it is quite an amazing sculpture of cakes and other treats. all told while she was in dock she generated over thirty thousand employment hours now headed to seattle where she'll be based for her alaskan violently and holy weep see her on tuesday the 22nd on the crews shipyard we're excited about that. bill where are you dunbar from bae congratulate you and your team and most importantly your ability to bring in the crews ships and provide the services that helps us to build our

cruise ship and to no small part to bundle the services you provide at the shipyard. all told we've seen 83 percent growth and a large part coming from the fact they can over the onshore power that's one of the projects out of the america's cup project and the port and puc and bae partnered inform put in the repair shipyard with an investment of $5.7 million and has allowed bae to build on the military ships and been quite successful so that's an investment well spent and very, very environmental sound and we couldn't be more pleased that's exciting news and latest on my

report not mentioned is may 28 tomorrow from 4 to 7:00 p.m. the eco center from 4 to 7:00 p.m. at the worker could center this is for the new operators to be able to welcome in the community and all who participated and they'll call it a collaboration between the bay institute of aquarium a their obey having a house warming party that concludes my report. >> thank you. i'll make my quick comments kudos to the staff regarding the tremendous efforts on the bond and shawn thank you. we often say it but appreciate the members of the public come down

and acknowledge and as director pointed out our maintenance workings at the jimmy terminal thank you for the tremendous work. public comment on the executive director report? seeing none, commissioners. commissioners reports are there any? public comment on the non existing conspiracy report >> seeing none, call the next item. >> consent calendar request approval the understanding of m-156 between the municipal transportation agency for the project on marin street for the general warehouses storage for the maintenance and repair of

sfmta buses including the fueling and washing of the same and incident for no other purposes for a term of seven years for the process and item 10 b the fee waiver for the to temporarily install public art near mission streets on the east side of the embarcadero street and peer 14 for a term of 4 months. >> so moved. >> all the all in favor, say i. >> public comment. >> i'm sorry public comment? seeing none. all in favor, say i. of the consent calendar say i >> opposed? consent calendar carries we've approved resolution 1436 and 37. >> item a approval for the management and ship, llc for

james at the peer 35 and 32 of the embarcadero and brooifrnt streets respectfully. >> good afternoon. i'm john for the planning development on on may 13th the port staff give a management agreement between the port and metro we've outlined the james r herman is a project that's taken over 20 years to complete but this summer this year peer 27 will be complete and operational late september. getting this project built has been difficult and clearly a loonth along coming once the project is collected mr. will be regards for the city at large as mentions in the presentation staff tried to have a balance of

fiscal responsibilities to do that the port has made over the last number of years to create a new port facilitated not only represent a state of the art crews facility for san francisco but to create an attractive venue for public and private events inside the terminal we hope this accomplishes the goal of the crews advisory panel for the recommendations sent out in 2007 pr generally speaking those recommendations including one build a new cruise terminal to preserve and promote one of the maritime's industries and two hydrahave the vice president of the peer 27 as the new peer facility and develop a plan for the new 27 terminal not only for the crews operations ambassador 44 for on site parking and

shared use of the terminal space for special events and increase the passenger crews fee. 4 implement the short tower and 5 build ashore side park. staff will have accomplished all those recommendations again that we set out in 2007. but let's be clear when the cruise terminal didn't serve as a cruise function we'll use the space for other functions because it brings people to the waterfront and costs costs >> while construction at peer 27 will be complete staff has embarked on a path to identify on the operator for peer 27 and 35 cruise tenors they selected metro to organize the operations

crews will be operated by crews and special events will be handed by the studios. parking will be managed by in park every metro those uses were studied in the eir approved in 23450679 and 2011 to we've laid out the information we've provided more information specifically to hosting cruise events and seeing 0 how the ground parking capacity impacts the facilities and metro and staff have agreed to a booking procure that makes cruise calls priorities and metro will provide an monthly update with the fees of the infrastructure

and they'll comply with the city ordinances and addressing light and other things >> as noted in the may 13 presentation staff port staff still has not secured a b c amendment to allow part time parking at the ground area so we've attached two attachments that talk about the b c progress. exhibit c is the base case which is the that was similar to what was shown on may 13th this scenario shows that scenario 3 hundred and 0 thirty are parking spaces and 3 cruise calls and an estimated amount of events if

the parking spaces were reduced or eliminated then the port would be negatively impacted. exhibit d is a similar too on the exhibit that you saw on may 13th the difference is exhibit z shows a reduced case obey sfaefd instead of 3 hundred and thirty parking spaces to that clearly it's not ports interest to book as many cruise calls and events as feasible the priority is to book as many cruise calls as possible and most of the ports inflict is deprived if the passenger fee and when the peer 27 sits empty book events and use the ground transportation area for the waterfront parking.

