i disagree with that, i think there will be more tenants lost and don't believe that the i believe that the market has con transacted die to the downturn of the economic placate but it's coming back the journals and perils have indicated this contraction that the project sponsor is describing happened across the country and the industry but has documented it's coming back and i believe that definitely to be the case. allowing office and landmarks is for its to retrofit but this

market is through the economic downturn so that isn't the spirit of code it isn't the spirit of landmarked legislation. i agree there, there has been an loophole and i look forward to closing that loophole to modify this parking lot part of the code and critiquing create a carrot that the building developers will create for pdr space. i've expressed my discomfortable public library and prifg with the thought of occasional obligating the previous office space we're not talking about one building ladies and gentlemen, but a total of 15 and so the approach here is one of

surgical precision you can't take a sledgehammer to cover everything. i do believe the building is beautiful and deserves landmark states, however, the decision is not about the designation of the building. i know it's the project sponsors thought to convert this to office space and many of the folks came into the public comment referenced we're building office space. should decision today sets the important precedence. by i like about san francisco among the small neighborhoods there's a dedicated design station and this design center made me proud high-end goods but

are partnering with folks that are blue-collar workers and more importantly employing them a that's important to our economy in the city we can strike a balance to support of the maintenance of the buildings but can't do that and go about doing that by displaying long term tenants and liking like i said eating the entire pdr building i know it's a beautiful landmark building but i'm not comfortable in forwarding that so i want to if at you will impossible join me in tabling this item >> (inaudible). >> i can speak on 3. >> tabling or continue to the

call of the chair. >> continue to the to the call of the chair i've put in language for the amendments late in the game. i introduced those interim zoning controls in response from the concerns from the potential of conversion of the office space in the pdr as a result of the landmark resolution this will expose a requirement for any building that is in the pdr one d and g zoning district it pay attentions to that of displacement for pdr tenants that require a tenant relocation plan as of component of conditional use requirement this

is an addressed layer for the certainty in an uncertain area like our former anywhere described this is a continued pull from property owners and tenants this on a commercial front as opposed to a residential. i have two amendments to the resolution that i understand are non-substantive the first one is on page 3 and in the further resolve closing clause i'm going to change for the time for address time to see whether or not their office space was abandoned additionally, the second amendment is the counterfeiting applies only to landmark buildings so colleagues, i ask you support those are two amendments today so we can have a robust public

process in place for pdr spaces. it's important to note that the conditional use will note that all the stakeholders will have a say but the conversation the conversion of buildings into office space so i make a motion to amend >> ; right with respect to item 4 supervisor cohen has made a motion. >> actually, i'm happy to accept this are those the amendments that were presented by the gentleman for the landmark for one hundred and 80 days. >> we'll take that without objection. those are adapted to item 4 and then schoen your intent to move item 4 to the full board with positive recommendation?

>> no. >> oh, item 4 and yes with positive recommendation. >> two motions on the table for item 3 motion by cohen to continue the item to the to the call of the chair and with respect to item 4 a motion by supervisor cohen to move the item to the full board of supervisors with full recommendation i'm happy to support both motions supervisor kim. >> so with respect to the item 3 to the call of the chair we'll take that without objection. and went to the motion to move item 4 to the feedback full board with recommendation we'll take that without objection.. >> great, thank you. thank you very much. madam clerk call item 5 >> item 5 is on ordinance e-mailed the code forever the rental for the seismic retrofit.

>> okay. we'll wait for the room to clear.

okay. i i guess we have a popular item coming up. (laughter) imagine that madam clerk you've called item 5 correct >> want me to call it again and item 5 is co-sponsored by the mayor and myself. >> good afternoon patrick for the city i want to thank you all again over the last two years we've take the opportunity great steps to make san francisco safer we passed the retrofit ordinance last year just to remind you this protects 60 thousand people in the city and

7 thousand local workers that are employed we have legislation that established legislation for poorer people and gives low interest loans this is the same effort that takes a specific change to the rent owners and amends it for tenants that are unable to park in their parking spaces only when a mandatory parking issue. it provides a clear mechanism for the landlord to sever parking services during the retrofit and this is unclear we have been working with the tenant activist community to come up with a fair and balanced framework if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them and as well as the

director of the rent board is here as well >> thank you, sir. did you have anything to add or are you here for questions >> terrifically colleagues if no questions or comments we'll open open this up for public comment on item 5. come on up >> good afternoon supervisor i'm charley representing the san francisco apartment association we've supportive of this legislation and thank you, supervisor wiener for your leadership as well as supervisor chiu and mayor ed lee. and as well as pacific with the earthquake safety implementation committee. if there's any comment i believe that a 10 percent reduction is more equal to the partially and in the beginning of this legislation a 10 percent legislation was the number takes

into consideration around but we're nevertheless, in support of the protective we believe it has circulate for an issue and many of the members are starting hair seismic work now we're supportive of this >> thank you very much. is there any additional public comment on item 5. seeing none, public comment is closed. okay. colleagues if there's no comments or questions can you have a motion to move item 5 to the full board with positive recommendation. we'll take that without objection.. okay we'll take that without objection. that will be the order madam clerk, any other business before this commission? >> there's no further business. >> all right. then we're

adjourned.you.

>> ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ in landing a contract with the sfoifk is pretty champ but now with the opened contracting center visitors can get opportunity at the new state of the arc facility and attend workshops and receive one-on-one technical assistance and learner what you need to become a primary contractor or what information to be a subcontractor and a created bed public commission it will help

people to assist people to compete for and performance open city contract a lot of small businesses do have the resources to loblth the opportunity so one of the things we wanted to do was provide ways to access contract >> access to the plans spiefkz and a data place basis ease contracting opportunity and funding or capital training. this is and other documents that needs to be submitted. to compete is a technical skill that it takes to win a scheduling for a popular to you can win a professional services job or how to put together a quote it's all those technical pieces. looking at the contracting assistance center is our touch

point with we get the people to come and see the planning specks and later than about projects earlier is he get training so you're ready to go arrest hello engineering it has all the tools that a contractor small or large can come here. i can't say enough about the center it's a blessing. we do business all over the country and world and a place like the contractor center to identify the business in san francisco >> the reality is you need training and that's what the center is here to train and make you better qualified to go work with the city and county and to be successful at the end.

>> that will give people the competitive edge e edge at receiving contracts with the city. >> we have krafshth services here that help you find out where you need to get the skills forbidding. >> i mean local businesses participation in city projects is a winning factor it helms help the business their local businesses they're paying savings and a property tax and payroll tax and normally adhere san franciscans so their bowing goods and services in san francisco it really helps the economy of san francisco grow so its not only a benefit to the project but to the city. the contractors center is 5

thomas melon circle in the bayview area open 8:30 to 5 welcom >> pilaties. it's a creation, an old regimen of exercise. really based on core engagement and core structure and core development. we do a lot of exercise in developing that and think about lengthening of the

spine and our muscles. if you're a runner, if you're into kayaking, martial arts, cycling pilates are for you. >> programs are variety year around at various locations and to learn more come to the welcome to the june 30th special meeting of the san francisco municipal transportation agency board of directors and parking authority commission. am i [speaker not understood], please [speaker not understood]. >> director reid? reid present. director nolan? nolan present. director rubke? director ramos is expected and director heinicke is absent with notification. >> thank you. >> item 3, announcement of prohibition of sound producing devices during the meeting.