those items are on tomorrow's meeting so and next wednesday meeting. >> that's correct. >> not open for those departments to combine so you adapted amendments that relate to those vice presidents but the overall meeting it should be continued. >> we'll make a motion to continue the items 2, 3, 4 to tomorrows meeting we'll take that without objection.. thank you mr. clerk for that consumption >> i'm monique what we've done over the last year's we've combined a resolution for the

board of supervisors approval encouraging with the controllers certification that southern services that have been contracted out continue to be less costly that's what you have before you today for the airport and the municipal transportation agency and for the port and public utilities commission now you'll be hearing the mta and the public utilities commission tomorrow and the sunset week about in every case we've analyzed the staffing requirement and cost and have fined in most instances significant savings and the security services and the certification and parking and paratransit and the jailer temperature port and security services and puc less contracted

if a they've been made by the civil service that's on the agenda for are tomorrow either way would be fine you can hold it or pass it out at this point and it will stay along with the budget and be a trailing legislation at the full board. >> thank you, colleagues any questions for the controller's office okay. so we can't pass it out today, we will have to continue this? item 5 the prop j? >> john gibner, deputy city attorney you'll continue to today until tomorrow and pass it out tomorrow. >> okay. take public comment on item 5 is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? seeing none, public comment is closed. all right. pass that out

tomorrow so a continue to tomorrow >> we'll take that without objection. >> mr. clerk call item 6 and 7 and the resolution for the contract for the procurement of the poorer prop inc. not to exceed to 11.6 million in a term to end in december 2015 and authorizing the fire department to accept the grant of approximately 7.6 million from the woichlt to december 31st to august 31st, 2015. >> welcome and thank you for being here. thank you conveyer farrell i'm chief joanne haynes-white we would like to first of all, thank the budget definite and appreciate the recommendations for the approval on this legislation and take the opportunity to thank jackie

functioning and in addition the mayors budget office as well as the mayors staff i want to ask the chief officer mark to present the item and answer any questions >> thank you. >> good afternoon mark to present the next two items that are tried to the same project to expend the approval of the contract for the fire boat in the amount of 11 million we have two fire boats over 60 years old on embarcadero and the department staffs one for a 24-hour emergency capacity and as well as that i minutes to is paid for by the port of san francisco. those boats are a tremendous

asset and used for a have a right to search and rescue and oil responses those are a part of the automatically will i fire system we can connect to the boats as needed. the fire boat was an incredible tool during the earthquakes and given the age of the departments boats and their importance in the fire operations the department has explored many alternatives for the outside funding for a new boat we applied for the purchase of 0 new boat and in 2011 we were what did you do due so a variety of delays the department was not able to complete that project and in august of 2012 the funding was reallocated

throughout the region. in june 2013 we applied for a security program to have another opportunity to complete the project on state levels the grant was ward in august of 2013. the performance period is two years and the grant expires in august of nia 15. working with the rfp process for the construction of the boat two bidders submits the proposals and the contract is before you today. the grant is 7.6 moiltsdz as well as a requirement for a match for the funding of 10.1 million. the total cost of the boat is over the anticipated project of $11.6 million at the mayor's office has been in approval and

working with the mayor's office we've identified the federal dollars and $8,983 in the 2014-2015 appropriation that's been reallocated towards the project and an additional in general fund allocation that's part mayor's office and 3 hundred and 35 thousand in the homeland security funding that's an additional federal source and the remaining of which resulted in the remaining balance of 1.2 million the department is looking for alternative be it grant or whatever to account for the department is pursueing a number of avenues if the department is nrlg neurology to

secure secure this we will pursue this in essence year. i wanted to thank my colleagues for working on this and from the city attorney's office they've sawdust us in the contract process and in the mayor's office this is important for the whole city the department respectfully ask asks you emotional to forward and the department is committed to a successful completion of the process and we're happy to answer questions >> just one question the recommendations from the budget analyst for the xoifrt fire boats upon delivery are you in corrupts with that or some reason you don't want to do

that. >> at this time we're not in agreement with them that's not coupling u coming out of the general fund we're from discussion with accident mayor's office and the port director related to whether or not it would be advantageous to have is a third boat we look at the cost and operablely there are times which one of the boats need to be taken out for dry dock and maintenance so whether or not it's feasible to have the third boat not only supervisor wiener was talking about the thirty thousand new residents into candle stick point woody allen one of our thoughts is to relocate one the boats 0 into this area because operationally it may want adventageous to have an addressed expense.

