power supervisor mar signals. but i'm so, so thankful that pedestrian is finally getting its day and i really, really hope that your leadership inspires the city of los angeles -- [laughter] >> -- when i get down there because i have made a pitch to every policy maker that i've met that the one thing that san francisco was able to really get on the same page about was safety, and that i hope that they are inspired by your leadership and we can bring that down south. and i really look forward to partnering with the city of san francisco on automated speed enforcement sometime in the next legislative session. but i just want to recognize my, my supervisor bridget smith, leadership of jerry robbins, ed reiskin, my fantastic team, you all, and really the ; isn't that right

and amazing aides that you have in your offices. they have really been our partners on some of our most difficult projects. and kudos to you for bringing aboard and supporting such smart passionate folks to drive and deliver an agenda together for great 21st century streets in san francisco. so, i will miss you guys tremendously and it is a very bitter sweet good-bye for me but i really appreciate all the support and partnership that you have offered in my time here. thanks. (applause)

>> our next and final commendation for the day will be provided by supervisor mar, who i understand has a number of commendations. >> thank you, president chiu. as many people know, this past sunday was the one-year anniversary of the tragic crash, asianic errol flight 214 crash from july 16, 2013, and i'm humbled to be here with five amazingly courageous he roic -- heroic airfield security officers from our san francisco airport. and before i call them up here to come accept these commendations, i wanted to reflect a little bit on the

one-year anniversary. so, the crash of the asianic flight 214 occurred at 11:28 a.m. on july 6. the plane carried 291 passengers and 16 crew members. more than half of the passengers were chinese nationals, many of them were students along with a large number of south korean and american nationals as well. three died [speaker not understood] and 181 people were injured with 12 in critical condition. these heroic airfield security officers risked their lives and saved many people and helped kind of many as they suffered on the airfield. today they are also here with many representatives from the service employees international union, their union as well. and i wanted to thank arianna kass nova from seiu and

[speaker not understood] from the san francisco airport for helping us honor these amazing five public employees. their names are henry choi, who was the first on the scene. so, we talk about first responders. hes was the absolute first person on the seen. also john [speaker not understood], alexis [speaker not understood], ryan [speaker not understood], bernardo [speaker not understood] and i wanted to read a little what each of thea brave folks did. the first on the scene was henry choi who was ~ -- who assisted a flight attendant that was trapped inside a plane. he's been serving as an airfield security officer for seven years. john bekowski found the hand of a flight attendant who had been ejected from the plane to encourage her until help arrived. understand there is a burning plane by them risking their lives hoping the plane does not

blow up while they're saving others. alexis is an 11 year vet with the s.s. airport. he carried three people off the plane and stayed with them, stayed with an elderly woman who could not move a safe distance from the plane ~ and he stayed with her regardless, even though there is the danger of explosion occurring right by him. he risked his life to save others. ryan horn is a 14 year veteran airfield security officer. he helped to coordinate the actions of all the airfield security officers. i believe there's about 20 at the airport, but these five were really critical in helping to save lives. and lastly, number five is bernardo magana who discovered and sought help for critically injured flight attendants and he's been serving at s.f. security officer 12 years. all these airfield security officers provided a great service and are deserving of our appreciation from our city of san francisco. they risked their lives to help save others and on behalf of the san francisco board of

supervisors and our city and county, i wanted to thank and acknowledge them. i want -- before we ask if other supervisors wanted to say a few words, i wanted to ask if we could show a short clip on their heroism on july 6, 2013. i think we have the video set up and victor lim from my staff will hit play. [video presentation] >> [speaker not understood]. >> [speaker not understood] more than 30 feet from that fire. they were really standing on the wing. i had to get everybody away from the aircraft. >> safety officer mentioned a lot of people walking, walking wounded and people coming off the airplane. [speaker not understood]. hopefully there's a lot more coming off walking. >> right.

and knowing i survived it is probably the best [speaker not understood] and i'm only no more than 100 feet away from it. and it was pretty much -- thats was the most i had to choose. do i run or do i stay? because she is in no condition to run. or even so much as move or carry her. but that's when i just [speaker not understood]. and just pray much, did a lot of praying that nothing exploded. and you can hear it in our radio, the recordings of that day. there were sick minutes of us just coordinating everything, working together and getting the assets out to ambulanceseses and everything. >> i see a human flash that catches my eye.

