the rear yard anyway in the activity without the conditional use authorization. >> so the earth question i saw the plan is the garage staying the garage so the restaurant is on the other side of the vacant. >> the garage is staying a garage. >> so the restaurant is not abutting the dr requesters property the mid building to the other side. >> a portion of the restaurant is touching the dr requesters property line and i guess again my second meeting here i've spent countless hours on the area that's a big issue there's noise ordinances but people go through circles i want to head

it off at the pass without issues we're 98 percent there i'm hearing from the dr requester they want sound like proofing it's a condition in the code and want good neighbor policy it's agreed it and they want i'm i missing. >> oh, the bone fide establishment. >> yes. there if there's a complaint in the future call mr. sanchez we're 98 percent there. a six months report >> that's reasonable. >> yes. >> i'm sorry, i shouldn't be entertaining we did one important pops bar and mr. commissioner antonini was his idea this is a reasonable request we can have an amicable settlement one of the condition i have one condition have the

door closed at the allments to the noise didn't escape. that's fine we recipe the best noise companies in the world and so our intent is to be a good neighbor so sound like proofing >> great. >> in 6 months we'll be back before you you're going to file for a conditional use we'll have a build in system for the neighbors and okay. thank you. >> okay. thank you if i could add on a question to mr. sanchez if both restaurant and barhopping are permitted does one impact other decisions do you have to apply for a colorful license. >> the bar will be a 42 vs. the

the bar is 41. we did a look back on tupelo any feedback in terms of was the department able to actually look at the receipt and catch the information that was desired >> yes. my recollection that the reports we got indicate they compiled with the definition those other conditions those were included as a condition as a cu so this is he conditional use it's okay in order for i to oppose that you'll have to take dr and commissioner antonini. >> i have a couple of questions for the project sponsor architect how many square feet is the restaurant and total 787. >> that's pretty small okay.

and then that includes our. >> the kitchen area. >> about 680 for the restaurant space. >> what's your capacity. >> we're a b-3 allowed 49 but no impossibility we seat 16 so i told you it will be 16 to 20. >> okay. that could be all right. >> now the other thing is describe the kitchen. >> so we've hired a kitchen equipment company we put the whole job on hold once the dr came up so the kitchen has food storage a microphone oven and oven and potboiler i don't have. >> it sounds like you've got a lot of equipment to prepare the menu. >> the questions are unfounded

they don't know how the restaurant is going to be operating and if you look at the menu they're delicious. >> i've landmark that muni menu is there a separate entrance to the upstairs that answers most of my questions i have a few dmments there are recuperates, you know, in a tack mode that if those of you have been to locals corners it's not very big i think most of their cooking facilities are behind the creditor we've had a bigger scale that's where all the cooking occurs and, you know, i did not think it was noisy and the food was very good and their

men i way small i'll need a couple which things first of all, the sound like proofing is already part of the thing that's teaching i would agree the patio door needs to be locked and a six months back to see how things are and the issue of the patio not before us that would be the conditional use because it would have to come back if there's interest in the patio. >> commissioner fong. >> i agree the conditions but i want to ask the architect where's the garbage and i said in pie presentation we'll keep the public outside of the backyard to put the garbage in the backyard one of the neighbors obtained so aging i

didn't agreed they're worried about bottle sound so aging yes to have the trash for the bottles inside. >> in the garage area. >> not in the garage behind the space in the kitchen. >> i'd like to add that as a condition that the garbage and recycling remain in the building operational thing. >> commissioner moore. >> could you briefly go through the issues we understand what was applied that and for me. >> so the couple issues regarding the history of the property and regarding the legal use of the property it was a violation and there was sfrornl a commercial establishment that's next door off site storage that's been addressed by

the project sponsor and a history where the building was converted to office use there's a permit establishing that there's no outstanding enforcement issues and i'll address the garbage so the code provides for that under the same acceptance the garbage compose must be kept within the premise only outside when a certify by a disposal company. >> could you comment on the saturation so the liquor license is there a large number based on one the diagrams how 80 do you see that approving that for a wine bar use it's currently zoned for retail once you've rezoned you can't go back as a supervisor in this district has

commented are there concerns i was there a few weeks ago in the middle of the night it was annoying noisy there's a fun side to it wow. arrest. >> an excellent point in regards to concentration of the concentration riches e issues that's not manage that the abc license in the license abc had a aphasia a type 41 they don't have the concentration test for it they do for the off sale licenses the liquor store and they have a concentration test the type 47 might and the project sponsor can talk about that i did not see that on abc website it would be subject to a concentration test but even if

