are getting tired there's seven hundred people or seven hundred households and 17 and last year participate in the available lotteries there were not many is it fatigue because they're not folks are not getting in its why bother. >> possibly for some but others it's waiting for the right opportunities. >> ize okay. >> and the right neighborhoods. so but there's no guarantee >> there's no gee it's a lottery and by the cop holders it's a guarantee if you got your eggs in a right now sorry ducks in a row eggs in a basket. your - you are going to be they're not limit in the amount

of units that will hold for a cop all 10 are going to get the units if there's 10 >> they have to qualify. >> and this so keep qualifying. >> that's why the marketing and preparation and the outreach and the preparation for the actual competition people are prequalified and ready so if the opportunity arises. >> the fact we've gotten 38 new certificates this year and half the year speaks to the fact that the program is still alive and well and people are applying and the word of mouth and they're looking forward to it their existed about it when they apply and some of them express you

don't i didn't think i'd use this but this is my guarantee when my family left i'm able to come back when any family left. we're working on marketing consistent across the different level of affordable housing and as well as the eligibility remits i think one of the things jeff spoke to the earlier in his presentation we're working with our development partners to start marketing a little bit earlier maybe a lot earlier. and marketing in phases so the first phases you get the word out there and work with community development organization to help people get ready for an opportunity coming in a year or 18 months they have

more time when the active marketing season starts they're there >> and we'll commitment looking forward to giving you a more independent reports on the obstacles and things we're seeing. >> looking forward it it. the only other point i know that one of the recommendations so to have the board of supervisors with respect to a review, you know, program after 3 years there's so many change in the last 3 years i think that 3 years is too long to have a report i prefer to have more regular reporting to make sure when you can about the problems you can nip them >> that's right. >> so what i have review period can we say-

>> we planned to go back to the board after a year. >> okay. >> just to report and then actually do a program evaluation so it's an annual reporting but a review of the whole program. >> that's fine. >> it's basically, it's got a potential sunset. >> yeah. if it's perfect and the rent is fair and yeah. - >> what is is dream on or what is the saying. >> you never know ducks in a row. >> if after 3 years still they're not self-eviction what are we going to do. >> we'll keep on giving people preferences i guess and we'll hopefully there will be some in

the next 3 years some legislation fix on the state level that will addresses what's happening. in some way i hope. yeah, that was going to be one of my questions about sxhart len these efforts it fell short of mark unfortunately >> any more questions. >> no. >> just a clarification commissioner rosales if i heard i cringe upper open and academy able to the class to include in the in addition to the 3 years review in the report whether to extend modify or cancel the program so we as we've heard it we can include that. >> yes. >> i don't know robert do

there need to be a motion and second to change the clause. >> yes. >> to make it annual. it's an annual report niendz the 3 year review. so do we propose that i'm shooum u assuming we have a motion with the proposed amendment >> yeah. you could do that. >> can i make the motion. i move that we adapt the resolution with modification to the result clause to read resolve that the office of community from and infrastructure shall annually report okay. he let me see off the top shall review the application under this resolution within 3 years of its

adaptation subject to annual an annual report or an annual staff report. that's not very articulate but i'm trying to get the report in before the final review any help council. hopefully. >> how about steadfast following an annual staff and i'm sorry you you've got to speak up. >> years of adoption following the annual staff report or after the annual staff report. >> yes. that works after the word adaptation after is staffer report. >> so within 3 years of its adaptation comma after the staff report comma to extend of adapt it. i make the motion

>> it's been seconded by commissioner singh. please call roll >> commissioner annunciation our vote. commissioner mondejar. commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. madam chair the vote is 3 i's >> excellent. thank you. >> thank you. next item, please. >> the next order of business item 6 public comment on non-agenda items. madam chair >> any speaker cards. >> a no one. any members of the public that wish to address the commission on matters of public comment >> i'm sorry yes. i noticeed that the slink age of the members. >> we went on a diet. >> did the mayor wish to

appoint anymore. also i notice on the looking on the forward calendar nothing mentioned about the very important senate bill 1404 that relates to the issues you've talked about housing. this is quite interesting and quite how can i put it in a way that we the community have to lobby not in this hall but in the state capitol with governor jerry brown because it looks like he'll be around if for the fourth time in a row but audio effectively this 1404 obviously is going to be in the business of mayor ed lee and what he's doing now but the bottom line i think there should be a special hearing on this in the community

for which this impacts the communities. on another keynote i'm sure you're aware of check our history i've been here requesting this commission come to the western edition to talk about the obligation and it's been i don't know why it's been hesitant but here president you've got hoof history in the western edition that will be appropriate that before this thing comes up i think you need to come to the community and hold the meeting right in the middle of our community so we'll have some empathy so this is on urban renewal i'm respectfully requesting that and let us come to you guys and do a

