saw the opportunity was available and we have a graton friends group coalesceesing and [inaudible] had one and golden gate heights -- the playground there didn't have a friends group until recently and actually part of this effort so i am hopeful as we move through the reason vaigdzs and engage the community and the design conversation that will spur the development of further stewardship efforts with the playgrounds that don't have a strong organization. >> [inaudible] >> absolutely. >> thank you for this. it's a tremendous document. >> mr. ginsburg did you have anything else to add? >> mostly thank yous. i want to thank dawn for her and her team for their very effective facility facilitation and all of the planning that went into coming up with the list. it's said it's often hard to spend

money than reducing spending because the choices are harder and this was done with facts and the community and i think the outcomes are very, very credible and i really do want to thank dawn and stacy and the entire steering committee for their participation in it. i ulc want to thank the san francisco parks alliance which has taken up playgrounds as a cause and i can't think of a more noble one. i know matt o'grady is here and i want to thank them and the parks alliance board for their interest. this is at the top of our philanthropic list frankly. we want to leverage this opportunity. we have a chunk of public money that if we can figure out and attract some private support we can do more and we can do it better and more boldly and the trick will be

trying to attract and get commitments for that support in a time frame that works with the first phase of renovations, but this is on our list. it's something that lisa bransten thinks about everyday and she and i talk about everyday so hopefully more good news to come. >> thank you. commissioner bonilla. >> yes. the question i have is what is the average use of -- or the useful life of our parks? how often do we have to renovate our parks? what do we do in terms of the design and the planning, the maintenance and so on so that we extend the lives of our parks? because i think in terms of all the resources that we want to leverage to

renovate these parks i think we need to have a way of ensuring that we don't have to be constantly going back to the till and doing more and more renovations, so i mean that's a big concern of mine because i have been on the commission for quite a few years and i have seen a lot of different renovations going on and maybe on a couple of them of the renovations that we did, so i want to make sure we're going to invest considerable amount of money and a lot of different resources that we have these parks for as long as possible so i would like that addressed in the future efforts, and to continue planning with these

quote unquote "failing parks". >> commissioner i think it's a great question and in march we can come back with more detail but there are two questions embedded in your question. one is what is the current replacement cycle for assets and then what should it be? because we're certainly squeezing every month of life out of the play structures that is possible. when you saw the play structure at bo decker -- for example at lily wong right now they have been around for over a decade in some places -- closer to two and merced heights and no one has been here in a super long time and so some of those are functional still. you can still play on them, but the trends and in design and whennure compare the quality of those play structures to mission playground

on valencia street it's a dramatic before and after so we can certainly talk about what i think a replacement cycle should look like. i think the department has learned a lot over the past decade about how to improve the durablity of the playgrounds that we build and also the ease of maintenance. we made a number of policy decisions over the past 10 years. for example a decade ago we were ordering playgrounds from germany and fancy things from other places and we discovered the replacement time when you break it there is a lag time to order a replacement part from a high end designer in germany when the yard is here in san francisco and it broke last week and all the parents are understandably aren't you going to get it fixed in the next month or so and seeing six to eight months to replace

playground equipment so now we moved away from that where we have custom work done but done overwhelmingly in the united states and think through with the friends groups how we're going to deal with that and helen dillard playground there is annual maintenance set aside and they have a donor fund for dealing with the replacement of the custom parts and working towards the overall deferred maintenance and we're pursuing something similar at the civic center playground as well so we learned real lessons. sand -- we don't put sand in new play structures in the way it was once used and creates eroding and maintenance for the staff so we have lessons learned that we are incorporating with more renovations that i think will overall lengthen the durablity of the asset and for the staff

to provide maintenance. it's a great question and i can develop a more detailed answer. >> yeah, if you could do that and a certain when we were looking at first tiers and squeezing in 13 of them i am thinking would we be squeezing so many parks in are we doing the job that we need to do to really ensure more permanentacy in terms of the parks. >> it's good feedback. >> yeah, i would be -- i would error more -- i would error on the side of caution here instead of squeezing too much in and really doing the best job possible even if unfortunately it involves fewer -- that we do fewer parks but at least we know they will last -- i mean that we will have them for a lot longer,

and they will have a longer useful life. >> great. thank you for that feedback. >> thank you very much dawn. let's go to public comment. >> okay. wilma gardner and if anyone else would like to speak and sign up by the table that would be great. wilma. no, no, no. you come on up. thank you. >> good morning. >> good morning. >> president buell, and members of the commission for rec and park and also general

