community organizations attorneys there's really no disconcert outreach >> the most important outreach when those people get their lecture notice their finding about the preference because very there to inform them. >> the landlord has to to the tenants there's this program you may not be to quality for . >> they a have a certainty amount of time. >> what's the average. >> you know what vanessa. help me out how long do they have once they get their notice of intent before they have to be out? >> so they have a little bit of time and look for another.

>> - and enter the lotteries we find they're entering the lotteries. >> they have to qualify for all the requirements. >> exactly just like the cop people. >> if they don't qualify for the next one they can apply again. >> yes. until they use the certificate. >> it's only used ones either a rental or purchase. >> we're applying they wrote into the owners it is part of the down payment assistance home if they want to use the down payment assistance we'll give them the priority in the funded. so >> that's a lot of handholding you have to do well, right now you have 82 that could increase.

>> the 82 is probably we've only been in business since april. so i think that is going to be the biggest push there were a lot of people waiting for this. we were told to go back to january 1st, 2012, toe people that were evicted back that far so, you know, we had a waiting list of like about 40 people 0 who were waiting for the program that had already been evicted since april. on an ongoing basis there are not will like next year we'll not see 82 people with the requested certificates it's gng to slow down if we had 10 a month that will be a lot

>> i have some more questions i want to understand the numbers whether 82 or 10 we're not talking about individuals but households. >> we're talking about individuals because we're counting the individual certificates but those individuals might be part of a households that's moved in. >> like a family. >> absolutely. a parent with kids absolutely. do we know when we say 10 participants that is 10 households >> well, we, found out that's very good. roadway it is 10 certificate holders but we can easily find out how many people are in the households >> yeah. because the others issue i read the attachment that came from the planning

department and i don't know if you can speak to this but what jumped out at me on 5 it says on november 5, 2013, mow cd has conducted 7 lotteries in 2013 including 7 lotteries for 3 thousand applicants only 17 with or cop holders for the unites when i looked at the 17 and hear of the number you've he presented 17 hundred it's kind of raises in my mind a small percentage of cop holders are partnering and why is that. and then i don't will i support of the ellis act i'm worried about that that the ellis act preference came in practical terms trumpet the cop program >> yeah. but it won't.

>> why. (laughter) here we go. so without giving you a full report on cop stuff we're looking forward to providing for you soon. the cop holders that we are working with and brooke barker is here. there are various reasons why they won't prefor one property or qualify for individual properties. and some of it is eligibility some of that at the don't meet the developers eligibility criteria. and others have preference or choice they don't want to apply for some of the inclusionary opportunities that are available.

we can - we are working on creating eligibility requirements that are across the board in the mayor's office of housing and community development properties. right now we have biscuits of affordable housing inclusionary heirs and we have the nonprofit developer driven one hundred percent affordable housing. and there are different eligibility requirements for each type of housing. our cop holders we find that they meet the requirements regarding income where you're going to take thirty percent of their income for sustainable rents.

often those eligibility requirements are toucher in those buildings than in an inclusionary housing building. anecdotally i don't have the data on it >> yeah. >> we're working on that. >> thank you. >> we're working on e-cigarette that it is more consistent across affordable housing the eligibility requirements. >> do you think that this low level of participation is there like a chilling factor people are getting tired there's seven hundred people or seven hundred households and 17 and last year participate in the available lotteries there were not many is it fatigue because they're not folks are not getting in its why bother. >> possibly for some but others

it's waiting for the right opportunities. >> ize okay. >> and the right neighborhoods. so but there's no guarantee >> there's no gee it's a lottery and by the cop holders it's a guarantee if you got your eggs in a right now sorry ducks in a row eggs in a basket. your - you are going to be they're not limit in the amount of units that will hold for a cop all 10 are going to get the units if there's 10 >> they have to qualify. >> and this so keep qualifying. >> that's why the marketing and preparation and the outreach and the preparation for the actual

competition people are prequalified and ready so if the opportunity arises. >> the fact we've gotten 38 new certificates this year and half the year speaks to the fact that the program is still alive and well and people are applying and the word of mouth and they're looking forward to it their existed about it when they apply and some of them express you don't i didn't think i'd use this but this is my guarantee when my family left i'm able to come back when any family left. we're working on marketing consistent across the different level of affordable housing and as well as the eligibility

remits i think one of the things jeff spoke to the earlier in his presentation we're working with our development partners to start marketing a little bit earlier maybe a lot earlier. and marketing in phases so the first phases you get the word out there and work with community development organization to help people get ready for an opportunity coming in a year or 18 months they have more time when the active marketing season starts they're there >> and we'll commitment looking forward to giving you a more independent reports on the obstacles and things we're seeing. >> looking forward it it.

