buses rolling through the neighborhood. so, please let's get rid of the barn up bailing looking adds. i agree with supervisor wiener's comments we're taking the lazy way out i'm not talking about the overtime charges at the muni but this is just enough money the wraps to run the muni bus only a small portion of the year >> are there any members of the public who wish to speak on item 9 seeing none, public comment is closed. okay. just real quick okay supervisor wiener. >> so a question for the staff. and mr. reiskin had to step out. this was previously in the 3

member committee my apologies if this was discussed and that's about the visibility of the l rbs and i know that mta sent around the video i can say in my experience it's not that often i've been on a wrapped rb above ground especially in the evening but one time in the evening in the winter is of the dark out and i actually really had trouble i wasn't sure what street i was at i couldn't read the street signs and if tlvrt there was a bus stoney felt like i was a tourist in san francisco i had to rely on other passengers to get off. has the technology improved or what's happening there >> gail from the mta pare the

technology does continue to improve will have of the wraps are clear and they've put a lot of the colors onto the body of the vehicles so we're definitely ware u aware that people have issues the contract requires the contractors to use better and better materials. >> so the experience i had was sometime last fall or i think it was last fall. is that not happening anymore >> we've heard not heard from very many people we don't feel that's still a problem. >> i mean despite the glasses i have descendent eyesight is that

again i don't have poor eyesight. >> we've not heard from many people i ride and look all the time and i have not had problems so, so i don't think that's that big have a problem. >> i know there's a variety of different kinds of adds some lighter or darker does muni have a way to access this color pallet on the ads is going to cause a sdanlt issue. >> we haven't had problems with disabled people coming and claiming but how you look at it sometimes, the whops that are clearer and don't have much color is easier to see in and out but we don't have is a way

of elevating the wraps. >> okay. colleagues if from my prospective i completely agree with supervisor breed everything is about trade offends i hate them but i saw a sequa appeal so we're going to be discussing that at the board which is fine. i'll tell you on the personal level wraps don't bother me by the billboards i'm in the convinced i appreciate we may want know what they look like tha that makes me nervous. i am improvement sending it out with no recommendation but absolutely with holding judgment on the vote i have no problem kicking it back to the mta for

next tuesday. i know that supervisor breed made a motion to send it forward without recommendation i'm happy to do that but want to pension that about the digital billboards so, have a discussion on tuesday >> the supervisor breed recommendation can we do a roll call vote without recommendation. >> on the motion supervisor mar. no arrest supervisor avalos. no arrest supervisor breed. supervisor wiener. supervisor farrell. the motion passes. okay. the motion is passed. madam clerk move on to item 11 >> the the recommendations commentating to the block number 33 and 34 in the mission area to

continue the tax exempt entity for the 5 hundred thousand grow feet in the project development area and making the finding under the california quality act. >> thank you madam clerk we have continued this item and i know there's been movement since then and going forward on the mta value of the go forward on the property tax given the ucf f mr. richmond i'll invite you up and go to our budget analyst. >> thank you chair farrell. good afternoon tiffany the executive director of community investment and infrastructure along with the mayor's office office of economic workforce development appreciate the opportunity to be here to present this new information.

it's a quick recap and o pas property there's a tax property agreement any agreement will be subject to paying those payments under the payment agreement under the currently tax agreement uscf will have to pay 3.8 million of our ucsf they'll pay up front 10.2 million for affordable housing 2 hundred and 35 affordable unit and for infrastructure that goes to the master developer informs he will. what were the had w what were the or with respect w to the new information supervisor breed raised that the mission bay

development will allow the operations to continue and uic leases those throughout the city as a tax exempt entity and they don't typically pay property tax, however, in this case citywide leases you see it's indicated it will not release those that will lease will discontinue in 20022 and in the first phase is complete in 2017. as a result of the uc consolidations tax commits in which the city and county of san francisco r will receive 68.2 million in net present value as uc vablths those