it can't be [speaker not understood], and there it is, somebody waving at me. and, so, i got on my truck and ran up to him. it was a flight attendant who got ejected from the aircraft. [speaker not understood]. i ended up finding that girl and making the call that we needed an ambulance. >> essentially for all the [speaker not understood] that we had out there, we were their hope. ~ [end] >> thank you. i'd like to ask if [speaker not understood] could escort our heroes, [speaker not understood], alexis, brian horn and [speaker not understood]. >> skew me, you forgot one. ~ excuse me can you all stand up, please? thank you for your service. >> can we have a round of applause? [cheering and applauding] >> thank you, supervisor mar.

(applause) >> first of all, to eric mar and the rest of the board of supervisors, i think i can speak for everyone when i say that we are very humbled that the city of san francisco has elected to honor us today. keeping it very short, collectively a we've talked about this over the last year, the question has been, were we trained to do this? but just recently, just speaking solely for myself, i recognize now that it whatant all about what we were trained to do that day or whats was the right thing to do. rather we were doing it because

people needed our assistance, many of them who couldn't move on their own. so, we just committed ourselves to doing the right thing, and that was helping our fellow man. so, once again, i'd like to thank you very much for honoring us. while only a small percentage of us are being honored today, i'd like to say that i'm very, very honored to work with airfield operations of san francisco. thank you. (applause)

>> thank you very much.

>> thank you. (applause) >> thank you, supervisor mar. and thank you to our amazing first responders. with that, madam clerk, could you please call the item related to the annual budget which would be item 8 through 9 with the exception of 12 through 13? >> purchase student to chart section [speaker not understood], item 8 through 39 except for items 12 to 13 are for introduction purpose he he. the board shall not adopt the budget items, fee ordinanceses and grant resolutionses associated with the annual budget and appropriation ordinance to appropriate the estimated receipts and the annual salary ordinance to enumerate position in the annual budget and appropriation

ordinances for fiscal years 2014 through 15 and 15 through 16. >> thank you. and, colleague, as our clerk has just said, these item will be continued to our next meeting under our city charter. with that, madam clerk, can you please call items 12 and 13 related to the general obligation bonds having to do with transportation and road improvement? actually our clerk asked to us do a motion to technically continue these item. if i could have a motion to continue these budget item. motion by supervisor farrell and seconded by supervisor mar, we can continue all of these item to the 15th of july. without objection that should be the case. items 12 and 13, madam clerk. >> items 12 and 13 are the ordinances and ordinance and resolution, the general obligation bond election calling for the general obligation bond election for the transportation and road

improvement to call for on tuesday, november 4, 2014, to submit to the voters a proposition to 500 million in bonded debt for the city and county to finalize the construction, the acquisition and improvement of certain transtransportation and related transit improvements and costs necessary and authorizing the landlords to pass through a 50% of the resulting property tax increase to residential tenants under administrative code chapter 37. >> supervisor tang. >> thank you. i first of all again want to thank all of the members of the board who have co-sponsored this item along with mayor lee for this general obligation bond. also, of course, again thank sfmta staff and everyone who did participate in the transportation 2030 task force for their thoughtful input on this measure. i was really great to see this item was passed unanimously by the budget committee previously and, of course, the unanimous support from our city family i think really just really demonstrates how important effort this is. as we all know, the

transportation task force that was convened to ensure that our city's transportation system is reliable and prepared for our future growth, identified $10 billion worth of infrastructure improvements. a lot are need over the next 15 years. i am excited today that we stand united in this proposal to raise 500 million dollars general obligation bond for november to improve our public transportation system so that we can serve not only us, but the generations to come. the great thing about this bond measure is that it is not just about improving our public transportation system. it is also about how we make our roads safe for pedestrians, for bicyclists, for everyone. discussed in the budget and finance committee about 300 million of the 500 million dollars of this bond measure will actually be spent towards achieving our city's vision zero goals where we hope to eliminate traffic related deaths within 10 years. so, i am proud today that we as a city are finally making the necessary investments in the most critical feature of our city and i look forward to everyone's continued support on this item. thank you very much. >> supervisor mar.