the only other point i know that one of the recommendations so to have the board of supervisors with respect to a review, you know, program after 3 years there's so many change in the last 3 years i think that 3 years is too long to have a report i prefer to have more regular reporting to make sure when you can about the problems you can nip them >> that's right. >> so what i have review period can we say- >> we planned to go back to the board after a year. >> okay. >> just to report and then actually do a program evaluation so it's an annual reporting but a review of the whole program. >> that's fine. >> it's basically, it's got a potential sunset.

>> yeah. if it's perfect and the rent is fair and yeah. - >> what is is dream on or what is the saying. >> you never know ducks in a row. >> if after 3 years still they're not self-eviction what are we going to do. >> we'll keep on giving people preferences i guess and we'll hopefully there will be some in the next 3 years some legislation fix on the state level that will addresses what's happening. in some way i hope. yeah, that was going to be one of my questions about sxhart len

these efforts it fell short of mark unfortunately >> any more questions. >> no. >> just a clarification commissioner rosales if i heard i cringe upper open and academy able to the class to include in the in addition to the 3 years review in the report whether to extend modify or cancel the program so we as we've heard it we can include that. >> yes. >> i don't know robert do there need to be a motion and second to change the clause. >> yes. >> to make it annual. it's an annual report niendz the 3 year review. so do we propose that i'm shooum u assuming we have a motion with the proposed amendment >> yeah. you could do that.

>> can i make the motion. i move that we adapt the resolution with modification to the result clause to read resolve that the office of community from and infrastructure shall annually report okay. he let me see off the top shall review the application under this resolution within 3 years of its adaptation subject to annual an annual report or an annual staff report. that's not very articulate but i'm trying to get the report in before the final review any help council. hopefully. >> how about steadfast following

an annual staff and i'm sorry you you've got to speak up. >> years of adoption following the annual staff report or after the annual staff report. >> yes. that works after the word adaptation after is staffer report. >> so within 3 years of its adaptation comma after the staff report comma to extend of adapt it. i make the motion >> it's been seconded by commissioner singh. please call roll >> commissioner annunciation our vote. commissioner mondejar. commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. madam chair the vote is 3 i's >> excellent. thank you. >> thank you. next item, please. >> the next order of business

item 6 public comment on non-agenda items. madam chair >> any speaker cards. >> a no one. any members of the public that wish to address the commission on matters of public comment >> i'm sorry yes. i noticeed that the slink age of the members. >> we went on a diet. >> did the mayor wish to appoint anymore. also i notice on the looking on the forward calendar nothing mentioned about the very important senate bill 1404 that relates to the issues you've talked about housing. this is quite interesting and quite how can i put it in a way

that we the community have to lobby not in this hall but in the state capitol with governor jerry brown because it looks like he'll be around if for the fourth time in a row but audio effectively this 1404 obviously is going to be in the business of mayor ed lee and what he's doing now but the bottom line i think there should be a special hearing on this in the community for which this impacts the communities. on another keynote i'm sure you're aware of check our history i've been here requesting this commission come to the western edition to talk about the obligation and it's been i don't know why it's been hesitant but here president

you've got hoof history in the western edition that will be appropriate that before this thing comes up i think you need to come to the community and hold the meeting right in the middle of our community so we'll have some empathy so this is on urban renewal i'm respectfully requesting that and let us come to you guys and do a presentation like everyone else to really show what we have been impacted by the urban renewal. as and mentioned before i am redeadlocking all my energy to put documents to assimilate to

the world what i've viewed for the last 25 years a that's why i have not been here but when i took a break to put this together the game changes constantly here you call city hall i call is silly hall. >> thanks. any others speakers >> no altercated speakers. >> next item. the next order of business is report of the chair madam chair >> i don't have on extensive report but asked 40 by the mayor's office to distribute this mayor's office policy on attendance which i won't read into the record and this is by the commissioners and secretary essentially the mayor is

