clarifying language to allow the tool for savings near the for the budget. >> okay. do we have a budget analyst report. we'll open up to public comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues can we send this forward. we have a motion and a second by supervisor avalos and we'll take that without objection. madam clerk, call item no. 10. city clerk: resolution amending resolution 265-13 to revise the scope of the work for an emergency trt from six to five digesters at the southeast water pollution control plant and increase the contract not to exceed $14, 535, 427. >> i'm with the san francisco

public utilities commission here to request an amendment to no. 265-13 regarding the south treatment plant in the bayview hunters point neighborhood. i would like to take a brief moment to refresh the memory to talk about the digesters of these facilities. we have nine digesters that have 50 percent of our wastewater. there are 100 feet diameter large tank. the basic function is their responsive of solid waste and using anaerobic digestion process which destroys the pathogens in the sludge and the biosolids that can be used for land application. during

the november 7, 2012, the staff operation discovered a large accumulation of sludge off one of the digesters. with the quick action by operation, they were able to safe the digester from complete collapse. so in retrospect, on november, 27, 2012, the sf usage manager claerd -- declared an emergency room to declare the repair. this digester of the treatment plant which resulted in another emergence in march 2013 for digester no. 4, 7,

6, 8 ands 10 and 3 and 4. from august 2, 2013. the board of supervisors approved the emergency work for the replacement of this work from six digesters. so the current status of this emergency to date we have completed repairs to three of the six digester covers and both of the cake bins. these repairs have improved the reliability and compliance. during the course of this emergency work, we encountered a situation such as hazardous led and as bes stos and required for removal and found extensive corrosion and also required design changes for the structural

modification of these digest ers. they were built in 1952. they have out lived it's useful life. all of these aspects have contributed to request amend our resolution which is not to include exceed $9 million. in addition, due to the accumulation, they decided to redesign a new pump system which will carry not accumulate and that will require design and putting the bid package together. today we are requesting to serve the digester from the report

because additional time is needed to put together a design approach and construction with documents. there is no time to allow us to competently bid this work. for this i'm available to answer any questions. >> any questions from staff? seeing none, we'll go to your report, please. >> yes on page of 62 of our report summarizes the contract with monterey mechanical company to not exceed 14, 535, 427. we recommend you approve this resolution. >> thank you. colleagues, any questions? seeing none,

we'll go to public comment. any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues can we take this to the full board? >> so moved. >> we'll thaek take that without objection. next item, please. item no. 11. contract amendment resolution authoring general manager of the public utilities commission to execute amendment no. 4 to an agreement with urs corporation. >> members of the board, the acting regional project manager for the water system improvement program. due to the interest of time, i will cut to the chase and give you my conclusion slide which is stated on the slide here. we

request the board of supervisors approval of amendment no. 4 to contract cs 716 with urs corporation for the purpose of increasing contract amount by $4.5 million and increasing the contract duration by two 2 years and 9 months. this will allow urs to continue a design engineer for our record for the project out in this region through project construction and close out. and i would refer to the budget analyst report. >> thank you, colleagues, no questions. we'll move to budget analyst report. >> members we support this amendment of the contract with urs would allow the contract to reach by $4.5 million which is 18.8 percent from $24

million to $28 million $500,000 as shown in table two on page 68 of our report. the cdc has spent on the contract to date. on page 68 we note the budget for 4.5 million shown on table three and page 69 of our report. we recommend you approve this resolution. >> colleagues, any questions. seeing none, public comment? no public comment. public comment is closed. members, can we take this without objection. this is

taken without objection. next item. 12. city clerk: item 12, ordinance deappropriating and reappropriating $23 million in wastewater revenue bonds for the wastewater enterprises northshore. >> your approval will provide us with a continue gency fund. this project will provide a redundancy force main, a pressurized pipe so it provides a red dante pipe to carry flow in south particularly in the northeastern quadrant of the city. this has failed multiple times. we have had a number of emergency room repairs in the past and this project will provide for redundancy for us to be able to transport the

sewage to this portion of the city. i also am requesting for a correction in page 4 of the ordinance. on page 4, item, there is a bullet item no. 2 which states the puc and board of supervisors discretionary adoption of ceqa findings for the project following review of consideration of completed project related environmental analysis were required pursuant to ceqa state guidelines and administrative code. the project has received ceqa approval through the board. so we request that for that bullet item to be stride out # -- striked out from the ordinance. >> okay. thanks very much. mr. city attorney i believe we can just amend this. okay. why don't we first move on to our budget analyst report.

>> mr. chairman and members of the committee. table 2 on page 75 of our report shows the projected deappropriation and reappropriation of this request of $23 million for the northshore main project. we have recommendation on page 6 and recommend that you amend the proposed resolution back to the board of supervisors on status with efforts regarding from korj of pg coverage for pg & e facilities and that you approve the proposed resolution as amended. just as a little background pg & e, the puc had anticipated that pg & e would pay for these cost. that has not happened. now the city attorney is working on this matter. that is why we made that recommendation. >> okay. thank you very much.

