tv [untitled] August 3, 2014 4:30am-5:01am PDT
4:30 am
develop the property and that budget is 253,285,0 80 dollars and that is shown in table 3 on page 78 of our report ~. on page 78 we also note, a mr. updike ha already stated, that this legislation would authorize nonrefundable payment of the city $1 million toward land acquisition costs and up to 250,000 for initial schematic design costs. on page 81, we have our recommendations. we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution [speaker not understood] prior to the date the board of supervisors must endorse the purchase and sale agreement on october 31st, 2014. and that report should provide details on the space requirements of the city debtsv and the proposed uses such as
4:31 am
training board room, space for occupying the new office building, including long term staffing [speaker not understood], also explain the option for big filling [speaker not understood] allowing them to relocate to the new office building and provide details on the space requirements and recommend poe tension project alternative if the increase in space is not required by dpw, dbi, city planning or other city departments slated to occupy the new office building and describe the real estate [speaker not understood] to be a policy matter for the board of supervisors. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. mr. updike, is your department okay with these proposed recommendations? >> yes, we are. >> okay.
4:32 am
if no other questions at this time, we'll open this up to public comment. if anybody wishes to comment on item number 26? seeing none, public comment is closed. [gavel] >> supervisor mar, we have our budget analyst recommendation. he >> so move the recommendations by the budget analyst. >> take the underlying objection. ~ gov. >> thank you very much. madam clerk, can you call our 10:30 special meeting? >> item number 1, resolution did he nating central city extra to be the neighborhood outreach newspaper of the city and county for the central city neighborhood; northside publications/marina times to be the neighborhood outreach knew paper of the city and county for the northern san francisco neighborhood; west portal monthly to be the neighborhood outreach newspaper of the city and county for the west portal neighborhood; and potrero view to be the neighborhood outreach knew paper of the city and county for the potrero hill, dogpatch, bayview, soma, mission bay neighborhoods to provide outreach advertising for fiscal year 2014-2015. >> okay, thanks. we have our office of contract administration here. thank you. >> good afternoon, chairman farrell and supervisor mar. thank you for hearing me. my name is deirdre darling. i'm representing the office of contract administration and i'm here requesting your recommendation and approval for
4:33 am
a resolution designating certain periodicals of the city's outreach periodical for the upcoming fiscal year. outreach advertising is intended to meet the public information needs of those communities and neighborhoods which may not be adequately served by the official newspapers. the contract term would start august 1 and go through june 30 of 2015. the estimated contract value is $18,000 to be divided between the awarded periodicals. the admin code requires the purchaser each year to invite bids for outreach advertising for the next fiscal year. the code specifies certain minimum requirement periodical must meet in the environment [speaker not understood].
4:34 am
the purchaser performs the valuation and reports the point totals to the board and makes recommendations. historically [speaker not understood] and made its recommendation to the board based on the response of bidder with the highest point total for the outreach communities. the admin code also states, there upon, the board of supervisors shall by resolution choose and designate periodicals as the outreach periodicalses of the city and county for the ensuing fiscal year. the board of supervisors in past years had decided to designate more than one periodical per outreach community in certain neighborhoods in san francisco and have split the contracts between most, if not all bidders who responded whether or not they were responsive to meeting all the requirements. oca sent bids to approximately 50 newspapers and received 11 responseses.
