legislation didn't confer or offer a residential unit for some use is not lauded by law a homeowners or rental agreement or any of the recreation or improbable agreement i want to enthused of authenticities we're not devolve into or changing the tenant lazy was speaking to the city attorney about the copy no time restrictions there's a prospective that carrie's are all right. incorporated negligence that will not override cc&rs but include the words cc&rs just like we're not going to impact the homeowners association agreements leases e.r. otherwise that's clear. the other things there's been a plate of horrible things will the air b and b short time

rentals whether or not there's prostitution or drug dealing as a matter of fact, that's happening that has happened in plenty of unit before air b and b came along it is not issues that are local law enforcement need to grapple with but we're trying to insure there's safety concerns but typical police department concerns and we are going after that you by the way, i must have the old version i didn't read in there what i read to me covers my concern about the hoa agreements. >> yes. on page 19 subsection 57 line 12. >> thank you very much. >> i'm going to call additional cards i want to speculate some

people may not have waited for their cards to be called (calling names) >> next speaker. >> good afternoon. supervisors i'm chris, i live in

district 10. supervisor cowen's district and i are happen to work in supervisor kim's district i've taken the day off to discuss this important topic. when i became a citizen easily this year i made a pledge to uphold and have full faith of the laws of the united states and as an air b and b host i want to do this legally it's important to me and important to my husband that we're following the laws in this i have to say it bothers me we're not curling within the boundary of the law and appreciate supervisor chiu's legislation and the amazing amateur of work he and his staff and supervisors have done. to make it so people like us can do this legally. i have to say we

live in the bay area and you may think we because of that we cannot host very frequently given certain conditions in the be sure we're full about 60 percent of the year with guests from around lights world who experience our neighborhood for the fritter we wouldn't come down to the bay area without the possibility of parole shop in the portal we've sent them to los angeles and aefblg we enjoy sending our guests and give them safety tips about using transit around the city and places that are safeer we're going to be staying with some of our guests as the a deplorable community and i don't wag the 90 day limit

given the time. >> for clarification for the people that raised this right now the legislation provides the 90 day limit when the host is not there are you referring to a 90 today limit when that 9 host is there. >> i've heard at some level having a 90 day limit hosted and unhosted. >> you're going for the extension of the periods of time when the host is present. >> correct so for hosted i disagree with the 90 day limit. >> i wanted to clarify that. okay. >> next speaker. >> hi gary briggs. i'm here today to comment on this sharing economy, home sharing and the way it stands right now, i'm against it because it is rezoning blanket the blanket

rezoning of entire city that's the problem there's planning code and procedure for this it should require a notification of the neighbors 5 hundred feet one thousand feet one unit at that time, until they go through the proper permitting process. before you get to that stage i would table this legislation until had that it you get the back taxes taken care of the disingenuous in-your-faceness so say there you go to pay the tax but not submitted anything on this and furthermore, i would take the steps of having those records and get the money do an

audit and then look at this thing make sure they're on board. they've ran david chiu done the rabble hole and for them to side or do this is really disgusting i'm against this and appreciate you'd table 24 and make them pay their back taxes and not do a reblanket of the entire city. thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm roger president of the west twin peaks council that represents 20 neighborhood associations in san francisco i represent fully ask the committee not to approve the legislation first at the previous speaker stayed this as a rezoning issue whether or not

people want to do short time rentals in the legislation is approved in the present form no longer single-family home district in san francisco. second renting rooms to tourists is not home sharing but rather room renting. the proposed legislation clarifies them as short time rentals they're really commercial uses clarifying those as short time rental it will make it difficult for the homework associations to enforce their caesar especially rh1 and rh2. the language speaking of hoa's in the cc&rs

will not trumpet the statute that says it's a residential use it's a commercial use. finally if there's a genuine need it should be a citywide rezoning perhaps by the creation of some special permitting not on an ad hoc basis and certainly not for the benefit of some large corporation that happens to be headquartered here thank you very much thank you. next speaker. . >> good afternoon, supervisors my name is ken i'm a san francisco native former director of the mira loma improvement club and a realtor for the last 40 years many questions have

been raised and ambiguities brought out by some of the questions and answers. through air b and bs a few questions that have not been answered when is the full scope of the short time rental market as it exists illegal at the present? and what could the scope grow to in the future that is. another question to what degree will the short time market contribute to the e slating sales force. will the lucrative cash flows derive contribute to speculation much of which is from foreign investors will the number of

non-occupants grow thus limiting the supply of housing for our citizenry. will this legislation contribute to the growing of exodus of families with children? is this legislation match the mandates that affordable housing be personal and enhanced and neighborhood character about preserved and protected. if you can't fully answer those questions i urge you inform return to for study and recommend an eir under sequa. thank you. >> >> next speaker. >> my name is kathy i'm also a native san franciscan. i'm a former san francisco school teacher accrual san francisco

volunteer i've lived in all my life i raised my children in the city i'm against the current legislation because one 0 single rented units with buildings with multiple apartment will be turned into short time rentals. this willes bat the extreme shortage of affordable housing and of long term housing in the city actually what i meant to say. the whole city will be rezoned turning homes into guest homes and - secondly, grossly unfair to hold landlords accountant to rent control and allow the tenants to profit without restriction or permission from the landlord or from other tenants in the building. by the tame token a

landlord should in the be allowed to circumvent it by turning it into a short term rental and finally yes. i realize he also this is a new economy changed by the internet but regulation needs to be put in place and zone needs to be replaced and health and safety issues address and liability insurance required. i urge this committee to make the long term needs of our city residents a priority over and over the profit making of short term rentals thank you. >> to my left. >> hello, i'm sarah with the housing rights