we went through a careful analysis which included an analysis of the existing states the block inspection and the streetscape analysis and that's of the previous house designed in 1981. this is a aerial view we've looked at we did a comparable analysis of all the lots within the block as well as the adjacent rear yard set backs you'll see there's a line of rear walls of the blocks that run this way the proposed steps in and to the south is blocks

are there's no rear yard set back whatsoever we also did a streetscape view. this is a view of the streetscape on the opposite side of the streetscape prop that is come down of three and four story buildings. we also did a streetscape view showing the east side of ashbury with the proposed project here and looking at to the full length of ashbury street. with regard to the footprint of the project the set back the

side mass 3 foot 3 inches to might light and shadow impacts to the neighbor to the south and set back the rare wall the primary wall 15 feet from the property line an extension of a balcony at one level into the 15 foot. your time is up >> speakers in support ever project sponsor? >> i'm tie bash the owner of 1011 ashburyburg you might be familiar with me i presented in

may 22nd of this year if you see my face you'll see some of the people i've never showed up to my dr i'm saddened by the fact that brings us together tonight as in in my opinion the collapse of the planning process but it has turned into a mudslinging 0 event which homeowners that wish to build their homes for the families to accommodate in their needs. and in preparation for my dr hearing i watched over two years ever dr hearings online in which the project sponsors repeatedly used - following the dr experience i choice to move out

they can't bear the thought of living next door to their neighborhoods it go pathic i ask each one of you this is the u top i'm of the opinion the populated home will be a wonderful edition to our street the materials create a good use of spaces and provides a nice size home and has minimal impact on the neighbors many families with children are leaving the city those home will come up the family in order to mitigate the impact the project sponsor proposed to excavate the family

for a knowledge space and as far as the petition how can we take seriously a petition that a little that is of stories fall if that's not a falsehood to the neighborhoods i don't know what is. i urge you to not take dr and approve the project as is thank you. >> good evening. i'm steve and my wife and i are owners on the home on bat out of hell did care a few blocks down and cool valley being a tight niche community we've been trying for years to find a place i know some of the gentleman's project i know thank you

very much. >> so the first point i want to address is the variance question there's been absolutely no rebuttal by the project sponsor i'm asking you to deny the variance there's no justification for the variance next the project sponsor representatives show you a straight on the ed and refers to it as the east side of ashbury

when we are making judaism's about the aesthetic we should look at the authentic which the the west side and showing the east side is quite immaterial in my mind. there are special and extraordinarily circumstances we have a petition of over 50 neighbors in the immediately zint that purports to support this program. i would also we've repeatedly heard there are not 6 floors on this building but if we look at please if he look on the projector for just a second i apologize for the quality of the image i'll show you indirectly from the plans it's a little bit rough but here's 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

and an observation deck on top there are 6 usable floors it this from the rear but it has a massive impact on clayton street. so in conclusion i ask you deny the variance it was misrepresented you've had 80 this clearly pointed out to you and take the dr. >> okay project sponsor have two minute rebuttal. >> thank you. i'll judge address did variance briefly we stand on our papers submitted we building that the finding can be met it's an unusual lot that requires the minor encroachment

into the rear yard it matches the rear yard to the rear of that property thank you very much. >> public hearing is closed commissioner moore. you want to bring to the administrative active commission? not approval wise it lacks those kinds of dynamics there are no lateral depictions so we can kind of understand it a legal document that we determine the lines of the buildings with a difficult rear yard situation i don't believe we were in a position to look at this project tonight that's not speaking to the dr requester nor

to the plant it's an immobility to judge the project. there are two diengz and the survey that generally speaks to the lots distinctions the western this being 44 to have that speaks to a small lot by which the citing of the building in the lot accurately dynamics is one of the key elements that this commission needles to take as it is based for approval mr. taylor when it goes to departments of building

approvals our recommendation has to rely on a common set of references which we don't have. i ask we continue the project perhaps until next week the architect might have overlooked them and atsdz adds them >> second, that if that's a motion. >> commissioner hillis. >> call the question, please. >> if it's heard next week we won't be able to have is plans they'll be priority the day of the hearing. next week is a full agenda september 4th >> commissioners there's not a good hearing in the next several weeks next week you have 3 drs with a full calendar on

september 4, 4 drs and september 11, 4 drs so it doesn't matter none of them will actually be good with 4 a 4 point dr. >> i'll not recommend because we won't get the drawings in time and just not be a good practice. >> excuse me. can i point out the definitions excuse me, sir this hearing is crossed. >> the track is obtain all drawings. >> commissioner antonini. >> continue to september 11th. >> that's part of the motion. >> all right. >> commissioner sugaya i also shrink or sing i won't be here

for that meeting i'd like the zoning administrator to take into consideration my concern about the actual variance issue 10 feet out of 22 is an awesome large variance to be asking for that's also did not object the diengsz a is relationship to others buildings surrounding it to the rears so that we can get an idea of the existing position in the mid block areas. commissioners there's a motion that's been second to continue the matter. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to

zero. and >> and the variance is is to september 11th. >> commissioners about places you under public comment i have there are not speaker cards. >> i think we're adjourned right. >> i have speaker cards. >> i want to thank you for missing my son's birth. >> (laughter). the meeting is d. >> (laughter). the meeting is a. >> (laughter). the meeting is y. >> (laughter). the meeting is .

>> hey entices neiman here and this week is no expectation that is the weekly buzz pr this wednesday checkout people in the

placing the 24 market street music festive puts on sdmerntsdz from july to october and this 13 join us from high waters at 12:00 p.m. shatter and this week is the summer exams and think about this is the adults camps and learn are about the great outdoors and plus settle into our camping bags for a scene of the crime of the movie and the festival is a outdoor based on the stories feature original songs and colorful screeny this musical is definitely one for the whole family.

and that's the weekly buzz invest it is sfgovtv.org and click on >> the city of san francisco sfgtv meeting of the neighborhood services & safety commission occurring july 17, 2014, will begin shortly. >> good morning, everyone, and welcome to the thursday, july 17, 2014, meeting of the board of supervisors, neighborhood services and safety committee, my name is david campos and i am the chair of the committee and we are joined by the chair, eric mar, and committee member, supervisor, norman yee is en route, the clerk of the committee is derek evans and we want to thank the members of sfgtv staff who are recovering the meeting for us, jim smith and jessy larson. >> do we have any announcements. >> be suo