4:35 am
of those 11 responses, six were responsive. the six newspapers are marina time, central city extra, west portal monthly, potrero view, small business exchange, and bay area reporter. we also received five bids from periodicals that were nonresponsive because they were either printed outside of san francisco or were not printed frequently enough. ~ to meet the admin code requirements. those newspapers are the san francisco bayview, [speaker not understood] daily, world journal, and [speaker not understood], also the western he edition. in conclusion, the purchaser has drafted the resolutions for outreach periodicalses based on the past practice of recommending the bidders who are responsive with the highest
4:36 am
point score. ~ the board of supervisors has the option to exercise its discretion to designate the recommended periodicals or if the board so chooses, to follow past practice to split the contract between most, if not all of the periodicals who submitted bids. last year [speaker not understood] were awarded to all who submitted bids. are there any questions? >> okay, thanks very much. >> a real quick question. >> sure, supervisor mar. >> are there any requirements from language access ordinance on how notice needs to be in languages by language minority populations? i'm just wondering because i know the small business exchange being designated for the latino or chinese or immigrant communities, i'm just wondering if they have the
4:37 am
abilities to communicate in languageses other than english. so, i'm just asking what are the requirements under our language access ordinance or even just that we follow so that populations that might not be proficient in english would still have adequate notice from our city. >> well, i'm not familiar with the language ordinance. the admin code 2.8 does not require that the notices be published in any particular language. however, the outreach newspapers that represent the chinese community and hispanic community tend to be published in that language. the small business exchange is a little different. they represent minority small business owners. we do have non-responsive bid
4:38 am
submissions from foreign language newspapers [speaker not understood], publishes in spanish. cinta daily and world journal publish in chinese. >> thank you. >> mr. rose, do we have a report from you on this item? >> no, there is no report, supervisor. >> okay, thanks. so, we'll open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item number 1 hereof our special 10:30? seeing none public comment is closed. [gavel] >> so, supervisor mar, we have options here, either to accept all the responsive bids or do what we have in past practice, broaden it to all the nonresponsive bids as well. i would say that would be my preference, better to be inclusive. [speaker not understood]. that would be my recommendation. >> i would support that. >> okay. so, we have a motion, then, to amend this item to accept both -- to split this contract up between all the responsive bids and the nonresponsive bids submitted. >> so move. >> thank you. >> that work? we can take that amendment
4:39 am
without objection. [gavel] >> and the underlying item as amended we can also take that without objection. [gavel] >> thank you very much. madam clerk, do we have any other business in front of us? >> no, mr. chair. >> thanks, everyone. we are adjourned. [gavel] >> good afternoon, everyone. this is not a new version of q and a time if you're wondering but we have a major announcing announcement to make and something that all of us and particularly the people that are
4:40 am
standing behind me want to really thank them for working hard for us and a number of people throughout the city realizing our city is more expensive and work families mr. taylor those who eastern minimum wage have struggled longer hours to try to make end meet and recognizing we'll have a tremendous effort being given to sustain jobs in the city and want to continue doing that but beyond the jobs how much you that make and so you can pay the high rents and all the things that costs sometimes beyond our control are increasing i'm grateful that last year, we made this announcement and he repeated it earlier this year at the state of the city address that we thought it was the right
4:41 am
time to make a boost to the city and counties city's minimum wage to our lottery workings i prengd to work with all the different businesses small and big with workers themselves the representatives with economic experts any public comment? with the members of the board of supervisors, to try to reach a sequence around raising the minimum wage in the city. and this is one of the great issues that we can ail unit around and push forward to the residents of this city with our san francisco values intact and a sure belief that someone who puts in a hard day's work gets a respectable wage we've heard the input from the sectors are our community earners and people that pay the minimum wage we've
4:42 am
heard from nonprofits as well as small businesses and large businesses and today, the current minimum wage of $10.74 there's been a across the board agreement that's not enough. and even though voters passed the minimum wage that we counter experience in 2003, the new the current minimum wage is left unchanged will be to the $11.03 were hour effective january 1st of 2015. the sequence measure that we are proposing to have to the voters and i'll the the first but everyone behind me it going to be very proud to have this discussion with other businesses small and large and nonprofits with residents and voters in san francisco. we will have before the voters a
4:43 am
proposal to increase san francisco minimum wage to the following numbers. in the next few years. beginning on may 1st of 2015. we propose $12.25 per hour and then each of the next year's beginning on july 1st for example, july 1st, 2016, that will be raised to $13 or a hour and july first $201,714 and july first $201,815 an hour and the consumer price otherwise to kick in. thank you to all the members of the board of supervisors who are standing here at the podium all here.
