commissioner moore i look at the presentation and personally doesn't have tools to deal with light or shadow impact as the project is code compliant it is this is a modest edition and skillfully done discussions about the privacy glass, etc. i don't think anything we can request an agreement between the two parties involved i happen to live in a very tight light well and while i see my neighbors i don't stand at the window to see what they're doing in urban live you might see each other but no intent of interfering with other people's so this argument did

not ring true i understand the light and appreciate it we're in no position to deal with that as an argument unless there's a disrespect for are not notches? not a full light well by definition i'm in support of the project and actually would suggest that i'm make a motion to move to approve. >> second and commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i feel the same way again, the option in privacy situations that the party that may want nor privacy can have shuttles or shades for privacy we're in a dense urban area and almost any place i live in the city is going to have vision

going into a window where people can be able to see outside a little bit better it seems like the light well situation is close to matching allows the left to right from the east and west i'm in favor in the motion. >> i'm supportive i know we sort of abbreviate our discussions in the last item but even though it's late we're tentative we're paying attention i know there's a couple time the project sponsor and others say 'tis it's late but paying attention. >> commissioner moore i appreciate our saying that because we move to the end of

this meeting has not changed my position i would have said the same thing if it was harder at as item 13. >> commissioners, we have a motion and a second 90 to not take dr. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis be commissioner johnson commissioner moore sxhoifkz that he commissioner fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously and places you on item 14 on gladstone drive request for discretionary review good evening southwest team leader we're on the south side in the excelsior neighborhood proposal the proposal is a two-story horizontal rear edition it

increases the wealthy by 164 inches and adding 3 bedrooms and two barrooms and a family room the logically e.r. relocation to the garage of the part of the interior it adds 9 hundred and 80 square feet to the existing rinse the subject properties 50 by joe 50 and 25 hundred square feet the dr requesters is concerned about the existing property line they're concerned this position will change the feel p of this home to a detached unit and the sunlight will be come down because it will add 4 additional feet to the overlay 4 feet deeper than the dr filer they'll not windows

on the other side facing the subject property the dr requester about modify the corner to accommodate the neighbors access to light despite at a 45 degree angle the side yards exit the side yard paper was not found and many are occupied by one story garages overall it was found to fit within the neighborhood context and the elimination was found appropriate it is in the rh1 zoning district where does yards are not required there's no exceptions or special circumstances not take discretionary review and approve

the building permit. >> okay dr requester you have 5 minutes. >> good evening, commissioners i'm the owner of 141 gladstone the adjacent property i have two problems the main one recommended to sunlight we get sunlight mainly from a side door glass side door opening to the backyard which is the south side of my house it expends 15 feet by 4 feet to the south to the backyard and this will actually bring the highway that is 4 feet higher than my house and 4 feet to the setting thisblast will

block the sunlight from my main glass door there is a problem that will be critical in the winter when sun actually in the angleed and i think it is a major problem for us and make the hours darker and definitely not as great to live in other problem is related to what the problem in the neighborhood there was actually a similar project on the adjacent project next to 135 from the other side this exact house one hundred 45 suffered from water into seep into the ground level the new owner became aware of the

problem that was disclosed to the new owner it's a known problem in the neighborhood not new i did not see in the planning a study related to the water i would say kind of study done to see the effect on the adjacent houses so those are the two major issues i think they can be avoided by a set back not adjacent to the line on the property line but can be 4 feet back and the increased or the extension to the inside of the property can be limited to the existing structure on the total width of the structure thank you very much. >> okay project sponsor i'm sorry speakers are there speakers in support of dr

doesn't look like it project sponsor. >> good evening, commissioners jeremy the project architect trying to keep this short and sweet in our packet a copy of the proposal to angle the rear of the edition which the dr requester never responded to we don't know how he feels about the proposal we've begun ahead and done shadow studies for that proposal anyways as he said the building in this block with don't get a lot of light their proximity to silver avenue this is much taller to the building on the south but in june in the summer soltice you

see with our original proposal that by 9:00 a.m. the sun starts to clear his rear deck sliding glass door and clear by 745 in our revised angle it is clearing by 9 o'clock but in full sun by 10:30 an hour and 15 minutes arbitrate more sun as well as with the revision starting to clear the door at 8:20 with the revision and the glass the full dysfunction by 1125 and by 9 or 10 in the morning and by

comparison in the winter time the project is in full shadow of the building behind that with that said, i'll comment on the horizontal aspect to the side property line the project sponsor himself has a side edition i'm not positive it's the lower level of the garage floor we're proposing the existing garage on the main portion of the building the side edition will house the garage that was a side patio now a garage we're asking for what he has next and speakers in support certificate project sponsor no one dr requester you have a 2 minute rebuttal if you like.

