the chronicle is deemed nonresponsive because it didn't meet the requirement of being printed in the city. at the same time the chronicle scored 21.14 points. the examiner met all the requirements and had the highest score for thirty points plus. the carpal tunnels price per line increased from $2.26 per line to $3 plus per line the chronicles bid price is the same. excuse me. in conclusion the purchasing has drafted the resolution for the examiner being the official newspaper for the recommendation of the bidder who has the highest score.

accident board of supervisors has the option to exercise it's discretion to inspect the examiner or if the board of supervisors wants to pilot the contract between the two newspapers awarding to both the examiner and the chronology california >> that's is that it. >> any questions supervisors. at this time open this up for public comment anyone wish to comment on item number 6. >> good morning, madam chair i'm diane of the san francisco chronicle i want to thank you for considering the san

francisco chronicle of one type 1 and two of the none of record we take an active roll serving our community with the associate responsibilities. the san francisco chronicle is the most widespread newspaper we reach 57 percent of the san franciscans in the county we match the voting of the population. we enthusiastically provide entertainment and access for our fell resident we've sponsored the black and white ball and the opera in the park the lgbt pride parade and all-star teacher program and the san francisco chamber of commerce expo everyday the chronicle delivers

newspapers to the school we appreciate your business relationship we've had over the years we're here to ask you to award the san francisco chronicle the full advertising for type 1 and two advertising we can serve you well in handling did responsibility and is there any public comment? on item 6 okay seeing none, public comment is closed. so i appreciate this is back before us it is everyday my preference would be to split the contract as we've done in the past practice and obvious two major newspapers that serve our cities that's my preference >> okay. can i have a motion to that effect. >> so moved. >> we'll take that without

objection.. madam clerk, any other business before this commission? >> john gibner, deputy city attorney you amended the resolution to add the chronicle and to the full board of recommendation. >> did he need to rede need tw.

leaders. >> hi everyone i'm patrick the director of earthquake safety forever for the stoifbl and we have the ryan white fair to teach people about the made sure soft story ordinance and connect them with the services they need you can save thousands of lives and if those buildings are rooiftd people will be allowed to sleep in their own beds while

the city is recovering. >> we're here at the earthquake ryan white center for people to comply with the ryan white or do a ryan white on their property to connect with the resources they need. i came here wondering what to do as a owner of an apartment building moderate to comply with the must rules that went into effect last year >> we don't want to go to 10 different events people said so we advise people of the event. so we try to be incentive not

everyone is going to be able to come 0 so this fans the afternoon and the einstein >> i've decided to be here it's amazing to see all those people's here it's critical to be prepared and to recover from disasters as finishing as possible. >> i've been to a lot of shows and this one was a trufk turnout a. >> since the structure the building represents the super structure the lower part of this particle on the buildings on the corner they shack quite a bit. >> so for the floors above as shaking that top floor is fog

go-go have no more mass and we saw in 1984 more structure destruction where we're ryan white this by adding a steel frame typically you want to brass in both directions and see how strong the building is. >> we've adapted a thirty year implementation program i worry about that was a retrofit requirement this is what we do to mitigate the shom and have's evacuation for the people and our partners. i had questions about what kind of professionals are involved in this i want to start to put together a team of people to help me get through this. i'm a structural engineer and

i'm thrilled at the quality of the contractors and engineers >> we've taken one civic awesome and put all the vendors in one place. >> you have financing and engineers and contractor and they come here and every we're rebuilding are that the office of the city of administer and the depth thought i environment and other partners. >> all those things one little piece of a resilient piece of - >> and i felt more positive about things i thought about how to pay for this. >> we didn't want to have one financing option it didn't work.

>> we found information about financing they are different options for different types property owners. >> we've seen them offering financially and a pool of styles for a complicated way of saying they'll be able to pay back their loans over the next two years. >> we have 3 options and secondly, to get a loan for the ryan white and the third becoming in the past program participants in that. it is encouraged along coastal easier where we have set time like sand and a high water table

to a cause the sand to shake i'm going to get this visitation on the same bridge you'll see the water come to the surface this knocks the foundation over and pushes out the ruptured pipeline >> it is intimidating i'm talking to people as a layman who needs help. >> this is a difficult process for people to navigate we're only focused on outreach so we've got the informational and we've spoken to many different owner groups and community groups all across the city. >> outreach is critical for the

retrofitting program the city has to get out to the community and help people said what they have to do and do it and raise finances so this program is an advocate and resource for the community. >> so why not skip to the theme. foremost and most to come we've been presenting community meetings and going face to face with community owners and helping people understand what to do >> you may be wanting to know about the sf green but this will allow you to have is a loan for the property so if you have the property the loan will be summoned by the new owner and

this is pay back for your property taxes and the low rates this is a fantastic option. >> i'm in favor of the program obviously we're going to have a earthquake this is from an investment stewardship. >> after a few minutes with folks even if you don't agree you understand the concept. >> we've talked about being able to do this now we're going to be forced to do this it's a good thing but to pay for it. >> it's not only protecting their property but every dollar is for mitigation it truly is protecting our investment overall the city. >> it's the right thing to do. you can look at the soft story

