still, service very well as we move into the regional planning through the regional transportation plan and we do want to take up the new and emerging issue and priorities that are identified through the recent studies. and so finally, let's see on the project delivery side, and it is moving forward and projecting well and the ramp is demolished and this is off of i-80 and coming into the city and there is a minor traffic change and so we will keep the folks posted on the website there and on the 6th street i was pleased to celebrate the addition of a new signal with commissioner kim and the mayor and prop k and all of you are city resource haves been focused on sixth street to improve the safety in that corridor and it is nice to see the process result in the important, mid crossing and signal improvements in that area, in addition, the prop aa, funds are improving in the sections across the city and we will share that on my street,

sf.com and for those interested, check that out and then the glen park plan, transportation improvements are beginning transportation this month and both again park and balboa are now seeing, i think that finally the construction happening after many years of planning and design and community involvement. and my very last, mention here will be a big thank you, to fong and her team, and we conducted an audit and that was a big achievement in the last month or so, even as the team was implementing and watching our enterprise resource project, erp system and a big financial accounting system that she has also been leading so thank you for that, and if you would endudge me, i want to recognize erika and she moving to another position in the finance and admin group, and she will be working on the

management analyst, working on contracts and a bunch of other really great things. and steve has accepted the position of clerk and we want to thank him for serving the authority in this way. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you, i know, supervisors or commissioners kim and yee are going to talk about their experience in new york with vision zero, but i wanted to say that i visited austin texas and an incredibly green city in a very red state and in austin, it was for the national league of cities, congress of cities, conference and expocysing and we were looking at bikes and at the have surpassed san francisco in size, they are the 11th and we are the 14th and the rapid growth of the tech sector and the culture and the

entertainment sectors are impressive and there is a lot of similarities with the growing divides of haves and have nots like our city and a booming economy with the cranes and all over the place, and similar to the look of san francisco and the key parts of our city. and i wanted to say that i did a, over two hour bike infrastructure tour on bike, looking at probably about 7 miles of their nature bike plan improvements. and the bike bridges over water areas. bike and hiking trails, but it was pretty impressive what their department of public works and department of transportation, i wanted to thank, katherine greger who i had the time to meet with who is the complete street manager and coordinated us sharing the road workshop with a lot of other city council people from the other cities and i also wanted to add that they have a brand new cycle program that was good for me to compare with san francisco's, i know that

bcycle has denver, and about 26 other cities, with bike sharing programs. i rode the b cycle from the soko area, and which was south of the downtown, and it was very easy to get into the convention center and the downtown area, but it really efficient bike sharing program with about 1,000 bikes there in that one city. also, there is 40 stations or actually there is now way more than 40 stations in the bike sharing program and i know a lot of bicycling and the yellow bike project in portland and austin and others, and inspired, the san francisco yellow bike project and i wanted to add that the city council is going through a major change with the district elections coming seen and changing from an ad large system to the districts and a major east, west, divide between more conservative voters on the west side, verses more liberal and progressive voters on the east side but it is a changing city, and i also wanted to add that their brt

system that i was able to observe, and experience they have this challenges since they start thised year with a brt and it is good for me to see a system that is not a pure brt system and criticized by some purists but really a, and i think that they spent about 47 million dollars on it and really good bang for the buck i believe and they are trying to market it better to get more of the younger work theirs have been moving into the city to ride it more and i know that that is a marketing challenge for them. and i also just wanted to add that austin is also, the flag ship or the birth place of whole foods and i visited their pretty amazing flag ship store and the draft house that will be opening soon in the mission district and the theater restaurant, and the tap beer but it is an impressive business and probably

challenging with robert redford subdance type of chains but we will see that in san francisco, soon. and lastly, i think that it is the rapid growth of austin and the rapid growth of san francisco, to made me think of a lot of the challenges in austin that we face here that i really enjoyed the trip and thank the national league of cities for a conference that opened my eyes for a lot of amazing things that happened there and making any appreciate san francisco as well. thank you. >> thank you, commissioner mar, and commissioner yee? >> commissioner kim? >> we did attend it in new york city hosted by the transportation alternative last week, two weeks ago. and it was actually really great to hear what our counter

