turned a big corner we can help each other out in situations we have two ties so those principles will lay out is how we'll talk collectively and work together to improve our collective water times in times of drought and in routine times there are power in that organization coming together so the things in red s are various ties between us and additional treatment facilities and for the decelebration project we see a lot of opportunity that includes bosco as a partner and that's a good thing. >> i would like to say that the ideas on the map is not earthshaking they've been around awhile but most remarkable within the water institutional

barriers prevent us from doing things this is a historic barrier being lowered and agencies willing to talk to each other so it's a very significant step forward. thank you. >> thank you, mr. richie. commissioner moran are you moving the item >> so commissioner moran moved the item a second. >> second. >> and it's been seconded. >> i'll go ahead and call for public comment on the item. the seendz will i'll call for a vote all in favor, say i. opposed. the i's have it madam secretary next >> item 10 improvement for the contract for the contract w w-483 r r with the kj woods

construction in the amount of 12 million plus and the increased with the contestants with the calendar dates and approving the allocated balances and approve the cost of 23 million and authorize the general manager to approve the future resolution and for the appropriation for funds for the project. >> thank you. >> i'll move the item. >> it's been moved forward and seconded. >> i'll call for public comment my any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed. all call for a vote all in favor i the i's have it madam secretary next >> to agreement for the urs

corporation and ask the general manager to execute amendment number 4 increasing it up i to 4 million plus an extension up to 2 years and 9 months pursuant to the charter connection 118. >> commissioner moran moves the item is there a second. >> i second it i have a question. >> my conversation. >> yes commissioner torres. >> the principle company of this is u s r corporation. >> correct u s. >> my subcontractors. >> there's a number of substances i can't name them all but there's 15 sub consultants. >> i'd like to see the list.

>> the list it's there. let's - >> the subs we have the list and let's move to so commissioner moran commissioner torres has an opportunity let's move it. >> thank you commissioner president caen always on the spot. >> commissioner torres shall i >> any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed. i'll call for a vote all in favor, say i. opposed? the i's have it madam secretary next item >> item 12 authorize the general manager to enter into separate agreements for authorized of facilities under proposition e for the agreements that expire agreements in 5

hundred million not not to exceed for $2 million plus up to 5 years. >> good afternoon. i'm with puc i'm happy to walk through the slices. is item before you today replies the existing bank agreement with the water are paper program at a cost about half of the current agreements. the reason for that is the bank environment has improved since we've put the current agreements in place. there's no new authorization for the paper program so you're looking at new agreements to replace the are expiring once they have 3 to 5 year armies through wissop and we'll could be to the commission and ask for a reduction for the paper

program in 3 to 5 years. we have one hundred and 86 thousands outstanding on our water program i'm happy to walk through the slices >> what's our pleasure commissioners. >> okay. so i'm going to call for a motion for those of who you who have received it there's an intentivelyly line item. you have a copy it reads like this in the second to last resolved paragraph of the resolution please help me out and execute my effective of the resolution and b's it further be

it resolved i amended this to include the unintentionally removed item it's been moved and seconded my future discussion on the amendment only that believe seeing none, public comment is closed. on the amendment i'll call for a vote all in favor, say i. opposed? the i's have it now on the resolution as amended. is there any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed have we called for a motion let's call for a motion at the amended is there a motion? >> moved. >> second. moved and seconded my future conversation all in favor, say i. the motion carries >> mrtd next item. >> 1213 is public hearing to consider and possibly adapt a

proposed schedule of fees for hetch hetchy electric facilities to the municipal to the city and county of san francisco and other public or golf o governmental agencies paying for the rates or fees of less than the cost of service to be admitted to water reading or an july 1st, 2014. >> good afternoon. charles deputy cfo the next item is to - to revise the proposal charged to agencies for the next 2 years. as a general manager mentioned the mayor's office proposed an adjustment to our municipal fund rate recently and as i recall fwoorgz this commission passed a general fund municipal department fund we're in the second year of that and the proposal before you is to adjust the second for the next 2 years

