mar's office has been involved for sometime so i'm going to request to withdrew the motion. >> supervisor wiener has withdrawn his motion to continue. >> i thought i would support a continuance i wanted to stated some of my comments the lion share i hoped we'd seen a come mice i know that the planning department has heard my time and time again, i building in creating additional housing stock it addresses some of our problems we're facing in san francisco so but i think one of the public commenters made it clear in saying we're struggling right now with competing policy goals i'd like to see additional units created i said the struggles that supervisor mar went through in trying to talk

with the project sponsor but i want to go on record to look at the situations that are similar as we're dealing with on the other hand, a great project where we're creating additional family sized unit i've been hardship on 3 bedrooms i think are great but on the other hand, trying to preserve the rent control heirs stock so i'd like to work with the planning staff to how do we tackle that. >> thank you with that, colleagues any further comments let's take a roll call vote on supervisor mar's - >> so i motion we table item thirty and we approve item 31 which disastrous the conditional use authorization with the planning commission. >> second on that motion.

>> seconded by supervisor breed and mr. john gibner, deputy city attorney in her. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney two comments first, the board should loss approve item 32 directing the clerk to prepare the finding and second just to inform that finding motion i wanted to make sure that i understand number of points have been made based on the record supervisor mar referred to some of the factors in section 317 that regular meetings are held on the second and fourth tuesday of each month. the conditional use authorization for circumstance one of them is that state converts rent control housing to other forms and removal o 0 removals the affordability of

existing housing and i believe that because many of the comments made eye by the supervisors it doesn't preserve the neighborhood cultural and that economic diversity. >> that's correct. >> okay supervisor mar assumed what you're city attorney has suggested is part of your motion okay with that roll call vote. >> supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener. >> supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor farrell supervisor kim there are 10 i's issuance of the conditional use authorization is disapproved and with that, colleagues that

concludes our 3:00 p.m. special orders now back to our regular agenda item 10. >> an ordinance to amend the administrative code to authorize the department of public health to designate another department to carry out the cat traffic program for the city families. >> on item 10. >> supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos. >> supervisor avalos. >> i'm just reviewing and item 10. >> oh, yes. >> supervisor avalos p supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor farrell supervisor kim there are 10 i's ordinance is finally passed. >> item 12 arrest ordinance to

revise the schedule requirement for the urban forest council. >> same house, same call? this ordinance passes. >> item 12. >> so appropriate approximately $8.73 to tell us to the refers in 2013-2014 and conditional loan for a project on van ness avenue. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on the first reading. >> item 13. >> so cloout execute a land acquisition agreement with good well sf for the property on mission street the anticipated cost is $337 million. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on the first reading. >> item 14 is an ordinance to authorize the municipal transportation for security services provisions that require the payment of prevailing wage

by the subcontractors and contractors for security services and same house, same call? this item passes. >> item 15. >> resolution to authorize the director of public works for the construction management with jacobs for the general hospital increasing the contract from $16.4 million to approximately $29 million. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on is the rest i submit first reading. >> so authorize the proposed lease for the human resources on third street in the basis year of $373,000 and estimated to cost approximately 3 hundred and 65 thousand. >> mr. john gibner, deputy city attorney in her. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney i communicated with the controller's office and the board can move forward.

>> colleagues, can we take this item same house, same call? this resolution is adapted. >> item 17 to authorize the city manager of the public works to execute engineering services agreement for the new tunnel project with the u s corporation ending 2016 and revised amount of $16.9 million. >> same house, same call? this resolution is adapted. >> item 18 a resolution to approve a modification for the operator lease and agreement between signature flight in the city to extend the lease by 5 years for a new date of 20022 for approximately $70.6 million during the extension of the term. >> same house, same call? this resolution is adapted. >> item 19 authorizing the multiple single families needing for $49 million for a financing

for multiple family urging known as the hunter view. >> this resolution is adapted. >> commissioner dooley's. >> sorry to interrupt i need to reaccepted the vote open item 14 i meant to continue that item approximately we made an amendment and the language has not been developed so i want to continue it. >> supervisor avalos as made a motion to resend seconded by supervisor kim we'll take that without objection. this is the case and supervisor avalos as making a motion to continue. >> to december 9th. >> seconded by supervisor breed we'll take that without objection. this is continued to the ninth

madam clerk call item 20. >> there's an item on the floor mr. president, item 19 you've approved it with an objection we're on item 20. >> if you could call it and to approve the issuance of tax exempt for college of the arts needing 2 of million dollars. >> colleagues, same house, same call? item 21. >> the city manager to exclusive an agreement with the engineers for specialized engineering services for the proposed new head works facility at water floougs pollution control plant. >> same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. this resolution is adapted. >> next item. >> mr. president, 0 would you like me to read the historic

