all of that information together, and comparing it to the various proposals that are out there and hopefully in the short period of time i would like to along with the city administrator, unveil some initial proposal to move this conversation along. and from my perspective this is my 6th year of having a conversation around this and frankly it has been six years of hearing the frustrations that a lot of the local businesses have, for many of you it has been a couple of decades and i do hope that we will be able to and a collaborativive way to really move this conversation along and it is my hope in the summer months that we will be able to get and once we have the proposals out there and the additional reactions and be able to move the legislation quickly after that. and so with that, and unless there are any final comments. >> no. just want to thank you, supervisor chiu, for calling this hearing and i know that this program is about as old as i am and i know that it is definitely time for change and i spent some time in my previous role working with

supervisor chiu on issues and legislation and dealing with the contracting world and so i heard from the community loud and clear about the need from some improvements and so i want to thank supervisor chiu and all of the department of relative and the community members that have shared with us and kept the offices informed about what is happening out in the real world and so with that, i will be there, at the workshop in the sunset district along with you all to hear what you have to say and with that, supervisor chiu, would you like to continue the hearing to the call of the chair? >> why don't we call this hearing item, likely if we introduce legislation, perhaps later this month, within a month, we could have a hearing on the legislation, that had the least i would like to keep this hearing open so we can continue to monitor the progress. >> all right, continue to the call of the chair without objection. >> and madam clerk, are there any other items before us today. >> that concludes our business for today. >> thank you. >> the meeting is adjourned. go

meeting will come to order this is the wednesday, june 11, 2014, san francisco budget & finance sub-committee of the san francisco board of supervisors i'm supervisor mar and joined by

supervisor avalos and clerk linda wong my noumentdz. >> yes. phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. items acted upon today will be on the june 14th agenda. >> i'd like to thank our sfgovtv bill dill lane and jennifer lowe foretell casting us today. clerk linda wong i think we need a motion to excuse chair mark farrell that's sick so can we do that we'll take that without objection. thank you. clerk linda wong call the first item >> number one is the resolution to approve the new contract modifications to security services for the human services agency for february 2014 to

january 2015 in the amount of 189.8 million. we have mr. david the ceo ceo >> good morning. i'm the director of contracts and facilities in way of background this is one of the larger security guard contracts in the city this particular one has been highly competitive in an city that's very expensive i'm sure supervisor avalos reminds in 2009 when guards mark got this contract we are before you in early 2013 requesting a two month expectation to complete the procurement progress we put out our bid in august of 2012 we

having had 10 recipients was one disqualified we scored 8g9 and can be with a grouping near the top of 3 companies we requested a 2 most extension to determine a winner of the new contract. we completed that and picked a winner which was t time security and we made the tentative ward and receives two protests from the number 9 international security services we didn't get a protest from the number 2 bidder that was the inthat community guards mart they instead filed a lawsuits against the number one bidder alleging violation of trade secrets and one of the officers the new company t ton was a former

guards mark employee so the litigation didn't name the city but had a visit interest so we talked to both companies guards mart said they will continue to provide the services until the resolution passed it took approximately one hundred days for the party to settlement out of core court ensue t ton had to withdraw their proposal so we had to go to number two bidders so we renegotiated a new contract with guards mark before you today. one thing i'll say in the previous contract guards mart wanted the observation to be at their discretionary we entering into one year contract with 3

options we're concerned about guards mart change of local management we have them under a corrective action from the adversary report and mortgaging their performs and if not performing up to performance we'll put it out to bid >> can you explain the local management concerns again. >> for the past 5 years the local management and guards mart is a worldwide company headquartered in memphis the local management manage our contract and we have 19 guards at the sites including homeless shelters. the local management as has done an "x" mr. star contract they've

bid against another company that's the subject of a litigation. the guards themselves are all subject to displaced workers act so in my stunner we've begin through 5 security companies so we're concerned that the local management over the services stayed intact because of the lawsuit they left the main individual go and new replaced them with a new person but there's a steep learning curve. as well as the fiscal impact the new contracts starts out at $0.16 higher we held it steady and it's a one year contract with the city's discretion to exercise. >> thank you for the presentation i see no questions

and we don't have a budget analyst report report open this up for public comment anyone from the public wishes to speak. >> yes. i would say the progress sometimes, it's a creative in terms of particular reason and structuring and infrastructure in order for the expansion of the geographic raise under the society for this funding things to happen see for everyone due to the contract. >> thank you is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? seeing none, public comment is closed. thank you for the thorough presentation, sir. i see no other questions can we have a motion >> sure a motion to approve move forward with recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thank you so much.