to reiterate the ports intention per the advisory panel was to promote the cruise in san francisco as noted in the september 2007 staff presentation it explicitly noted quote cries terms are not a generate our of the port similar to the convention center they operate as lost leaders they bring people to the city but the city lose money hour very generate constitutional returned to the city and enhances the cities reputation as a world-class waterfront city and tourist designation as well as preserves and promotes one of hitting its maritime industries. as noted in the may 13 presentation the port must look

for revenue opportunity and look at the cost side of the operations particularly the dredging costs port staff has tried to have a state of the art cries facility but that is which is financially responsible. port staff firmly buildings that the metro agreement will allow the recommendations to be set forth by advisory panel. therefore the port staff recommendations that the port commission approves in terms of described in the staff report with the caveat there's no resolution with respect to the b cdc permanent academy for its use as a part-time investor resource. the staff further

recommendations that the port commission ports executive director for the ability to negotiate different terms with metro pending the outcome with the discussions of b cdc. the approval of the agreement will allow them to begin the operation from pier 25 to 27 so pier 27 can be proclaim by late september. it's critical that there allow metro to directly book events and begun the implementation to attract yourselves that's it i want to see that peter daily and john and grass and tom carter and james are here to answer all of us here to answer questions they've been instrumental in

pitting this together >> so moved. is there a second. public comment? first person is shawn >> hi. you know, you don't have opportunities like this come around very often we all know that is a pretty special project but one of the things you look for in success is leadership and stefan have stepped up and we have a super cargo and that's james and they've invested time and effort because super cargo gets the passengers off and the bags moved i'm confident when

they transition into the port you'll see the operation that will bowed well, for everybody so thank you >> thank you. additional public comment? come forward >> good afternoon port commissioners i'm frederick. i'm here representing a group known as recreation and small property owner for the waterfront that includes a number of resident that live across the street from pier 27, 31 and 35 those have been there are since 1977 before any of you participated in a port hearing before monique was probably born on the one hand but nevertheless, they've been

living there enjoying the site we've had the america's cup there and we know that wouldn't have happened without the enthusiasm of america's cup now we have a great cruise ship and suggesting to use for roughly 45 days a year for 2 hundred and 77 dazed o 77 percent of the year this has nothing to do with the cruise ships to raise money for the port. except for the fact our right across the street in one thousand comedy and people living in telegraph hill upset because of the concert series this summer my live nation. we filed a lawsuit and stopped live nation from having another event on pier 27 or an rfp to

cause the same type of events because of the lack of how the event was handled right across the street from the residential homes and commercial prospering properties and the commercial tenants in trounl with the amount of traffic associated with the supplement we are disappointed by the modifications of the may 13 agreement with the various intashlts we noticed the only thing that caused my responsibility inform maintain noise powers even if operation and the type of operation for on the that 7 percent was relied open the police and the entertainment commission we had to sue them because they didn't do anything to stop to the noise and with the difficulties of the

america's cup. we want to make sure that i'm sure you're going to adapt that but before it going to the planning department and the peripheries and the mayor, etc. we want to be sure everyone is heard and the neighborhood this important neighborhood is important what you're trying to do economically. we'll be there next week whether we have a ballot measure thank you four hearing me today and enjoy the new ship terminal >> is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. . commissioners >> i just have one comment to question. the visitor partnering for non-cruise is that the restricted public interest

issue? >> well, i think diane ocean can answer that with regards to ac b c not having anything to the with the public trust contingency. >> so what's the basis of the issue it makes a big deal about the 2 hundred and 50 thousand and the break even for the port. >> good afternoon, commissioners diane with the planning and development division the visitor parking is not a public trust you use issue but the visitor parking was not included in the use of permitted uses and the b cdc permit when it was issued at the time, we were talking about the cruise loading operations in the g ta

and the parking and staging so marked with the events we had to call the visitor parking at the time other environmental issues. >> is there a effect on the bay. >> i don't think we see the impact on the bay brown but from the b cdc concerns around the public access along the embarcadero promenade and how the management cross over into the facility can impact that. >> how much open assess in the part is open space is open. >> unfortunately, i don't have the percentage off the top of my head particularly we have a lark park on pier 27 as well as the