property. >> those were recommendeds mills historic contracts with the city and he was the owners of the following property on peers street 563 water street and 621 water street. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, mr. president colleagues today before us is 3 contracts under the millions act the state legislation that initiate advised improvements to in maintaining historic properties in historic districts two years ago as you recall i introduced legislation this board passed unanimously to reform our local process around the miles act i worked with the san francisco historic heritage and other advocates in drafting that long overdue legislation

miles act for people to maintain their properties in a historic way the intent of this legislation that we passed a few years ago was to increase access to the miles act that helps homeowners to make costly improvements to roars structures we prioritized the historic preservation around the architecture of the thought city we want our historic building to be maintained as costing hass as that would be the miles act provides for property tax credits for owners to restrict a 10 year maintenance for a deliciously in terms of what the owner has to do to the building the miles act applies to property that are contributing

to a local state or historic building or landmarked we've put a lot of maintenance and want them to be done the miles act provides an incentive to maintain them in an appropriate way in 2012 other communities for example, la had a robust miles program and oakland across the bay a smaller city than san francisco had a robust plan significantly bigger than san francisco over time there were few miles a acts in san francisco other than a larger properties almost no small homeowners that were participating because the process here was difficult and long and expensive and unpredictable legislation we adopted a few

years ago has significantly improved that and made a streamlined and more predictability thanks to the planning department and the assessors office we've seen a bunch of miles act glutton and last year, it was approved a series of small homes for miles act contracts 3 miles act contracts before his today are from the newest historic district in san francisco one that i authored and this board elective last day last year the historic district immediately north of delores park the all of a sudden dead end street pierce carmelita it's a behalf historic district and

the earth is remarkable and those 3 contract were all recommended for approval by the historic preservation commission and in addition the 3 contracts have the support of the san francisco architecture heritage and we've described a letter from the executive director of the heritage strongly supporting those krikts contracts so colleagues, i ask firing support and any questions about the process for the miles act the planning department is here to answer our questions. >> supervisor avalos. >> thank you president chiu so clooepgz colleagues which of those in committee last week, i was not ready to support it i'm kind of on the fence i actually feel the miles act works pest when it's looking at preserving the property in blighted areas of the city and this part of san

francisco is definitely not an area that is blighted perhaps in 25 to thirty years ago it could have been but 40 years ago it was in that condition but right now not those property are already in pretty good condition one of the projects where the building is looking for the miles act designation as accomplished much of the work that is done in terms of the renovation i know it covers maintenance a separate issue but i actually feel that the miles act is really geared towards looking at parts of neighborhoods that are more blighted where the tax break can actually help people who have less means to do do renovations on their homes to do them in

this case, i building this landmark district is in pretty good condition and the buildings there are worth $1.7 million we the people are actually owning those buildings can actually do the renovation without the tax break i'll rather we didn't unable to to happen i'll be voting against the miles act on those 3 items. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, mr. president i appreciate supervisor avalos remarks but i disagree first of all, it's an initial matter colleagues this particular area wasn't 25 or 20 years ago, it was a very challenged neighborhood until recently it was a point challenge due to the incredible work of the residents

of that area this has been a drastically improved area the residents of that area deserve a lot of credit we shouldn't reward them but no longer going to give me miles act contracts i want to note that the miles act is not just for obligated properties but to give homeowners an incentive you can do work on historic building in a lot of different was and range of costs in terms of the care and you can go above and beyond to honor the district of those property or change of venues choose no to go above and beyond but entering into a contract you've gone beyond to honor the

district of the property if we're going to get into a situation in a historic place not considered to be blighted whatever intense you use we're not going to have miles act contracts in san francisco i can assure you that will be a long time before we see a historic district formed in san francisco when we went to the formation there was a lot of concern in the neighborhood you're putting extra obligations without benefit and the miles act is that benefit it's not a full benefit he in terms of counter balancing all the obligations but something i think it will send a powerful message that we start rejecting those contracts from people not to support of the creation of the historic district i hope

we'll support those. >> at this time madam clerk. >> supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos no supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor farrell supervisor kim there are 9 i's. >> one no. >> the resolutions are adapted. >> item 25. >> is a resolution to authorize the use of city for the internal council for the san francisco anniversary on 15. >> on to a different kind of resolution today is a resolution declaring february 2015 internal 50th anniversary and 30 years the internal to use the san

