>> it's mined that the post was not on site to clarify the process that the department provides the project sponsor with the physical poster and they're required to put it on site and you give us american people affidavit and we provided the poster but not places on site there was a mail notice but not posted physically on site. well, that being the case it seems like we can only regretfully continue this to the august. you have the ability to take testimony >> that's maybe a good suggestion to let the people talk about this but not make a decision. on item 14.

are 490 van ness i was at the community meeting there were many people in support a few people in opposition but it generally seemed to be well presented and had a right to building that people in the neighborhood were not aware of the item with that said, supervisor campos has granted those who question the more time to meet with the sponsors or sponsors but i believe the project sponsor and the sprafrz have a meeting scheduled for july 15th so i don't see why the continuance should be longer august 7th if there's a problem with that date it can be continued to a later date but if we can get it moving forward yes

did you want to respond >> i believe it was august 14th and but mr. lessor preferred the 7. >> we haven't talked about that day not that i know of. >> yesterday when we spoke we heard that the supervisors office agreed to the 14 of judgemental. >> we had to come up with another date; is that correct the 31st. >> yes. july 31st is cancelled. >> so we had to move that meeting we're willing to go to the 14 very understand it's a full agenda, of course, our preference is for the 14 that's what they would like.

>> so apparently everyone is in in favor of the 14 so i'll be in favor. we have a lot other comments i'll wait until the other supervisors comment >> commissioner borden. >> obviously everyone is in agreement on item 2 but item 4 - on the liberty street no one talked about but i wasn't sure what happened and he in terms of duncan street just to make a not to the public there's two commissioners not here actually 3 i'm going off the commission and two other commissioners are absent so if we take testimony you'll have a subtle different commission on whatever the dates are and none of that can factor

into the deliberation because of the legal issue it's reprehensible because the posting didn't happen and it calls into question a lot of things but it leaves under the law we can make you stay until we get to item 167 and hear the testimony knowing your have to have a different commission donate why it's not optimal so it's the last item on the agenda i personally am disappointed that happened. it is i would say that maybe the commission can take that under advisement but to the planner on item 15 what's the - >> the dr requester is asking for more times but the project

sponsor wants more time so maybe it's better to continue the continuance. >> can i follow-up on item 16. there was an inquire around the mandatory discretionary review >> the department will combine the notification into one hearing so the notification specified that the commission will look at the mandatory discretionary review for the demolition and the new construction for kwefg that was filed by the new neighbor. >> i'll add with commissioner borden why it was not posted on site it's clear to the lawyers involved this is also required. >> commissioner sugaya >> just to add to the

composition of the commission there are other commissioners whose terms are already up it's quite conceivable you may be seeing one or two or no at least 2 commissioners may also not be here in the future. so to hear it now i think is very risky in terms of having the composition change over time i'm not saying that's going to happen but another possibility to add to what commissioner borden said. there are ones that are in agreement looimg i'm going to go ahead and move item one and two on the consent calendar and item let's see - .

14 south van ness to august 14th was the argued upon date. did we have consensus on - >> 14. >> i think the project sponsor wanted it to go to august 24th. >> on duncan street and lastly liberty street - okay that's right we'll leave that off. >> second. >> so what was the date for the 16. >> duncan and the liberty street to take it up for and clarify number two to

august 7th. >> august 7th. >> yep, august 7th. we're number 2 >> okay. so on that motion. >> still commissioners that have questions and commissioner antonini. >> i'm supportive of the motion regretfully i'd like to have the people comment on it it will be taken up later but it seems like the thoughts of the other commissioners it has to be turned one way or another. i have a question on the 31st of july. it seems like this was a date that was added back on our calendar to replace we've lost because of the july 4th >> we wanted it but it didn't happen it. >> maybe because we hoped it would happen just judge to

clarify the calendar you've approved that thursday was cancelled. >> i want to make a note to the public the comments that commissioner borden and commissioner sugaya said are correct you may see another commission it may not be worth going through all our comments on dunnigan street but a medical cannabis portion at the end of the meeting so the people who missed work you have an opportunity to speak generally at the end of the calendar that is item h i'm sorry public comment is closed. >> the item was moved to the 16 of july since you've all rerapgd

we should making sure make sure it's a date to accommodate and i want to ask everyone to so to speak speak out on behalf of this issue to stand you'll see with regard to the dr. so we would so it looks like the 24th is a good day we'll to express our profound disappointment that on behalf of the partnerships they've dropped the balance i don't know what kind of checks and balances are in place we've make it work ways we're completely devoted to preserving the character of our community we'll be here on the 24th but again, we're very upset about what's happening today and okay. please call the question >> on that motion to continue

item one to july 17th, item to august commissioner antonini. >> commissioner borden. >> commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero that places you on is consent calendar. are considered to be routine may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing.