building and theirs like the buildings that collapsed in the earthquake and your shufrtdz to see this >> people are getting caught to get this done and if people can find a place in our homes of shelter it will keep people in their homes. >> together we'll work out of getting out of 0 disaster and making the community bringing back to what we love. >> as a level of folks we've talked about we make recommendations to make everyone mitigated their soft story problems no other jurisdiction has tried to tackle this

ordinance and we're set to have our program complete by 20/20. >> the quality of the people are here because of the leadership. >> it's a great conversation statewide how to do this and i can only stress this enough if we didn't have the community of the san franciscans that are concerned people, you know, talking about our financing is options and our engineering requirement if you altercated all our work it's consensus driven to provide options we don't have one path but one relative for people to get there. >> it's been an excellent consumption of the services i think i'm going to need if i go through this yeah, i'm very goo

today is tuesday, july 1, 2014, this is the san francisco community investment & infrastructure commission i'd like to call this meeting to order at one 15. please call roll >> thank you, madam chair the first order. commissioner members please record >> commissioner ellington. commissioner mondejar. commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. chairperson johnson. all members of the commission are present. the next order of business is announcements a the next meeting will be held on tuesday july 15th at 1 o'clock at city hall room 416 and announcement

of the prohibition of the please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, pagers and similar sound-producing electronic devices are prohibited at this meeting. please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. c nauchlt of the time allocate of the public members of the public may address the commission up to 3 minutes on each agenda item. it is strongly recommend that pubs who wish to address the commission please fill out a card and submit it to the commission secretary. item 3 report an actions at the previous closed session if any. no reportable actions next order of business matters of

unfinished business no items. the next order of business it item 5 the matter consisting of new consent calendar. first item 5 a the minutes of may 20th and 5 b approval of the minutes of june 3rd, 2014. >> thank you very much commissioner members should have received those minutes we'll take the public comment and discussion together and then we'll act on the items separately any public comment on that item on both sets of minutes. >> no comments. >> thank you very much anyone have any comments or changes. seeing none, let's act on the first minutes the minutes from

may 20th, 2014, >> i move we approve the minutes. >> thank you very much a second. >> thank you madam clerk wall roll. >> commissioner ellington. commissioner mondejar i ab abstain >> commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. chairperson johnson. >> sorry. >> 4 i's and one attenuation. >> slow it down i'll entertain a motion on the second set of minutes. >> so moved. >> thank you very much is there a second madam clerk call roll. >> commissioner members. commissioner ellington. commissioner mondejar abstained i was absent >> commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. chairperson johnson.

there are 4 i's and one at about stipulation >> next item please. the next order of business is the regular consent calendar 5 c for the xhifrping of the reagency of the city and county of san francisco community facilities district 7 hunters point shipyard phase one improvement not to exceed $40 million approving a preliminary official assessment and the constitutions of the statement and other actions properly relating there hunters point shipyard the confirming reduce the resolution number 47, 2014 >> madam director. >> thank you. here we go thank you make secretary good afternoon to the commissioners and members of the

public. commissioner as you recall we undertook those changes for the related acts for important this hunters point shipyard the development is well underway on the housing on the hilltop this is the final action at the commission level to approve the issuance of the bonds as well as the preliminary official statement. there are a number of other steps that will take place. this is the final action with that, i'd like to ask our hunters point shipyard project manager to present this item. >> hello. there you go. thank you make director chairperson johnson and members of the commission for the hunters point shipyard. today, the commission is confirming the authorization to issue special tax bonds for the

redevelopment for the hunters point shipyard phase one improvements in an amount not to exceed $40 million. i also will be approving the statement authorizing the official statement and paragraphing others action. for your consideration the hunters point shipyard we'll give an overview and lastly give you a forward look at marketing the bonds. ultimately we're seeking to refinance the variable rate bonds and on april 15th the bond process started the board gave it's approval and this is the final commission approval for the bonds to be issued later this month. the shipyard will be developed

in two projects including the hunters point shipyard and the candle sticks bay area totally acres in san francisco. this agreements for the agreement were executed in 2010 for the phase of the shipyard and candle sticks the cf d-7 and 8 are over the geography boundary which phase one and two this is the critical part of the financing the shipyard development and the issue before you there will be no authorization. we're going to look at the bonds not to exceed $40 million to replace the bond issuance as you recall the credit was needed no 2005 when the shipyards yard was being developed and had a low land dike he knew we wanted to

convert this but explicit see that until last year but today, you'll hear the shipyard has over $20,000 shipyard and can support of the bonds. before we begin i want to give you a quick update we've got 4 hundred unit and approximately 2 hundred address 50 units are under construction today. i can see the blocks under construction outlined in the blue doted line. here are construction project photos block 51 after the 2014 groung and excavation was beginning and by august and september the shoring had been

implemented and the foundation footings were being installed. you'll see more progress here block 51 and the garage podium. and then today a few months ago we've got go buildings getting ready for their occupancy. under the cf d-$730 million bond were used for the parks and facilities and for the shipyard and the portion time were to develop the program and complete the bond and the cf d-8 was formed. to determine the maximum size the properties were accessed the

prior valued the property at over $127 million that supports bonds over $420 million this is the value to lean 3 to one that will exposed our minimal requirements of is lean ratio of 3 to 1. our cf d policy says if there's a less than a valued uniform we may get a line of credit, however, if there's no credit risk we get an exception of a line of credit. for the consideration of public benefits the project is taking delipidated vacant, land and prouz new housing and jobs and parks and infrastructure