>> thank you, president chiu. i'm also very happy that we're moving this bond forward today. and thank you so much to supervisor tang and the mayor for advancing this with my colleagues. i think that transportation 2030 task force deserves a lot of credit and i think this bond will go a long way to making permanent improvements to [speaker not understood] that was started recently and investing rapid service or geary and other key corridors and arterial streets. i think as supervisor tang said, unity is critical. not only in passing this bond, but also as we move forward like in 2016 with a vehicle license fee and other revenue sources that we need for our transportation system. for us on the west side and southern neighborhoods like my district in the richmond, supervisor tang's in the sunset, supervisor cohen's in the bayview, and avalos in the excelsior, i think there's a need for much more efficient transportation that serves the outer areas of the city, not just the inner core. and the funding that will come

from this bond will be spent equitably. i'm very proud that the transportation task force and community and transportation advocates have really moved forward and equitable bond that will really help neighborhoods that need it the most. also i'm looking forward to moving this forward as well as the charter amendment that will ensure that there is equity and that the spending is done with accountability as well and for the blf in the coming years, too. i think we need to stand true with our transit first policy in our city, though this year hasn't been as strong as one for transit as i would have liked, but hopefully this bond measure puts us on a great step forward for better transit in our city. >> any further discussion? then colleagues i want to thank all of you for your work on this and for moving this forward. with that let's take a roll call vote on these two items. >> on items 12 and 13, supervisor cohen? cohen aye. supervisor farrell? farrell aye. supervisor kim? kim aye.

supervisor mar? mar aye. supervisor tang? tang aye. supervisor wiener? wiener aye. supervisor yee? yee aye. supervisor avalos? avalos aye. supervisor breed? breed aye. supervisor campos? campos aye. supervisor chiu? chiu aye. there are 11 ayes. >> the resolution is a doddthv and the ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] >> colleagues, can we go to the items having to do with the schlage lock project, items 48 and 49? >> item 48 is ordinance amending the general plan to amend maps 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the commerce industry element, map 6 of the transportation element, maps 4 and 5 of the urban design element, and the land use index to implement the visitation valley/schlage lock special use district, which generally includes the properties bounded by bayshore, blanken and tunnel avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, including the properties fronting bayshore boulevard from arleta avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, and including the properties fronting leland avenue from cora street to bayshore boulevard; and making

environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. >> 48 and 49? >> item 48 is ordinance amending the general plan to amend maps 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the commerce industry element, map 6 of the transportation element, maps 4 and 5 of the urban design element, and the land use index to implement the visitation valley/schlage lock special use district, which generally includes the properties bounded by bayshore, blanken and tunnel avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, including the properties fronting bayshore boulevard from arleta avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, and including the properties fronting leland avenue from cora street to spec >> and item 49 is the ordinance amending the planning code, section 249.45, to provide for use controls, including controls for formula retail uses, building standards, and procedural requirements, including noticing and community participation procedures for applications for development, including design review and modifications, among other controls, in zone 1 of the schlage lock/visitation valley special use district, which generally includes the properties bounded by bayshore, blanken and tunnel avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, including the properties fronting bayshore boulevard from arleta avenue to the san francisco/san mateo county line to the south, and including the properties fronting leland called item 40, 48 and 49 together. a no problem. i'm going to talk about all of them. first i'll start with 40. ~ i want to thank you for hearing this item. you've heard many times how important this project is to not only the city of san francisco to begin to address our housing crisis, but also specifically how important this project is to the visitacion valley neighborhood. so, i have one amendment to the ordinance that i passed out to you with clarifies the effective date. you should have that information in front of you. additionally, i've also distributed one change to the underlining agreement which doesn't require an amendment to the ordinance, but hugh lights

the results of additional discussions that we've had with the puc. now, while this doesn't require a motion, colleagues, i want you to be aware of the change of this document. this is in the interest of full disclosure and transparency. also, for item number 40, i also would like to take this amendment to this item and that i ask you continue this item for one week's time. so that there are issues that we are still working out quickly to resolve and i believe that we can do it within the next week. >> so, first of all, on the motion to amend supervisor cohen has made, seconded by supervisor farrell, if we can take the amendments without objection, that should be the case. [gavel] >> and then for all three of these items, supervisor cohen, do you want to continue them to next week? >> no, sir. i'd like to talk about item 48 and 49. >> okay. but you want to continue item 40? >> that's correct. >> and move item 48 and 49 1234