ginsburg. dorothy strictland and i i are part of the 800 block club and have been stewards and advocates for the merced heights playground for more than 21 years. we have followed the failing playgrounds task force closely for about eight months. we were impressed by the facilitator, task force members, the recreation and parks staff and the parks alliance and say job well done. also we appreciated the opportunity for active participation of the public throughout the process. we wholeheartedly support the report given by dawn and ask

that you adopt the recommendations of the failing playgrounds task force. thank you. >> thank you. >> dorothy did you want to speak? >> good morning everyone and i just want to really express my very, very much appreciation for our task force. the task force was so inclusive of the community at every point of their analysis of everything they did and we learned an awful lot and it's much appreciated. they have done a tremendous job. >> thank you. >> it was a wonderful experience. >> thank you both. >> next speaker. >> good morning commissioners. matt o'grady, the ceo of the san francisco parks alliance. you may know that we were created by a merger over three years ago.

in three years -- can you believe that? but at the time we attempted to combine stewardship and fill land pee work with policy work and made us unique across organizations across the country and many asked how we were going to combine the approaches? we have no further to look than this initiative. we engage volunteers to do the report card and engage them to do clean up days on a regular basis across playgrounds across the city and most importantly it's the volunteers that do fundraising for playground renovations and construction. philanthropy -- if those partners that raised millions of dollars in recent years for renovation and expansion and building new playgrounds across the city.

we know them in delores park, lafayette park and [inaudible] and dog patch neighborhood and there is more on the way. last year party in the parks helped fund some of the renovations. policy. you know our report card. it's one example that we bring data to the decision making processes. we are proud to co-chair thursday task force that bring this is recommendation to you today. it has members from every district in the city. represents various neighborhoods and interest groups. it brings to the table expertise in education parenting and childhood development. this task force went through a thorough and objective consideration of the data to help prioritize the playgrounds with the greatest need and dawn has outlined all of that for you. this task force came to a unanimous recommendation after five months of analysis and discussion. this task force has

demonstrated a solid process that we can rely on this decision before you today and also a process to rely on future projects. i want to ask you to pause for a moment and reflect. what would it have been like if there was no task force? what would your decision making process be like without that guidance and spend $15 million? now i am happy to jerk you back to reality because we have had a task force. you don't have to deal with that kind of environment. we have had this guidance so we do all owe a debt of gratitude to the task force for their hours of volunteer time and especially for their unanimous recommendation they bring to us today. i also want to thank julie and sonya, the parks alliance staff who did the heavy lifting in support of the task force so i am delighted to ask julie to come up and provide

some specifics to you. >> thank you. >> next speaker. >> good morning commissioners. >> good morning. >> julie from the san francisco parks alliance and i manage our playground initiative program at the alliance which includes data collection for the playground report card, and i served on the steering committee of the task force and also was a task force member, so i won't repeat what has been said but i again want to thank the rec and park staff, dawn and stacy and tokes and everyone that did an amazing job. they provided solid data and information for analysis. it was a very thorough process. extensive community engagement and very robust public participation that has been mentioned. the groups did a very hard thing with

starting with this universe of over 55 playgrounds that could be considered, and whittled it down to a list of 13 and i feel like it truly does represent the most needy of playgrounds and again a balance of considering the conditions on site and then also the neighborhoods in the most need with the low household median income and high youth density and low report card grades. also when all 13 of those playgrounds are renovated there will be no playgrounds in the city with the hazardous cca wood, so i am very proud if we get there and this will be a major milestone for the city, something to be celebrated, and just wanted to thank all the people that served, commissioner mcdonnell. i also wanted to

call out lee an weldon from the san francisco parks alliance council who is here and all of the members of the public that came and in conclusion going forward parks alliance will continue to partner with the department both for leveraging funds for the playgrounds in tier two and as dawn mentioned will also host a civic forum on playground design to get input from community members on what elements and experiences they would like all of our playgrounds to have going forward so we look forward working with the department to continue our work. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker please. >> good morning. thank you for the opportunity to comment. my name is trudy garber and a project manager at the trust for public land. i work with alhand ja who served as a member on