4:44 am
i want to thank dr. laura tyson from uc berkley and there's a lot of stakeholders in this big and small businesses labor unit want to thank all of them for being at the table and workers rights groups invaluable to the process they've been talking to folks in languages to make sure they understood what in the meant and nonprofit groups a very large number of hours committed i want to thank the number of nonprofits that came to the table that make sure that we were taking care of them as well their invaluable to the employment to san franciscans all in an effort to really try to get a consensus approach thank you to the coalition to the fair economy my the san francisco chamber of commerce.
4:45 am
sometimes they maybe speaking times at the opposite ends but they came together with all of us to make sure our interests were united. a lot of hard work to build consensus in the city i'll be the first to say but i've been proud we've done so on a number of occasions whether this was pension reformer are or the housing trust fund or a number of general obligation bonds we'll have in the past we've had a united effort this was well work out it when you get a consensus to raise minimum wage that will be the highest minimum wage in this country. we will remain progressive and i want to specifically thank our supervisors and i know as of
4:46 am
last night supervisor jane kim spent an which they recalled amount of time loans with the representatives of our fair committee but in particular we wanted at the beginning to work with the supervisors and i'm very glad that supervisor kim took up the challenge she put in the hours to work and i want to introduce her not only has helped us do this she's been on the forefront of a lot of issues for the city. supervisor jane kim (clapping) >> thank you. mr. mayor and i can't tell you how happy i am am to be here san francisco is once again setting the bar for emphasis economic agenda we're doing it together. i'm proud to be here with the
4:47 am
mayor the buyer board of supervisors, labor our nonprofit leaders and the chamber of commerce. united to bring forward a proposal inform the voters of san francisco the most progressive and strongest minimum wage proposal in this proposal all san francisco employers will be paying $15 by 2018 this is pure wages that san francisco workers will be bringing hoyt home despite setting the prototype in the city in the last two years in particular we've been seeing a widening inflict gap between our lottery and highest paid worker no one should be left behind an economy that is so successful some be able to benefit. when the mayor and the board committed to creating more jobs in san franciscan it was not
4:48 am
about creating just any jobs but with health care it was not only allowing our workers to afford to live in santa fe san francisco but support their families i want to acknowledge the labor and workers they've been clear in leading issues to protect our protecting workers they fought for sick day and no other city considered those landmark lacks foundation now cities are joining san francisco's ranges san francisco has a lot of to the proud of not only are we pushing the boundary within the boundary of san francisco but impacting the lives of workers throughout the country our president made a call to raise the national minimum wage but if congress
4:49 am
can't do it localities should it's simple and clear and i and i'm confident san franciscans will proudly vote for the measure there are so many people the mayor and mayor's office the nonprofit leaders that were committed and, of course, labor and workers that have been waiting for the wage even as different that was no one wanted to walk away from bringing this proposal to the city. i'm very proud thank you. (clapping.) >> the coalition for fair economy has been working the streets late and you've seen them on the street corners we were cognizant of that let me be clear now that we've made the
4:50 am
agreement there are no two different measures this year's only one measure wisp able to contact and start negotiations with this coalition there were compromises that should had to be made and reality if that checked in and we were fortunate we were able to catch each other to make sure we connected in the base ass basis and the relative to be sure there are no longer two measures before the public that was a possibility up underlining until a few weeks ago i'm glad to introduce charleston who's been representing the coalition her staff and volunteers were talking to workers and making sure that the economy was not going to get away from them but
4:51 am
also making sure they made contact with us as well. ma'am. (clapping.) good afternoon >> i'm here representing the campaign for a broad coalition for labor i'm not sorry who have collectively been representing over one hundred thousand workings we fought for the original 2003 minimum wage increase which set the bar across the country and which has been model by cities and states for minimum wage basically as well as health care laws. and we're very proud of that work but as mentioned by that mr. mayor and supervisor kim the minimum wage as to it stands far
4:52 am
