we're learning a rule saying our chandler child can't be part of the community. when it comes to admission priority i understand the intention but the execution is extremely problematic the flaws and issues the school system can't be completed in on crosstown bus i see how putting children into low districts to raise the scores it shouldn't be sacred at the others the children at coal valley have a been attending school and playing in the parks and the shared experience is being taken away from them instead of juggling kids between sklgz i think the school district should

make every school district better from the hunters point to the man or woman if the city can do that we will have time to talk with our children about what they learned instead of how many buses and trains it took for them to get to school thank you very much >> thank you. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hello, everyone my son was assigned to john but actually, we choose to go to washing and

lincoln. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> tilt we live in sunset so washington and lincoln is very close to our house my son since in fourth grade is leon violin so he is looking to go to a high school that has an ornament program so i hope the superintendents will help us solve this problem.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> and because john is so far away from our house and difficult to send my son to john o con everyday in order to send him to school and put another layer of burden into our low income status so i hope the superintendent can look at our case and help us out. >> thank you, everyone. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hello, everyone i really understand the parents how she

felt and actually and i have the similar experience as the other speaker. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> okay. so just now i heard from you all people talking about we do all the things for the good of the students, however, i have a series case here because my girl is not going to school right now i want to bring out this problem

and hopefully, i'll get help from you speeding i have to say that system in skufd is without equality because we choose 5 schools you, however, we were assigned to a school that's not our choice how come we don't

listen and try to check into the choice of the student my girl not going to school instead of going to the school she didn't like i hope you provide a safe and quiet and comfortable place for the student to learn so they can shine >> (speaking foreign language.) >> actually, i brought my girl to burton the school she was assigned to, however, she didn't like the environment so she choose not to go to school.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> so here as a parent i really asking help from you to hope you can really consider our case and help her help to assign her to the school she wants. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hello, everyone i'm here to speak for my grandson.

he was assigned to requested to go to balboa, however, he was not assigned to that school he was crying everyday and not wanting to go to school >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so actually his mom kind of passed away some time ago and i'm his grandchildren he was very sad that's why he asked me to speak to you and hopefully get help from you. >> (speaking foreign language.)

>> well, actually he went to a middle school near balboa park for a few years he really liked the neighborhood he had set in his mind he want to go to balboa high school he was not assigned to that school and disappointed that's why it is make we wondering why do you provide us the choice options, however, we

choose the school we didn't get the assignment for the school of our choose so i'm thinking the school districts assignment policy is fooling us around. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so i'm here to kind of strongly asking you to help us to place my grandson to the school he wants and i can see he might want to skip classes or he might want to quit so i don't know i'm the guardian so i don't know how to do when that

happens. >> okay. thank you very >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hello, i'm a mother of 3 kids ail my 3 kids are going to the 3 schools many in the west and east areas so any date applied for a school 5 minutes from our house; however, assigned to a school like today it tookized two hours.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> well about my family my father passed away and my mom had depression and i'm thinking i can spend little time to send my kids to the school so i can have more time to take care of my mother speeding i hope you can check our case and help us out thank you. >> okay public comment is now closed mr. sandyer son will you

please meet with the parents that just spoke they're in need of interpreters so, please interpreters would be mind helping mr. sandyer son he is in charge and w will take the information from the parent and speak to the educational placement center thank you very much mr. san leandroer son. okay item k advisory committee any committee appointments to be announced by board members seeing none, special order of business may we have a motion and second for the 2014-2015 local control and other plan for the san francisco county of education and the san francisco unified school district who will read the recommendation into the

record >> so moved. >> thank you president fewer i'd like to ask superintendent to read it. >> so the requested action is that the board of education approves the other plan or l cap for the san francisco county of education and san francisco unified school district keeping fiscal year 2014-2015 through 2016-2017 subject to annual updates. so actually, i think the 2016 yeah, that's correct if i can provide a little bit of information regarding the item before you and this is summarized in the language under background. as the commissioners know you approved the first l cap for the district at our i believe it was the june 24th meeting and that

was submitted to the california board of education later that week and over the summer we got feedback as i am guessing many other district and communities got feedback upon their review of the submission and they give us item a few items of feedback listed on the bottom of the background language. and they were very minor not problematic in our view it didn't take long to incorporate the feedback but asked the changes to be made i'll ask the board to adapt the changes. just to go through the 4 specific changes they recommended one was that the l

cap be separated for the county office of education versus t unified school district so our view covered the county and district responsibility but the california board of education asked us to separate the l cap from the district with the county l cap any references to kindergarten be removed and that's okay. number 3 was that in both the county and district l cap they wanted us to include a reference to the take care accrediting as one of the elements the states

priorities specified in the regulation and finally for number 4 in the county l cap include the references for the foster youth and for coordinating services for the dispelled youth in the county related to the county office all i have those were be incorporated into the revised versions and those versions are not red lined if you want i can point you to the changes they're all very minor. those revisions are on our website in english and spanish. if you have any questions, we'll be happy to answer them commissioners >> commissioner. >> i don't have issues with the proposed amendment but in the last 3 meetings we've taken up

the l cap i've requested our partners be acknowledged as one of the organizations that was very much a part of the community communication i asked they be listed as partners involved? process it's important to communicate that we work closely with our labor partners in developing this i ask they be bulleted under the process that we're impounded and we discussed this i'm disappointed it does appear so i'd like to get an amendment to the organizations that they be listed formally as organizations we included in the consultations.

