tv [untitled] June 16, 2014 2:30am-3:01am PDT
2:30 am
we ask appropriate experts their experts on cholesterol if we ask the experts to come and present their prospective on the issue we've looked for rooms to have an evening meeting to open this up to the public there were none available i i know none available in september we'll have to do it around our agenda time we could have time in august. so the resolution is before i. >> all right. any discussion >> yes. i'd like to talk about the foreman maybe get a boarder
2:31 am
participation and maybe there is another venue around the city plaza in this immediate area we - i took the mandate be ethnical training i have to walk up and down the street to find an entrance there maybe another ruin like the library but i think we need to give active thought to the possibility of having this may be a designated hour where we can get a boarder audience and do a special mailing to our membership and retirees they might be interested. that's just a request it didn't have to be in the confines of our celebrated cake house here.
2:32 am
>> any other discussion or comments. do i have a motion >> i see move i move the accepts of the resolution to the additional guidance to the staff they seek alternative venues that might be appropriate for the forum and it's timing. >> i'll second. >> second any public comment on that item? no. okay in favor. i >> opposed? it's unanimous if favor. >> item 15 vote on whether or not to cancel the july health board meeting. director dodd >> in years past we'll not had a meeting in july so this follows the previous calendars.
2:33 am
>> will the city be able to get along with us not meeting? >> a motion. >> i so move. >> second. okay. any public comment on that item? all >> can i comment the rate hearing will be on july 9th and 15 so if you're missing the health service meetings you're welcome to come to at the board the july 9th meeting in particular that's all the work you've done in the last 3 months will be presented you recall that was quite a meeting last year. >> is that the committee. >> the july 9th is the whole board. >> thank you. >> all right. it's been moved and seconded arrest is there any public comment oh, i already did that in favor.
2:34 am
opposed. no opposition. item 16 and item 16 action item election of health board officers president and vice president for the 2014-2015 president bris less than >> the point and vice president commissioner limb. this president and vice president commissioner lemon limb and i are termed out so the nomination is in order we can take those nominations together. so i nominate commissioner frazier for president and commissioner scott for vice president >> second. all right. any discussion. any objections >> i'm not accepting.
2:35 am
(laughter). >> any public comment i don't need a second on this. any public comment on that item? all right. all in favor of president as confirmation frazier and vice president commissioner scott. all in favor, say i. opposed? no objection. all right. thank you. great. that's the main part of our business. item number 17 >> item 17 discussion item report on the health care issues if any. >> anyone come forward on this item. nothing. already any public comment on that item? seeing none. item 18 >> item 18 discussion item opportunity to place items on future agendas. >> i'd like to hear from the
2:36 am
gender on the urgent care vendors at the some meeting where they were and their times not just for san francisco. we had a testimony last time will someone from someone who searched for urgent care facilities and couldn't find one it's important the vendors know where the urgent care facilities are on the website and i stooped stopped by one and the doctor was not in i was not looking for one someone was there looking for a doctor and had an emergency and sounded like the gentleman that spoke last time i think it's important i've never been able to know where they were without calling up and getting vague answers so if
2:37 am
we're serious about the urgent care facilities i want to know what are the hours and i want to hear that at our next meeting i know kaiser - i would like the bay area but most of kaiser is at a kaiser facility; right? >> yeah. >> but as far as the united health care and blue cross blue shield i would very much like to see exactly where people are supposed to go that's my question any one else. any public comment on that item? item 19. item 19 discussions item opportunity for the public to comment on any matters between
2:38 am
2:40 am
2:41 am