communicating to all commissions the basic sending a message of studying consistent standards for commission attendance for 2014-2015. that's all i have. you have a copy >> the next order of business the report of executive director. a informational memoranda of the university of california san francisco ucsf for the ucsf mission bay project area. madam director >> thank you madam secretary commissioner members and for the members of the public each of those informational memorandums are on our website and certainly available for review and copies at the meeting. first an update you mean theirs

vice chancellor laura presented their long term plan for mission bay around this time last year and really that long range is to guide they're planning and development of their compasses or compasses for the next year's for 20035 ucsf has developed been 82 percent of their campus to date as part of the long term plan that's coming out in draft form the last time it was updated was in 1997 before the redevelopment plan and owner participation agreements were adapted will guide ucsf development an opportunity for the public and other tdrs government agencies to have a say in their growth plans.

as you've heard ucsf does a grateful business in mission bay and outside with the shoigz for blocks 33 and although the payments for the family house block 7 west related to ac/dc deals with even then they need more stacey's spaces to add additional you housing units that's in your memoranda and we can have ucsf come back their presenting their development plan before the city earthquake commission currently now. that concludes my presentation. on item a and b >> on the results of the initial phase of the selection of evaluating the transbay request for parole for the project area. madam director >> again, this is another

informational memoranda that was in your packet we want to advise you since the commission approved and authorized the block 5 rfp we received had proposals at the end of the submission term at the end of the june after it was issued in april. those 4 proposals came from boston properties and ska log on block of you building it's 299 beale is the official name of the development in transbay. and j paul company and there's a potential item recommended to j paul company coming up on your calendar and a reality that kwirdz block 40. of the four developers there were significant criteria you

set forth in our rfp based on the design excellence and purchase prize and compliance with the sbe and workforce contracting policies of the had develops ska log had the highest of 4 two or three 7 million from the mexico one that is boston and j paul and killing roadway were ranked and their prize accordingly, you have in our informational packets the selection criteria the detailed analysis from our third party and the real estate to help us take a look at the feasibility and the detailed comments from the plaintiff and how each the developments faired and based on

selection planning including the transbay joint powers authority and our staff and others we're moving forward with bringing for your consideration and inclusive negotiation with ska leg in september that will set forth strict milestones >> i'm sure you're aware of all pro sale precedes go to the biography hole in the ground the joint powers authority he terminal and others fees to build your affordable housing with the streetscape program. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for questions and others from transbay are here to answer questions >> commissioners any questions. >> good job.

>> we don't have questions quite yet. i just have two other announcements senate bill 1404 co-sponsored by the city and senator leno related to the housing obligates and the members of the public indicated it's made it through the protective progress for the consideration of the assembly floor and it's accepted to take place by mid-august. and then it gets sent to the governor for his refuse and consideration and he'll have until october 1st i believe to sign or veto the bill we're certainly active in those efforts and implementation of how to use those funds will certainly w be a policy matter

to come before the commission >> can i have i mean, i have a related question i don't know if it's appropriate but it came to mind. do we have a lobby firm or do we use i mean do - what do we do with lobbying at the state capital >> this is a city supported bill in city as a lobbying firm shaw and loader went through the selection process and does the lobbying for the city even though we're not part of the city we advance the goals and objectives of this particular agency we're working with the mayor's office staff and the city of lobbyists in those efforts. >> okay.

do we - yes next item >> the next ordering of business 9 commissioners questions or comments. >> do any other commissioners have questions or matters. >> what's the memo from the oh, the la send it's a fy i. >> yes. oftentimes the correspondence is sent to the ocii offices until the commission has directed outcomes to have another public address so any correspondence that comes for you, we immediately transmit to there is a meeting coming up so that particular corresponds relates to a warriors project we'll certainly packing take anything into account and

advisement. >> any additional questions. >> no next item. >> the next item of business is closed session there's no item. >> and adjournment is next make. >> we're mak. >> we're . >> we're i. >> we'rt. item. >> we're

[pledge of allegiance] >> mr. president, i would like to call roll. >> please do. >> >> president mazzucco? >> present. >> vice president turman. >> here. >> commissioner marshall? >> here. >> commissioner dejesus? is en route. commissioner loftus? >> here. >> commissioner wang is excused. >> commissioner malaro. present. >> we have a quorum and with us this evening is the