parts in new york city and sweden have been doing to implement the vision zero in their country, or their city. and i also, we got a chance to learn a lot about the advocacy groups that exist in new york city as well. and i know that some of the colleagues that were already very familiar with the transportation alternatives and families for safe streets but it was my first opportunity to actually see what the advocates do on the ground to really push, new york city's policies moving forward. and also the incredible network and those who have lost the members of the family to vehicle collision and how powerful their testimony was both this vision, forward.

and just want to recognize that we had a large con ent and we had commaederer from sfpd and we had several including john knox white, and megan wier, also presented and we had members of the pedestrian, safety, advisory committee, and bike coalition and walk sf and china town, and senior disability, action and central city, sro collaborativive. and just a couple of take aways that i had and i know that norman is going to share some of his i was impressed by their work on the city drivers in particular and both are the large vehicles, but any city employee that drives in new

york city. and it is something that i think that san francisco should model itself after and use some of their curriculum, and they have the tracking devices on all of the vehicles and the tracking devices, which will track how hard they accelerate and whether they are wearing seat belt and a number of things and the driver, education course is definitely, a whole other level and with mta which is a separate agency from the city, they have now made it their policy that it does not matter whose fault it is, that the driver should always be driving defensely, and i think that those shifts will impact the ability to achieve vision zero and we got to hear from one of the chiefs in sweden and he talked about how they were able to cut the number of deaths in half by 50

percent and actually have the speed limit has been key to that and what they have been able to do to enforce the speed limit is what they, and what they don't call them speed cameras they call them safety cameras. and they have been able to implement that throughout the country and it is effective in lowering the speeds and therefore, reducing the we have a lot of work to do, but we are far behind and unfortunately the countris in asia and europe but we are doing well in the u.s. but we have a lot more work to do and we are able to learn and share the best practices.

if we can go to the public comment on this item. >> commissioner mar and yee? >> there were a lot of take aways for myself, and i mean, that it was nice and comforting that we had really the largest con tining ent and i felt like we were in san francisco, even though we are in brooklyn and it is one of the boroughs that are larger than san francisco and it was interesting to hear some of the streets and the

pedestrians itself and the message that they are trying to get across is that the human beings make the mistakes and pedestrian ans will make the mistakes and they can be distracted and we should pay attention to that. and one of the things that was interesting, was the opening sort of keynote address, in which the professor there talked about streets in a very different way, and just prior to i guess, in the maybe, in a 1920s or so, and the streets were, quickly changed because of the auto industry. and in which they made and they basically had a campaign, the tree belongs to the car rather than the pedestrians will we get back to that notion?

probably not, but it is interesting to know that history, and that the streets were not made for the cars originally, but we have to keep in that mind, and as we talked to in particular, the drivers who have this, and the streets belong to them. >> and i have noticed to a lot of people, over there from san francisco, and that is what we have already, in san francisco. by the way. and it is a default speed limit. and i would really like the idea of the safety cameras. in swaoed sweden, what they said besides the cameras is that they really didn't have that many, but, what they did not have were movable cameras. and so, they were able to move it from one place to another, and every so often.