>> any other questions or comments. i just have one i wanted to know so we're separating the l cap from the skufd from the county so i wanted to know that during our discussion with parents and groups did we have my representatives from our carefully that represents the is the in our county program >> i know the answer is yes but i can't specific which schools and scanning the room to see if ms. williams before that time is here she's probably in a better position to provide the details frankly than i am. >> thank you georgia.

>> i don't have exact figures but when he convened wi the stakeholders that served the county group they were part of the conversation. >> so we had guardians and parents present that's great. i think did we have student voices as part of the program >> that i can't speak. >> i think it would be helpful now we're separating the two and there maybe a different focus over and over something to add so thank you very much. next. commissioner wynns >> thank you. okay. so i that seems like the request from the state we had a separate l cap from the board of

education is a bureaucratic mistake i think they don't understand so i'm going i want to study this but i want us to write them a letter and say okay. we did that but our county of succession e education is sgrathsd with our school district this is about spending money we spend lots of money out disgust before you get u budget those students are our students i'd like them to be more integrated not separated so i think as a matter of policy we ought to or your opinion okay. we've done this so mr. and mrs. bureaucrat is no the the the reason we did this in the first

place >> are you saying i'll write to mr. and mrs. bureaucrat. >> so commissioners, i actually will go to the staff and confer with the county superintendent but actually we'll talk about that and bring that to the policy committee and then we'll craft a letter as well. >> great we'd be compliant by passing this that doesn't mean 53 we should follow-up this is i want us to do it the way you want it not put $0.50 in this budget and 20 in the next. >> thank you also deputy superintendent please note the commissioners request to add in our labor partners s c a u and u

s f f. >> i don't think that's a problem i want to make sure that commissioner the comments you made that wasn't disregard the distinction is there's a specific group of organizations working with the district several of the organizations that are listed that coordinated a specification community process and usa f and the other one participated in some of the activities around community engagement around the l cap but not organized through the district and not originated through that effort so they have a forum and members of the district and commissioners

attend that that was a parallel effort for the district connected effort per say it's might be splitting hairs but that's the intention behind the list there's no problem in the eyes of the organization i wanted to comment why the list appears as that appears as far. >> thank you superintendant commissioner maufas. >> so in the regards to mr. and mrs. bureaucrat conversation. so i understand the superintendant policy and operations and i'm going to seem but i'm actually asking have we had legal council weighing in on

the separation of the the entities and why we've done such is there any opinion? >> there's not. >> okay. continue on to the letter to mr. - and no opinion that's very helpful >> maybe i misconstrued the opinion and we didn't ask if you personally - >> (laughter). >> the question is should we look at the question of the legal requirement but i'll look at it. >> good commissioner maufas. any more comments from the board roll call vote >> mrs. jones. commissioner chin oar commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell.

dr. murase. commissioner norton >> ms. wynns. president fewer. 6 ice >> item m discussion even if education issues no one. consent calendar resolutions we have none together so this is item o we're voting on the consent calendar it's under section f. >> ms. jones. >> yes. mr. chin. mr. haney. police vehicles >> yes. except items 8 and 9. >> k and 9. >> correct and 13. >> and 12 and 13. >> okay. dr. murase. ms. norton. ms. wynns. president fewer.

thank you. thank you. item t consent calendar resolutions. those are south side of for board discussion i believe we have - >> commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell i located 7 things. >> these can all be taken together perhaps the gentleman can answer this for me. so i pulled those because their retro actually but contract we do year in and out for theist i want to find why >> good evening this is a first for me, i have not had to do

this. i know that commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell is very good at findings those things. but i want to apologize this should you have been on the last board meeting of june and it wasn't those restraining order that basically k things done every year for auditors and school services is an annual contract and the third one was kevin harper and we use him sporadicly. i was told they basically missed the end and this was submitted a month ago and not on the agenda i i'll it should have been on the june agenda it will never happen again and i guess it

stuck out one was a significant amount for $210,000 i want to make sure we especially toe continue on an annual reluctant get in on time thank you >> i'm sure they live in the fire chief. >> but that's our cpas d t d and at least the the fee didn't comboip so that's good (laughter). >> it's good news. >> i think we're ready for a vote. >> commissioner wynns. i know that we've been very happy with our auditors because ourist are great can you for the record can you tell us the industry practice for how often we ought to look at changing

auditors or reboyd the contract or reevaluating it i have no question with the auditors but should we think this is routine rolled over every year >> we've have a good relationship with the auditors and you mentioned and we did go out to bid there are basically if you companies that don't want those bids a lot of cases it becomes very costly event for some. i was surprised but i wasn't with the district very long how few people were interested? assignment. they change partners every 3 years and mr.