Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    October 12, 2014 10:00am-10:31am PDT

10:00 am
issue in a different context when working with hope sf and coordinate efforts. i will say this is a particular tricky population to aggregate data because you have hippa requirements. you have minors that have special protection on the school district side. you have legal providers that have upon confidentiality requirements with their service and you have individuals just by the nature of their status here are less inclined to disclose information so you perhaps target the most difficult group of people to share information with across all of the service areas w that being said we will certainly be working with the children and their parents to try and gain the consent to share information to the degree possible. again in this
10:01 am
situation you have unaccompanied minors and it's not clear to me who would give consent on their behalf to share information across the health department, the school district, and legal service providers. >> are you looking at ms. wong to come up as well. i am curious -- >> i'm not sure -- [inaudible] >> i think it would be good to have the same youth teacher -- mental health counselor, houser able to talk to one another and share information, so it's going to really take a village to make sure these youth are successful and ifer we're not sharing information and is a lowed in identities then i am worried we're not going to get there. >> so i share your children and i have been digging around that question too, so i have been working with the federal government to try to get them to actually give us the names of these kids and the locations of where they're being placed
10:02 am
because the one unique thing about the surge is they're coming through -- you know they're turning themselves over at the border or the majority at least, not all of them, and they are taken -- our health services system takes them in and they get placed so the federal government actually knows the name and addresses and their age and the only information they have made available to some folks is the zip code for which the children are placed and their age, so i share the aggravation because i feel we have a great head start they're tracked from the minute they get across the border but we don't have access to the information so as brian was saying this is a difficult group so once they arrive there is a network that embraces the children and connect them to services but to get that network to share
10:03 am
information with this population as i asked these same questions. they're vulnerable. they're afraid of giving that -- so it doesn't mean we shouldn't be asking the question and figuring it out. >> you brought up a good point. can minors consent to the sharing of the information? >> i think ms. wong said that and from the parents get parental consent or have the sponsor consent if they're living with a family now. getting back to what ms. kent said one of the most consistent ways to identify the individuals is when we receive assignments from the immigration court because everyone on the docket will be identified to the legal service provider and the attorneys will be aware of the support system from the school district and the department of public health and at that point we will do our best to have that individual consent to having a
10:04 am
structure of support available to them. >> thank you mr. chu. i apologize you're not the lot of presenter. we have the office of civic engagement and immigrant affairs. thank you for being here. >> thank you supervisors and commissioners. i just have three slides and i'm going to skip to what we're doing particularly relative to the unaccompanied children. we have been working for the past months with our nonprofit and partners in san francisco in san francisco and washington d.c. and the policy institute, and a number of other organizations and i think chair kim you put it -- you hit it right on the button that data and having numbers and names is extremely difficult. data collection is going to be really important for san francisco, especially if the city is going to tap into any
10:05 am
state or federal funding that may become available. if we can forward to the next slide i think we're one slide behind here. we have a mayor's page and bilingual resource guide and translated materials provided to families by the san francisco immigration court. we translated a number of websites in the city to multiple languages including the aca website and victims portal and immigration and doca and we will provide updated information and translations on the unaccompanied children web page and we hope to work with the grant team to also have this translated, not -- we have it in spanish but we need it
10:06 am
translated in my an languages as well and our community ambass doors do outreach and education about city programs and healthy sf, 311, the city id card so they will do that in language. also we're coordinating our efforts with the mayor's office, 311, city departments, our dream sf, doca, grantees, pathways to grantees and the language access network so you know we have been -- we're in year two of our pathway to citizenship initiative which is to try to get as many of the estimated 100,000 legal permanent residents in san francisco on naturalized and thus far this collaboration of community based organizations has reached over
10:07 am
5,000 san franciscans who are eligible. they processed 15 new applications for citizenship and the doca grantees have reached almost all of the 5,000 estimated doca eligible youth and processed 600 applications and i have to commend the unified school district because without christina and the school district's partnership we wouldn't be able to get any of this done as well as lonnie. we also have 14 doca -- dream sf doca fellows on board this year and for them funding it and they're doing outreach and education to their own constituency so we place them in the cbos to help with the outreach and of course we're around partnering with the immigrant partnering groups and on sanctuary city and immigrant rights. we were asked recently
