could be accessible that led to two things one is the fact whether it's two separate buildings which is probably what the first desire is of the appellants vs. the connect our of some types of and a central courtyard the connect our will provide the linkage across the floors i'm guess that appears that the project sponsor wants to aggregate his private activity spaces around 1:00 particular floor and one location and that's his own personal desire i said that i don't see that the bathrooms in terms of their location or anything have anything go to do

with the ada issues they could be located in turn of their placements it come down to me whether i accept to satisfy the neighbors concerns a large central courtyard that's 0 only thing that will satisfy them what side that do to the project sponsor and their property and i've made a decision in my mind i'm prepared to not force the central courtyard on the project spons sponsor. >> what about the recommendations that are listed on page 2 of the appellants. >> it didn't do anything. >> no, no fromlogically it to 55 feet.

>> they want the 10 foot clearance to match the ceiling floor line of the existing cottage. >> this is the same problem at the planning commission had as well and i defer to you, your the resident architect that's been here since 18 hundred. >> if you're accepting the floor the act it's one feet higher it didn't effect the shadow the bigger question whether the fourth floor is consistent with either for the neighborhood or you know whether its intended use. >> what about what the commissioners wanted in terms of height does that make a defines of difference to you. >> no. there's no architect on the planning commission so -

>> excuse me. you're not allowed to participate. >> the other thing i've heard on how much the neighborhood input they've worked with them and bring a project from 39 hundred to 39 hundred and 80 feet is not a compromised and that square feet occurred after the dr in terms of they've made certain reductions in the notch they increased the no such during the course the thirty feet occurred after. >> in the - >> i believe to clarify the changes i see in the plans and the reductions of the 40 square feet were made between meetings 210 east two and 3.

>> it oriental plan was that 917 so after all the 50 phone calls it went down 40 feet. >> but in terms of what was tracking 0 through the 311 notice what was ultimately approved available those are changes. >> can i get some clarity in the project sponsor. >> your dad and mom house you draw up initially what was the square footage of that. >> what we simpleminded. >> what was your original plan. >> 3917. >> and if i may we took that 40 square feet first of all, thirty percent of the building is dug underground not to go up other floor we're

allowed by code we took that 40 square feet with even though appellant wished for us to take it off we offered to take it off they had no interest. >> you're arguing your case i didn't ask for that. >> i want to say one more thing at the dr the project was approved at the 3917 all the other changes happened afterward. >> okay. thank you. >> voluntarily. >> that's what i thought. >> scott sanchez planning staff just to clarify those are changes they had proposed between meetings two and three since the commission doesn't take dr they were not going to to make those changes they proposed between hearings two

and three but made them anyway. >> like i said the original project started at 3917 they were in the dred they took off 40 square feet. >> they've proposed in between meetings two and three they honored those even though the commission didn't impose that. >> madam president you want to weigh in open that (laughter) and i'm stating is also (laughter) i mean i'm not sure we're going to come out where the planning commission didn't. >> the tough things the smallest home on the block happens to be next to his house that's the most impacted they have the most to lose not other

houses 3 or 6 doors down even though the house happens to be next door their the most impacted so when neighbors want to know why their claiming they're the most impacted a that's where they have their complaint before. >> they're not the only complaint. >> i don't know what to do i don't want to hold up the folks but there are quite a few concerns and property owners have been here since 5 o'clock. >> i'll propose something they sit down and we continue this i know that kind of bites but it is just we got 50 on one side

and 50 on the other we need more consensus here. >> i'm not sure i see a benefit in this particular case. >> i'm not sure i do either. >> so i hate to put everybody through an official case besides all the other meetings they had. >> but they're close at this point. >> we don't know that. >> then i'll bite the bullet and make a motion i'm going to move that the appeal be denied and that the permit be issued as allowed. >> on the basis of code

compliance. >> yes. >> we have a motion under president fong to uphold this as code compliant on that motion vice president is absent commissioner president lazarus commissioner honda. >> no and commissioner wilson. >> thank you. the vote is 2 to 24 votes are need to modify a motion the motion fails bull, however, under the charter that permit is upheld by default. >> unless there's another motion made; right? >> no other motion. >> okay. the permit is upheld as stated by default.