francisco additional seal next to that event we don't authorize the seal but the internal is a big deal with the lgbt so it's appropriate the yes, ma'am peril is one of the older organization in the world next year is is silver bullet it's 50th year and supervisor campos had jose here in the board of supervisors chambers before he passed away and ran for the board of supervisors in 1962 as an openly gay man and became the first reigning empress the first one was core in an accident in 1972 each year they represent the

empirical people and they raise charities in the landlord/tenant and hiv around domestic violence and so forth after the founding in san francisco other imperial courts were started in the u.s. starting with portland and seattle in the early 70s and there was 60 imperial courts through canada and mexico arrest given the long leadership has retained it's leadership and so its appropriate to recognize this 50th anniversary of the you mean peril court and there is no

them to use the seem like in essence with its 50th anniversary. >> thank you to the collect to put this resolution together colleagues thank you. >> supervisor wiener and with that, colleagues, can we take a resolved supervisor mar. >> supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor chiu supervisor farrell supervisor kim arrest there are 11 i's excuse me. there are 10 i's that resolution is adapted. >> item 26 an ordinance to addendum the alcohol district to allow the small beer

manufacturers and making a requisite finding. >> colleagues, same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. this item is passed. >> item 27 an ordinance to amend the planning codes on the restrictions on criminal housing and employment. >> commenting. >> thank you to colleagues for passing and voting unanimously for the fair chap act i've thofrd along with supervisor cohen that past february with a hard work a of a diverse group of stakeholders to the housing commending communicated and our business community we were able to craft the most probative reform in the state and leading the country to remove unnecessary barriers and create work and housing opportunity for people that have an arrest or conviction the fair chap has been in effect we've received

additional recommendations from several city departments including the office of work 0 enforcement regarding clarifying the fair chance act this trailing legislation cleans up some of the language so the board understands what the clean up looks like it allows the employers and city contractors to consider infractions for positions that primer involve driving this is a long this runs with the compliance normally we'll not want to look at infractions and employment record for positions where driving was the primary duty of the position it makes sense to look at it the record to pursuing our vision zero policy and second that allows the

employers and city contractors to consider convictions more than 7 years old concerning the care of minors this is after the package of the department and after some months of looking at it we've decided to include this allowance it also authorizes the city to bring the violation against people against violence with the definition of employment for the fair chance act it must be 8 hours per week and provided the restricts if this code prevails we've had a few ordinances where our office has need a discrepancy this will allow the fair chance had trumpet ero

conflicting laws colleagues, i ask for your support in the fair chance. >> same house, same call? ? we'll take that without objection. this ordinance is passes as item 28 to allow the eloquently bus rapt project >> colleagues can we take it we'll take that without objection. same house, same call? >> this ordinance is passed on the first reading and madam clerk could going to our committee report starting with item 45 were considered by the oversight committee and the committee forwarded the items to the board recommended as with the same title and 45 to amend the

administrative code for the local business enterprise program. >> thank you president chiu. >> colleagues, i want to thank you for your consideration of this ordinance which is co-sponsors with mayor ed lee to reform chapter 14 b of our administrative code also known as as the number one discretionary this has been in the works for the better part of the year i want to thank our mayor and naomi kelly and others who was involved in this complicated ordinance as well 0 many representatives of the local small business and contracting committee including the coalition of economic equality through 30 decades ago we recognized the goal of government and what was then

sometimes active n and often passive discrimination we recognized the possibility of million dollars dollars that our city spent for goods and services for economic semilose we passed a law that represented our city long-standing commitment to justice that foster a strong network of small businesses in san francisco as a local enterprise law now helps our small businesses offset higher costs of operating in or city when it works our city's contracting process keeps tax dollars at home for san franciscans the reformed package we have have flovenl you have you it helps to establish a no long run 40 percent san francisco's first

program to make good faith effort from construction contract under $400,000 and professional contract under $100,000 before opening the process to non-lbe's and it at 20 to $40 million and expands the projects that require a agreement to be approved by the board of supervisors and in certain industries that allows small businesses to participate in the lbe program to foster partnerships between established contractor and local businesses thank to the many actors it took a lot of effort from the departments as well as small businesses and i want to take a moment and thank our

geocommittee for their support. >> thank you supervisor avalos. >> thank you just a question that was raised recently by some contractors with the city as related to architect addressed engineers i think they were looking for language it would be in here for contractors that get a better shot inclusion in this legislation and i wanted to ask the author what the discussion has been if there's a possibility for that inclusion and some other version that can come forward at a at a later date. >> your leafing us has there been anyone in legislation to bring up that issue. >> first of all, i appreciate that question in the final dies to the full board i want to say a few things there was a contention to consider braegd