supervisor campos. supervisor kim. supervisor mar absent. supervisor yee. that item passes >> thank you. can we please call the next item >> item 67 recommended approval of 14, 2014 prop k 5 year provisions prioritization programs this is an action item. >> any questions from the committee oh, we have a publication. >> i'll be really, really fast. >> maria thank you supervisor kim. this is probably would be one of the most important decisions this is the approval of the is 5 year plans that the prop k savings measure it is by the

expenditure plan meant to present transparency into the process as well as certainty for the public and others to see what is coming ahead and maximize missing leveraging issues for the city and county of san francisco. on the website what we have two presentations what is prop k and what are the 5 year plans yo go into that but it's a great reference and our deputy city attorney are going to tobacco tag team and i'd like to let the committee know we get the opposition we have folks from the mta area and other folks and strangely from the chech republic so with that, last

month we had a productive of the bart portion of the state of the great repair the vehicles and guide ways and the public works and whatnot what is left is pretty sure everything else we have the finalizing of the bus preferential streets with that, i'm i'm going to into through this highlight some of the things that prop k has delivered and phone call e focus on the policies we've delivered. so you see on this screen the 14 categories that we are talking about today. one thing i want to refresh our memories and for those watching we apply lessons learned from

the past and the current context by what you see update is the san francisco transportation plan plan in the area and a whole bunch of initiatives from the agencies. and you can see those up through vision zero all the categories that came out of the vision zero projects we'll trite to commit those plans together. the neighborhood transportation improvement program was one of the initiatives and it's a call for both providing planning fund one hundred thousand for planning in each district over the years it's meant to help both develop a pipeline of neighborhood projects that are at a later date to our districts you do not go through that but

in september we'll talk about that and we have an idea how to use the planning fund and working closely with the project sponsor particularly with mta and the program has a capital component we're targeting two mid and small and midsize capital projects in the next 5 years 0 those are not the only projects but we're talking about the planning project we have 9 pointed $6 million and that matches other state and federal fund. so diving into the categories the first category 4 of them is the caltrain and the capital improvement those are the state of good repair funds caltrain was discovered by 3 entities and

the budget is negotiated so prop k is offsetting the city of san francisco local match contribution and the approach i'm going to flip we're going to take is to match the capital programming at santa clara and the transit plans so it fascinates the troy partners every year and this is the state of good repair not san francisco specifically but the thought signals excuse me. customer information at the different stations. transit enhancements this the the category that has the category of the competitive parts we've got slides proposed for the next 5 years you see the 22 philip extension with the mta their going to get is an

application i want to point out the fort mason the names in the expenditure plan it's the search-and-seizure wrote a provision that prop k can only provide $52 million and the rest of the fund come from the park services. as a condition of the funding proposed this is funding that will start in 2015- 2016 for the conceptual engineering and mta will be the project sponsor our recommendation is we have an operational analysis for the operation cost benefit and funding plan in order to to the decision makers about different transit extensions. so transit enhancement is one of the few categories we've got a little bit of money for expansion most the vehicle money is for replacement of our existing fleet you can see

there's a little bit of money to get more of the historic cars available to improve service on the f line. another category that is for the commission supervisor avalos is the station project there's a number of place holders to implement some of the projects that bart and muni have been implemented and some of the studies that have identified potential changes to the ramp the southbound ramp portions. and the cac comments the funding for the caltrain station so in the next 5 years the funding for the connection our road that was part of the package of project to make sure that when caltrain replaces the bridge there's funding for the next oakland

study and this category like many of the others you can see the place holders is over one million dollars and it's the capital projects we've identified the last one is the new and upgraded street if so a mix marsh but the stabilization on the highway project and a lot of the improvements on the 19 corridor helping to landscape helps the people not park on the sidewalk and some of the signal improvements. some of the things in the capacity there's additional funding for the 19 avenue project. there's caltrain refarsz and walk first and the water project and the sewer project going on this is a big deal and trying to coordinate the construction on the community. there's a dpep will get money

back from the from federal government so we're going reallocating it so from chris from our cac this is not part of the plan 1952 work that needs to be done immediately to prevent erosion and last but not least is the category that includes some specific funding for the projects coming out of the study i'll appoint us u out last month the committee talked about the schlage lock project to provide direct cease to the caltrain station through the development there the sequa benefits now as well as the people from the rehab with that, i'm going to turn it over to this will be more ground level provision for the categories