>> thank you very much i just want to highlight that the proposed proposal for this solution can cause a problem in the summer because of the sharp angle of the building the new this will be 4 feet higher than 38 my house in the winter the problem is different the amount is lower i have a short window of time when the sun gets into the glass door then blocked by the silvers with this extension is changes things. >> project sponsor two minute rebuttal. >> i guess one thing i forgot to mention the water table that's a known issue like he said in the historic report

there was sprairg in the neighborhood that will be incorporated both the solar report in terms of the height of the street that's the way the street is sloped we can't do much about it so that's it. >> okay public hearing is closed commissioner moore. >> i'd like to ask the project architect could you come to the podium please if you had a discussion with the applicant prior to this meeting like in the haul today, etc. your mischievous i think t is generous way to address the problem this is as far as

someone could respond to the request on light i've explained this is not falling into a rule or registration to deny. >> we we have the preapplication meeting the neighbor was not there we spoke on the phone several times as gabriel my partner with the 311 notification period we've not spoken since the dr was filed like i said we've not received a response. >> this is the first time that the applicant is suggesting this modification. >> we e-mailed that to him during the 311 notification he didn't respond. >> could you perhaps tell us what you think about the change

other than saying it didn't solve our window problems are you comfortable with it solving our problem during the other times of the year. >> no, i phoned the architect and he recommended i talk to the city about the problem first, i talked to jean in a i believe was the project manager and received did proposal of the angle solution and in my opinion this solution must solve the whole problem in south e summer months but not the axis to sin and i decided to go for this hearing. >> i personally building that this project as taken as many modifications as are reasonably

possible in the circumstance we're seeing here i personally do not building i can personally suggest how to meet the full expectation i'm not intending to do we don't have the tools so unless other other commissioner has a comment i'd like to suggest we approve it. >> that's a motion. >> yes. and second. >> commissioner antonini. >> so the modified project is before us we don't have to take dr to approve the modifications or do we. >> i was going to ask for clarity commissioner moore if you're going to incorporate that proposal. >> yes. >> the plan in front of you don't incorporate that proposal. >> i'll take dr with the

specific and right the current plans the architect is probably explain it but i understand it's a 45 degree angle at the top floor corner you may want to explain that. >> the 45 degree angle starts one foot 9 feet and go 45 degree for the full horizontal towards the back. >> yes. >> yeah, we can submit that revision in a few days. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you. i guess we'll e resend it and take modifications. >> i'm mention that in the motion. >> second. >> commissioners, we have a motion and a second to take dr approve the project include in

the packet materials on that motion. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore sxhoifkdz and commissioner fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero i wish i could say we can take general public comment but we moved items c and d to the end of the calendar we have a couple of things to move on commissioners that places you under commissioner matters the adaptation of the draft minutes for september 11th and 18. >> i have no speaker cards. >> second. >> on that motion to adapt the minutes. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner fong

excuse me. commissioner chair commissioners that places you on commissioners questions or comments. >> commissioner moore. >> there was a tragic accident on stockton in sacramento mrs. friday or saturday again, a woman was crossing the street was run over and died i talked with president wu and i like to remind the commission planning staff and all departments to look at the single for green man plus technology i know there's an idea of creating a scramble at that intersection that's not enough to deal with slower moving people that dominate it the scramble is not addressing the issue of people getting across in the time allocated for

returning in all directions so i'd like to remind people to look at the green man technology i described from singapore other thing to light will even up the conversation i got an alcatraz to look at the exhibit it's a one of a kind experience in my entire times that i've not been in alcatraz (laughter) this was remarkable so i this is the architect artists who did an installation in four of buildings it is just absolutely stunning. >> field trip. >> commissioner johnson i second the field transmittal

good giants and i appreciate commissioner antonini wearing a go giants. >> director reports. >> let me give you not a director report but a board report i'll try to make that united states subject on short-term rentals one requiring an annual report by the host the number of days increasing liability insurance to half a million dollars and requiring the registration for hosts and multiple units the tenant to be removed and the effective date is february 1st of next year to gear up and 6 the dedicated funding from the enforcement go to 9 planning department and the

registration fee is included and 7 the annual report to the board of supervisors that we provide an annual report regarding accident enforcement of the program there were several amendments a lot of before and after from the board members and supervisor wiener also suggested amendments to require between 6 months the commission to hold a hearing prior to fee adjustments the controller based on the information would have the authority to increase the fees the registration fees and supervisor wiener has asked we have a hearing before we do that that makes sense i think supervisor kim made suggestions she suggested the change about having the 90 day limits to

hosted and non-hosted tre was not an agreement supervisor wiener self-support that and supervisor cohen expressed concerns about rome rentals from the housing market it doesn't move forward from the land use committee the full board we'll try to keep you informed and a cough of pieces of legislation the you've heard an item open the 18 of the amending to insure sro unit can't be converted to student housing that move forward from the land use the moratorium on selma was put

forward spord by supervisor kim that moved forward and at the full board the night life larger than 25 square feet in the western selma you saw move forward the supervisor incorporated our and it passed on final regretting supervisor breed's requested a hearing that the woemd reports on the housingic group and evaluate the relationship if that affordable housing and you've talked about this obviously gearing up to do that we'll get that hearing on collapsed and supervisor mar introduced an ordinance african-american the police code to ask for formula retail use to put work steldz e schedules in advance and so on

i can't tell you why it's in the police code because it is not currently schedule for a planning constriction hearing it does rely on the information of the formula retails by otherwise not going come to the perhaps because of work contemplation o compensation schedules at any rate sorry for the rushed recorded hopefully more daily next week. >> okay. it's late i appreciate your patience commissioners, if there's nothing further go commissioners general public comment. >> any general public comment general public comment is

closed. and we're