>> that's right ~. >> do you want to move them now? >> i'd like to move 40 now and just like to speak briefly on 48 and 49. >> so, supervisor cohen has made a motion to move item 40 to continue it one week to the 15th of july, seconded by supervisor farrell. without objection, that item will be continued a week. [gavel] >> as amended, mr. president. >> as amended. and now to item 48 and 49. >> excellent, thank you very much, colleague, for your support. now, items 48 and 49, these are planning items and ~ schlage planning item. 48 and 49 are planning and zoning ordinances that accompany the implement -- accompany and implement the schlage lock development agreement. that's all i wanted to say on these two items, very brief. as i mentioned with the development agreement, i have one item we're working on to resolve that aspect. we'll continue this as well for one week. >> continue items 48 and 49? >> yes, thank you very much. >> if we can continue these items as moved by supervisor cohen. is there a second by that?

seconded by supervisor kim. without objection, these two items 48 and 49 will be continued to the 15th of july. [gavel] >> thank you. >> okay. let's move, madam clerk, could you call items 41 through 46 related to a variety of local operating subsidy contracts. >> items 41 through 46 are the resolutions to authorize ~ resolution authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to execute a local operating subsidy program grant agreement with plaza apartments associates, lp, a california limited partnership, to provide operating subsidies for formerly homeless households at plaza apartments, 988 howard street, for a 15-year period, in an amount not to exceed $19,119,769. ~ and formerly homeless transition age youth, with the plaza apartment associates at the plaza apartments at 988 howard street for a 15-year period, for not to exceed amount of 19 million. with mercy housing 50, for vera haile [speaker not understood]. for 15-year period in an amount not to exceed 435,000. [speaker not understood]

broadway street for a 15-year period in an amount not to exceed 4.5 million. with 111 ocean avenue associates for [speaker not understood] for a 15-year period in an amount not to exceed 3.7 million. with mercy housing california at 1180 4th street, amount not to exceed approximately 10.2 million. and with chp scott street at 3155 scott street for a 15-year period in an amount not to exceed approximately 8.4 million. >> colleague, can we take these item same house same call? without objection these resolutions are adopted. [gavel] >> let's go to item 47. >> item 47 is an ordinance amending the planning code to exclude affordable housing units as defined from density calculationseses for projects that provide at least 20% of their units as affordable units and amending density calculations under certain scenarios; and adopting findings, including environmental findings, planning code, section 302, findings, and findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101.1. ~ and adopting findings. >> supervisor wiener.

>> thank you, mr. president. colleague, this legislation before us, and i want to thank supervisor kim and supervisor cohen for co-sponsoring the legislation. this measure is a straightforward and common sense way to increase our production of affordable housing in san francisco and it did you so by providing incentive to developers first to do their affordable housing requirement on-site instead of paying a fee. ~ it does so by and do more than the 12% minimum of on-site affordable housing. in fact, at least 67% more by doing at least 20% affordable. the legislation basically provides that if a developer does the affordable housing requirement on-site by producing on-site units and -- and produces at least 20% of the units as affordable, then a the affordable units will not

count against unit density limits in the project ~. we know that we want developers to put their affordable units on-site instead of paying the fee and we want developers to do more than the minimum requirement of 12% affordable units. however, currently on certain -- in certain zoning classifications in this city, there are limits on a number of units you can put into a particular development based on lot size and at times this means there is space that could be used for housing units that can't be used. and then if we encourage the developer to add more affordable unit, the only way the developer can do that is reduce the number of market rate units that puts the developer in a difficult position and this legislation will help eliminate, by choice the developer will be able to a add affordable units without [speaker not understood] if the developer produceses 20%

affordable. legislation will also effectively eliminate unit density limits for 100% affordable housing projects. so, colleague, this is a very positive step. we know that we have an affordability crisis in term of housing in san francisco, a population has grown and continue to grow. we need to produce more housing and part of that needs to be more affordable units. we have seen that the fastest way to produce affordable units is through and connection with development and this will give developers one more tool to be able to add additional affordable units. so, this legislation did receive the unanimous support at the planning commission and, colleagues, i ask for your support. >> thank you, supervisor. colleagues, can we take this item same house same call? without objection this ordinance is passed on first reading. [gavel] >> we can take item 50 and 51 related to the transbay transit center. >> item 50 is a resolution of