as part of the budget process. the agreement before you today is to increase those general fund rates one penny every year for the next 2 years 0 so it's a half cent increase for the next two years. again, i'm happy to walk through the slides in particular in this if you want to see the impact slides of in our package today shows the impact over the next 2 years. >> will you please put up - >> it will show the counter years in the 2014-2015 columns and for 2015- 2016 and it is a one penny increases for the next 2 years. the rates for most general fund

departments have had .5 percent kilowatt one penny increase and there are other depends that are charging other rates that were negotiated over the past few years. this slide it's hard to see on the overheads i can appreciate but the 3.4 millions in the cycle is the impact to the general fund and overall impact for the power rates for next year is a little bit over 4 million if you include the gas >> if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them. >> commissioners. i'd like to request it general manager kelly make a comment on this item give us a little bit

of background, please >> so as charles identified we was in a position to go back to the mayor's office to ask for increasing in the general fund rate because of the capital needs. i want to point out that, you know, within the power enterprise we do have capital projects our joined and projects only power so i want to have a discussion as far as our rates and stuff by you recognize we operate the system first so we really need to look at that. the other thing i want to point out in the resolution we do make point to the fact that on the

bottom of the second package where we have the whereas the commission hereby finds the adaptation of the resolution will find an increase inform the electric rates and charge one e.r. more the following purposes and the last one to obtain funding for the capital projects necessary to maintain the services within the existing services. although it's in there we could add on page 4. on the resolve it is what state this commission hereby determines that proposed increasing to the electric rates and charges are required for those receiving the electrical services at a fixed rate established by the puc to meet

the revenue requirements including revenue, recover to funds that to fund the hetch hetchy capital improvement program so we can add in the resolve paragraph so hopeful that will address the commissioners concerns. commissioner moran >> yes. thank you commissioner president caen. >> i do there's at least one other place it talks about the purpose of the rates the only piece missing is these rates basically were adapted by commission within the budget as part of the revenue package.

which taken as a whole was sufficient to meet our operating and capital needs that's the one thanking thing that's not included if we could quite frankly that's most appropriate but something we'll realize those rates along with, you know, others revenue provisions a budget adapted by commission whatever day we did that the would deem sufficient to meet our operating capital needs. and so where do you think it's more efficient to put it or do you want us to put it in or add what we've stated and add an additional sentence or in the

one of the whereas on page 2? >> city attorney's office. is the point you want to emphasize is that the budget you've submitted and approved was balanced based on the rate increasing and you want that point to be understood when the - >> more specifically that they were a lot of revenue provisions within the budget and taken as a whole was sufficient to do the job job and my implementation if part of the balanced program is changed then that presented a problem it has to be rebalanced in some way.

and obviously that doesn't need to be in there only the implementation >> marine city attorney's office there's a whereas clause from the third top of package 2 whereas the proposed revisions and the rates and fees are more intended to align and to improve the rierp and replacement of infrastructure. would that be in an appropriate place to reference in the totality of the revenue package that the commission adapted >> that would be a fine place whereas in the whereas place or immediately following whereas.

>> okay. i'm going to ask you if you wanted to take a shot of saying exactly what you wanted to say i'm not sure i can draft the whole whereas clause without future clarification if we want to come back >> we can do that when we come out of closed session. >> we could let me suggest whereas on some say commission adapted the budget with the balance of set of provisions including those rates. >> i have a question would it be appropriate to continue this item when we came back tb closed

session and put it into item 13. >> we could continue item 13 after we come back from closed session. >> is that your pleasure. >> okay. so we'll go ahead and do that item 13 we'll suspend until we come back from closed session any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed madam secretary next item, please. >> public comment on matters to be discussed in closed session we'll read the closed session items first, the litigation with the leon vs. city and county of san francisco and 18, 19 and 20 have been removed from the calendar so any public comment on item 14. >> i'm going to call for public

comment seeing none, public comment is closed we proceeded to closed session. >> we need another motion on item 14. >> it's been moved to the attorney-client privilege and seconded. > all in favor, say i. >> okay. we are back briefly from our closed session. my announcement following that closed session is that the commission did approve a settlement for item no. 16. i will call for a motion. is there a motion on the floor whether or not to discuss the discussions held in closed session? >> it's been moved not to disclose. is there a second? >> second. >> all in favor say, "aye". >> aye.