colleagues, any questions for our budget analyst. seeing none, we'll open to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on this item. seeing none, public comment is closed. we are going to have to do an amendment. >> deputy city attorney john gibner. i want to clarify. the $8 million was going to be on reserve pending the earlier of either ceqa or controller certification. i think the board would be -- i guess my question is would the board be placed on reserve for elimination of funds or replacing it altogether. >> it's still pending the controller certification of funds. the only item we want to strikeout is the pending the ceqa. that no. 2 still

retains. >> okay. >> thank you. >> so could i have a motion to accept our budget analyst recommendations as well as the department articulated by our attorney. we have a motion and section and we can take that without objection and send that item forward. we can take that also without objection. thank you. >> mr. chairman, i would like to request the department provide us with the amended legislation before 9 :00 a.m. tomorrow morning. >> okay. we can do that. clerk, can you call item, 13. city clerk: item no. 13 #shgs resolution authoring the filing of an application for funding assigned to the california transportation commission and authorizing the department of public works for grant funds awarded to the

commission. >> okay we have department of water and power to speak on this item oovm hi, i'm from san francisco public works. the support of this resolution authorizes public works to accept for and expand a total of 1, 298,000 in program funds. the funds will be used for environment alan design work for projects the school in the financial district and the second is redding elementary school in lower knob hill. it's a program created last fall. a consolidation of listing federal and transportation program including task, the vpa, the bicycle transportation account and the resolution for school funds. the goal of stp is is to

enhance bicycling and walking and reduce gas how the emissions. we feel that our school projects are good candidates to achieve such school and for the city's vision zero goals. $180 million will be awarded by the california transportation commission and an additional $30 million will be awarded to agencies in a 9 county bay area, the metropolitan transportation commission. we expect to learn and mtc's decision in september. we already submitted our two applications in may and the same application. i tc will not accept our application without local support. >> i just wanted to ask, it's john chen and what's the second school in >> the second school is

redding elementary school. >> thank you. colleagues, any questions, comments. mr. roads, can we go to your report, please? >> no fiscal impact. >> okay. >> so i would like to move approval. a motion by supervisor march. >> supervisor, public comment? >> great idea. we'll go to public comment. any public comment? seeing none, this item is closed. we can take this out objection. : no. 14. city clerk: item 14. ordinance retruax actively appropriating to over time.

>> goofrng i'm the deputy director for the department of management for emergency communicates. our request this afternoon is to deappropriate money from our contingency savings plan unexpended salaries and to appropriate a corresponding amount to over time. the original request was for $147, 976. there are three factors requiring this additional over time spending in our department a computer system dispatch. we hired a new dispatch class employees and there was trapping --

training cost for that. these two factors were behind a previous increase and appropriation for over time but complicated by a third factor which increased call volume. there was a number of calls to our 911 center for any month on record and i believe june was the fourth highest. i believe there was an increase in call volume and had to increase staffing as a result. so i had three factors together. we needed to spend moreover time in order to provide services necessary and we are asking for approval of this item. >> thank you very much. colleagues, seeing no questions, let's move to our budget analyst. >> mr. chairman, on page 80 we recommend you amend the ordinance to reduce by 7, 7143, to 76, 242 and

recommend you approve the ordinance as mained. amended. >> okay. colleagues, any questions? seeing none. public commented on this item? seeing none. public comment is closed. we can move this without objection. >> would you like to adopt that. >> apology. motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation on item 14. thank you again madam clerk. we can take that without objection and the underlying item without objection and we can also take that without objection. we have one item left and due scheduling issues throughout the day through no fault of their own on the fire department for the last item of the day. can we quickly ask, i know this is cleaning out or mang to our mayor's

budget staff if you wanted to present on this item so we can get this approved. i know this is a last year's close out and we want to get this done. oh commissioner, coerce -- -- -- is here. can you call the item. city clerk: item 15, ordinance retruax actively appropriating $677, 587 to over time and deappropriating $677 ks 587 in salaries in the fire department's operating budget in order to support the department's projected increases in over time. >> mr.. corso.

>> thank you mr. chairman, i apologize for the delay. the next item is an over time supplement for the fire indemnity. department. there are two aspects to it. one is the general fund supplement reallocation from salaries and in addition there is an airport component of it as well. the department is now requesting any additional fund for salaries but rather a reallocation of existing budget due to administrative code. for general fund operation, the main driver of this over time reallocation is at the department saw this last year retirements and

separation then what was anticipated in its budget. the department projected approximately 30 retirements and saw 43 retirements and separation over the course of the year. while the department -- had additional academies that came into the budget there's not additional personnel to offset the additional retirements. the department's request in this legislation amount to less than one 1/2 percent of it's total over time budget and in addition, the department will close the fiscal year approximately $2.1 million below budget of the previous fiscal year with regards to over time. for the airport, the departments requests approximately $140,000 to reallocate. back in april, the

department came before you to request approximately $1.7 million department reallocation. sense that time, the department has seen additional separation from retirements and promotion throughout the department leaving the airport and leading to allocation. the airport funds are paid for by the airport. in addition to that, the department has over all for it's general fund operation budget for over time in the budget that's going for formal approval is anticipating in it's overall budget to approximately $7.5 million. >> okay. thank you very much. colleagues any questions, if not we'll move to our budget analyst report. >> mr. chairman, base on our analysis shown on the table page 84 we recommend you amend the ordinance for the

appropriation by $24, 304 to $653, 283 in an airport fund reduction of $16, 483 and we recommend you frauf -- approve the ordinance. >> we in agreement with the budget analyst. >> great. comments, public comment, seeing no public comment. it's closed. >> the fact that you are in agreement, makes me want to give the money back. i will motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation. >> i would like to thank the budget analyst for their help. >> we have a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation and we can take that without objection and the other line item as amended we can send it forward without objection. >> madam clerk, do we have

any other business in front of us. >> month, mr. >> no, mr. chair. >> thank you very much. we are adjourned. [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >>

>> okay, good afternoon. welcome to our special rules commit toe meeting for thursday, july 10, 2014. i am supervisor yee and am joined by supervisor tang and tell ls. the committee would also like to acknowledge the staff of sfgtv,