presentation like everyone else to really show what we have been impacted by the urban renewal. as and mentioned before i am redeadlocking all my energy to put documents to assimilate to the world what i've viewed for the last 25 years a that's why i have not been here but when i took a break to put this together the game changes constantly here you call city hall i call is silly hall. >> thanks. any others speakers >> no altercated speakers. >> next item. the next order of business is report of the chair madam chair >> i don't have on extensive

report but asked 40 by the mayor's office to distribute this mayor's office policy on attendance which i won't read into the record and this is by the commissioners and secretary essentially the mayor is communicating to all commissions the basic sending a message of studying consistent standards for commission attendance for 2014-2015. that's all i have. you have a copy >> the next order of business the report of executive director. a informational memoranda of the university of california san francisco ucsf for the ucsf

mission bay project area. madam director >> thank you madam secretary commissioner members and for the members of the public each of those informational memorandums are on our website and certainly available for review and copies at the meeting. first an update you mean theirs vice chancellor laura presented their long term plan for mission bay around this time last year and really that long range is to guide they're planning and development of their compasses or compasses for the next year's for 20035 ucsf has developed been 82 percent of their campus to date as part of the long term

plan that's coming out in draft form the last time it was updated was in 1997 before the redevelopment plan and owner participation agreements were adapted will guide ucsf development an opportunity for the public and other tdrs government agencies to have a say in their growth plans. as you've heard ucsf does a grateful business in mission bay and outside with the shoigz for blocks 33 and although the payments for the family house block 7 west related to ac/dc deals with even then they need more stacey's spaces to add additional you housing units that's in your memoranda and we can have ucsf come back their presenting their development

plan before the city earthquake commission currently now. that concludes my presentation. on item a and b >> on the results of the initial phase of the selection of evaluating the transbay request for parole for the project area. madam director >> again, this is another informational memoranda that was in your packet we want to advise you since the commission approved and authorized the block 5 rfp we received had proposals at the end of the submission term at the end of the june after it was issued in april. those 4 proposals came from boston properties and ska log on block of you building it's 299

beale is the official name of the development in transbay. and j paul company and there's a potential item recommended to j paul company coming up on your calendar and a reality that kwirdz block 40. of the four developers there were significant criteria you set forth in our rfp based on the design excellence and purchase prize and compliance with the sbe and workforce contracting policies of the had develops ska log had the highest of 4 two or three 7 million from the mexico one that is boston and j paul and killing roadway were ranked and their prize

accordingly, you have in our informational packets the selection criteria the detailed analysis from our third party and the real estate to help us take a look at the feasibility and the detailed comments from the plaintiff and how each the developments faired and based on selection planning including the transbay joint powers authority and our staff and others we're moving forward with bringing for your consideration and inclusive negotiation with ska leg in september that will set forth strict milestones >> i'm sure you're aware of all pro sale precedes go to the biography hole in the ground the

joint powers authority he terminal and others fees to build your affordable housing with the streetscape program. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for questions and others from transbay are here to answer questions >> commissioners any questions. >> good job. >> we don't have questions quite yet. i just have two other announcements senate bill 1404 co-sponsored by the city and senator leno related to the housing obligates and the members of the public indicated it's made it through the protective progress for the consideration of the assembly floor and it's accepted to take place by mid-august.

and then it gets sent to the governor for his refuse and consideration and he'll have until october 1st i believe to sign or veto the bill we're certainly active in those efforts and implementation of how to use those funds will certainly w be a policy matter to come before the commission >> can i have i mean, i have a related question i don't know if it's appropriate but it came to mind. do we have a lobby firm or do we use i mean do - what do we do with lobbying at the state capital >> this is a city supported bill in city as a lobbying firm shaw and loader went through the

selection process and does the lobbying for the city even though we're not part of the city we advance the goals and objectives of this particular agency we're working with the mayor's office staff and the city of lobbyists in those efforts. >> okay. do we - yes next item >> the next ordering of business 9 commissioners questions or comments. >> do any other commissioners have questions or matters. >> what's the memo from the oh, the la send it's a fy i. >> yes. oftentimes the correspondence is sent to the ocii offices until the commission has directed outcomes

to have another public address so any correspondence that comes for you, we immediately transmit to there is a meeting coming up so that particular corresponds relates to a warriors project we'll certainly packing take anything into account and advisement. >> any additional questions. >> no next item. >> the next item of business is closed session there's no item. >> and adjournment is next make. >> we're mak. >> we're . >> we're i. >> we'rt. item. >> we're

