the implementation stages of sfaes one housing development. fwraerng very surprised to see this project today. we at the cac has sat in meeting after meeting and some of our members have been involved with the project forfully to 20 years we've heard everything we need to hear about the shipyard where were the public works and the fire department why did they not work through the process earlier so we wouldn't be here he 11th hour to figure out one way or another what to do. we're at the cac are in agreement we know the firefighters jobs are not easy and we appreciate them. and we're appreciative the

conversations how to improve those streets but we do not want to discussion to be a reopening of the shipyard plan and project we definitely don't want that. the project design was approved in a buy in from all the vice presidents it went through the board of supervisors and the project is in process at alice griffith. you need to know supervisors that the shipyard a a great 0 source of pride and represents not only jobs lenar has provided over $30 million in community benefits more than any project in the horrifies of san francisco. ? a monument overlook project we're grateful to lenar for his leadership and going on

engagement with the city and community leaving. the cac wants to see the project continue on schedule. thank you for your fine work you're both doing and we appreciate your efforts >> thank you for all your work. thank you. next speaker. >> for the record. supervisors the subject, of course, is the hunters point shipyard master plan. >> could you talk into the microphone. >> i'm marketing internal revenue a development planner a member of 15 years with the hunters point shipyard cac and i was the chair of the subcommittee. my comment on the hunters point shipyard mastered plan that was approved the brief comments the hunters point shipyard master plan was in the making for over

20 years a direction the city department of planning the numerous citizens in the wizarder san francisco community at that particular time in the planning process and the master plan in its final plan was done and the hunters point shipyard master plan take into account all the known points from the san francisco in the 21st century and my comments the fire department apparently has the master plan as follows:. where i began any career in planning in the 1970s the suburban plan were widened to accommodate the fischer and relate to this they're more

extracted than the 18960s and paving over larger acres of lands must be acknowledged while no one can deny that adequate assess it is important disseds problems can't be fixes by yesterday's solutions and they must take into account all of today's circumstances looking at the major cities across the choice they never thought years ago. this is critical that everyone comes together because sustainability long term and short term is absolutely preliminary circumstances that new solutions that integrate all concerns is required.

thank you very much. thank you very much >> dr. jackson. >> dr. espanola jackson and, you know, it's too bad you have two minutes number one i'd like to say the history of bayview hunters point most of the people don't know anything about the shipyard area not holland. when the baseball field was at the candle stick i had to go to the department of public works to get the stop signs put up in my neighborhood because those of us who went to church because the ball players wouldn't let us in you're not concerned about the height of the citizens of

san francisco because if upper if you were you would want to know history. now and then in 1962 the alice griffith project was built and there was no epa point a time itself area a land field the shipyard is land field it's a toxic site and that was put together by the navy not us there was a lab board set up to say when things what about exchanged in the city and guess what the ramp board was kiss continued by last mayor because they were pushing down everybody's throat lane and people that dying and still dying and sick public utilities the public health department and city planning and the

supervisors have been the rubber stamps for the continuing of the people in bayview hunters point the death of those people if you pass on this you're not different you're not different than being raciest against the people >> this is a hearing no votes. >> you're going to come back later and vote you've been doing it all the time. >> thank you. next speaker. . >> thank you, supervisors i'm rick hall. i i don't not will have is prepared speaker but a resident of district 10 and sometimes go to the meetings associated with district 10 and i do support whatever district 10 residential groups want. i live in katrero hill part of

the district 10 when i go out to district 10 places like captain sullivan's meetings. i've learned a lot about my other neighbors and learned that they're not just - it's different out there not the sort of intense castro and everybody wants walkable streets they drive a lot and have concerns about roads. their - they don't get the transportation they need i know we've got like a team out there but to where this project is going you need major transportation changes. and until you get that those people are going to out in the

ear are going to be driving. i really need to get our transportation. and in sync as a driver i suggest somewhere out there place a transit he metropolitan center capturing the people avenue off the 180 let them park and take the transit and use that as a hub to develop what bayview hunters point needs. thank you. >> thank you very much appreciate it. ms. hill son >> good afternoon. i deal a

