as a tech trainer and just recently i was promoted to tech training full time and i believe that even though i don't have a lot of experience, my dedication to the job, as we have said, in this meeting, disabled people do not call out sick as much and they are on time and more loyal and that dedication is the reason that i have been so successful in a short amount of time in my work history and so thank you for this meeting and i hope that you guys will consider hiring more team with disabilities and i am an example of someone and i may not have a lot of work experience, but i have a darn good job with what i have done. >> thank you miss daniels. thank you. >> i see no other speakers, and let's close public comment. and supervisor yee? >> i just wanted to thank all

of the speakers including the ones that were listed and the ones that from the public. and after hearing everybody's testimonies, i will be supporting the recommendations, i am particularly want to be supportive at the fiscal level of making sure that there is a budget process to include that position. certainly, would be supportive of deactivating the advisor group and in particular, i think that it was supervisor chiu's comment of one of the biggest reasons why i would like the supervisor to be put together again is to gather, or to come up with ideas in which we could as a city, legally, gather better data around people with disabilities and

aging. and who is employed and who is not employed and that is where i would be standing, and once again, thank you, thank you for the public, for coming today. and thank you supervisor mar for hosting this hearing. >> thank you, supervisor yee. and i also wanted to acknowledge, i have learned a lot, i think that the stories that people have told have just shed tremendous light on the challenges and the ongoing discrimination and how much more the city needs to do to insure equality and diversity as is written into our charter. and i think that we have heard a lot of good suggestions for follow up, with alameda county and seattle and some other examples. and i wanted to say, in moving forward, i am going to do my best to convene the stake holder groups, johnson and the department of public resources folks and especially the community based center such a tremendous resource for our

city and we need to be working together to achieve the vision that i think that came out of the movement of the 80s that established not only rule 34, and 115 and many other civil rights changes that we still have a long way to go to achieve. and so, with that, a lot of great suggestions and i will be convening those meetings and hopefully coming forward with other suggestion and looking carefully at the 2008 recommendations from the task force and also with miss simon and others, reestablishing a current task force that can address many of the challenges that we have all pointed out today. but tremendous, tremendous, comments from people, that i am just very, very happy for this is the first step to achieving better equality and dignity as carla johnson said for valuable san franciscans who are people with disabilities and everybody else as well. and so with that, mr. evans,

can we let's see this is the hearing and could we table this hearing without objection? could we table this hearing? >> and is there any other business before us mr. evans >> there is no more business, thank you everyone for coming up. meeting adjourned.

>> thursday, june 5, 2014, i'd like to remind members of the audience to silence my devices and and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. i'd like to take roll at this point. commissioner president wu. commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissions fong and sxhifgs are expected to arrive commissioners, first on your calendar is the items from the evidence for continuance item one u and t the form retail is

for continuance and an amendment to the planning code section 303 formula retail uses ordinance introduced by supervisor mar that proposed for continuance until july 17, 2014. i have no other matters for continuance and there are no speaker cards. are there my questions or comments on the items seeing none, public comment is closed >> commissioner moore. >> move to continue items one and 2. second >> second at about on that motion commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you under our

consent may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 3 case at 3520 through 3520th requests for condominium conversion and the next case conditional use authorization i have in speaker cards a do you have a public comment seeing none, public comment is closed >> commissioner antonini. >> move to approve items three

and four. under consent commissioner antonini arrest commissioner moore and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you under commission matters item 5 for the draft manipulates of may 15, 2014. >> is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? on the draft minutes seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner sugaya >> yes. on thursday may 22nd on page 28 under 10 the speakers i don't know how kathleen download will i spells her last name but noting that's not correct i think is it warmer.