10:08 am
by one of the senate offices to provide information on immigrants and the refugee population in san francisco and i thought it was an odd question coming from them because i assume d they had all the information but they didn't, so you probably know most of the information. over 25% of the country immigrants live in california and over one out of every three san francisco residents is immigrant. there are estimated 30,000 or more undowsmed immigrants in san francisco and while only one in 14 children in san francisco is an immigrant 54% have at least one immigrant parent and 34% are headed by an immigrant. since the refugee act of 1980 we have received hundreds of refugees by san francisco. 80% of the
10:09 am
participants in the human agency cash assistance program, rca, are asylees and families are aided by calworks. and finally when it comes to where you have some gaps and disconnects. about 75% of all immigrants in san francisco have arrived since 1980 and the proportion of linguistic isolation in san francisco immigrant headed households and no one over the age of 14 -- i apologize there is an error on the slide -- no one over the age of 14 speaks english very well is the highest in any region in california. we're at 35%. there is no other place that is higher than that and there are economic gaps for full time employment, income, high school graduation rates and that is growing more slowly in
10:10 am
san francisco when you compare to the rest of the state and there are work force issues that need attention and english skills for children and esl education and then of course the high income inequality over all in san francisco and a shrinking middle income po and -- population and the high cost of living are driving low wage earners out of the city so these factors along with the language barriers are limiting the upward path for immigrants. >> thank you. i just had one quick question and then we have a question from maria su. you mentioned community ambass doors out on the streets. >> yes. >> i am aware we have them in bay view and mid-market neighborhoods. are they in others as well or working in
10:11 am
hose neighborhoods and if they see a young person or identify someone as unaccompanied undocumented youth do they reach out to them? how does that work? >> they're working in three areaof the city so district 6, along in the tenderloin, along mid-market corridor and up further and i guess upper market and then in d10 along the valley and bay view and we have a pilot project in the mission and 16th and mission bart station so they are -- as they see the population they're providing information, not just on doca or citizenship but healthy sf, 311, how to access -- how to apply for city id card, so a number of programs and services. >> so they're all trained how to do this and do they actively search out young people or wait
10:12 am
for the young people to approach them? how does that interaction take place? >> they provide information on all of the city programs and services -- >> i am aware. >> dream sf fellows doing the specific outreach to the target population -- >> [inaudible] >> because many of the dream sf fellows were unaccompanied minors themselves. >> that's amazing to hear. i didn't realize there was another segment to the program. in d6 -- i wasn't aware about 16th and mission and great we're piloting a program there. how far into the tenderloin do they go into? >> everyday we're asked to go deeper and deeper and do decker part and the tip of the tenderloin where it meets market and i think we're sitting down with the captain turnish to talk about is there a defined route, where are the hot spots because
10:13 am
we're spreading them thin now so we have to be strategic where we place them. >> my office would love to meet with you on that issue. >> we would love that. >> great. thank you. >> thank you. >> okay. so i know that we have the head of our department of children youth and family services here today. thank you for sticking around. we just have one question commissioner mendoza. well, you know the question. >> so i was just curious how you're involved with this work, in particular with the funding that you do with our children and families? >> so thank you supervisors and commissioners. good evening. i am maria su, and the director
10:14 am
for the department of children, youth and families and it's our pleasure to partner with these departments here. we don't do the district services ourselves, but we partner with them to fund all the really great work that they're doing in their respective offices and departments, so specifically for the school district we partially fund with private dollars that new position, the unaccompanied program coordinator, so we're really happy we can do that to support the school district around coordination and outreach to the young people. with the office of civic immigration and affairs with the director we are supporting the doca work which is partnering with several nonprofit agency totion provide the legal services to ensure that young people and families that want to apply for status,
10:15 am
for doca status they can. we also partially fund the dreamers program that director pond was referring to which is the first of its kind in supporting young people who are undocumented to have trainings and career awareness and opportunities to have a job and to learn skills. on top of that we partner with -- we fund many nonprofit agencies that provide lingual services to the community and all of our programs are throughout the city ranging from child care, to after school programs to teen programs, family support programs and youth emplment programs and in all of our programs we allow young people regardless of status to participate in the programs and services that we provide. i do know we're working with the mayor's office totally how much funding that
