planning department recommending that settlement. i'm sure they'll be talking to you about the merits and answering your questions. i'll be here and outside. i don't know what the propriety is of asking me questions, but i'd invite you to call my office and we'll be glad to answer. the time has come to settle the case. it will not open the flood gates. we wrote a letter to you last week in response to the letter you received from the attorney commenting on san francisco's sign law and i don't need to put anything more in the record. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker. >> stand by, please. i stayed up late last night.

my name's charles. >> please speak into the microphone directly. >> i was down here earlier today trying to make this work. i just load my two minute video on -- didn't work earlier. i was assured by mr. ken that it would work when i came back. it's not working so i may have to come back or wing it. it's a two minute film that i produced for the board. i stayed up 'til 1:00. i was down here earlier, there's no way i can get it down now because it's a minute and 59 seconds so i'd like to come next week and i guess i'll just use my time to enter my objection, which i stated earlier in your offices that this set up isn't fair to the public. i came down here early today with my video. i stayed up 'til 1 o'clock last night. it's pretty important to me.

i think it's pretty slick. i think you'll enjoy watching my video rather than listening to me talk. i was assured that it was playing fine. i'm not getting my movie played though so i object to this and i would appreciate if the board -- in my last 30 seconds i was down here this morning, what i was told by it and it and by the media services department both is that this machine is neither of their responsibility so i'm falling through the cracks here folks. i stayed up late making a movie. i thought it would express to you about how i feel about what's happened to san francisco. >> if you want to contact someone at our board of

supervisors staff we can make sure it properly displays. thank you. >> good afternoon supervisors. >> i didn't come here today for public comment. i came to hear the discussion on the next item on your agenda, but i need to say it's very troubling to see most supervisors leave at the beginning of public comment. i don't think you're sending a good message to your constituents that you want to get the public participation, so i would suggest to you -- i do want to thank supervisors tang and yee and supervisor avalos for sitting during the entire public comment. to the others, i suggest you show more respect to your

constituents and perhaps you'd get more than 20% turn out at the next election. thank you. >> any other public comment. seeing none, general public comment is closed. with that, why don't we go to our closed session item. >> item 31 is the conference with the city attorney on existing litigation, a motion that the board of supervisors convened in closed session on june 10, 2014 regarding existing litigation with contest promotions filed on september 22, 2009. >> thank you colleagues. with that motion we'll go into closed session. any objection to that? without objection, we will go into closed session. i could ask members of the public if you could please step outside the chamber doors. we will reopen the doors when

>> we are back in session. before we proceed, supervisor farrell was not feeling well. i'd like a motion to excuse him. with that, could we have a motion to not disclose any discussions in this closed session. without objection this motion passes to not disclose the information. with that, why don't we go to our adoption calendar. >> items 32 through 35 are being considered for immediate adoption. [inaudible]. >> thank you colleagues, would anyone like to sever any of these items? seeing none, roll call vote on the adoption calendar? >> supervisor breed. >> i. >> campos. i. >> chiu. >> i.

>> cohen. >> i. >> farrell. excused. kim. >> i. >> mar. >> i. >> tang. >> i. >> wiener. >> i. >> yee, i. avalos. >> i. >> there are ten is. >> could you read the in memoriams. >> for the late [inaudible] on behalf of president chiu for the late young casen shelton, for the late miss caroline elaine rodman; on behalf of supervisor tang, for the late shawn. >> i want to thank sf gov tv

for streaming this televised meeting? with that, do we have anymore business? >> that concludes our business for the day. >> ladies and gentlemen, good

the san francisco full board of supervisors luldz i'm supervisor wiener the chairman of committee we're joined by supervisor malia cowen a member of the committee and supervisor mar it is sitting in for supervisor kim i want to thank sfgovtv specifically jennifer lowe and charles madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices and are prohibited at this meeting. copies of any documents to be submitted to the clerk and the items acted upon will be on june

agenda. madam clerk call items one and two together >> for the multiple revenue bonds for walker drive not to exceed to 25 million plus and the revenue bonds for walker drive not to exceed $23 million. >> and supervisor cowen is the author of items one and two. inspire >> well, good afternoon everyone thank you for hearing those items this are 40 for the alice griffith site in the neighborhood with the help of 0 thirty million choice grant from hud and our partnership with double rock will be transferring this 2 hundred transforming this