mrs. wong call the next item >> it is a resolution to authorize the public health department for accident services to enter into an amended service contract with the states department of public health for the term of july 2010 through june 30th, 2014, and authorizing and to approve the all the times for the lense agreement contract amounts. >> thank you. the director in the public health department. >> this is the regular can he occurring contract for san francisco it was a job and continue after me the final hopefully amendment to who was a 4 year contract. every california county is

required to provide clofg drug and services this is for the state and federal regulations to the major overriding change in this amendment is a name change of the department of public health services that oversees it. >> okay sound like a simple amendment thank you. i see no questions open this up for public comment is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> motion to approve. we'll take that without objection. ms. wong >> item 3 is a resolution for the acceptance and the provider for the bicycle project from 2014-2015 totally approximately

8 hundred 81 hundred thousand. >> rachel from the department of public works the proposed resolution authorizes dpw of the sfmta to accept and extend a total of $71,000 plus as long as the state grant fund from the metropolitan transportation fund in 2014-2015. the transportation development act of 1971 earmarked a quarter percent of the sales tax and created a local transportation fund in each community to receive the funds the state board of equalization in accordance with the sales tax collected in each county article

3 appropriated 2 percent of the sales tax for the purpose of funding the bicycle and pedestrian and road development projects the funds are looked at by the transportation funds to the 9 bay area county. dpw and the sfmta has a collaboration and those are the fund in the package. as you see we're dividing the funds equally mta proposed to use 8 hundred thousand plus for the maintenance of various bike facility projects including bike expansion. dpw proposes to use $202,000 because. the sidewalks improvement and

the remaining $202,400 will be used for planning and designs throughout the city. those programs locations are selected from a list development by dpw and the mayor's office of disability it will be constructed the following fiscal year 2016 using for the sales tax measure funds. the mta doesn't require the counties provide local matching funds. i'm joined by mta and the dpw program staff and if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them >> thank you, ms. alonzo open this up for public comment anyone from the public wishes to speak, please come forward. >> go ahead. >> i've been in jerry for the

planning project to be created if the go holistic wholesale be objective plan to 10 thousand 10 thousand tense thousand difference >> is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. . i have a question about the mta accommodate out of curiosity supervisor campos and i have questions >> of the $440,000 the $10,000 will go towards the bicycle project by the 15 stations and one hundred and 15 additional bikes. >> i think it was detailed a

little bit because of some kind of change in the company that was installing them or what's the progress on the expansion plans do you know. >> the planning stations in place by the end of the calendar year they're working through the schedule but that's the current plan. >> what was there going to be a change in the bayer entity. >> their preparing a request to potentially finding a new contractor maybe the same contractor. >> thank you. so i see no questions. so colleagues, can we move this forward with a positive recommendation without objection >> ms. wong call the last item. >> number 4 is a resolution to

the pufrdz office to accept a grant from the board of state for the purpose of implementing illegal education advocacy for the period of december 31st, 2014. >> good morning. >> good morning, supervisors we have lauren who is our expert education federal reserve the san francisco public defender's office who's been the moving force behind this successful grant we're in the are third year of funding and this is the final year and many of our board of supervisors members we know we're hoping to instill lists this program in our office we have incredible and not able achievements i'd like lauren to really mention and to remind the supervisors that the work is

ongoing and it's very important work. we continue to save lives and money for the city when we're keeping youth in their appropriate educational programs and out of jail >> morning i want to highlight a few things over the pass 2 1/2 years we've served 2 hundred and 050 students in san francisco we have less than a 13 percent recidivism rate and students have increased their attention in school if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them. >> actually, i was going to ask about the funding and i know that this is residenttively authorizing funding but what happens in the future for the funding for the program. >> with your support we hope we

have this funding for the education attorney and our youth advocate but we're hoping to fund a paralegal position because as it is we have well exceeded our target population of one hundred 4th of july per year and actually turning down cases where our lawyers are making referral so the need it there i think the mayor has been supportive of funding the education attorney position and the youth advocate but we're looking forward to adding another position the paralegal position. i know that given the program it's a model program that cities are looking at this is money wisely spent from our city budget. >> can you talk about how this program fits within a broader