something exceeds the concentration there's a approval at the board of supervisors they can allow the establishment that exceed the concentration and police weigh in open that to be considered, you know, that's something the concentrations issues are vested out by abc. >> we've not heard opposition from the molt use across the street that particular prove or disprove was brutal when it came to the housing but we've not heard anything ton or on this matter. >> maybe staff can address that i have not heard comments in the

supervisor. >> sounds like there's a letter of support from the hotel. >> thank you commissioner richards. >> i think i want to add the good neighbor policy for someone asked for so administrator is that standard. >> we have standard operation conditions that maintain under the section maintains the entrance to the building and keep them in sanitary conditions optional add. >> the law son. >> the community liaison. >> when you talk about good neighbor policy i think i've mentioned that was it in terms of of providing a contact phone

for the law son for the streets? >> i guess it would be it would be preferred if the law so that was added since it's right there maybe the owner or could be anyone but they have the ability for the ongoing dialog and okay. thank you. commissioner johnson >> thank you very much. i just wanted to add one quick thing i think it is great to have a condition in order to do some of the things we're talking about we might have to take the dr so if we're going to do that i want to add one more not to consider a seat for the outdoors space until the six months look back is done i know you're not anticipating come back i want to do thing in the right order >> is that 6 months from

today's date. >> from the date they commence operation. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i'm going to make a motion to take dr and approve the project with the following conditions and add open if i miss something the patio is to remain locked during business hours 6 months of report back to the commission from the time that they begin operation. >> would 0 i like to be in the form of a memo or a presentation. >> a presentation he lets do that they'll have to appoint a community liaison and make that information available. and make sure that the garbage and recycling is kept in the

designated area and police when it's taken to the curve it's not readily assessable to be rum aged through this is an issue you know from the noise you can put a couple of 50 pound concrete it can discourage anyone until the garbage man walks up that's the motion >> oh, no cu application for 6 months at least 6 months avenue you've opened the establishment cu being for the outside. >> just to clarify the garbage requirement is already part of the planning code it's not needed it's a requirement this is imposed. thank you >> sir, you can't be calling

from the audience. >> the project sponsor has a good question i want to ask it can they file for their conditional use authorization procure to that six months reporting, you know, it does there's a backlog so i think would the idea be they can political for it now by no hearing until their had their six months o months report balk or back. >> i guess we can amend it commissioner antonini. >> i think the actual hearing can't be any sooner than 6 months. commissioner moore >> i would previous not to build that otherwise we lived here hear it today, i wouldn't support it today with an outdoor

so this is a conditional approval i'm not comfortable 5u was it change that we worded it differently no hearing until after the report back. >> if no hearing until the report back the hearing will be after the report back and great. >> great okay. >> is there a second to the motion. >> thank you commissioner richards shall i call the question a motion to take dr and approve the project to keep the patio door during business hours that there be a 6 month update in the form of a presentation a community liaison and no cu hearing will occur until after

the six months. >> commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson campfire commissioner moore >> commissioner richards arrest commissioner fong. >> commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero commissioners that places you on our final agendized item at 250 roosevelt away a discretionary review an abbreviated discretionary review >> will you ask them to be quiet. >> oh, yeah. good evening planning commission southwest team leader the two properties in the castro upper market nauseated the proposal

for a one level top floor to an existing this a one level petition that will expand is that hundred plus square feet with a 16 hundred foot roof-deck and requires no variance the subject property on 25 by one hundred up slope level at the front property like line and two at the rear the massing is sent from the front property line and the vertical edition above about the residence they've reviewed the residence and determined it is determined to be okay. the dr filer receipt is located diemg i dialoging and on higher

ground the residential design team no extraordinary circumstances and accepts the recollection not to take discretionary review and allow it >> thank you doctor requester. >> i'm richard the requester i live in a tick behind this complex the techy live in consists of 11 cottages i'm at the a paradox the lowest open the hill when this unit adds on additional level we'll be looking each other across the lot. the area is quiet i basketball it two years ago when i retired my unit is one thousand square feet the europe level is not impacted i fully admit i'm the only person faxed by the project

but affected but it. i asked the plant to do something about the viewing into my unit i suggested the unit be part of their unit that looks at into my living area is the fourth bedroom and the 3 third abruptly >> is there a way to turn this open. >> it's on. >> this is my deck immediately behind this is where the. >> sir if you could pull the microphone offer to you. >> this is where they're going to add the third level and as you can see those windows go into my space this is