intention to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $1,400,000,000 for the city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1; and other matters related thereto. and other matters related therein. item 51 is resolution of intention to establish city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1 and determining other matters in connection therewith. >> supervisor kim? >> thank you. i'd just like to make a motion to continue item 50 and 51 for one week. >> supervisor kim has made a motion to continue these two item to the 15th of july. is there a second to that motion? seconded by supervisor campos. without objection, these two item will be continued to the 15th of july. [gavel] >> item 52. >> item 52 is a resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of san francisco to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to submit an application and related documents to the california debt limit allocation committee to permit issuance of qualified mortgage revenue bonds in an

aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,000,000 for 800 presidio avenue; authorizing and directing the director to direct the controller's office to hold in trust an amount not to exceed $75,000 in accordance with cdlac procedures; authorizing the director to certify to cdlac that the city has on deposit the required amount; authorizing the director to pay an amount equal to such deposit to the state of california if the city fails to issue the qualified mortgage revenue bonds; approving, for purposes of internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, the issuance and sale of mortgage revenue bonds by the city in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed 15,000,000; authorizing and directing the execution of any documents necessary to implement this resolution; and ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the projectindenture providing the terms and conditions of the bonds; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a regulatory agreement and declaration of restrictive covenants; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a loan agreement, authorizing the collection of certain fees; ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the bonds and the project; granting general authority to city officials to take actions necessary to implement this resolution; and ~ senior housing. >> same house same call? this resolution adopted. [gavel] >> item 54. >> item 54 is a resolution determining that the issuance of a type 42 on-sale beer and wine public premises license to larry livingston for the basement, located at 222 hyde street (district 6), will serve the public convenience or necessity of the city and county of san francisco in accordance with the california business and professionses code, section 23958.4, and recommending that the california department of alcoholic beverage control impose conditions on the issuance of the license. ~ public convenience. >> supervisor kim. >> thank you. i just wanted to quickly thank the neighborhood services and safety committee for recommending that this new bar have closureses at midnight instead of at 2:00 a.m. i do think it is important when we do have additional bars coming into a neighborhood ~ that has a flood of liquor licenses that it is important to see its new owners can be good neighbors in the

neighborhood neighborhood before we extend their license to 2:00 a.m.. it is [speaker not understood] tenderloin captain for all of his work. >> colleague, can we take this item same house same call? a without objection this resolution is adopted. [gavel] >> item 55. >> item 55 is a resolution determining that the transfer of a type 21 off-sale general license from 424 hayes street to 559 hayes street (district 5), to ramiz yousef for nabila's naturals, inc., will serve the public convenience or me it of the city and county of san francisco in accordance with california business and professions code, section 23958.4, and recommending that the california department of alcoholic beverage control impose conditions on the issuance of the license. ~ will serve the public convenience. >> same house same call? this resolution is adopted. [gavel] >> item 56. >> item 56 is an ordinance amending the health code to authorize the implementation of court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment for individuals with mental illness who meet the criteria established by california welfare and institutionses code, sections 5345-5349.5, to require the county mental health officer create a care team to try to engage individuals referred for aot in voluntary treatment prior to the imposition of court-ordered treatment; and making a finding that this authorization will not result in a reduction of current adult and juvenile mental health programs. ~ before imposing court ordered treatment. >> supervisor farrell. >> thank you, president chiu. colleagues, we all know that we

have a mental crisis, mental health crisis on our hands across our country. there are far too many who are not receiving proper care and treatment that need to be on the path to recovery. recent studies and reports have shown that over 40 million americans, adults, experience mental illness. close to 10 million of those experience severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression and close to 4 million of those people have their mental illnesses untreated. we believe and know that people are falling through the cracks not only across our country but also right here in san francisco. we see it on our streets and in our communities, in our families, every single day. additionally with the current mental health treatment options, families often feel helpless after the loved one voluntarily decide they do not need treatment. it should not need to be this way. i believe family and parents and friends need not feel helpless. they should