of the pilot because at the end of the day it's difficult to say that was the deleted allocated authority it's not meanwhile the fault of the policy one of the things the project sponsors we're working with to try to engage their precipitation of how well, this is working last thing the project lists the perspective has 25 projects will will be projected allocations it represents about a third of one hundred and six some projects we have in rfp in a problematic categories and the total of $5 million in prop k fund and for per inspection for 2015 we have $4 million it's a relatively small process the cac approved it but up to the

committee if you want to you can remove those if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them and jonathan will be happy to answer. >> supervisor campos thank you, very much and thank you to the staff there was a lot of thought and work i want to say have are a great deal of respect by i'll vote against it is a misguided policy if you look at the 4 page memo that was sent to us not a single line even addresses what the problem actually is it describes the policy but didn't address the one bullet that they have which is, you know, to expedite allocation of prop k funds i mean, if you're going to change the determination of authority this is one of the most serious things a body what

had you have to have examples of why the change t is needed simply saying you need to allocate the fund is not sufficient i have to hear the timely project was impede because of delegation of lack of authority and beyond that i think if you are changing for a third of the projects the role of the citizens advisory committee and not taking them out of the picture and not only taking them but taking this committee out of the picture you better have a good reason and i think it is telling that staff is given a lot of segregation to make sure if they deem a project to be controversial it wouldn't be on the list part of the transparency is for the public to decide if something is

controversial things are likely not to be controversial if the public doesn't get an opportunity to say anything i think this is really misguided i know it has good tennis but the wrong the we're going to the ballot asking voters for hundreds of million dollars and now we're talking about diminishing transparency and accountability because that is precisely what's happening here i think we're sending the wrongs message i don't know why this is happening i'm surprised with all the things i've seen as a member of this agency this is the first time i'm what is going on here i don't understand this so i'll be respectfully voting against it i be sure that my colleagues in my district know about this.

>> thank you supervisor kim. >> so actually having i have a press conference it downstairs i'm not sure this could be expanding continued i see the benefits of some of it but i agree there are a lot of questions i have about this allocation i like extremely the process i get frustrated at the project delivery so i like the idea of extremely bureaucracy but i want to feel comfortable to support that that makes sense for small projects might be $75,000 can be streamlined but i'm gladly we're looking at walk first at least going through vision zero i want to assure that walk first happens as quickly as possible but we don't know accident locations we know what the

overall plan and the mta has identified as provided for walk first but not gotten the project plan with the alleyway actual locations i imagine the board or commission times to look at accident things before 3 more going out this is my initial feedback this deserves a longer conversation this is my motion to continue it. >> thank you supervisor breed. >> i said support a motion for continuance if i had to vote open this item today, i wouldn't be able to support it i have concerns about streamlining the process and the prop k funds from my understanding a lot of the cac and the committees there were established were to make sure there was public input from a variety of places on those

particular items i know that some of the departments have expressed frustration with me trying to get the project done as quickly as possible and not being able to assault of some of the details but there's a process we need to under take you previous we not change the process unless i clearly understand why this is being proposed it is two random to say it's a controversial project a small dollars amount like a bulb out could constitute a controversial situation is it's not about the dollar but the fact we're changing it in the city and making sure i macro decisions we need to make sure that the public has a seat at the table i'm not comfortable with what is being proposed. >> supervisor yee.

>> i'll also be willing to support a tennis when i had the discussion earlier it was a little bit - it was a long discussion because i wasn't too sure what is rational was and what the proof and any sufficiency and if we're going to be talking efficiency there are other possible vehicles to get there i think we should have a discussion on this. >> thank you and you've heard the sentiments of committee i hope i bring it back with the organ but specific examples this is addressing and how to maintain accountability. >> if i may the staff raised the concerns and i think also, if you made things like jonathan