>> that's correct i'll make that. >> otherwise oil move to adapt the minutes as amended. >> commissioners, on that motion for may 15 and 22nd as amended. commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you on item 6 commission questions or comments >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. a couple of items one was an article forwarded by commissioner sugaya behind the corridor it's thought provoking it's part of the public record the second is from the new york times and that's worth noting it speaks as other than outsider it

invents positively we're renovating places rather than tearing them down and talks about the successes that have come 239 in the last few years by part of the reason is our processes so involved and makes it so difficult to build anything new they didn't renovate anything old the only thing is to maintain what's there and some of the assertion are in the true but the important thing is the conclusion that's drawn that is my problem we have with affordability being either commercial or residential is not what we've built but rather not being be it further resolved banishment or left in disrepair i agree with those thoughts

found in the article it's certainly a good article to read and commissioner moore. >> i have a question for the city attorney and for commission secretary jonas. a few weeks ago last sunday we had a motion from the 1433 bush street and the wording of the motion was void of some quantify comments the ideas that the applicant was in a few hours or standing in front of us agreed on, on site approvals when the approval is inadequate how do we know that's properly amended and incorporated?

>> 1433 bush at least far as my not the motion that was made was approved with the staff to continue working with the sponsor and there were a variety of independent concerns raised by the commissioners the sponsor is looking at it. >> a few hours before the commissioners or the applicant stood in front of you he wrote an e-mail he was considering on site affordable that's not part of the motion or restated by us approving the project we said it's great but not repeat it while the motion was being made i'm concerned that might fall between the cracks. >> if to the not part of the motion. >> the question is whether

staff read it into the record. >> it was amended with a what staff read into the record i can look at it for this case but if it's not part of the official record from the draft motion or read into the record by the staff that's not adapted into the action or the final motion. if the sponsor voluntarily wants to provide that >> to enable the concerns we obviously want to see the idea that we forgot to restate it and that sometimes happen i recall how do he know whooer we're

catching this. >> it's the responsibility of staff and the commissioners and myself at the hearing i wasn't even understanding that it before the hearing but unless its mentioned as part of the motion then it's not adapted into the final motion. >> i'll forward the e-mail to you. >> i can follow-up on that. >> check out what happened. >> commissioner sugaya. >> yeah. i seem to remember that staff made a presentation that included that statement. that the project manager included that on site and don't know whether there was a conversation but staff mentioned it >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further under

constrictions questions or comments weeping we've into directors announcements. >> i believe you have a packet i have nothing to report. >> commissioners item 8 review of the past events and the preservation commission the board of appeals met, however, no report from the zoning administrator. >> good afternoon commission aaron starr welcome back and this week they've met with the

designation of one hundred 7 market street this proposes to change the article inspection from a category 5 unrated to a 3 trickery building the change of designation was proposed by building be owners and the community arts stabilization trust it allows the owners to sell it was heard on april second of this year and the h pc voted unanimously to remedy the change 7 of of designation supervisor kim supported it and said it's an important tool for stabilization in san francisco. the members of the consultant perpetrate did change of designation report and spoke to the arts committee the committee voted to send it with a positive recommendation.

the board was off last week but this week there were two items on the agenda there's the mayor ed lee and supervisor cowen's planning codes changing to amend that for p district for the new sf plaza program it was heard on may 1st and recommended for approval. this item passes the second reading and was sent to the mayor's office for signature. there was an appeal for 565 fell street of lot subdivision this was scheduled to be heard on may 6th so the applicant can provide the board with information. the appeal was withdrawn because the two parties came to an agreeme agreement. there was an ordinance that all the times the planning code for

the installation progressing fees the reproceeding fees and the request for information technology. which is a mouth full the retaliation fee this ordinance was recommend for approval on may 8th. also was a resolution correcting the resolution established in the latino district the resolution was amended to amend the park from the district there was a resolution introduced by supervisor kim declaring the the president of the board of supervisors to order the vacation of a portion of the street for the hub plaza the ma coffin city plaza will come to you next week and finally there was a resolution of intent to establish the community facilities district for the transbay center transbay transit

center the plan was adapted t in august of 2012 authorizes the planning code for the major development is required to join and since then they've been working to deputy the materials to create the cf d including the materials on tuesday it will be heard by the planning committee and the board of supervisors it needs a vote by the property owner and it's going to be ad t adapted by the end of the year there is an ordinance on the ballot they won't be brought to the planning commission for review or action the first is the charter fund introduced by supervisor wiener to adjust the

annual propositions from the general fund to the transportation fund to show the increases in the population in san francisco and the rainy day reserve introduced that would have the city reserve and the third a chart special elections introduced 41 by supervisor avalos that calls a special election where there's a vacancy in the office of mayor or city attorney or da or the treasurer or member of board of supervisors and feinstein there's an ordinance for the general obligation bond introduced by mayor ed lee this plaza $500 million on the november 4th ballot for the improvement of transportation this will be on the november