lot with land use issues not only for bayview hunters point and alice griffith park it's going to be a key thing for the entire city when the streets with widened to 26 feet i know in the planning code their relate to the height ever buildings and a lot of that height comes the bulk and density and what you might get later than is an entitlement right with the additional weight of street going to lenar go they'll not lose the people that have testified didn't said they didn't know whether or not they'll be at the front or back it makes no difference they'll be additional rights granted. i'm getting worried about about the development. i understand about the safety of

the firefighters i've learned bmw the jack's if you want a few of the trucks 26 won't suffice he need 34 and you can't go to anthony that's stretching things. i'm beginning to one day suddenly after 2010, i thought that was done i didn't go to the hunters point shipyard and candle stick plans but this is odd. thank you >> next. >> good morning. welcom supervisor wiener and supervisor cowen and thank you for calling the meeting i'm lynda former planning commissioner and over 20 something years i was the chair of the land use planning and transportation for the bayview hunters point under the

san francisco development agency. as my counterpart sister agencies the cac said earlier that the verona honeycutt we've had thousands and thousands and decades and decades of plan in honor we talk about bayview hunters point it was a resident and any resident in the city you can attest to this we've come here over and over and over and over again to the construction of the shipyard and thank you for all the questions. i know and i want to put it on the record under chief joint and his wife san francisco has had the longest safety of any department in this country we give her a lot of accolades for that. we need to san francisco has an obligation for the performance

for the obligation of the shipyard. 2010 were here and you need to think about the entitlement if you cause any public delay i think the san francisco will be gookd and alice griffith has a deadline written into it that i hud you're going to stop the project and given climate of the economy with the republicans he lose an opportunity we have the infrastructure plan in place being approved by the planning department we should move forward with this project. thank you for your time >> thank you very much any is there any additional public comment on item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed first, i want to thank all the

departments for being here today. we're this is a team of departments s it really works well together even though we don't see eye to eye on everything this is a one of the strengths i thank you. this has been a useful hearing in terms of flagging this issue wherever one falls down after we announced that a few weeks ago i got passionate e-mails there are views on our - from our members of the public and staff it's an important issue to be discussing this our streets are the major

topic of discussions and mr. jacobs said it's 28 landmass this is a twice as our park system this is how our city gets around whether the fire department or biking or walking we want it to be safe and usable for everyone. as this process the concerns what the impact will be in the long run and people raising their children and grandchildren and having the liveable walkingable contact or streets that are overly wide and less safe and less inviting for the community tote. i don't agree that having a liveable what canable is for the castro or the other valley it's

something that people that value in hunters point shipyard or other place deserve to have complete streets and i think that's incredibly important and be concerned about the precedent it sets. i disagree are some of the perspectives that were expressed but agree we have a frank discussion. so with that said supervisors if there's nothing further >> no, thank you. >> and thank you to the public. so with that cohen i'll entertain a motion to continue to the call of the chair >> thank you we'll take that without objection. >> folks if you could clear the room we have item 3 through 6 to

get through. thank you >> okay.

>> okay. thank you everyone madam clerk call 3, 4, 5 and 6. >> so coordinate the private property and right-of-way and item 4 is the mischievous of the technical zoning district are that item 5 is the ordinance amending the ordinance code to establish a public right-of-way and the next is the amending of the police code. >> okay cohen is the author along with the mayor on those items. >> thank you for the folks that have remained for the discussion of item number 3 through 6. >> to today, we have a couple of proposals before us. the san francisco plaza program it's an excited not upper

program that aims to build communicated efforts to have for innovative and liveable solutions that engage the port of san francisco most vibrant communities. i'm happy to support this legislation i believe it will have positive benefits towards the plazas and open space. now the legislation gives the city a tool to activate plaza like farmer's market and limit live performance that will have partnerships with the community members and proposes to streamline the permitting process for standards of the plaza making activation easier and sustainable it establishes an inner agency group to incite the administration of the

program. now we've got a couple of speakers first, i want to bring up ms. robin as well as another gentleman from the office of economic workforce development they'll give us a detailed description of the program and answer any questions you have. colleagues you should have in front of you some non-sun active codes and the planning code that's some of the questions the public has. this clarifies privatization it addresses concerns about privatization noting identification of plaza stewards and private events we have anothers attorney here to discuss this matter.