and so if it felt to drivers like they had a lot of cameras up. and maybe that is something that if we don't have enough funding if we pursue that avenue, we may want to look at that strategy. i think that one of the things that really, we have like advocates we have walk advocates, and these organizations, and one of the things that struck me is that we didn't have families involved. and in an organized way, and the as commissioner kim was saying, the familis for safe streets, that group was really to me, the power behind the advocacy and i am hoping that people that went to the syposium will talk among themself and see if we can form

a similar group. and the point about the black box and so forth, i will, and i am already pursuing seeing what we can do in staoet for that, and it is just such an inexpensive tool for us. and to, and 250 bucks a crack, and for, and, the approach will be whether we could monitor to see if we could save gas, but it also, the residual of that was that they were able to detect the bad drivers and not doing the right thing. and so, muni supposedly has a black box and others, and so i am trying to find out who else, or what other department haves that and which one don't and we will find a way to hopefully mandate that and we have that in the city cars. and so, those were some of the take aways. and i am glad that i went. and i loved their messaging.

and in regards to the education piece, and pedal safety. and i took a cab, and a few times. and in the back they have the stream, and about 25, 30 percent of what they were showing they kept on saying visions zero, vision zero and so the messaging was really powerful and they had the street signs all over the place. and i understand that clear channel donated a bunch of signs for them to put up or to send these messages. i am hoping that we could, our education piece could be as aggressive as that. and i know that it was just starting with, and i love it to be that way. thank you. >> thank you. >> commissioner mar? >> yeah, i just wanted to thank commissioners kim and yee, and i wanted to remind the body that there is a budget

legislative analyst report on reducing speed limit and looking at model and other cities and so i will do my best to try to integrate what you have learned and brought back with the budget analyst report, which i think that we will having the hearing later in the new year. and i wanted to also say that just remembering now, in austin, unfortunately they were not able to pass a one billion dollar transportation bond. a spread out city, verses a dense city and, we were able to pass our prop a there is a lot of differences in our electorate supporting transition, i know that a lot of effort went into proposition a and i want to thank tang and others for the support and the mayor as well. and i want to give a plug for chair avalos and i will be in new york city for this gathering of city council and local leaders called local progress. and we will be in city hall, and believe that it is on

thursday, of next week. with different panels participating on a economic justice panel, with city council folks from philadelphia, and dc and other cities as well. but, we will do our best to learn about the transportation issues as we are there with progressive and liberal council members from around the downtownry as well. thank you. >> thank you. >> so we can go into public comment. >> any member? >> seeing none come forward. we will close public comment and move on to the next item. >> five, accept the audit report for the fiscal year, ended june 30, 2014, this is an action item. >> any comments or questions? >> seeing none, we will go out to public comment. >> and public comment will close and roll call vote. >> on item five, avalos? >> aye. >> breed. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> chiu. >> aye. >> cohen?

>> absent. >> farrell? >> absent. >> commissioner kim? >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> tang. >> aye. >> weiner. >> aye. >> commissioner yee. >> aye. >> the item passes. >> okay, let's go on to the plans and programs item. item 6... >>allocate $6,795,385 in prop k funds, with conditions, for eleven requests, subject to the attached fiscal year cash flow distribution schedules and amend the relevant 5-year prioritization programs. this is an action item. >> okay. colleagues, comments or questions? >> no, we will go on to public comment, any member of the public that would like to comment? and seeing none, come forward we will close public comment and have another roll call vote. >> 6, avalos. >> aye. >> breed. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> chiu. >> aye. >> cohen? >> absent. >> farrell. absent. >> kim. >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> tang.

>> aye. >> weiner. >> aye. >> yee. >> aye. >> aye. >> the item passes. >> item 7, introduction of new items this is an information item. >> colleagues, any new item issues to come before the transportation authority? >> seeing none, we will go on to public comment on this item. >> and seeing no member of the public come forward we will close public comment and go to the next item. >> 8, public comment? >> okay. >> general public comment is now opened. and seeing no member of the public, we will close general public comment. >> and our next item? >> nine, adjournment. >> okay, colleagues we are adjourned and we want to wish, everyone a happy holiday. thank you. >>

we are celebrating the glorious grand opening of the chinese rec center. ♪ 1951, 60 years ago, our first kids began to play in the chinese wrecks center -- rec center. >> i was 10 years old at the time. i spent just about my whole life here. >> i came here to learn dancing. by we came -- >> we had a good