too low and 10 years later the same things that compelled us to raise the minimum wage are working today in san francisco we see the workers are falling behind in rent and when the average one bedroom agreement is 2 thousand plus per month workers can't live here and have long term futures in the city so many are homeless and worker two or three jobs and living in cramped rooms with shared kitchens or living with three or four or 6 people in agreement to pay the rents. san francisco should not be leading the country as the number one faster growing city that's not the legacy we want to
4:53 am
leave so we are pleased to be standing with the coalition with the mayor's office and the board of supervisors and other groups to reach the consensus measure. our consensus measure will raise the bar by getting all workers to $15 in 200128 and insure that no minimum wage worker in san francisco goes without on increase over one hundred thousands of our lowest paid worker will benefit it puts hundreds of millions of into worker wages money going directly to local businesses and fuels our economy. i want to put into prospective what that means the campaign is made up of organizations that fight for the lowest minimum wage workers get a decent chance of thriving in san francisco around many policies around
4:54 am
housing and health care and education. for people in may day of 2015 theirs to see a pay increase been $240 a month that is a different between paying for health care or paying rent. and within 4 years time as we get to $15 an hour that's putting $9,000 a year into the pocket of protecting workers it's not everything but it reduces the stress. so the campaign for fair economy wants to recognize supervisor jane kim and mayor edwin lee in raising the issue and bringing the city together to fight for a
4:55 am
unified coalition and thank you to the worker the fast food workers across the industry put tare livelihoods on the edge to raise the minimum wage and we're proud that san francisco, california join the fight and help to lead the fight. i also wanted to say that we know for our workers sometimes $20 makes a different between paying the bus or paying rent. we're confident that the voters will support this measure finally, i want to say we're pleased that the mayor's office and supervisor kim has made a commitment to continue to increase the minimum wage we're going to make sure this is
4:56 am
enforced so we have the resources and the tools needed to make sure that employers that minority employers that often my try to cheat the workers are held accountable. thank you very much. >> (clapping.) >> i'm very proud of the city as you've learned our unemployment rate went down to 4 point percent latinos that's the lowest in the country we want to continue to employ people in the private and public sectors and nonprofits as well and a partner wanted to make sure that you knew that working on this particular task was extra sensitive for the san francisco chamber of commerce but their proud you have we, in fact, had
4:57 am
a consensus let me trolley mr. wade rose who is representing the san francisco chamber of commerce. (clapping.) >> mayor ed lee and supervisor kim and supervisors we the business community are police department mr. reginald that a single ballet measure had been appearing in november to ask the folks of san francisco whether or not they want to support an expansion and growth in the minimum wage. the issue about the discussions we were involved with and have been involved it come down to the observation that a compromise is a precious idea that has to be experienced to be healthy that we think that the consensus built up around this measure residents will be voting
4:58 am
on we've reached the compromise. one of the kind of facts of san francisco which is not well understood because we're bless to be a headquarter city and a huge amount of high tech are coming in is that 80 percent of the 6 hundred thousand people who are employed in san francisco are employed by small and medium businesses businesses often less than 20 people, 80 percent in the twitters or the pg&e. it's the folks who have put themselves open the lineup to put a business together and make employment available that are impacted by this the most so our concerns as a business origins to make sure that the process when was agreed to in the compromised reflected their concerns from a business prospective which means whatever
4:59 am
the amount had to be phased in it had to be within the means of people who to afford as business owners 0 write paychecks to people who work in san francisco. we've arrived at the at a that venture and up to the people of san francisco but we're pleased many the consensus is reached and the work of mayor ed lee and the work of the supervisor kim and the other supervisors and entities within san francisco that are pushing the issues and we look forward to november. thank you very much (clapping) >> you know, as i said early consensus building is not a easy task i want to shout out to someone on my staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls
5:00 am
alive to make sure idealogy with everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone
41 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on