>> that window is 413 feet tall and how about the windows in the front. >> the taught itself one is 11. >> the middle one look about the same size well, the top one yeah. those two well, i would ask if the commissioner moore would be interested in accepting an amendment where you take 3 feet off the bottom of all three of those windows and put your siding on there instead. >> i'm sure i'm not here to design the architecture i only comment i believe the building is fine there's no 3 feet but which i'll reduce the windows i made comments about something that is about the stair and the

glazing which is already codified that's it. >> thank you commissioner johnson. >> thank you this is also for staff as well as maybe the project sponsor so did the rdt team comment on whether or not the balcony for the top story terrace in the front sort of front open patio space whether or not that broke up the reading of the set back so the way it is rendering here i'm trying to make it clear it's first class so how it will look the top story patio s it sort of jets out into the street and

north america gaits it is cut off my i by 45 degrees. >> they said the massing at the front was appropriately designed the wall of the living space is set back and in a traditional boxy style architecture will be set back in that building it is an architecture feature that provides the glazing. >> you're saying even though bedrooms is set back 8 and a half feet and that's the shading that's the guardrail. >> how tall is the graduate rail. >> 4 inches.

>> the pardon could we look at the south facing windows one more time, please. looking at and seeing it myself. >> it goes roughly half the length of the building on the top floor. >> this is solid we're going to plant there is s a window for the study we didn't do a 3 by 5 feet as opposed to 3 feet and not the glazing. >> the glazing faces the dr requesters window is there a window on the other side. >> they have a north facing window we have a south facing

window. >> it seems like a lot of glazing. >> we originally designed the project no glazing there but when we cut the light well, it didn't makes sense not to have latin-american there. >> the only thing you'll expect is privacy curtains or fraufrt on the dr requesters side or the other side. >> that's the master bedroom for the structure. >> commissioners, we have a motion and a second. >> could you please restate. >> the motion i understand is to take dr for the exterior stair being moved inside and recognizing did bird code and second. >> on that motion commissioner

antonini. >> no commissioner hillis commissioner johnson. >> commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner johns and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 6 to one with commissioner antonini vociferating against on item 12 for the next case at 86 directive you mandatory discretionary review. >> chris barns is a native of san jose he saw the light move north and the current planning for the county of santa barbara and santa monica and he was a planner in the counter operations chris early planning work is

architecture coordinator for kaiser and the ucla in southern california he is a b.a. from berkley and has worked in the southeast that quadrant we welcome him to the department. >> thank you for the kind of directions director ram and chris from the plaintiff northeast quadrant i'll be providing the discretionary review the subject property in the bay area rh1 zoning district that property on, on the north side of the drive between ta peck after the rear yard of this property as well as the adjacent proposals butt a large hillside and the existing use is approximately 16 square feet

rectangular shape constructed in 1964 the proposal for the interior and exterior remold to the single-family residences to the master bedroom at the first floor and a new deck and a new balcony at the second level the first floor deck is 11 feet in depth with an area of 2 hundred and 5 square feet and the second level is 8 by 11 in width with an area of 92 square feet the blockage is approximately 11 feet from the shared property line of the dr requesters dr requesters concern you know to address that topic the neighborhood reside on the drive his property locate immediately adjacent to the subject property

their concerns are specifically to the rear deck and balcony the dr questioning requesters are concerned the second floor blockage will diminish their privacy and american people intruder could colonel through the rear yard window and also that the new property like that firewall will prevent them from painting their house the response to the dr requesters concerns they've offered to share the lighting and paint the side of their house access and the residential design team has reviewed the request and said there's there's

there's there's no extraordinary circumstances they ask you approve the dr as proposed if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them. >> thank you okay dr requester our team has 5 minutes. >> my commissioners that is my brother i'm michael this is my brother at 82 bridge well drive and the planning on 82 - 86 on the drive is planning to build remodeling can i show you the picture before i - okay. this

one is 86 bridge field drive and this one is 82 bridge field drive my brother's house planning is trying to remodel extension beyond the rear of my brother's house that means that is further out at the rear of my brother's house you see the window here is my notifies bedroom the building of the deck they're not just the first floor the second level very close to the kitchen window is one thing is blocking the rear the partly blocking but the main thing on

my niece bedroom any intruder can climb up there maybe less than two feet they're not just building the deck their building the rear of my property innovating not my property my brothers property so i want you to review this one and cut down the deck no deck at all they can build what we have they want the planning commission is right they are just b.a.'s on the planning of their permitting property they can build whatever they like but one of the impact downstairs any intruder can get

in - >> is that your presentation. >> i want to save you time this is the most important thing not just to niece but danger to anyone in the house. >> thank you okay project sponsor your team has 5 minutes. >> hello. >> i'm sorry, i keep forgetting any support for the dr. >> for the project owner i want to point out first of all, on this deck as you can see it does not go beyond the neighbors at this site there's a set back about 3 feet back from the back