>> there's no further business. tonight we're adjourned so, same time next week? well, of course.

>> ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ in landing a contract with the sfoifk is pretty champ but now with the opened contracting center visitors can get opportunity at the new state of the arc facility and attend workshops and receive one-on-one technical assistance and learner what you need to become a primary contractor or what information to be a subcontractor and a created bed public commission it will help people to assist people to

compete for and performance open city contract a lot of small businesses do have the resources to loblth the opportunity so one of the things we wanted to do was provide ways to access contract >> access to the plans spiefkz and a data place basis ease contracting opportunity and funding or capital training. this is and other documents that needs to be submitted. to compete is a technical skill that it takes to win a scheduling for a popular to you can win a professional services job or how to put together a quote it's all those technical pieces. looking at the contracting assistance center is our touch point with we get the people to

come and see the planning specks and later than about projects earlier is he get training so you're ready to go arrest hello engineering it has all the tools that a contractor small or large can come here. i can't say enough about the center it's a blessing. we do business all over the country and world and a place like the contractor center to identify the business in san francisco >> the reality is you need training and that's what the center is here to train and make you better qualified to go work with the city and county and to be successful at the end. >> that will give people the

competitive edge e edge at receiving contracts with the city. >> we have krafshth services here that help you find out where you need to get the skills forbidding. >> i mean local businesses participation in city projects is a winning factor it helms help the business their local businesses they're paying savings and a property tax and payroll tax and normally adhere san franciscans so their bowing goods and services in san francisco it really helps the economy of san francisco grow so its not only a benefit to the project but to the city. the contractors center is 5

thomas melon circle in the bayview area open 8:30 to 5 welcom >> hearing for october 16, 2014, i'd like to remind members of the audience the that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind please silence all electronic devices. that may sound off procedures and and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. for those 0 of you people standing in front of the doorway and along that wall find a seat or move to the other side of the room i see some scombi seats

can't have people blocking the exits commissioners i'd like to take roll at this point. >> commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner johnson and commissioner richards. >> we do expect commissioner hillis, however, commissioner moore will be absent first on our agenda consideration for items proposed for continuance stem one planning code to consolidating dings we make other substantive items planning code to continuance october 23rd, 2014, i have no other items proposed for continuance commissioners. >> is there any public comment on items proposed for continuance?

seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner antonini >> move to approve item one. >> continue item one i'm sorry to october 23rdrd. >> on that motion to continue commissioner antonini commissioner hillis excuse me. commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you under our consent calendar to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 2 case no. 20141.09-c to the 577 castro street request

for conditional use authorization and item 3 at 1245 alabama street request for conditional use authorization i have no speaker cards is there any public comment on the consent calendar seeing none, public comment is closed. >> commissioner fong move to approve items two and three. >> second. >> second. >> commissioner johnson i have a quick question can we pull that off of consent calendar i have a question. >> then once in a while we'll take it off cds and hear it at the regular calendar. >> yes. >> okay then the motion. >> approve item number 3. >> thank you, commissioners a we have a motion and a second commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner richards

commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you under commissioner matters for the draft minutes for a october texted second a joint and regular hearing minutes. >> is there anyone from the public who wishes to speak on the draft minutes seeing none, public comment is closed. >> move to adapt. >> second. >> on that motion to adapt the draft minutes for october 2nd regular and joint hearing commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 5 commission questions or comments. >> i would ask to adjourn the

meeting in honor ever ted alison a long time tenant advocate and the director of the san francisco tenants union he passed away earlier this week. >> commissioner antonini and yeah. most importantly go giants (laughter). >> but i voluntary another article i want to talk about city on the edge one of the most interesting one was eviction crisis reality check basically brooerl the aorta points out out a number of evictions is approximately, one percent for any reason the question i have for staff just for in my edification he talks about the number of evictions by the rent board and the number in court