prompts and moves to blocks 32 and 33 pr we believe those offsets the 7.6 million >> can you repeat number again, please. >> it's also shown in table 3 of the budget analyst report report shows that. we believe the 6.2 million in the present value to the total dollars that goes to taxing entities neons offsets the payment that would have begun to ocii the total that was previously identified in the budget analyst report. certainly after the hearing two weeks ago i indicated and conceding asked for more information ocii reelevated the potential impacts to the

proposed uc consolidation at mission bay. the finding of which i've outlined it's this new information if the upgraded analysis error. i want to ask ken rich to briefly all the benefits to the city as a whole. i'll be quick >> just wanted to thank the committee for allowing us to drifd open the details. wells fargo within the constraints of the disillusion law we've got a comprehensive passage we're getting more money from the inclusive we're leaving the infrastructure funding intact has compared to a taxable

entity and the remaining funds can't be passed through because of the dissolution allowing law are being eat up by 1r5kd properties. this is something we've been working closely with ocii and i want my colleagues to be presenting this information and our presentation will be concluded. >> supervisor farrell and members of the board i'm with the planning at the ucsf we're here to present letters of support from organizations that couldn't be here including the san francisco parks alliances and the nomad garden and the leader in the dog patch neighborhood. i'm i'd like to submit this for the record and provide copies to

the members. so as related by director boo key and rich the university i university is ready to implement the memorandum of understanding before you including the $10. million for the affordable housing and so far infrastructure as well as other payments to maintain and infrastructure at the mission bay. through the community facilities district. i want to emphasize the you thought is ready to extend the management program to the block to get the majority of our staff and visitor out of the their cars and plan to extend our local hiring programs to hire

local residents. for to perform at least 20 percent of the construction hours on the site and then expend our excel job program that will provide intirmdz and job training for community resident many from the bay area and to conform our standards to the mission bay plan >> supervisor avalos. >> if i may you said that the local hiring requirement is 20 percent of contract hours. >> we have a volunteer contract of hiring san francisco for 20 percent of construction hours at mission bay. >> okay. that's. >> and we'll extend. >> i appreciate the effort it's low thirty percent is the current level. and 20 percent s was we were

able to get the goal it was 50 percent and not mandatory >> i'm damon the director responsible for cooperating our local hire plan with the mission bay and other community based organizations. your volunteer local hire policy we've instituted does mirror the city not a 20 percent goal for the projects i said it to be thirty percent but essentially trying to mirror with city >> supervisor breed. >> okay. are redone from the staff presentation prospective. mr. rose to our report please.

and shown no table 3 of 21.

therefore we are now recommending the approval the proposed resolution since the $7 million gap is now taken away by the gap, in fact, a benefit of $8.5 million we base our recommendation strictly on the recommendation >> thank you supervisor breed. >> i think the problem we have with that there's no guarantee the property will be render and the taxs would be collected. that property has nothing to do with that property we need to treat it different we have no control over the property they

occupy. i realize realize this was brought up as a argument but don't understand why we approve an agreement when we should be asking for the entire amount for the contracted. the reality is yes ucsf is one of the biggest employees in san francisco. yes, their developing with the mission bay they have partial parcels they've worked together with but at the end of the day long term ucsf is not 3w4r50bd to may taxes to the city and county of san francisco so my prospective in all fairness they should fulfill the responsibilities to the proposed taxes for this parcel.

i understand this is a deal between the sell forest but required to be approved by the body human resources for clarity it's no a certa - not a certain >> i understand supervisor breed's concerns we're like many tenants in office buildings this month of the space we're talking about is in office building and one of the main purposes for acquiring the property is to

reduce the costs. this is a hive incentive for us to vacate those properties who's leases b will be expiring in 2018 pr the current leases are below the office represent so the rent will be escalating and there's a strong reason to vacate, however, there's a strong incentive to do so especially consolidate those with the programmed >> mr. rose. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee i believe that supervisor breed has made a good point. >> really good point. >> in that there's no