item 3 at 3004 a conditional use authorization and item delores street a request for a condominium conversion >> any comment on three and four. seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner antonini. on that motion to approve commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously. commissioners that places you in the commission matters item 5

consideration of adaptation of draft meetings for june 6, 2014. >> any public comment on that item? open the minutes there seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner antonini >> move to approve the minutes of june 19th and june 26th. second >> on that motion to adapt the minutes for june. commissioner antonini. commissioner borden. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero. and place you on item 6 commission questions or comments. i want to say a quick note to commissioner borden today is here last hearing she'll be mostly to the mta board of

directors i wish she couldn't move i want to thank you for your your service and also being fair on the commission. councilmember sharp >> yes. i will miss commissioner borden, of course, as we all will. jonas did you have a pictures to put >> couple of those on the screen for a second oftentimes when you come back if a vacation they ask what i did on our vacation i just wanted to share my project with you i think it's going to come up on the screen basically, i put in a brick walkway for our fractured and made me appreciate our laboring men and women this work is physically demanding and precise it took 10 hour days to get this in and the other thing in terms

of planning issues we made a lot of runs to the home depot but, you know, things like fresh grant it or certain types of mortar it's regretable there's not going to be a home depot in san francisco not in the near future but a place for those types of organizations especially, when our working on a semi holiday week but anyway, that was a fun project and very satisfying and we also had a lot of painter typed to block the bricks so when the mortar was put in it 3-d stain the bricks that's what i did. commissioner borden >> as everyone said this is my

last commission meeting as a planning commissioner next week i'll be sworn in at transformation agency. i've serviced 6 wonderful years and honored to be of service to the commission and enjoyed the opportunity to work with each of you i was be layoff at commissioner antonini's comments i don't know where it will be like to be on a commission for someone who provides commentary on such broad range of things. i've learned so much about architecture i've learned quite a bit from commissioner moore and her outcomes and commissioner sugaya with his expertise in historic preservation a tauveng that i

hadn't thought of and commissioner antonini as thoughtful comments and that's been a pleasure but commissioner antonini is very thoughtful he'll meet with anyone he's generous with his time and commissioner president wu she cuts through the noise and asks that you know the right questions and kind of, you know, didn't indulge as vera bus dialog so i thank you all and working with the planning director ram and look forward to work with in the new roll and as well as the staff and kevin and aaron and christen and all the

other staff people the planning staff is a quality place and you have to deal with us and the public trying to make interpretations of the code and i respect the professionals in the department. i look forward to being part of the mta we've spent 6 years planning neighborhood plans and coming up with a vision for the city that runs with a great transportation infrastructure to match the development we envision so the challenge to make sure our infrastructure was delivery with the orient development and move people around in the future and b be a safe place for people to walk and bike thank you for your friendship >> thank you to the members of

the public eave educated me on so many things over the years. >> thank you commissioner sugaya. >> yeah, we'll miss you commissioner borden. in more ways than one now we know who to direct our transportation questions to especially bicycles >> congratulations and good luck over there. i have a couple of things one i think we have a new commissioner secretary not secretary but assistant secretary i'm not sure what the title t is welcome and jonas can keep sitting over there. let's see i really read willie brown on sunday but in the column directed to staff the academy of the art university is

going to purchase the concord club on van ness and post which raises issues of the aa u continuing to purchase properties in the face of well - i don't go there but we all know what the problem is. secondly, that the board of supervisors i think took the correct stance on 2 henry adams in denying they didn't take up a vote but tabled it i guess. i think that the debate about using historic preservation incentives to convert pdr is that a to office really needs a lot of ira in the city given the potential for a loss especially south of market. and that comes from someone that's been in the historic