2 hundred and 56 public housing site into a denseer more mixed income and integrated neighborhood be aids, abets is an isolated place in our neighborhood after working with the residents for the rebuilding we're finally going to be breaking ground on the affordable housing unit this is long overdue to insure all our residents have safe clean housing and more importantly community. i believe we have representatives from the mayor's office to represent and present on those two items i want to acknowledge the constituents i see 3 that i see wait 4 okay. we've got a good showing from

alice griffith so welcome. mayor's office please. thank you >> thank you good afternoon, supervisors i'm elizabeth with the office of community structure ocii the applications for the bonds precedes will pay for the development costs for alice griffith phases one and two for 26 and 2700 walker drive the salazar is the project sponsor including the san francisco housing authority that will be implementing this phases one and two are the two phases of the alice griffith public housing site as a mixed income community developed according to the principled of sf. no existing residents will be

replaced and the calculations will rain the same when the development is complete all 2 hundred and 56 housing you unit will be retained and 3 hundred and 82 market rate units and 2 hundred and 81 workforce units this will be a 93 unit project and phased two a 90 unit replacement units and 40 percent overlooked affordable housing. this will take a look at tacks $2,600 for families this year that there will have 1, 2, 3 bedroom units their located along the walker drive and i also mentioned no existing

residents will be displaced, in fact, one of the benefits their adjacent to the existing houses so so resident can move from their current to their permanent housing. no demolition of existing units p is prior to 2017 at the earlier double rock ventures is create for the redevelopment of alice griffith. the leonard corporation is the master project people for the candle stick point this is for the purpose of redeveloping the shipyard at the candle stick point and now ocii executed the disposition or d da with the development company. lenar have required is minimum of $20,000 for the replacement unit and 70 thousands toward the redevelopment costs at the alice

griffith. the ocii is providing a base subsidy to be different among the folks. and it was awarded a hud choice implementation grant or c n i in the amount of thirty point plus million dollars for the developed at alice griffith. the c and i have a one statutory project to be verified for the portion felt funds for phases one and two this laws the mayor's office of housing to make application for the bonds along with the other funding to start the construction to meet the critical hud deadlines those are conduit financing that doesn't law allow the city to

replace the bonds this is for the committee in july of this year and if awarded that will return to issue the bonds this year this is slated to begin in january 2015 and completed in july 2016 we have residents from alice griffith and the hotels and in addition marseille from the salazar and from urban strategy we appreciate your corporation and this that concludes my report. and myself as well as the development member team are here to answer your questions. thank you very much >> thank you. >> so thank you very much. at this point we'll open up items one and two to public comment it will be two minutes. any public comment on item one

or item two. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor cowen would you like to make a motion >> i'm to send this to the full board to for a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thank you very much. machine gun call item 3 >> item 3 is a resolution approving the revenue bonds for the department not needing $2 million. >> we'll call up the director of housing. >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm joan making mar the senior painting with the office of economic workforce development the resolution will authorizes the bond precedes to pay important the rehabilitation

costs a 68 favorable housing union on webster street a nonprofit housing corporation is e h they are the current owner and will serve as the owner entity and the investment limited partner has not been selected they have a section 8 subsidy that allows extremely low income names to pay thirty percent even if householder income another of thousand your understanding unites will have their housing set for one-on-one. the rehabilitation work with upgrade the repairing or a recreation and parks department major systems including plumbing

and electrical those do not require the city to pledge repayment of the bonds. here today is e rh staff ethan painting and the director of real estate development and they would like to say a few words >> good afternoon ethan i'll keep this short. the property is the only property inside the city so i know our company and myself is excited to make the improvements thank you joan for helping us through the process and supervisor breed for sponsoring this and the board for hearing it today. thank you >> we both available for any questions if you have my and