i'm supervisor mar and joined by pervisor avalos and clerk linda wong my noumentdz. >> yes. phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. items acted upon today will be on the june 14th agenda. >> i'd like to thank our sfgovtv bill dill lane and jennifer lowe foretell casting us today. clerk linda wong i think we need a motion to excuse chair mark farrell that's sick so can we do that we'll take that without objection. thank you. clerk linda wong call the first item >> number one is the resolution to approve the new contract modifications to security services for the human services
2:42 am
agency for february 2014 to january 2015 in the amount of 189.8 million. we have mr. david the ceo ceo >> good morning. i'm the director of contracts and facilities in way of background this is one of the larger security guard contracts in the city this particular one has been highly competitive in an city that's very expensive i'm sure supervisor avalos reminds in 2009 when guards mark got this contract we are before you in early 2013 requesting a two month expectation to complete the procurement progress we put out our bid in august of 2012 we
2:43 am
having had 10 recipients was one disqualified we scored 8g9 and can be with a grouping near the top of 3 companies we requested a 2 most extension to determine a winner of the new contract. we completed that and picked a winner which was t time security and we made the tentative ward and receives two protests from the number 9 international security services we didn't get a protest from the number 2 bidder that was the inthat community guards mart they instead filed a lawsuits against the number one bidder alleging violation of trade secrets and one of the officers the new
2:44 am
company t ton was a former guards mark employee so the litigation didn't name the city but had a visit interest so we talked to both companies guards mart said they will continue to provide the services until the resolution passed it took approximately one hundred days for the party to settlement out of core court ensue t ton had to withdraw their proposal so we had to go to number two bidders so we renegotiated a new contract with guards mark before you today. one thing i'll say in the previous contract guards mart wanted the observation to be at their discretionary we entering
2:45 am
into one year contract with 3 options we're concerned about guards mart change of local management we have them under a corrective action from the adversary report and mortgaging their performs and if not performing up to performance we'll put it out to bid >> can you explain the local management concerns again. >> for the past 5 years the local management and guards mart is a worldwide company headquartered in memphis the local management manage our contract and we have 19 guards at the sites including homeless shelters. the local management as has done an "x" mr. star contract they've
2:46 am
bid against another company that's the subject of a litigation. the guards themselves are all subject to displaced workers act so in my stunner we've begin through 5 security companies so we're concerned that the local management over the services stayed intact because of the lawsuit they left the main individual go and new replaced them with a new person but there's a steep learning curve. as well as the fiscal impact the new contracts starts out at $0.16 higher we held it steady and it's a one year contract with the city's discretion to
2:47 am
exercise. >> thank you for the presentation i see no questions and we don't have a budget analyst report report open this up for public comment anyone from the public wishes to speak. >> yes. i would say the progress sometimes, it's a creative in terms of particular reason and structuring and infrastructure in order for the expansion of the geographic raise under the society for this funding things to happen see for everyone due to the contract. >> thank you is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? seeing none, public comment is closed. thank you for the thorough presentation, sir. i see no other questions can we have a motion >> sure a motion to approve move forward with
2:48 am
recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thank you so much. mrs. wong call the next item >> it is a resolution to authorize the public health department for accident services to enter into an amended service contract with the states department of public health for the term of july 2010 through june 30th, 2014, and authorizing and to approve the all the times for the lense agreement contract amounts. >> thank you. the director in the public health department. >> this is the regular can he occurring contract for san francisco it was a job and continue after me the final hopefully amendment to who was a 4 year contract.