approach within the subsequent and the city. >> well, i think that laura i lauren can address that with our partners being the courts the probation and the da and the community-based organizations obviously the unified school district and the youth and family in community. >> i'm sure you're aware of there are a lot of really excellent programs moving forward with the restoring of justice what we've been able to do within the center is provide a strong link between the programs at the school sites in with the court and probation department and the city attorney's office and make sure we're matching up what what see

happening. >> it sounds like the reduced recidivism at the school board level fewer x permission cases but at the lower levels looking at the supports for the young people to turn around their lives and it's a wonderful program thank you very much for presenting today. open this up for public comment is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? >> okay. >> on the outgoing program it's important for the 10 thousand practice steps for successful like it requires 10 thousand practice training steps to achieve the positions thank you. >> thank you, sir. anyone else want to speak any public comment on that item? .

supervisor avalos moves this forward >> clerk linda wong madam clerk, is there any further business before the committee? >> no, mr. chair. >> thank you meeting adjourned the san francisco full board of supervisors luldz i'm supervisor wiener the chairman of committee we're joined by supervisor malia

cowen a member of the committee and supervisor mar it is sitting in for supervisor kim i want to thank sfgovtv specifically jennifer lowe and charles madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices and are prohibited at this meeting. copies of any documents to be submitted to the clerk and the items acted upon will be on june agenda. madam clerk call items one and two together >> for the multiple revenue bonds for walker drive not to exceed to 25 million plus and the revenue bonds for walker drive not to exceed $23 million.

>> and supervisor cowen is the author of items one and two. inspire >> well, good afternoon everyone thank you for hearing those items this are 40 for the alice griffith site in the neighborhood with the help of 0 thirty million choice grant from hud and our partnership with double rock will be transferring this 2 hundred transforming this 2 hundred and 56 public housing site into a denseer more mixed income and integrated neighborhood be aids, abets is an isolated place in our neighborhood after working with

the residents for the rebuilding we're finally going to be breaking ground on the affordable housing unit this is long overdue to insure all our residents have safe clean housing and more importantly community. i believe we have representatives from the mayor's office to represent and present on those two items i want to acknowledge the constituents i see 3 that i see wait 4 okay. we've got a good showing from alice griffith so welcome. mayor's office please. thank you >> thank you good afternoon, supervisors i'm elizabeth with the office of community structure ocii the applications for the bonds precedes will pay for the development costs for

alice griffith phases one and two for 26 and 2700 walker drive the salazar is the project sponsor including the san francisco housing authority that will be implementing this phases one and two are the two phases of the alice griffith public housing site as a mixed income community developed according to the principled of sf. no existing residents will be replaced and the calculations will rain the same when the development is complete all 2 hundred and 56 housing you unit will be retained and 3 hundred and 82 market rate units and 2 hundred and 81 workforce units this will be a 93 unit project

and phased two a 90 unit replacement units and 40 percent overlooked affordable housing. this will take a look at tacks $2,600 for families this year that there will have 1, 2, 3 bedroom units their located along the walker drive and i also mentioned no existing residents will be displaced, in fact, one of the benefits their adjacent to the existing houses so so resident can move from their current to their permanent housing. no demolition of existing units p is prior to 2017 at the earlier double rock ventures is create for the redevelopment of

alice griffith. the leonard corporation is the master project people for the candle stick point this is for the purpose of redeveloping the shipyard at the candle stick point and now ocii executed the disposition or d da with the development company. lenar have required is minimum of $20,000 for the replacement unit and 70 thousands toward the redevelopment costs at the alice griffith. the ocii is providing a base subsidy to be different among the folks. and it was awarded a hud choice implementation grant or c n i in the amount of thirty point plus million dollars for the

developed at alice griffith. the c and i have a one statutory project to be verified for the portion felt funds for phases one and two this laws the mayor's office of housing to make application for the bonds along with the other funding to start the construction to meet the critical hud deadlines those are conduit financing that doesn't law allow the city to replace the bonds this is for the committee in july of this year and if awarded that will return to issue the bonds this year this is slated to begin in january 2015 and completed in july 2016 we have residents from

alice griffith and the hotels and in addition marseille from the salazar and from urban strategy we appreciate your corporation and this that concludes my report. and myself as well as the development member team are here to answer your questions. thank you very much >> thank you. >> so thank you very much. at this point we'll open up items one and two to public comment it will be two minutes. any public comment on item one or item two. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor cowen would you like to make a motion >> i'm to send this to the full board to for a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thank you very much. machine gun call item3