>> thank you maria thank you deputy for policy and programming so this guide demonstrates the first vision zero oriented educate with the pedestrian safety and the circulation category. there's 3 signal categories in prop k. and those are 20 to install signals and signs and to improve the infrastructure and bring it into a state of good rape much felt technology in san francisco is old so this is upgraded work. this thing i'll point out about signal work the consideration is to identify benefits to all modes with the infrastructure that's put in place there's the signal heads and the padded count down signals the curb ramps and a host of consortiums that are supportive of vision zero and the improvements to the

network. i will highlight that the work that's been done and the work proposed to be done at the signal location is sf.com where you can look at the planned signal locations that's been identified by mta. this gives an indication of the work in the next 5 years including the pavement workers this work has shifted from the pedestrian safety category into the signal category to free up prop k funds for others improvements to be opportunity from that category. sf go this is the corridor level the transit signal and sinking to allow for the vehicles to communicate with realtime information on transit and traffic in the fields so this is

continuing the work that's fund we've funded work that has been 0 supportive of the benefit corridors over the last 5 corridors and continue to be the transit effectiveness project on the network. the is as follows a that's done and underway you can find the location on the website those are for the modification with the existing infrastructure. and the work that's property over the next 2 years is also on the website this includes improvements more improvements to the van ness signals and the van ness corridors rather and those are supportive as well as on the ellis theres 75 percent more prop k that mta is prepping to ask allocation of in the next 5 years then the last so ramp up

delivery on the projects are that for traffic by the way of background prop k has funded the traffic cohn a program and most recently, the planning work for the revised about a year and a half ago to improve the traffic cohen e cohn program to reflect the city's priorities including shifting resources with the greatest safety needs based on the safety data and supportive of vision zero so this slide highlights the work funded to date with the residential cohn plans. over the next 5 years particularly within the mere term in the next year mta plans to request about $2.6 million in

prop k funds to complete the backlog of the plans those are plans that have been implemented over the past several years and the list of locations is shown in our packet available online at sf.com and the location on sf.com the residential program is underway on track and applications are done every year and the first grouping of the locations that has been accepted for the program will be delivered around the end of the calendar year. the pro-active residential program and the aerials program are part of the new program the pro-active residential program allows mta to have the residential locations that have not summit the cohn applications

but benefits in terms of safety and moenlt as well as an opportunity to improve the groeveng equality and the prop k funds in the fiscal year are to further plan and scope out those elements the traffic cohn program and come up with a method doing and implementation plan for the aerials and pro-active residential this is really mta is transitioning away from the program and in full swing to the new program in 2015-2016. i think i've pretty much covered the highlights in the next 5 years mta is coming in for more money than the last 5 years there's significant funds available from existing allocations so the work will be continuing as time is going by

and we're supportive of vision zero and there's also the pavement funding for the mta and dpw can coordinate on the improvements. for bicycle safety we're identified through the 2009 bike plan and funded the bike plan through the transit stations and through the vision zero large vehicle education campaigns with the bicycle access. the projects proposed there's a number of how often of projects and a significant number of place holders and the project are shown in our embarcadero and the second street will improvements the bicycle

upgrades are still working to identify the highest priority location with the prop k funds so there's we've worked out a condition to have mta could you be to the authority board with a list of projects to be delivered with this funding we expect that to happen by the end of the calendar year by the end of 2015 continuing the work in addition to the bike and others work we'll continue to fund the outreach and the education classes we've been funding for the last ten years back to workday and caltrain and station access. continuing with the highlights this is the bike strategy in vision zero again most of funding is place holders is 65 percent of the funds to be

listed and that the allocation will be conditioned upon cob to the board this is only for the improvements. for the bike circulation and safety educate this slide shows the highlights of the projects completed and underway in the past the city has lacked the pedestrian safety and the program is benefiting from the walk first and the projects to identify the pedestrian high injury network. there are large walk first and zero place holders one of the things that is an option for the committee to consider the vision zero committee could officially list the projects and forward

the list of recommendations to the plans and projects for allocation since there's significant place holder and 50 percent more in prop k you funds over the next 5 years as in the last 5 years we want to make sure that the resources in place when the projects are identified and ready to go into the ground. with that, i'm going to turn it over to maria >> we're almost there too more educates the last two categories are transportation and parking management and the transportation land use categories they're two of the other small categories in prop k they call it the fruit and vegetables brakt basket a lot of eligible holders but a lot of things come out of them the p d m parking management we've

funded the 70 environment work on things like commuter outreach practice writing these programs and the emergency ride home program and the first investment strategy and the bicycle analysis. >> it's a nicely placed photograph of supervisor avalos and children. >> one of the underway things is a cigarette way to the transportation is leading an interagency group and the mta for the private-public partnership it was trying to do develop a coordinated citywide strategy the most cost-effective but with a limited amount of resources they've reached an agreement but that's really shaping in part. what's proposed for the next 5 years. so this is the first of two