2:49 am
every california county is required to provide clofg drug and services this is for the state and federal regulations to the major overriding change in this amendment is a name change of the department of public health services that oversees it. >> okay sound like a simple amendment thank you. i see no questions open this up for public comment is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> motion to approve. we'll take that without objection. ms. wong >> item 3 is a resolution for the acceptance and the provider for the bicycle project from
2:50 am
2014-2015 totally approximately 8 hundred 81 hundred thousand. >> rachel from the department of public works the proposed resolution authorizes dpw of the sfmta to accept and extend a total of $71,000 plus as long as the state grant fund from the metropolitan transportation fund in 2014-2015. the transportation development act of 1971 earmarked a quarter percent of the sales tax and created a local transportation fund in each community to receive the funds the state board of equalization in accordance with the sales tax
2:51 am
collected in each county article 3 appropriated 2 percent of the sales tax for the purpose of funding the bicycle and pedestrian and road development projects the funds are looked at by the transportation funds to the 9 bay area county. dpw and the sfmta has a collaboration and those are the fund in the package. as you see we're dividing the funds equally mta proposed to use 8 hundred thousand plus for the maintenance of various bike facility projects including bike expansion. dpw proposes to use $202,000
2:52 am
because. the sidewalks improvement and the remaining $202,400 will be used for planning and designs throughout the city. those programs locations are selected from a list development by dpw and the mayor's office of disability it will be constructed the following fiscal year 2016 using for the sales tax measure funds. the mta doesn't require the counties provide local matching funds. i'm joined by mta and the dpw program staff and if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them >> thank you, ms. alonzo open this up for public comment anyone from the public wishes to speak, please come forward. >> go ahead. >> i've been in jerry for the
2:53 am
planning project to be created if the go holistic wholesale be objective plan to 10 thousand 10 thousand tense thousand difference >> is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. . i have a question about the mta accommodate out of curiosity supervisor campos and i have questions >> of the $440,000 the $10,000 will go towards the bicycle project by the 15 stations and one hundred and 15 additional bikes. >> i think it was detailed a
2:54 am
little bit because of some kind of change in the company that was installing them or what's the progress on the expansion plans do you know. >> the planning stations in place by the end of the calendar year they're working through the schedule but that's the current plan. >> what was there going to be a change in the bayer entity. >> their preparing a request to potentially finding a new contractor maybe the same contractor. >> thank you. so i see no questions. so colleagues, can we move this forward with a positive recommendation without objection >> ms. wong call the last item. >> number 4 is a resolution to
2:55 am
the pufrdz office to accept a grant from the board of state for the purpose of implementing illegal education advocacy for the period of december 31st, 2014. >> good morning. >> good morning, supervisors we have lauren who is our expert education federal reserve the san francisco public defender's office who's been the moving force behind this successful grant we're in the are third year of funding and this is the final year and many of our board of supervisors members we know we're hoping to instill lists this program in our office we have incredible and not able achievements i'd like lauren to really mention and to remind the
2:56 am
supervisors that the work is ongoing and it's very important work. we continue to save lives and money for the city when we're keeping youth in their appropriate educational programs and out of jail >> morning i want to highlight a few things over the pass 2 1/2 years we've served 2 hundred and 050 students in san francisco we have less than a 13 percent recidivism rate and students have increased their attention in school if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them. >> actually, i was going to ask about the funding and i know that this is residenttively authorizing funding but what happens in the future for the funding for the program.
2:57 am
>> with your support we hope we have this funding for the education attorney and our youth advocate but we're hoping to fund a paralegal position because as it is we have well exceeded our target population of one hundred 4th of july per year and actually turning down cases where our lawyers are making referral so the need it there i think the mayor has been supportive of funding the education attorney position and the youth advocate but we're looking forward to adding another position the paralegal position. i know that given the program it's a model program that cities are looking at this is money wisely spent from our city budget. >> can you talk about how this
2:58 am
program fits within a broader approach within the subsequent and the city. >> well, i think that laura i lauren can address that with our partners being the courts the probation and the da and the community-based organizations obviously the unified school district and the youth and family in community. >> i'm sure you're aware of there are a lot of really excellent programs moving forward with the restoring of justice what we've been able to do within the center is provide a strong link between the programs at the school sites in with the court and probation department and the city attorney's office and make sure we're matching up what what see
2:59 am
happening. >> it sounds like the reduced recidivism at the school board level fewer x permission cases but at the lower levels looking at the supports for the young people to turn around their lives and it's a wonderful program thank you very much for presenting today. open this up for public comment is there anyone who wishes to speak on the item? >> okay. >> on the outgoing program it's important for the 10 thousand practice steps for successful like it requires 10 thousand practice training steps to achieve the positions thank you. >> thank you, sir. anyone else want to speak any public comment on that item? .
3:00 am
62 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on