guarantee. that ucsf will relocate. so the committee might want to consider an amendment if possible that will give assurance f to the committee that, in fact, what they say they'll intend to do or go obligated for the 10 point plus million dollars. >> i get our comments i have a little bit of personal prospective one the biggest property in my district we've been working on i've had multiplied discussions thank you for the team for spending time with me. absolutely no guarantees i don't think a guarantee will work. who knows what will happen but it makes sense no sense for a

hundred thousand dollars facility and not move the employees there they're not growing their workforce by that much i get it's not a guarantee based on my own experience they're trying to vacant the property in my district. i want to thank them for working with me and hopefully to continue to work together. i'm improvement with the proceeds i'm not guaranteed they'll come in, however, >> supervisor wiener. >> i have a question for rich or other on the development fees. so let's assume the sales force has kept the land it's deficit into one portion inform ucsf and one to the warriors and my

understanding is the warriors will they darn well better be paying transit and development fees. but ucsf b will not and ucsf is a state entity so had sales force kept the entire piece of land and developed it as originally planned would p d i f knee with the other regulations >> it's a tricky question if the sales force state on a schedule interpret at that point insides the 10 year point. >> let's assume 10 years

extraordinary. >> that aside yes. any non-taxable entity will pay the fees. >> so right now my understanding the reason that ucsf is open the hook for the 32 or $39 million is because those were obligations that were recorded against the property by the sales force and ucsf stepped up to the plate into the sales force shoes. >> they were rotted by the land own and passed on. >> and ucsf stepped up to the plate into the shoes. >> yes. >> why were there no fees recorded against the property. >> supervisor wiener tiffany back in 2005 when the mission bay owner participation contract

was amended it was that provision that is now about the board and the o pa the 14 percent any taxes exempt they have to either pay or enter a payment tax agreement between the master developer and the former agency that tax payment agreement was recorded bifocals - by fossil. at the time it was to make up for and it was within the 10 year exemption period to make up for affordable housing and the other core obligation under the contract. i think it had a function of the

time period the fact that it was a third party conceptual agreement between the city and occ it was really focused on the provision and the fees and 10 year lockout was taken care of with the redevelopment plan >> was it not within the 10 year period it applied to mission bay. >> it was negotiated it didn't it was within the 10 year lock anti period so it wasn't at the forefront i wasn't at the table at the time but based on my review of the parties at the table and we were not at the table when the new seasons apply. >> i appreciate that so i'll

make my comments after public comment. >> supervisor breed. okay. all right. no other questions for supervisor breed or the staff anyone wish to comment on item 11? please step forward line up on the far side of the wall except for the first speaker >> i'm the director for the jewish location services i'm pleased to speak in support of their partnership we were founded 40 years ago to support of the jewish community and began our partnership with ucsf as they had you interning and jobs for the sovereign refugees.

today j v f serves the residents in obtaining jobs and so too our partnership with ucsf continues. one example we do with the excel program it's the community engagement and learning. those programs successfully leverages the health care academy and jobs now. we do direct outreach for the city's southeast sector. excel is is work based program that used the classroom and work experience at the you mean to prepare individual for administrative and college positions. since 2010 the excel program has seen many san francisco residents lives transformed.

we have had 6 cycle and graduated 95 san franciscans and our next is on may 19th we're elevated the folks additional after six months of closed session 80 percent of the graduates were working with an annual salary of 80 thousands. we have this near the john hospital. thank you to ucsf for the partnership my i want to acknowledge and thank you to the ucsf assistant director of community relations and for ucsf we're grateful for the partnership inform transforming

the lives of san franciscans >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> thank you for hearing this item general manager of the hall we provide job placement services in hiring solutions to employers we support the acquisitions of blocks 33 and 34. we're providing the services through the we developed agency and now through oewd. we work with mission bay to continue the employment. i've had direct involvement in placing folks and the liaison and project managers have significantly promoted did equal opportunity for as follows. in 2011 ucsf they have a

outreach program and work closely with other folks in the southeast community to place the residents on the projects. and also block 25 a. through we'llable about put more folgz to with work and provides benefits to their families i'm happy to a support the second largest employer i'm a