>> [gavel] the commission will please come to order and the second will call the roll. >> commissioner singer. >> present. >> commissioner taylor-mcghee. >> present. >> commissioner chow. >> present. >> commissioner sanchez. >> present. >> car da. commissioner karshmer. >> applicant. >> the -- present. >> the second item and i was on vacation and the minutes are an earlier version of the resolution you passed. the updated version should be in your pile so the minutes should reflect the final resolution. >> commissioners we're prepared for a motion to accept the minutes and with the fact that

the final version of the resolution will be in the minutes. motion please. >> i move. >> there is a motion and a second already. are there any corrections to the minutes? >> i had a question. >> sure. >> on the request for follow up from human resources about progress on streamlining and making more effective hiring which seems to be a drag on progress in many of the departments in terms of meeting their objectives. when can we get that update? >> i believe the hr director will speak to you. >> director. >> good afternoon. we have a event in the last week of august and mapping it out and making improvements and i believe i asked to come back in september to give an update and i will check with mark to make sure i'm on the agenda.

>> perfect. thank you. >> you're welcome. >> okay. any other comments or questions on the corrections? if not all in favor say aye. the minutes are approved. next item please. >> the next item is the director's report. >> good afternoon. i am sitting in for director garcia who is on a well deserved vacation in hawaii right now and the first is the launch of the san francisco health network, the sign is behind you and launched on july 30. simultaneous events took place at 28 sites around the city and staff celebrated the creation of the network and each other's contributions. i know rol an pickins is here and can talk about the launch last week.

>> good afternoon commissioners. i am the director of the network. thank you. you will remember when i came to you in february and gave an overview of the development of the network i had slides on marketing and branding so this network launch was the fulfillment of the first part of the marketing and branding campaign which was an internal focus. we described we needed to do internal markets and branding before we went out to the public so this launch event was a culmination of the last months of an internal marketing and branding committee and chaired and co-chaired by staff and our chief communications officer so they had 30 staff throughout the department from community programs, laguna honda, san francisco general and actually did a great job

developing the launch activity itself, a description of what the network is. there is information on all the different sites that the network consists of throughout the city, the various clinics so this was our internal launch and we will come back as we get ready for open enrollment in the fall for covered california and other health plans to do an external marketing communications program, but this was part one, and you will be be hearing more about part 2. i will be coming to the commission in september on an update on the network and we will talk more about communications and marketing. >> thank you. i am sure the commissioners would be happy to help also with our external approach to the public. >> okay. we will get your picture on the muni bus going

by. okay. >> just a couple other items in the director's report related to open enrollment which mr. pickins referenced last thursday covered california and announced the rate for the exchange and the cost will go up by a weighted percentage of 4.2% and covered california region four which comprises the city and county of san francisco saw the largest weighted increase of 6.6%. the other changes in the regions were a reduction of 1% and those areas and increase of 6.3% in orange county. among the five health plans that will be available in san francisco and some blue cross has the largest weighted increase and those that stay with blue cross

will have an increase of 10 to 14%. kaiser has the lowest weighted increase at one point 6% and those consumers will have a change of a reduction or a increase of 4% and blue child and health net and chinese community health plan also. finally the environmental -- supervisor cohen has introduced two measures at the board of supervisors to improve air quality in san francisco. one enhanced ventilation for sensitive use development is consistent with a resolution passed in 2013 by this commission commission and require ventilations for certain developments and multi-housing and others. clean construction is a companion measure to

improve ventilation at sites to improve enhanced ventilation at construction sites that. concludes the director's report for today. >> commissioners any questions on the director's report? yes? >> colleen any -- what happened with covered california in terms of rate increases and where the providers for the city and county of san francisco came out relative to other places? anything remarkable about that or was that in line with what you guys expected? >>i think it's in line with what we expected. i think the overall increase state wide was reigning in costs and it's not seen as a large increase. i think there is a wide variety of costs with the providers in san francisco so there continues to be low cost plans available in san francisco. even though we have the highest rate of increase across all plans most plans ranged within the 4%

margin, the next closest county was orange county at 6.3%. i think given our cost of living and other things here it's not unexpected that we landed where we did. >> when you cite the averages are they straight averages of bronze, silver and gold plans or averages of bronze? >> they're weighted averages and consider the increases in the plan and the commissioners in the marketplace. >> okay. >> on the exchange programs here in the city part of the real key would be what premium is at and some are very high and some very low. do the premiums come closer together for each of the plans because after all in the first year it was a guess on the part of everybody about where to go, so tea