10:16 am
is and how many young people we're reaching and so hopefully we will have that information for you soon. >> so i'm going to ask the question again about how we can share data. i know it's a really tough issue but i am wondering where we can house it under? can it be under dcyf? heard everyone, all of the departments and i know everyone wants to do it but can we look to a department to make sure that coordination is happening and we're figuring out how to do that really difficult but really important work? >> thank you for the question. you know i do agree that coordination, making sure that the data that we're collecting reflect the type of services that we are implementing on the ground, and that we're using our
10:17 am
different resources appropriately. i think director chu made a very correct and accurate statement, particularly for this population it's a little harder but it's not impossible. i think us coming together as a body of government providers and department heads and departments as well as nonprofit agencies just to think about how do we address the system and address this issue might be the first start to this. i know that our nonprofit agencies have a direct link to the young people and their families and maybe that's where we start to make sure we're coordinating appropriately. i like the idea of connecting the bits and pieces of data we're getting from the feds to perhaps some of our other services that's through the want
10:18 am
department of public health or through the human services agency so we can at least get an idea of the -- you know, the types of kids that we're serving so we can at least narrow it down what they need but right now we don't have a very good answer for that and we would love to to be a partner in that. we can convene meetings and folks to have this conversation but i have to say that ms. kent has been a phenomenal convener of department heads and service providers, particularly around this issue. the mayor has shown great leadership. >> no, i appreciate that. we have someone that will coordinate all of the departments but i imagine that ultimately this data base has to be housed somewhere under a department. i can't imagine ms. kent will have that capacity but great if you do, but i imagine it would eventually have to be housed somewhere so that's
10:19 am
where the question was directed. thank you so much. >> thank you so much. >> commissioner commissioner -- commissioner wynns do you have a question? >> i don't know if anyone can answer this. i am wondering about people getting lost somewhere. as you said the uniqueness that most of these kids coming across the border are turning themselves into the border authorities, the federal authorities so theoretically they have their names and have them on some list and presumably since most or all of them are in the legal system they -- immigration should be tracking them. they ought to be able to tell us where they are and who is here and do we have a way to know about all these people? what i fear is -- i don't want
10:20 am
to -- is that other people are afraid, family members, friends, whoever may themselves not be appropriately documented and i want to -- from our point of view we need to make sure that the kids are in school and they understand we have services for them, language services and we're not only dedicated to serving them but having things available for them so is there some way? i mean that's the -- sort of supervisor kim's question. can we check and make sure everyone we should be serving contacted us or exist in the system somewhere? >> so first of all this is a good conversation. this needs to happen. this is part of what we sending up the chain just in
10:21 am
terms talking to national leadership on this. the short answer is if -- i mean if we want to do that we do it on our own. sadly what i learned once the children are placed they get a court date and then the track ing stops, so there is this whole process from homeland security to hhs and drills down to the office of refugee resettlement and once that placement happens they're done. the only way to be comprehensive is when the children come and don't have a placement and 80% are coming with a family name. the 10-15% that aren't there is a rfp out. a couple of the community based organizations went after the funding to house these kids so for that population we will have data because they be connected to services and the state -- or
10:22 am
the federal government's going to want to monitor the outcome, but locally i think mr. chu referenced this and maybe through legal services as children show up to court we can capture the names there. as our community based organizations go after funding that we make available we can build into the contract reporting requirements that have the follow up so we can -- there are some things we can do but -- >> but 85 to 90% of the children who are get through the beginning of the federal system and then are assigned to hopefully the family member with whose name they came across the border that's it. we don't have anyway of knowing who they are. nobody is telling the city and county of san francisco this many children have been placed with relatives who have
10:23 am