of the neighborhoods property and this is the lower deck over here i'll give you more but this drawing we show you where the catch comes out to and the stared to the rear yard so it did not impact going around and seeing the windows their claiming at the rear of the property you have to be pretty hard to cut across and look inside the window open the upper deck it's set back i'll give you another elevation by it's set back 9 feet from the property this is a balcony so again, the window is on this side over here i'll show you again in a second but it doesn't impact so here's the window their throbbing on the property line window it's

approximately 12 feet if the bottom or the top of deck to the bottom of the window there's 90 no way to see insides the window it's not going to impact their privacy or security looking back of the property at the owner's property you see the balcony over to the side not next to the neighborhood property its way way, way away it's not going to impact that at all here with the images we see the clients the owners property is the blue one and then the property adjacent is the one next door so you can see the window they're talking about as far as decks concern other properties in the area have decks so the owner of the property didn't want these others to have those in the area

just to give you an idea on the window on this image as you can see here's a hand drawing the window is way, way high and the deck is below there's no way you can see inside the window so there's privacy a mention about the access to the rear of the property i want to point out that on the zoning map there is here's the rear and it is just a hilly hillside from the access of all the properties there's no way that the owner of the property in question can make any securities bach because everyone has access i urge you not to take dr and approve the

project. >> is there public comment in support of the project sponsor seeing none, public comment is closed dr requester you have two minutes you in desire. >> okay eject emphasis on this kitchen window they're not talking about the rear window here deck is higher than this one because they have first floor there and the second level and even though it is not blocking completely of the windows the emphasis on the window of the kitchen but not the end part of the window because that is the great impact

on my brothers property is danger whatever intruder get on deck they can get into his property and ones in danger not only the niece just about two feet away you see it when they build a dent beyond the end of our brothers property that's the main point we're talking about the window of the deck not the window in the kitchen thank you. >> thank you project sponsor i have to minutes. >> i just got back there is no

possible way to look at the windows at the back the property talking about the security to the back of the property his bit of an image here with the stairs that go up and from the back to the property so getting access here's another view the stairs that go up and all the way back to the hill there's access from the rear to all those properties each and every one of them i don't see how they have a problem the decks are not that high and quite frankly i don't see how there is security problems the windows are on the back there is no way you could stand on a deck and look into

someone's property commissioners i urge you to not take - and approve the property. >> thank you okay. the public hearing portion is closed commissioners commissioner richards based on the project sponsors definition the height of the deck on the first floor with the window around the corner and the second deck away from the kitchen window i find it impossible that someone is going to swing around the corner to get into the nieces bedroom it will be easier to get open a ladder i don't see the issues on the second floor i don't support taking dr by the project as is. >> that's a motion.

>> second. >> commissioner moore i ask staff the kitchen window sits on the property line is not effected to the ceda is a property line window that inadvertently disappear should the building come out if far. >> yes. and okay. >> commissioners, we have a motion and a second to not take dr arrest commissioner antonini. >> sxhvg commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on general public comment and i do believe we have two speaker cards. >> yes. >> again i am macintosh i live

at the martin luther king in the paermentd here in san francisco i want i told you open the september 4th yes. the reason we were dealing with the discrimination lawsuit the disabled act in that action certain spipgz by the john stuart company to fellow such things related to this statement consequences of breach section 2, 3, 434 the respondents understand that failure to carry out the terms may result in suspension of termination of or refusal to grant or continue fell financial assistance or other actions tlosz by lieu they

should be indicted on charges for fraud, conspiracy and i suspect shoddy work article 7 as part of the election portion for which all deals with the parties with their duties position whether their board members or not they have not carried it auto and olsen lee is another one i was effected by asbestos and in regards to article code title 17501 and of this is regarding the video back in july 17th which was not long ago me and mr. harvey lane was cut out of the video we saw it on another sector it happened on a computer we saw it on a computer

at a location 0 we decided to see what was up with that we have the goods right here and under title section 17 section 50 one and six the question why we were cut out of video we believe it was talking about the old construction and this is under the fiduciary robot do you know that john stuart not only him but henry was fired various issues under intentional injuries and a competing are a of things in housing and people being interrogated and privacy action we're dealing with a myriad of foolishness a circus of foolishness i believe the

city has not done their job this was anti privacy laws will he be able to speak. >> absolutely. >> will he have two minutes. >> he'll have 3 minutes. >> thank you. >> okay. i work for san francisco housing i have find out i have 24 years in okay this is under new and old construction and hunters point and rosa park two there was a lot of construction they let the violence gone for hunters point to get the property cheap their fraud in construction going on and construction you got fraud

and sure enough in new and old and you've got you have mayors about 4 retired mayors that stand to gain from it that outline of this plus you got all kinds of city officials in fraud and corruption what will be done we asked to see the da we have not seen the da so this is what i'm asking for, thank you. >> is there any additional public comment okay seeing none, public comment is closed meeting adjourned

>> good morning. welcome to the san francisco full board of supervisors meeting of tuesday's october 7, 2014, go giants yeah.