time. made a lot of friends here. crisises part of the 2008 clean neighborhood park fund, and this is so important to our families. for many people who live in chinatown, this is their backyard. this is where many people come to congregate, and we are so happy to be able to deliver this project on time and under budget. >> a reason we all agreed to name this memorex center is because it is part of the history of i hear -- to name this rec center, is because it is part of the history of san francisco. >> they took off from logan airport, and the call of duty was to alert american airlines that her plane was hijacked, and she stayed on the phone prior to

the crash into the no. 9 world trade center. >> i would like to claim today the center and the naming of it. [applause] >> kmer i actually challenged me to a little bit of a ping pong -- the mayor actually challenge me to a little bit of a ping- pong, so i accept your challenge. ♪ >> it is an amazing spot. it is a state of the art center. >> is beautiful. quarkrights i would like to come here and join them

>> please stand by... >> >> >> government and audit and oversight committee will come to order. i'm supervisor london breed: and joined by >>president david chiu: and we would also like to thank sfgovtv.org for filming this meeting today. madam clerk, do you have any announcements? >> >> please silence all electronic devices. items already placed on the agenda.

>> today we'll be taking item no. 2 out of order. please call the item. city clerk: [contract agreement - recology san francisco, recology golden gate, and recology sunset scavenger - refuse collection - not to exceed $44,000,000] resolution approving under charter, section 9.1188bb, a contract agreement between the city and county of san francisco and recology san francisco, recology golden gate, and recology sunset scavenger contractorss, for refuse services, resulting in total compensation to contractors in an amount not to exceed $44,000,000 for the term of december 1, 2014, through november 30, 2020. city clerk: sf 21234 >> i have j d fong who will speak ton this matter today. >> good afternoon supervisors, jackie fong from contact of administration i'm requesting an mou from the city andy -- ecology from november 24th #shgs 2014 to december -- november 30, 2020 , to not compete the amount

of $44 million. this amount negotiated 11.4 percent increase in refuse waste in the agreement. the average annual increase for years 1-4 is between 8.25 percent and in addition the mou grants annual cost-of-living judgements to the rates beginning july 2015 through november 20th. this table indicates the city's estimated spend for the term of the contract. the recology group of companies are the only license use of refuse in sfrabs. san francisco. the company has served san

francisco since 1932 granting recology then known as sunset scavenger garbage rights in san francisco. the ordinance remains in effect and a proposed vendor remains the only company that has provided residential customer service since 1932. the proposing mou was not competitively bid. as city residents or by ordinance still legally required to purchase residential services from recology. recology is uniquely positioned in the san francisco marketplace. it would be i am

mpractical to duplicate services throughout the city for traditional and government customers. it does not provide the rate, reasonably provides the rates increases to base commercial rates. some commercial clients have negotiated adjustments to these rates. oca there negotiated with recology on behalf of city departments. we appreciate the budget analyst the approval of the mou and lca is willing to incorporate the budget recommendation to amend the resolution by reducing the mou not to exceed amount by $4 million to $40 million. this will still allow the 1

$1.2 million for fluctuations for refuse by city department. it does not obligate the city to spend that amount. it's the amount determined by the budget which has already been approved for fiscal year 14-15. representative from recology are here to answer any questions you might have. the office of administering is recommending approval of the mou with a not to exceed amount recommended by the budget analyst. >> okay, thank you. can we have the budget and legislative analyst report, please. >> good afternoon, chair breed, supervisor chiu. budget

legislative office. as noted on your report reiterating what ms. fong said under the new contract agreement the cost increases will go up by 4.4 percent in fiscal year 2015 considered what the city paid in 13-14. the city paid $5 million and will pay $6 million. it's $37.9 million. therefore we are reducing the not to exceed amount contract to $40 million that will still allow for $2 million contingency. we recommend approval for that amendment. >>supervisor london breed: okay, we are going