>> the item carries. commissioners, anything more? >> the last item 13. >> city clerk: item 13. pub hearing for the san francisco public utilities commission to consider and possibly adopt a proposed revised schedule of rates, fees and charges for hetch hetchy power enterprise electric utility service to those municipal departments of the city. >> i will entertain a motion? >> commissioner moran? >> shall i move the entire item first?

>> why don't you move the amendment first and then we'll call the entire item. >> i will move to add a "a whereas" clause on page 2. it would read as follows.. "where as the proposed rates are one of many puc actions taken as a whole are sufficient to fund adopted by the puc on may 13, 2014:" >> is that your motion? >> that is the motion. >> the motion to amend the item as discussed. commissioners any other conversations about the amendment. is there a second? >> the amendment has been seconded. is there any public comment on the amendment? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> opposed the ayes have it.

the item is amended. commissioners, what's your pleasure? >> item moved by commissioner moron. is there a second. >> second. >> is there any public comment on item no. 13 as amended? seeing no public comment, i will call for a vote. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> the item carries. if there is no further business, no objection, this meeting is

>> i would like to ask, if there were any of them who would be willing to come back another time? first of all? i know that is a lot to ask. but i would like to check with them and see if they would be willing to put it on another time and also to comment on the

urgency on the item that they are just to speak on. >> and julie?

>> i would suggest that we eliminate the following items. in the interest. and the health and the physical health of all of us, number, 8. ten, 11, 12, 13, and maybe we could combine, 14, and 15. and 8. sounds good to me, and i just did not take notes fast enough. >> 8, 11, 12, 13, combine, 14, 15, 16. >> okay. >> and something that you wanted to say on the director's report is that we had a new one, right? >> and there is a written copy, in the report. and so, continue item 8, and continue, item 10, and yes, or no? >> yes.

>> yes. >> and item 12. >> continue item 11? >> continue, item 12? >> you said continue the director's report. >> there is a written report in the packet and so it does not need to be verbalized unless there are questions. >> got it, and maybe we call the item but it is not going to be much but maybe a question. >> or we could just continue it. >> my colleagues will promise to restrain themselves. and you know we don't have a lot more hearings with david and i feel like the chance that we are going to get the thoughts from him. and would that be okay? >> and he could give us his thoughts, and it is part of item 9. >> and maybe. >> and yeah? >> could we continue item 7 to

the policy committee, and to seek to have continue five to for us and then we will do, three public comment, and four, tep, and six, clean construction, 9, special surprise, that is not so much of a surprise, and no director's report, then. and, then, we are going to combine, 14, through 16. >> okay, i know what it is. >> okay. >> commissioner? so we will, kind of collapse the 13 into our david love fest number nine. what do you think?

>> yeah. >> okay. >> all right, so, colleagues, could i get a motion to approve the minutes? >> motion. >> and second. >> and any public comment on approval of the minutes? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. and all of those in favor of approval of the minutes, to approve the motion, or the motion to approve the minutes, please say aye. >> aye. >> any nays? >> the minutes are approved and could we hear the next item. >> public comment, and the members of the public may address the public, and are not on today's ago ahead agenda. >> any member of the public? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. could we hear item four? >>informational presentation on san francisco municipal transportation agency's transit effectiveness project (tep). sponsor: commissioners nicholas josefowitz and johanna wald; speaker: julie kirschbaum, operations and scheduling manager, san francisco municipal transportation agency, sfmta (10 minutes) (informational presentation and discussion)

>> sf gov. >> i am the operating and planning and scheduling manager at sfmta and a big part of my job is focused on how to make the transit more convenient and appealing to our customers which i think folds really well into a lot of the goals, and i appreciate you guys and having me here and an opportunity to talk about the program, and i will be briefed because i know that you guys have had a long day. and as an agency, sfmtc, and a