i understand that >> any questions for the fire department. >> i have a question about the process and what happened to the loss of fund for the previous grant for its boat when this came along. >> thank you, supervisor just to classify we applied for the grant in 2010 and awarded in january of 2011 there was a delay on the federal level from approval for the grant from fema and so this backed up and there were parolee process for the rfp there were billing for the vendor and it got stretched out we requested an extension and were not able to get one through

fema. >> so for the architectural work for the fire boat the process they went through there was a second rfp process for the second fire boat. >> same boat the first was for the indulge and specifications because the current boats are 60 years old we started from scratch to design the fire boats the specification are in the because of the rfp. >> the need to do open additional process to put the project out to bid for the specifications did that cause the delay. >> that caused a portion of the delay. >> there's not another mechanism we can fast track it. >> we worked in a short

timeframe and everything had to really smoothing but we explored a variety of things to move our timeframes along with you due to details beyond our control at the federal level unfortunately lost the funds. >> in this process what's chang changed. >> prior to the loss of the award we initiated the construction and after we were awarded the second grant we continued where we left off that minimized delays in the procurement process. >> okay. thank you. colleagues, any further questions. okay mr. rose can we go to your

report on items 50e67 >> regarding the condition of the boats first of all, the fire departments all those years have had two boats is reason they've applied for the grant is those boats are 60-year-old the fire chief says their port fund that's about $600,000 in maintenance we didn't say that for the sake of saying it it didn't make sense for the fire department to maintain a third boat when they've never had 3 boats area they're playing for the grant because the functionality of the new boat for explodes the old boats that's the basic of our recommendation regarding the grant we certainly recommend

approval of on page 3 of our report on the bottom of page 3 the fire boat in the amount of 11 thousand polluting plus on the same page we note as show that in table 3 on page 5 of our report in order to fully pay for the fire boat they anticipate 2 hundred 77 thousand that's not secured so we points out on page 6 supervisors just to make this very clear this could result in a request and again, we're recommending approval we want the board to know the facts this can result in the request for the board of supervisors to appropriate in general fund be money in the 2014-2015 money and fallout if the fire department

doesn't talk about the grants for a balance to pay for the fire boat this could result in the board of supervisors giving more money in the general monies in the fire departments 2015- 2016 budget we recommend i've already states about the deconditioning of the one boat for the reasons i've stated we recommend you approve the $706 million federal grant and we recommend you approve the contract workplace the city and the companies vigor fab to purchase the fire boat not to exceed the $11 million plus. >> thank you mr. rose. >> supervisor breed comments. >> i have a question for clarification. so since the port is technically

responsible for maintaining the boat is that why operating through won't be additional operating expenditures for this new boat. i'm trying to understand why there won't be >> you're correct the port is responsible for the maintenance of the vessel. >> so they're responsible for the additional operating he expenses in in addition they'll be responsible for any necessary matching grant funds in other words, to pay for building the boat in the first place or will that be from the general fund. >> i'll let mr. co-sponsor so speak about that one. >> just for clarification on your first question with regards to the increasing costs there's

not an increase in those costs there could be potentially an increase in the maintenance down the line but the requests if the fund outside the federal donated did you understand u funds the port is not responsible for the match the fire department is the matching award. >> but the port can potentially provide the match. >> if they have funding the match yes, if they want to allocate funding for the boat. >> as the city we're paying for the capital costs out and they're paying for the maintenance. >> correct. >> okay. any further comments colleagues. iceland open this up for public

comment on item 6 and 7 >> you had your speaker card from a long time ago. >> mime todd robert representing the california bay shipyard we were one of the bidders i'm here to ask you reflect this to on the unfair slaengs of the bids. regarding the price having anyors appraise are bond and selected opening statements is $11.6 million and marina groups price is $10.8 million a difference of 8 hundred and 40 thousand taxpayers. dollars but if that's comparing apples to apples the price we're proposing to the document for

more expensive boat that was to be awarded to vigor and it is less cost equipment and a variety of modifications which is different rfp than what we bid on its possible our price would have gone down if the other bidders could have remodified their prices. this is the most troubling the city is buying a basis boat because bond for $10.3 million plus the cost of that oepgdz for expended warrant all price by manufacturers we did the math $1.3 million and the value in the arena groups is based on the

fixed stellar prices from vendor very the material being instead of. if i were in our shoes i'll wonder how to get from a $3. million boat to a $10 million virtually no labor to a as a matter of law what an additional cost of $10.3 million it costs the city in xeesz of one million dollars >> thank you very much, sir appreciate it. anybody else's wish to comment on items 6 or 7. the seeing none, public comment is closed. chief any comments on this process >> thank you chair farrell we'll have oc comment on the process. jackie fong.

>> hijacking write fong i'm the purchaser and the director for the contractor administration. wooech we'll say we stand by the recommendation that is on rfp process. and included in the escalation was points for american people executive summary and it's work out 15 points and the qualifications that's work out 15 points and there were quite a bit of points award for the experienced of the firm and the sub consultant and an additional 5 points for the technical support and then the fee prospering proposal was thirty pots for a total of one hundred. so undertook the fee proposal was important not all of the

criteria. it was separate elevation panel that consisted every two people from the fire department and one person from the port and one from outside the city. the selection of that panel was actually confirmed and approved by the contract monitoring division. the 4 panel i was unanimously ranged is he ignore fab as the top selection that's where why we entered into negotiation. occ is confirming the recommendation >> thank you supervisor breed a question. >> i have a question under the whereas clause on page 2 line 16 it says the san francisco fire department is budgeted for this purchase of a new type two boat

and the majority of the funding is grant funding. i was wondering where it is coming from is it budgeted if the current budget. i'm going try to get clarity open where the fund how are they budgeted >> mr. chair. >> mr. rose. mr. chairman supervisor breed on page 4 of our report we point out that a million 5 hundred thousand plus is generally to be proposed by mayor this is according to the fire department and in the fire departments 2014-2015 budget with our appropriation budget and another $1 million plus in not identified grants or fund is