ballot all of the above thank you >> thank you. >> good afternoon tim frye to share a few things the architecture review committee provided the light rail art installation i might be familiar with the aluminated art installation extend from the machining line and attached to the light rail system the ar c was approving of it very have a few issues the project manager will resolve and they're up on the light fixed and they're

overall location. the h pc about tomato take up the certificate of the appropriateness in the june hearing. the full commission composed and provided a comment on 57 spine street that item will be before you at the later date questions or comments i'll forward those to you and finally a certificate of appropriateness of the alamo square appropriation advertise for improvement of the landscaping along the entry and 88 updates and a new structure adjacent to the playground. overall the commission was supportive of the project and the improvements there were members of the public that came out in support of the project and some members raising concerns about the landscape

treatment and the necessity for an additional structure at the end of the hearing it was voted unanimously by the board and it was reviewed by the architecture review committee and all the comments from the aa r.c. were incorporated based on the final approval. one other thing i wanted to mention the h pc continues to have a discussion about preservation incentives and how they effect areas for the pdr so did commission has an informational presentation at the next hearing on june 18th you'll have it on june 12th their continue to have raised some of the same concerns we'll keep you posted on their comments. that concludes my presentation. unless you have questions thanks

>> commissioner sugaya. >> yes. in terms of that june 18th hearing will staff have prepared an analysis of the pdr losses in the city at this point? i can check on that we'll be given the >> separate. >> i believe he's going to be giving a complete pdr presentation. >> i forgot the case. >> 63, third street. >> yeah. >> i'll definitely look at that. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we, move on to general public comment not to sdpeed 15 minutes members of the public may address the commission on items

of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, each members of the public can address up to 3 minutes. >> is there my general public comment. seeing none, general public comment is closed. >> commissioners that places you under our regular calendar item 9 u the moscone center from the environmental impact report the written comments will be received until june 20th. >> good afternoon jessica i'd like to take a moment to introduce elizabeth she joined the department in 12. we're really excited to have elizabeth as part of our team

i'm certain you'll be seeing here a lot more in the future >> good afternoon. i'm elizabeth from the virile section of the planning department this is to talk about the impact environmental report for the moscone expansion project today's hearing is not for an approval or recreation. this is under the planning section. comments today should be directed to the adequacy and o of the draft eir staff is not here to respond and then written comments will be responded to. commenters should be speaking clearly and slowly for an accurate transcript and speak

clearly your name and address. we'll take comments on the draft eir. the comment period began on may 30th public school. i'd like to to the commission with response to the community input the project manager has made revisions with the design changes it remains within the perimeter of the project as analyzed in the draft eir and the changes don't effect the analysis. i understand that the project manager will be running to give you an update on july 24th. that concludes my presentation. unless the commission members have comments i suggest this public hearing be held

>> thank you. okay. i have a number of speaker cards please line up on the speaker side of the room (calling names) >> good afternoon, everyone. commissioners i'm johnson i'm a president of thank goodness go group and the chair of the yerba buena consortium. i'm going to start at the end e end what do we want. for thirty years the number one issue of yerba buena and it's 2 thousand persons of 12k5b89 has been pedestrian safety due to the impossible crowded conditions that result from the moscone center. of course, the whole purpose of

this expansion project is to allow larger conventionss and more frequent multiple conventions at the same time that can only dramatically increase the situation >> next speaker. >> that's not just the smaller events but the bigger once how difficult it is to travel the sidewalks at the peek time of movement. this is observe what we want and trying to get the inclusive mitigation of improvements to the sidewalks and streets that will solve the problem we've been unsuccessful over the 3 decades to get that from the city. our mitigations we've seeking on the diagram widower sidewalks and observe places their needed

a new mid block crossing where their hazardous and the mere installation of red light arrows at the intersections where navigated no turns are commented on read and finally implementing the plan for all kinds of things on the sidewalks logically so that the open through way is optimized unlike today. we want that to be done as a mitigation required at the moscone expansion project and built at the same time that project is built. the letter goes into the legal issues how the city is low balling tenants blatantly in the draft eir. there's a simple point if the