identified -- with an address in san francisco. >> they will give us a number but won't give the names or addresses, so it's hard. i have been barking up that tree and what they -- i mean the reason is which sort of makes sense is not all local jurisdictions are as welcoming as we are, and have the intentions that we do in terms of doing the right thing. >> does the number match the number that we -- >> so the numbers they're providing -- so -- gosh to date -- no, through the end of august we received about 208 kids formally placed here and the number from the school district is i think 240 -- was it? 200. okay. so using the school
10:24 am
district as a gauge i think it's pretty close. to help myself sleep better at night because i have that same question i take some comfort in the fact that this surge -- what is unique about it the children are turning themselves over compared to historically they don't so i feel like in a sense we have less to worry about because of that small piece, which is not a good situation, but we do have that? >> thank you. i am a little worried about the people they're coming to. we've set up here, and by the way i don't know if anybody wanted it but my staff provided me copies with the resolution that the board of education passed, but so because this is a crisis clearly as demonstrated here today we set up a public and publicly funded community based infrastructure for the kids that we know have
10:25 am
been coming across the border, but what we don't know is what kind of service or relationship anybody has with the family members they're going, so that's the little vacuum there that could cause people to fall through the cracks if we don't know who they are and whom they're going we can't follow up to make sure they're served. >> so my question on that one is what is their evaluation requirements when looking at these sponsor families so the children coming across the border they're put in temporary shelter for 30 days and during that time they're looking for the family sponsors and doing some sort of evaluation and i think when i get that information i can forward that to you. >> and then presumably eventually, but what i have been reading on the papers and hearing on radio it could take months and years to all of the
10:26 am
cases to be adjudicated in court. that's when we would find out. if it's eight kids, four kids and as it goes up in the next couple of years it turns out to be 30, 40, 50 kids and we find out in two years when the cases come before court some of the kids are not in school for that amount of time. that would be bad. i understand it's nobody's intention but i see the potential there. that's the big crack that people could fall through. >> so the one way that we're trying to address that through the services that we colleagues talked about today so the agency human services agency they respond to -- i mean you can call them and they can come out and do an evaluation if you suspect there is something fishy going on, and then the department of public
10:27 am
health when we met with legal service providers they said a lot of the children have been through trauma and might not be in the best situation, and so just having those folks in the room we were able to make that connection so the legal service providers know they can go to hsa if they're suspicious and dph can work with them and work with the children that went through these traumatic situations so even though we don't have the names and addresses to make us feel better we have using the resources to catch the kids in the way we're not able to get in front of the issue. >> i appreciate that. thank you very much. >> thank you. so if there are no other questions or comments from commissioners we will further open up for public comment so i have one card. i have louis avalos and if another member of the public would like to speak please do come up.
10:28 am
>> okay. >> thank you so much for being here. >> thank you supervisor kim so good afternoon. i am the district 5 youth commissioner. i come today to show my support and gratitude for this hearing. i would like to thank the departments and agencies that came out today that shared this information that personally hits me close to home. i am myself undocumented and hearing this hearing i know it might be troublesome to figure out the execution tactics and procedures to implement all of the support services but with that being said i know it's not impossible. i myself regardless of being undocumented have received a lot of support services from the city and county. i received consultation and guidance from lawyers thanks to the services. i have vision issues and i received aid from the low
10:29 am
vision and blind groups and from healthy kids san francisco and i would like these resources to be given to these undocumented children just as they were given to me. san francisco is known for innovation and addressing the needs of these population and this is a great example what it can do for all of the unaccompanied minors facing hard ship and let's support these children and what it truly means to be a sanctuary city. thank you. >> thank you commissioner. any other members of the public that would like to speak? seeing none public comment is now closed. commissioner mendoza. >> so thank you. i just want to thank everyone that presented today and i have to say having been part of the conversations early on it was really great to
10:30 am
see the collective, both wisdom and desire to help bring in the young people that are coming to san francisco and finding ways to really support them being part of our community, and it all happened really quickly in terms of our ask to the feds and what we can do to ensure we're protecting and understanding everything that's happening to our unaccompanied minors and i just really want to appreciate all the efforts put into that because i have seen you guys come together time and time again under the leadership of lonnie kent from the mayor's office who has kind of got thrown into this in a way that she didn't expect it to kind of come through, and to gain the momentum it has and to see all of