we're joined by john updyke and the department of real estate and the rec and park department staff are all present. so first robin and ken. thank you very much robin. good afternoon, supervisors i'll change that to good evening. robin with the office of economic workforce development. thank you very much for the opportunity to addresses you today about the proposed plaza program you'll be considering four amendments that enable it process. allow me to start with the program mission and goals i'm sure you're aware of cities are dauptd proposals and san francisco should be a leader in the positive activities but currently the city department of motor vehicles doesn't have a

system we're going to try to fix it so san francisco can be a initiative leader we want to support of vibrant community by creating and successfully managing san francisco's open spaces. o e w d is launching the program and we've formed a plaza working group for agencies that have those issues at heart. here's a summary of how the program is structured it will streamline processes to encourage activation by dpw more tools forlogically the permit costs and this is the - some plaza like is that a have been

clearly enhancing the goals but the plans are not clear. the city lacks the coordinations of the plans. each the individual programs will provide a stem tisk approach mriment overlapping city efforts. the program aims to have the stewart's involved as well as the pavement to parks program. while san francisco partnership has the greening of sidewalks and transformation of the parklets the city has yet to develop the systemic plaza outside the jurisdiction. for the plaza program the the

appealable the potential at the words warts obey robust proposals to carry out the community support goals and include a scope of work and project letters of support. the plazas program is a program framework it didn't include specific plazas plazas will be adapted on a plaza a i plaza basis and also the program will design robust escalation robust programs to benefit everyone. directing the revenue this is a

fundamental part of the program approach the program directs the monies back into the plaza and in addition when possible the revenues generated by the stewards could be directed back to the other plaza. the program supports the maintenance goals by working closely with the at the warts for the sustainability of the plaza. an important part of the aspect it is designed to educate a long term management approach for plaza for the community processes like example on the left as you see from the diagram the plazas programs include the pavement to parks and plaza could emerge from the area programs and others programs in kind agreements. if a space emerges for one

position and brldz the benefit to the community but the strategy is unclear and a potential for stewardship process the space will be looked at. once it's dermdz that a project is developed could be sponsored by plaza program and the local stewardship is a good program first, the street placing that are plaza in the right-of-way they're still streets this is the best strategy for the vehicular traffic like a driveway they'll use an encroachment permit and over permits for streamlining their

support the activation in the spaces the second type is a city plaza their city owned but not streets. agreement formed will be a license that will detail the plans are a term years as well as the streamlining elements. many communities have expressed interests if the increased levels of activation this can help them to have transformative aspects we want to give you a demonstrates this is an example there are some examples in spaces in san francisco but we want to note that will allow unknown activations approaches as they emerge.

this slides gives an illusion how a steward will act this represents the city initiatives where the plazas would emerge and dpw or the real estate division to administer one the processes so you see in the process above the blue line the city releases an rfp and only eligible at the warts would be available including the documents for the orientational capacity now let's look at the particularly diagram above this this is the same but slightly different because of the regulatory process. this process also requires a

detailed plan that all plazas will have a term years or less unless the stew wart is installing improvements. oewd has a outreach plan as individuals plaza are proposed we brought various stakeholders to the table and made presentations to 40 stakeholders groups it helps us to create the new legislation. we'll like to thank all of those for meeting with us we believe their additional feedback has helped. oewd prepared to the small property owner commission and the planning commission. we also conducted an open house using the planning department list we comprised a list of one

hundred and 15 questions theirs in your packet. based on the input from the list of questions we made changes to the legislation. they're listed in your 3 page table in your packets i'm going to do one slide. there was initial confusion this might include the property under the rec and park department that he amended it to state clearly no project shall be under here. we've heard the impact so we amended it for the weight