that concludes my presentation. thank you. >> thank you at this point if there's no questions or comments we'll open this up for public comment any public comment on that item on item 3? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues could i have a motion to forward item 3 to the full board with positive recommendation >> moved and seconded. >> madam clerk call item 4. >> it's on ordinance admitting the acholic beverage special use district. >> supervisor campos is the author and laura is here. >> thank you. so we're presenting >> microphone. >> thank you very much a change to the special use the acholic beverage district that will allow miniature golf course to

serve acholic beverages. bowling alleys enjoy this expectation because they're an speciality and supervisor cowen buildings this is okay to benefit the contingent. directly benefits the ervin facility on 22nd and van ness they have the business that may be in san francisco it's the only miniature golf in the entire city. and been dreamed of by san francisco residents and has been a great partner and community organizations. i have no further comment >> thank you, ms. lane. okay. if there are no questions oh, mr. star from the planning department >> good aaron starr the elective affairs for the planning department as laura

pointed out this will allow miniature govlz golf course to obtain a liquor licenses they're not permitted now to obtain licenses within the mission district. the planning commission heard it and recommended unanimous support with the following modifications b-1 c the uses of the bowling alleys are retained with other uses that don't require an entertainment permit and clarify the uses in subdivision b-1 with the eating establishments get the b c licenses they allow bowling alleys and skating rings to transfer liquor licenses with or without within integrated with the restaurant use.

the commission recommended this modification so another modification will not be needed for a similar use for bowling alleys that want to open in the district and utilizes a defined used in the planning code for the clarity of the code. the second modification clarifies the departments practice laughing uses to transfer liquor licenses out the su d if the abc. my understanding is the first recommendation was not included but the second one was. that's it thank you >> thank you mr. star ms. lane i have a question as supervisor campos decided not to accept the first recommendation. >> we're not moving forward we've not been able to get the

community input so this will have a small control change that's not clean in the code that's a better way to get the community input for the special use district. >> mr. star this other entertainment uses so bowling alleys, movie that's right and mini golfs. >> skating rinks and things like that we understand the supervisors reason to not. >> okay. thank you. so i very much support this legislation and support in legislation and this has been just a long and widening road for a number of years and the acholic beverage special district was put in place in the 90s out of concern for the

proliferation of some colorful uses it's well intended. it was, however, a very, very blunt instrument and over time it evident up causing huge problems in terms of making it difficult for new and interesting businesses to come into the mission and be able to serve beer. i have expressed because i co-sponsored several of those with supervisor kim i've expressed the u u d should be repealed and making those patchwork exemptions is not good i've supported them because they do improve the situation even though not addressing the root issue supervisor campos and i

co-sponsored legislation about a year and a half guaranteeing ago to transform the controls within the su d. i think there's something to be said with the recommendation of the planning commission the bowling alleys we allow them to open and it's phenomenal we have a single athlete groups to allow them to serve alcohol and now for mini golf given the list read by mr. star we shouldn't have to when a business comes in the area they should not have to get special legislation because we just did movie that's right but businesses he said to be innovative to the roller skating

rink so i really think that the first recommendation should be accepted and colleagues i don't know what you think but i'm open to an amendment to include the first recommendation from the planning commission. so i'm asking for input if colleagues supervisor mar >> can i ask mr. star to repeat first recommendation and supervisor camposs position on the second one as well. >> so the first recommendation is to modify section d one c that's the machining golf course and strike out bowling alleys and put other uses that don't require a permit. that was added because those types of uses this are poetry

recitals and live music performances other types of uses that are typically clued if the uses. way - >> away was 0 it to add the language for the miniature golf. >> supervisor wiener's ideas to board even it. >> to one in case another use wants to open up it will allow that without another ordinance and the definitions. >> what did you say about poetry recitals. >> the other entertainment is other uses and i think anytime that you do serve amplified sounds you need a place of entertainment permit.

>> poetry was with amplified sound. >> yes. >> it would not be permitted with under our modification the idea was to take anti things that require places of entertainment predicament to narrow the types of entertainment. >> so a poetry recital i use the microphones you'll fall into the general requirements the alcoholic beverages and hoping there's other ways to serve beer or wine. >> you wouldn't be able to have a poetry recital use a place that only does poetry retilt i silt with the restaurant and serve acholic beverages. >> that's ridiculous