and ellis act i obviously understand the ellis act there were 2 hundred and 16 of the total but i don't understand the difference my assumption if with the rent board are a rent eviction if i prove it you can evict them but giving me a better idea because he listed vario numbers. >> commissioner richards. >> a couple of things that commissioner antonini said it's hard to not put a face on the numbers they may seem small ethics commission to the number but each eviction has a face and it's another piece of the city that is a rotor and goes away it

is one percent it still several thousands of people a year getting displaced my friend called me up and she's been evicted now she's thinking of leaving the city it hits home and hurts second question i have on the commissions process question an is interim control question that gets communicated how does this commission habitual that there was a i think a piece this week on a moratorium on second street in supervisor kim is there a comment on - >> commissioners interim legislation happened in a quick turn around the board can impose the legislation for a period of time 18 months maximum and it can be effective in a short he

are period of time something in the order of 7 or 8 days and typically doesn't require our review but not the time to review it given the nature of the legislation there have been as you say three or four piece of legislation in the last few months. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we'll move on to department matters item 6 announcements. >> announcements i don't have any but go giants. >> in the past event of the preservation commission no board of supervisors report. >> the board of appeals he met last time and last week it was the first hearing for bobbie

wilson who filled the seat of one who had another business interests and the questioning we had 3 hearings at final of the hearings no action by the board so the project was approved as a matter of default and i think this was bus the commission struggled with the right balance of changes to the project and i think that last week the board of appeals struggled kind of with the project and what changes, if any, were necessary and they had a split vote of 2 so by default it was finally approved and last time the board had on appeal for at academy of property on tailor the camera of art withdrew their and the

penalties will accrue we pursued that because it can't be misdemeanor but it is approval under the north beach commercial district we'll treat it as the other enforcement projects for the statute of eir and they had their annual report and it was to the commissioners note a thirty percent increase in the number of appeals and the board hears a lot of appeals a number of appeals from planning and it could decrease slightly by a decrease in the dpw of the boxes and the public right of ways and that's all. >> good afternoon, commissioners tim frye here to share with you briefly a couple of items from

the october 1st and the october 15th preservation hearing that two items to share the h pc renewed their delegation for preservation entitlements we think the h pc further tra trust in the department thirty percent of the entitlements can be approved at the staff level rather than a fuel commission hearing that delegation is for two years and significantly reduced our backlog and the loose item to mention the h pc unanimously recommend approval of 3 miles contract to the board of supervisors all 3 contracts are located within the park district and they involve single and multiple family retains and the maintenance projects they've agreed to the restoration for

the seismic retrofit they'll hear that this year. >> commissioners commissioners, if there's nothing further we move on opium needing 15 minutes move on opium needing 15 minutes members of the public may address the commission on matters that are within the commission's jurisdiction and are not on today's agenda members of the public may address the commission up to 3 minutes there are several speaker cards. >> thank you roberta 0 hernandez and (calling names). >> i'm roberto with the mission to answer our question interests been over 4 thousand households

in the last 18 months that have been evicted from san francisco seniors, disabled, artists, families and students i'd be more than glad to bring a map and all the documentation that will document the evictions going on beyond the evictions we have next door to me the house get rented out for 5 thousand dollars a year in the mission district i was born and raised here across the street from me a two-bedroom apartment was rented out for $11,000 we ask this commission begin to address evictions begin to address affordable housing, begin to address how are we're going to preserve and a half people of san francisco who have worked so hard to build

it city and worked hard to contribute to the heart and soul and the spirit of the city african-americans are appearing if this city the latino community is disappearing from the city and the asian-american community is disappearing from this city we need to put a stop this this and you as planning commissioners need to address that now we have been saying this for over a year our mission of no eviction had a march over a though people came out marching down the street today 5 hundred people out here because children got kicked out of admission playground by tech who are played to play if you haven't seen the video you'll

learn about the impact of those evictions happening in san francisco it's your responsibility to plan to preserve the beauty of san francisco if you don't plan and study and analysis what's going on there will boo be no heart and soul of san francisco only tech people that came here looking for the love and looking for the soul and the spirit and the art of san francisco we will all disappear so, please i ask you to create an agenda item where we can all come back and make presentations to you in the mission we don't need more, more month are development and luxury condos there's currently 4 developers from lamar who want to build nor luxury condos at