evictions happening in san francisco it's your responsibility to plan to preserve the beauty of san francisco if you don't plan and study and analysis what's going on there will boo be no heart and soul of san francisco only tech people that came here looking for the love and looking for the soul and the spirit and the art of san francisco we will all disappear so, please i ask you to create an agenda item where we can all come back and make presentations to you in the mission we don't need more, more month are development and luxury condos there's currently 4 developers from lamar who want to build nor luxury condos at minimum the rent is 35 how does

and the condo sold for a moinld. >> thank you thank you. next speaker. >> i'm andy blue can i turn on the computer here can you turn that on the screen? roberto hernandez and as he said several hundred other people >> sir you're going to have to speak into the microphone. >> does this one work i'm here with several other people that witnessed the video i hope you'll all seen they see the connection between what's happening in the video and a what's happening in rec and park and the chambers and in this room development the out of control reckless market development in the mission district is not making the neighborhood a better

place that video is a perfect demonstration i heard a commissioner on this panel say recently he felt the mission was a better neighborhood that a than in the past base it occasionally thinks it is participate less crime folks that are familiar don't believe it's a better neighborhood that's a step in the right direction on october 4th a thoughts people marched by mission street and stopped at the plaza demanding no monster in the mission not build 3 hundred and 50 units in the mission district i'm telling you the neighborhood everyday businesses and contingent organizations, cultural organizations, regular folks are saying no monster in the mission no more market rate development

in the mission district until affordable is met we're losing a neighborhood cultural if you could have seen the folks that were in support of the kids that are forced on the mreeld i'm sharia real economy instead of because you have more money and pushing off the youth of the neighborhood i've brought you a late flier we had one thousand people on the fourth i wish i could have been there thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> i'm a little bit behind so was working on getting ahead like we're all trying to go ahead and and brought a couple of maps but a decision that went

by in august the f t m a converted mcallister street and developing other plans for the hate street and several streets in the tenderloin and this decision reflects a lot of others so long as the worker in the word is germany that means making streets pedestrian friendly as outlines in a study in 1994 are we ahead as a municipality in this department of we're ahead of several other american cities this city has an opportunity to use it's street as a means to reduce carbon output and reduce the inequality while improving the open space

and mobility before we arrive the immediate theory it deprovided from speck from jeff speck and pier 27 newsom speck runs a design firm that advised people on walkability and several books on youtube as well as books on youtube and books it's fun inform walk through a city and map it out and the design i forwarded the most interesting things to the commission secretary as well as a link to the federal study and in front of us is a map of the planning department in 1948 it plans to take two-way streets and turn them into one way streets as outlined in green are the previous one way streets idle in

red is a street that we took from two-way and turned them gov. into one way streets on line on google be checkout that. >> and next to that on our computer those maps trans pier over each other this is the injury corridor that was outlined and available online the study that we see in the vision zero policy the high crossroad studies the red ones one hundred and 20 to two hundred and 34 people injured i'd like to close with a quote and art is doing well, that needs to be done grafbz. >> thank you (calling names). >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm with the latino cultural

district were a merchant association i want to highlight what's happening in our neighborhood in the mission we have seen you know a lot of small businesses being pushed out the rents they can't afford and the development is always push ousted businesses on 12 blocks we have 3 buildings for sale that's putting 13 of our small businesses in jeopardy and those on behalf of the commercial spaces we have 3 lots that are looking to develop and for that a laundromat a restaurant and another that restaurant a that's been there over hocking years it's out of control if people don't think this is real you know it is something that's human and people are being affected in small businesses are being be affected are they're losing their businesses and family you

need to really, really look at the human aspect and the bigger picture we're here to talk o those people and come down and talk to the people don't look at development as one piece but the birthday eligible picture the 16th plaza is the beginning of a domino affect that's going to displace people we saw it on 24th street we're looking at the development you need to look at not what benefits did developer or from the outside we welcome everyone but want to stay in our neighborhood we need you guys do really, really look close and a lot into our hearts at the human development. >> is there any additional public comment okay. seeing

none - >> may i pass it over i'm anastasia i came over to ask you i will have very soon after the election i think a significant natural area plan a program in san francisco for your approval and i think i want to ask you to invite san francisco alliance to do a preservation because it is really an awful and damaging problem this is a vision in this city the parks near the parks but i've been go forward i