promenade the general observation with the growth and volumes of pedestrians and the transmission of the promenade there's an interest not to create the quality issues in that experience one of the things we've put together as part of the package is not only what are the numbers of spaces and how this shared use be dominated within the visitor parking and the cruise and special events but also a transportation management program it includes some staffing levels for varying levels of peaking activities to try to address the pedestrian conflict issue. >> what my question is we should encourage ac b c we hold that the port and port commission's to make sure we're in a financially fiscal

available position i'm not sure i heard there was a reason not to have this parking and it's important to us being fiscally responsible and to generate a million dollars deficit budget we have to maintain it's very important i go on record ac b c needs to take a look at the pursue verify of the financial robot and what maintain what we need to maintain he in terms of maintaining the quality i guess from my standpoint in walking in that area lots of open access. >> those remarks will be very helpful thank you. commissioner murphy. commissioner brandon >> i want to congratulate the

entire staff it's been a 20-year process pee we've moved from 27 to 35 back to 27 and now we actually have a new cruise term this is a major accomplishment i really want to thank everyone i can't wait until september when we have the groundbreaking or the grand opening. >> thank you. i too want to echo commissioner brandon's kudos i made a note that's like the current giants team it's not only winning but doing it together it's more apparently everyone is working together for the better time of all san franciscans to increase the tourism but look no further than the large newspaper number of people enjoying the browning done street wharf we're making

all san franciscans to enjoy this. >> i want to note in terms of the events considered at the site first of all, i think that dates back to a number of public meetings and voices panels and he setting the recommendations that included that's been included in the efforts to have available space so of us were lucky enough to see the building before opened to the public by many of us not going on cruises we'll have an opportunity with the openness of the building to enjoy the size and the space it this cruise officers and people will perimeter in events when cruise are not under with metro managing the operations they'll

be sensitive to the community needs and make sure that the operations run smoothly and want to thank everyone not sure where we are going to end up up on the parking issue but we're going to have a beautiful terminal and park. >> i want to say one thing i didn't give the general a sort specific but i want to echo the commissioners this cruise ship terminal is a great accomplishment i've looked at other new terminals in hong kong and this is a first-rate facility it matches the reputation of the city and the comments we've heard from the public i believe what we did

during america's cup is something we xefrmentd with and i understand there will be requirement put on the events and i don't think it will impact the core of the neighborhood it will be well orchard and i'm sure is metro and hartman will work with us i want this be o be a win-win. >> yeah. you gave me a tour about a year ago great structure. glad we're on the veerj of approving it and thanks to staff and everybody involved for all the hard work >> i mentioned one other thing i respect to see the lastly hong kong terminal we did extremely well, for what we built it for

(laughter). >> we have to remember sometimes, we don't compare, of course, they have the money in hong kong and do more but we've done an extent job and hopefully, we'll make it sustain itself. >> i also want to drill down one more we'll be having shore power at the term and we really were at the forefront is providing the power for cruise ships it's more and more bam a start so kudos for putting this together it deltas our desire to be at the forefront of environmental issues and be good stewards for our waterfront. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> resolution 1438 carries.

>> we should clap (clapping.) item 12 a presentation on the ports strategy to remove deteriorated and non-treated wharves along the southern waterfront. >> good afternoon, commissioners david with planning and development. this report is no response to commissioner brandon's where where about the statistic to remove the derattled structures in the southern waterfronts. since 2000 the port has removed a number of piles and structures prifrm as it relates to the special plan requirement but also to accommodate life safety and port operational needs this

exhibit shows the piers we've removed since 2000 in the north fisherman's wharf and pier 43 in the northern waterfront portions of the pier valley around the ferry building inspection we have pier 24 and then in the south beach area pier 34 and 36 and lastly pier 64 in the process of being demolished and pier 74 those are the piers we've removed since 2000. piers that we're looking for demolition in the future include pier 70 wharf 8 and the green silos and pier 90 at the pier view gateway and we've got the

old wharves on the north and west side and the pier 311. the next few slides illuminate the various stages where we at the inn the individual projects. pier 70 is one hundred and 50 thousand square feet supported pier into both the combination of wood and steel piles has been considered a project for removal under the b cdc project where a they were short one hundred and 08 thousand square feet of the bay removal. the port has submitted a project request to the u.s. army of core of engineers under the bill to receive $5.5 million to remove the pier if we're successful in getting the