approximately about 63 foot okay. this is the closest building to they property people next door are way up the hill and the people own the other side are one hundred feet away pr the backyard area so i suggested i mind since they're going to be here bring this part forward so the bedroom that was back here overwhelming will be a block from looking in and put the window across the time to get lighted and they could open up for air and not verify into my complex that's right if the my suggestion i was open to anything and i was told they would get back and i didn't hear and spoke to marseille at the planning commission she recommended i file the discretionary review because if i didn't i would losses that my

right to protest so they made changes they switched the two rooms now the bedroom is here and the bathroom is over here instead of a window they put a room i don't and jutting juliette balcony i didn't see how that addressed my concerns they were looking into me and i into them the difference they're a abruptly and bedroom my bramz have fostered glass. so i didn't think i was asking too much i'm open to suggestions. i was hoping they'd meet me halfway and they'll put in fostered glass and therefrom

give me privacy and i'll go along with a full glass on the other side i was told by the planning commission they didn't want to block off the other part they need a variance and didn't want to deal with that issue. i i don't think what i'm asking for is going to cost a lot of money i only want high privacy if this is the wisest thing oh, that sound like something very rare when i discussed it with two of the people in the planning commission they encouraged me to apply. i flew agree they've fwlot letters of loving them open the street i'm the one faekd affected and i'm the only one my neighborhoods are a level higher they see right of over that.

i'm asking you to mediate i'd like to keep my privacy i'm willing to go 50/50 >> is there public comment in support of the dr requester. >> seeing none, project sponsor your team as 5 minutes. >> i'm even though architect representing the owns. we've gone you our letters already can you have the overhead i'm going to talk about the scope and their talk >> so this is a seven hundred and 35 square feet they didn't recognize with a master bedroom and a guest bedroom and a goilt guest basket the radiation to

the roof did he know up above the intent of the design that margaret and andrew are looking forward to having a living space on the main level separate from their dining room and their living room. the second bedroom for guests for andrew mother who's in her 80s she stays there quite a bit >> and radiation mark and aurnd interned to live there they appreciate this converts that property into a viable family unit adding an additional bedroom the surrounding contention as was discussed more than 60 or 63 feet by my calculations it's a ways away

and diej the project is modest in scale and fits into the neighborhood no variances are needed more over we've had a sensitivity to the views and privacys of the neighborhood we created a smaller unit by code we've that i would the edition back. i'm sorry here we are well pulled it back under the front primary facade to the frontd front we've pulled it back in the rear and 12 feet in the front and 12 feet in the rear with an effort to minimize unbelievable and viability of the vertical edition. you know, this i think it a quiet great graphic here's unus

the proposed edition the red line in terms of height quite sympathetic and kitty corner and quite a bit up above the drs property that's all i have to say i'll hand it over to mark >> good evening, commissioners. >> thank you for hearing about our project we want to go through the neighborhood outreach that we conducted and we got some extra documentation of letters that came in over our packet during the preapplication the week of july 7th we kashtd the neighbors whether owners or renter and in the surrounding property our neighbors were in support and the nabts appreciated we worked diligently with the architects to keep the

edition always small as possible while still chief of police the center spates we didn't maximize the building and pulled the edition back from the street and then our neighbor to the west really appreciated we pulled back the side of the building as well so the sun could come in to the light shift. >> which she has with her apartments so we did, however, make changes based on staff what they asked us to do lowered the ceiling it was a lot higher we brought it down 2 and a half feet throughout to bring it further down so we didn't expect any observations when the 236 went out the dr requester was

concerned about the views and privacy. so we did meet with him he asked for 3 dhangz we are were not able to meet most of them we needed egress for windows and so on we reduced the number of the windows in the pack back that triggered a floor change we were happy to do and i guess that's it so >> thank you. is there any public comment? okay. seeing none dr requester you have a 2 minute rebuttal >> most of it was said by the applicants didn't relate to my issue which the loss of privacy due to the large number of

windows looking at into my unit i was not contacted i meet with them and they didn't come back with this and that they said that was a last minute thing the moving the rooms i don't see how there's one less window not a big brech overview french door supplied that down the middle whether the bathroom or bedroom pasta u put a window across the top or stain the windows it's at bathroom that most people don't have big clear windows in their bathrooms that's all i'm asking. and i don't know what else to is >> project sponsor you have to minutes. >> i'