preservation for 40 years. i applauded the efforts on the part of the city and other communities around the country to include incentives for preserving historic resources in their communities. but because they're really were not very many incentives available to owners and tenants but i think that sometimes there are larger issues that need to be addressed so i hope we can have a conversation about this especially with the historic preservation commission >> commissioner moore. >> thank you commissioner borden. her experience goes beyond the 6 years we've been sitting here together and shining through the times there are a political matter about what's in front of this commission i've learned a lot about you're positive spirit

when i looked at across the room there's a a fabulous smile to look at you so thanks your insensitive and i look to keep our fellowship and i hope you move from theory to practice >> if commissioners, if there's nothing further item 7 directors annuity. >> and welcome to crenshaw tin jonas back up forgive me for not remembering our names and next week when jonas whereby on a vacation so we'll give christen our support and commissioner

sugaya question about the aa u commission with the zoning knows we're informing them of the issue whether it's actually used foyer institutional purposes we're looking into that and the potential details and violations of the current violations as well. lastly i wanted to on behalf of the department thing commissioner borden for her 6 years of service and i'll miss our energy but you'll be seeing us in our new roll we'll getting involved in the transportation issues so congratulations. >> commissioners 8 review of past events at the board of supervisors there were no hearing for the board of appeals or the historic preservation

yesterday. >> good afternoon aaron starr planning staff this covers the week of july telegraph hill to 11. on june 30th was a resolution to establish the transbay center the proposed legislation includes the two resolutions and support document they presented the documents consistent with the transit joint authority talked about the project and community members asked a number of questions proirl regarding the funding and supervisor wiener expressed concern with the funds will be used toward phase one the rooftop park and leave less funding for the downtown rail expedition and ken rich talked about the rooftop

park supervisor wiener hesitate you hesitate officer got a letter had raised a number of concerns regarding a the tax. there's one public comment in support jim harassing the item was forwarded to the board with recommendation. also the general planning code amendment for schlage lock perverse nor the predevelopment and this ordinance came to the commission on may 8th and recommend approval. the particular reason at the land use committee supervisor kim had questions about how you the department choose the land and all the committee members having had questions about the cost and unions questioned the

development and at the end of the testimony the committee sent the ordinance to the full board with recommendation. at the july 7th land use hearing we talked about the land uses and the resolution imposes the zoning controls in the castro district to require the kwufks for a proposed used to be formula retail even if the project sponsor removes one over and over or more feature since this item is proposing interim controls not required to be you reviewed by this commission it was forwarded to the board b with positive recommendation. on the agenda for land use was the determination of 2789s and

supervisor cohen signed on and it was heard on june 30th and continued to july 7th. public comment and supervisors questions of the project sponsor focused on the land use conversion of the buildings and the availability of pdr buildings where they're designated as landmark arrest as commissioner sugaya mention supervisor cohen tabled the land use designation to the to the call of the chair. also on the docket was the interim zoning controls related to the 2 henry adams it will impose the kwufks for office conversion in landmark building in pdr one g and d again, this item received little comment and

move forward the board of supervisors cancelled their hearing lecture but it is for an item related to the acholic beverage and the open space element the commission approved the edition of the rose the land use commission forwarded to an june 16th the controversy on the policy drove the no recommendation and the concerns prepared at the commission hearing regarding specific actions the city might stack to proof some nature areas like removing eucalyptus trees. the staff clarified this policy only calls for the coordinated management effort while such

management plans will be through extensive outreach supervisor wiener expressed concerns that the language the planning commission may preserve the important portions of such area if found consistent with the planning code the planning commission will not be able to take away rights from the development property and they have to remain consistent. supervisor yee and supervisor campos vote no on this item and the rose update was passed after seven years of community process on the first reading and next on the agenda was the fee elimination ordinance that was sponsored by mayor that eliminations 4 planning code fees it was heard on may 8th

that was recommended approved unanimously and recommended approval the ordinance passed on its first reading. the other the density bonus sponsored by supervisor wiener and signed on by supervisor cohen and supervisor kim and the legislation that adjusts the density for affordable housing when 24 units are on site it was heard on may 12th and it was recommended adaptation it passed on the first reading this week. the general plan for visitacion valley were continued until next week as well as the transbay district that was continued null july 31st. the police and planning codes