passed over the letter comment to for d i r r for significant symptom for - from the council and it is not only the dr i certification of dr i but the line it's a neighborhood had a presentation for forest designs and the road is not a road it will probable be an extension but unanimous road to oppose national area program it is highly unnatural like creating molds that costs a lot of money and disadvantage the environment

and creates - to replace the forest area - this and a half grass inhabitant and the herbicides is a concern they use the most toxic and more toxic one and two herbicides more in the department and the use is growing and the habitant and wildlife i want to a meeting when not improving the tree - the tree - in this city because we need the forest grasslands and trees so you only need to look around and see the

grasslands in san francisco and without cutting additional trees so, please consider to invite san francisco first alliance for a presentation when you are considering adaptation of the natural areas and management plan thank you very much. >> thank you commissioner that will place you under our regular calendar item 2 was pulled off of sxhoent we'll take that up now at 577 castro street request for you confusion. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners i'm with the planning staff the item is a request to allow the development of is making restraining order existence facility at 577 castro street briefing the project involves 9 roof panel antenna attached to

the elevators penthouse on the roof of the building and support electronic equipment in the parking lot parking lot it is a 4 story 15 unit dwelling along the castro commercial district and the rooftop misrepresents will be screened by the - staff has received 4 comments based on the health concerns search warrants the radio frequencies and we had a community meeting to better understand the project the project was dual noticed and the staff recommends approval. >> thank you project sponsor. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm teddy director of exterior affairs for at&t

we're seeking our approval on a conditional use permit the cu p will allow at&t to place up to 9 antennas with the anular except necessary to run the equipment on the roof and in the first floor parking area to develop the lease intrusive means and to close the 0 gpa gap it's important to review the application based the applications and the city code and state and local lay it is incumbent to talk about the service coverage and will close the gap it is a two prong test in our application at&t has shown it has a significant service

coverage in the city on 660 castro street we engineered the inexperience of the coverage grasping gap at&t has a gap and 4 l g t services and the proposed facility will close the gap the city processes requires an independent engineer selected from a list provided by the city to see a gap in the coverage at&t selected hemet and edison to conduct the analysis and on july 14th of this year they confirmed that at&t has a significant gap in the coverage open castro street and at&t proposal will indeed close the gap hemet representative is here to address questions as it relates to that report prong 2 onsite

applications aims to close the coverage gap by the least intrusive means based on the city's code the question that is raised whether the proposed facility is consistent with the values expressed in the federal code is includes an alternative site analysis which is a code evaluation at locations which at&t will close a coverage gap at&t evaluated 21 sites and 13 preference locations on the basis of it's comprehensive analysis at&t selected did proposal at 466 castro street in short no other aefltsdz available from that list which at&t could close it's coverage gap by the least intrusive means

on our 0 meeting in august regarding the health effects of the facilities edison was hired to look at the determination that is far below the proposal will be far below that of the prevailing standards the site will be tested to confirm the calculations and every two years as required by the city it is important to note the health concern is not evidence to support a denial and federal law prevents the local folks to deny the wireless facilities to the extent they comply with the ftc recollections in sum at&t has

shown a capacity gap in the area that cases a significant service coverage gap in the wireless technology and the site analysis that the proposed facility is the least intrusive maples to close the gap at&t is trying to upgrade it's technology and it is going doing so in a careful consideration of the impact of the facility in the values that the city t is seung to promote it's in line with the regulation and the facility is the least intrusive means by which attica fill it's coverage gap in the area i ask for your consideration and consider the information presented to you this average and the recommendation from staff to approve with conditions and vote to approve the conditional use

permit today. >> thank you any public comment on that item? seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much i have one quick question i agree with the site analysis and the commission has one question on the schematic it wasn't clear on the first floor where the parking can be somewhere else you i had the opportunity to vital the it and that location will not take up any partially. >> thank you. i move to approve this item. >> second. >> on that motion to productive that with conditions. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnck commissioner johnson commissioner richards

commissioner johns and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously have to zero and places you on item 8 for case no. 2014 t reasonable moifgsdz to persons with disabilities seeking fair access to housing in the access code and good afternoon commissioner planning staff i'm here to remedy the modifications ordinance and calendaring this proposed hearing for approval and adaptation that is required by the state and must be finished the reasonable modification ordinances provide a program for the be disables for any barriers to access to their home a reasonable modification modification is to modify the zoning and building