slides they're in the stuart p d m sub educator with the p d m strategy i'll highlight two the second sub let the employee program it's off and on when we studied what's proven to be effective is a hielthd area that's funded the other thing the will transportation planner this includes program elevation to make sure it's working. and a second pot of money in this category is the plan calls out for studies to improve the ability for disadvantaged community so there's funding to supplement the projects and good example is the western edition

of the transportation that's in an identified concern we've business owner be supplementing this with some of the money here. the last two buckets within the category this is the allowing for a data first to continue to identify the categories that are in need of improvements and also the match funding for the recreational capacity study this is a planned bay area and the mta looking at the growth that's assumed to be take place our transit corridor and you're our muni cord they're at capacity so as you know m t c had a tiger grant that involves the transportation authority this is a match for the tiger grant if you don't get the tiger grant

the agency will be contributing fund last but not least there's a demand in placing the management in the past we've worked on this mobility study i'll highlight one thing the freeway corridor management study this was in 0 o our sf t p if you looked at the map of the freeway network you'll notice that san francisco is the only place that didn't have carpooling so we've been award a grant under caltrain to move people first if the corridor that probably will include looking at our ramps to see for example, guess if we want to give the transportation - it's our initial work to improve the transportation for our san francisco freeways. and the very last category the

transportation and land use i'll not dwell on what we've done this is a small by critical place of match fund for the predecessors as well as the caltrain planning grant. so going forward we have the board of last currently cycle this is our prop k matching and we have a place holder matching from the last project and the planning fund are in this educate i'll note one the lessons learned from community-based plans it is that the most important part of the process is properly scoping a process and we've provided goals for the sfmta staff to work and make sure their scoped properly and we result in a visible product so there's lastly a planning match for the city

grant for the transit with the priority and lastly the match for the grant funds which again is community based. so we've made it to the end of the slide i'll say quickly in total when i consider all 21 of the programs it's about $585 million in prop k fund for the next 5 years not including the transbay and central subways their leveraging about $2 billion in funds that's a sequesterer estimate this is a 47 percent increase in the last 5 years and this is exciting we want to see more projects and benefits delivered to the public i'll not the majority of this is

the replacement of tire fleet f this is a terrificly critical project but other careers that are related to vision zero all of them have substantial increases as well this is the subsequent increase in deliver so in september in the last 5 years is the adaptation of our strategic plan that's our thirty year documents this has the policy to the prop k program but this is where we show the bonds and the agencies where if we don't have enough money >> can i ask you about the significant increase you said 50 percent and most of it going towards the replacement of fleet but still it's a significant increase how will we have the capacity within the dpw and the

mta to complete that. >> that's an stent e excellent question most of it is the vehicle project and mta once it's scoped out the money will be spent but the traffic calm and the traffic are double digit and more increases we've had those decisions at the vision zero committee about what the agencies are doing what the mta and the dpw are able to speak to that but the traffic calming that's one of our categories that have the traffic record but the program restriction that mta undertook after we have the experience we find this is extremely reliable where community submit an levitation and the next year get their improvement so lastly i'll add along with the strategic plan

you'll see the designated pilot program one of our customer service things this is the board approval the specific listed of projects where the board detail has been provide and when the agencies are ready to proceed they present the allocations and the staff will look at so its about 4 to 6 weeks when we ran that by the cac members we're trying to balance the transparency so people can weigh in and lastly the m t f gill's want to thank courtney and others in the background. >> thank you, ms. lombard and all the staff that worked on

this. questions or comments let's open this up for public comment is there any public testimony seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor kim >> so i just had a question on the school portion i know there were one hundred and 15 thousand looked for fiscal year 2015-2016 is allocated and then the following year a smaller grant i was hoping that someone could walk me though how the grant will get spent down. >> just to clarify is this for a particular school locations. >> i asked about carmichael. >> let me pull of sfgov staff

we've opportunity the work. >> yeah. that was in the report. >> yeah.. good morning with the sfmta thank you for the question so if i'm understanding you want an update on the sfmta project eave recently implemented a walking audit and the draft is being finalized we're going to enter the environmental at the end of this year with the construction occurring between october 2015 and 17 and kwhadz that mean >> right now, we're just implemented the walking which will help determine the improvements on the street then we need to make sure that all the improvements are vooiment cleared and construction will start. >> what are the examples of