spoke on behalf of the project sponsors but from the perspective with but approval of the 5 year plans just to reference we h have more details than any other counties but the cac board has had a chance we're missing as people put their radar out when the allocation come forward and that's what is lost with the policy with that, i think supervisor campos. >> your explanation to how the policy works but not providing the justification what went wrong. >> i think jonathan should speak to that it doesn't allow the last minute projects because the board has to approval the list of projects. >> thank you marie jonathan

rivers with the mta, you know, maria brought universe i up the background that had to do with the studies of krorldz and the feedback a lot coming from us some keep in mind from the public works and i think the staff i completely agree with supervisor campos that part of the issue not reflected is the problem and the sponsors identifying the problem not the authorities responsibility to say they're not being as quickly as possible the policy as framed real focuses on the quick improvements we want to get out open the streets one example hapsz to be the match for caltrain grant we might get $200,000 we need even though $300,000 match we want to good faith those with caltrain but we have to have the design the 4 to

6 weeks behind on that we have an obligation schedule with caltrain and trying to get past the red tape another example it's been very important for this vision zero committee for us to continue it work with dpw on better cooperations especially with repeal pavement projects and very often dpw they want to go out and bid a contract may have to delay the bid because we want to add 20 to $30,000 or so, so as maria pointed out within the prop k $200 million it is $5 million and it's really those opportunities with regard to vision zero a lot of the projects are quick paint projects we want to get out

there as quickly as possible you've seen the allocations for $8,000 it is a paint project so we can do those in bundle and cooperate it makes the projects done quicker will happy to have this postponed and come back and work with you. >> it mr. rose. >> supervisor breed. >> can i add it would be hopefully to see the mta supports them and have feedback from them as well as and others providing consistent comments with the projects relied to the prop k funds. >> one thing we've built into that was useful i want to thank the authority staff the process we went through this year, the cac we spent 3 hours on special

meetings going through each category and projects and questions they had it will give you a better sense of the strategy and we'll know what we're doing through the global process we've committed we're very transparent and have ever opportunity to answer all questions. >> thank you anyone from the public wish to speak on this item anyone want to speak please come forward. >> tomorrow wednesday not morning or afternoon but evening 7:30 the american culture center so some u.s. taiwan relationship of culture matter some people speaking in the buchd temple i think that is as i said we have

to have all the wholly talent to extend to people not only for politicians but the educators and the church personnel we have more talent and having about wholly talent on one body so we been boundary so we have to engage in more areas to enforce our position to extend what angle more area so we'll be more fulfilled position thank you. >> thank you, sir you have to focus on the issues on on the agenda for your remark. >> you want to have the mta point out in the packets where the list are because we have some a big list ace the tuesday

supervisor campos in regards to the citizens advisory committee concerns over the public and how money is being spent on the capital projects like the caltrain and what went on there and the concerns it is changing the scope of the project against maybe what the public may approve as a project same thing with the central project how we're spending money on the design and completion of the promotions so the public's input is critical and sometimes the public puts forgot persistence things on the bike planning that has combats on buses and transit and you've got to look at more than one thing it is in regards to throwing throwing out paint we don't want to rush it that fast we want to see that citizens have a right to see the

implementation and the best solutions are taken into consideration. >> thank you anyone else 0 from the public seeing none, public comment is closed we've got a continuance from the supervisor campos to the call of the chair, sir a roll call. >> on item 9 supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor kim absent supervisor mar supervisor yee item is continued. >> thank you sir call the next item which is an informational item. >> draft neighborhood transportation planning guidelines an informational item. >> ma'am, can we get through this as quickly as possible. >> again, this is an informational item as part of

approving the prop k 5 year program you have a approved funding for the neighborhood transportation program i'll call this is out of recommendations from our county wide plan the transportation plan and your and public input there be more of a focus on neighborhood type projects and social and economic and justice analysis that said we need a stronger pipeline of promotions like in head projects at the neighborhood scale so long story very short this is now approved one hundred thousand for each district supervisor to with regard to a neighborhood level grant up to 6 hundred thousand from 2014-2015 and the guidelines you have in