registrations that has no undue burn on the city of san francisco or to the zoning and planning program those modifications include the changes to the residential property that enables residence to access their property it has to provide apple continental opportunity to live in the neighborhood some for example, i'll discuss are the access ramps and elevators in developing this program the plaintiff looked at the municipalities and met with the mayor's office of disabled to understand the types of modifications and the most common modifications is the elevator and the additional ramps elevators and ramps allow access to the homes and that's for the residential property and

parking spaces help people to access - the ground floor can help with the visibility and current the reasonable question for modification are address by itself zoning administrator on a case by case basis for the future applicant are not offered a clear process which can lead to delays in approval the programs provide two programs in the case report as described first an administrative pass for access ramps and elevators and additional parking spaces those accommodations are important for people to assess their homes and does not provide an hard of hearing on the building the guidelines are proposed for the administrator question for example, parking can only be approved with no obstruction and

elevators are the elevators structure are not visible but set back 10 feet from the property line and the policy implementations and approving the modifications to understand how much parking should be loud and how people that don't have a disable in requesting the modifications they'll continue to be misdemeanor described in section thirty 5 of the planning code any plans that don't meet the plans will be considered through the surveillance process and it proposes a hard of hearing fee waiver for residential uses if misinforming for some reason the applicant can't pay the fees under this ordinance a fee waiver maybe grant on a case by case base it meets the needs of

disabled to access their homes to adapt a initiative and schedule an adaptation hearing the staff is available for questions. >> thank you any public comment on that item? okay seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much definitely in supportive of that item and moving it initiating the hearing i have a couple of questions normally after the hearing but the first one it does fair housing law implement the modifications i know we talked about our fees but the actual modifications itself and then again i don't think it's appropriate for today, we're initiating on the vote of the hearing but can you give a

little bit of detail on what we mean by parking i think we're talking about rear and side yards but what other accumulations and the elevators are the only type of modification that sound like it is not reserveable were to leave the property can we talk about the difference types of elevators and, you know, how they will be maintained if the person has a handicapped we can see the modifications for access ramps and habitable space but elevators where it total make sense for the person as a change to the property i need to understand who is supposed to be in charge of that and how it works i think it's all my questions thank you.

>> we'll make sure to research those and get back to you. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i have questions about the legislation i'm assuming that the things that are the accumulations that are being allowed in this legislation people with the disabled there might not be parking allowed or difficult to get it and it's easier for people possibly an elevator where it might not be allowed. >> yes. that's correct that's why we put that under the variance but you can only get the requested modification if you have a disability. >> and this is for people that reside in the particular units that a disability and across the

map where no one has a disability. >> how about multi unit where a tenant has a disability. >> i can research that. >> that would come into play a lot of instances where the tablet may not be the owner but the tenant needs a reasonable compromised to access the building there's a conflict between the owner and not necessarily wanting to do those things or being able to afford them so have the answer next time. >> thank you thank you, commissioners we'll need a motion to establish a future date and what's the proposed. >> november 6th is the date the

earliest date. >> we can certainly do it. >> very good a second. >> second. >> thank you commissioner johnson. >> november 6th. >> on that motion to initiate and establish a hearing on november 6th for potential adaptation commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 9 a and b for 181 fremont street request for a approval of the downtown authorization. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the commission i'm kevin guy before i get into my a staff report i want to introduce my colleague from supervisor kim's offers who

wants to say a few words. >> good afternoon. i'm april with supervisor kim's office located others one 81 fremont is located in our district 6 the supervisor has co-sponsored with the mayor that's before you we ask firing support on the development all the time as well as the downtown authorization amendment the supervisor prefers on site affordability but this case and circumstance the developer has agreed to contribute supra funds and there have a prediction of more housing moving us forward with the housing and this mayor's office of housing is here to speak about the hoa and how that

was a consideration as well in terms of the fee for the affordable housing rather than having this on site the supervisor wants to thank the ocii staff for in their expertise in understanding what was actually be a fair fee out for this project i think they'll be more presentation about this in detail i understand it is 2.5 times more than the fee that is required in the inclusionary housing program it would be used only for the creation of the transbay that's an important consideration this be within the location and in close approximate to the primary project i understand this will be used to