our packet are guidelines we've developed with the project sponsors but i'll say the cf b didn't discuss this last month the intent is not a board cost of projects each district supervisor can there will the efforts they want to fund to their district so the guidelines are to provide guidance on the one hand on how to have a robust strategy and you need a fund plan with that, i'm happy to take comments and we'll have a presentation next month. >> colleagues this is great it creates a participatory planning process anyone from the public wish to speak on this item we have one card aaron goodman. >> i was very interested in this item because of the

transportation that was suggested in district 7 so hopefully supervisor yee your issues of the alternatives simpleminded by members can change the ideas of how the transit exist in that district. >> thank you. is there any additional public comment. >> actually for the past year since 2013 june and sometimes, people that are preclassed sfo and i started to gave me on to my holy pathway to you talk to people about they're meeting every monday or tuesday e.r. wednesday or thursday or if i or saturday or sunday about the

wholly way and the way to what you of walking with an objective action for anyone people in san francisco so how it's been one year already sufficient influence over my from my side wholly study and onto the people's new thinking see because we don't talk there's no reaction about talking so we talk a million billion people everywhere see i'm continuing to do that into otherwise something else happens. >> thank you. is there any additional public comment sooibd so colleagues, i see no other comments f this is an informational item next. >> item 11 introduction of new

items anyone from the public wish to speak on this item seeing none, public comment is closed call the next item. >> item 12 public comment? >> wrap up quickly it was mentioned early on the buses but in general overseas they replace business every 6 or seven years that mid door idea of opening up doors because the front entrances are blocked about his but it's something to look at in the study of egging ingress for business on brt so when we increase the housing we increase the capacity of people to load and unload people. >> thank you, mr. goodman is

there any additional public comment. >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> item 11 adjournment. >> thank you, everyone meeting is adjournedyou.

>> what do you think about working at an airport and i love it is busy all the time. >> we want it to be an those

away was this is a venture if i didn't love it i'll be an accountant. >> we want the experience that is a non-airport experience the negative stigma we're trying to erase that. >> everything is in a bad food to excite them about the food and they have time to learn about us. >> people are imitated by traveling and the last thing to do is come to a place fill of chaos. >> telling me how the extent of napa a farms came about. >> it was a vision of the airport director he had a suspicion of a really cool gourmet speciality market locally friendly products this

market local flavors this is the best. >> can we get a little tour. >> absolutely (laughter) ♪ ♪ >> so first on our tour. >> we have the clock we like to call it. >> this is coordinating it is made in san francisco. >> what about the customer presence. >> we like to get the permanent farther i love the cappuccino and you have to go to multiple places for the cupcakes the cup a cakes from kari's people want to live here they're longing phone call for one thing in one spot in you know anything about san francisco the cheese the most popular cheesy think a lot

of the people from the west coast say so this the real san francisco sour dough and they're curious. >> you find people respond to the idea of organic and absolutely. >> this is autumn. >> thank you, thank you and there's a lot of personal touch. >> i see san francisco. >> it's very hands on. >> what's the most popular items. >> this is quite surprising our fresh jotting this is the chronicle special a bowl of warm oats and coconut that's mites farther. >> and speaking of drinks tell me again the cocktail scenes is that one, the things your known for . >> the cocktails are fantastic. >> really.

>> fresh ingredients we don't have a mixture it to order this is our marcus bloody mayor. >> farmer's market bloody mary the bloody marys in the airport are great shikz it up. and then we're going to garnish it with olives. and some lime and a fresh stalk of selly. right on. >> we like

>> so what brought you out here for the bike ride today? >> i grew up in san francisco but i have been living in new york. i wanted to see what san francisco is doing with infrastructure. >> cities are where people are living these days. the bay area

is doing a lot with construction and the way to change the world starts here. >> we are about to take a bike ride. we have 30 cyclist. i'm really excited to hit the road and see what the city has in store. >> i definitely recommend it to people. it's a fun afternoon and you learn so many things. >> this is so much fun. i go to

parts of the city that i don't come to. this will make the city a more susta