the failing playgrounds task force. we are a national nonprofit and conserves land for people and parks. our goal is to make sure every child has safe access to play be a garden, park or playground within 10 minutes walk of their home. we're a proud and close partner with san francisco recreation and park department and with rec and park and community groups we recently completed the san francisco parks initiative or san francisco initiative to renovate three different parks in san francisco and working on hill top park and bay view and civic center. we're especially supportive of the process that the failing playgrounds task force under took. the comprehensive research of the anatomy of a playground, mapping of existing conditions, and consideration for other park initiatives makes the process

comprehensive and realistic. the playground selection criteria that the task force used to select two tiers of playgrounds is very similar to the trust for public lands playground selection criteria and parks selection criteria. we consider high use density. we look at seniors. housing, income, demographics and quality of parks as captured in parks alliance report cards and while there are many playgrounds in san francisco worthy of improvements we believe that the task force recommendations show a the sites that will have a transformative impact on the residents in san francisco and in fact many of the sites chosen have been on our potential project list for many years and we're excited to see funding allocated to these sites so we look forward to supporting and working with rec park as an implementation partner for these sites. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker please. come

on up. >> hello commissioners. my name is linda lighthiser and here to represent the mclaren park collaborative. we are proud that a playground within mclaren park was considered for the failing playgrounds task force and one of the challenges with that playground that it did have cca wood. however t was removed because it was dangerous several years ago. there is no rem nance of this park left so -- playground structure rather so there was nothing to grade so for many years some of us kept the banner going to say even though you have a failing grade you have park playgrounds that were eliminated and removed and those need to be considered too, so we considered those and incomplete perhaps but nevertheless the task force kept it for consideration and on the

list even though we couldn't get a grade year after year but happy that mclaren park will have another playground to replace those that we lost over the years. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker. >> thank you. good morning. >> good morning. >> my name is edna james and i am president of omi community action organization which is a tax exempt nonprofit organization taking a lead role in the rebuilding of mercy heights play ground. i would like to introduce you to barbara williams and karen lacoi which she has the merced heights playground family. okay. that's also been helping. we

strongly endorse this project for the following reasons. the 2010 census reported there was an increase of over 10,000 in population in 941 three two causing a shift in the district and district 11 from ocean avenue all the way over to holloway and i am sure commissioner mcdonnell worked on that project and how the community increased in its population. also the knowledge structure has been. >> >> also the building structure is in need of repair and brought up to ada standards and investing in the basic structure is a sound and good investment to the community. this is an under served community and

welcome your support. the survey that we conducted under the leadership of karen mccoy gave support for tiny to thes, -- tots and seniors and adults. the courts and the athletic field and the play structure. recreation and park -- i have worked with recreation and park with [inaudible] playground. when you first came out with the bond we were looking at rebuilding that project. also we have looking at support from the school district there, jose ortega, ymca and other community organizations in that area. on a personal note my children grew up around merced heights playground and we remember -- i remember the tiny tot s program

which gave me two hours of mental health therapy just having my kids provided a safe fun and educational activity for my children, and so with that we support this and we adopt the task force report and we're just waiting for you to say yes, i worked on the [inaudible] and the library at ocean view under the leadership of mayor willie brown at that time and we're looking at banks who are supporting us so we strongly want you to keep it going. thank you. >> thank you very much. >> is there anyone else who would like to make public comment on this item only? seeing no one public comment is now closed. >> commissioner mcdonnell. >> i'm not sure if we're ready for a motion, so i have one

more comment but i would also lead into -- >> well, let me say before you do that i want to join the chorus of commissioners and others thank you for the service on the task force. it means a great deal and very much appreciated. mr. ginsburg. >> i wanted to thank you do mcdonnell for all the time you spent on this and from my friends at merced heights and edna they have been -- you can be persistent and do that pleasantly and not pleasantly and thank you for your pleasant persistence and steadfastness on getting this playground done. >> commissioner mcdonnell. >> yes thank you. so one of the wonderful children that ms. james described getting therapy from i actually went to high school with at lowell high school so every time she walked

into the room it felt like my market was walking into the. >> mother was walking into the room to get this right so with that endorsement i am thrilled to make a motion. >> second. >> there is a motion and a second. all in favor say aye. >> aye. >> unanimously approved. [applause] >> and we are now on item 9, general public comment continued. anyone who did not make comment under item four and would like to make general public comment now? seeing none this is closed. item 10. commissioners matters? any commissioners matters? any public comment? seeing no one public comment is now closed. item 11 new agenda business setting. any public comment? this item is closed. item 12 communications. is there any public comment? seeing none this item is closed. item 13 is adjournment. >> is there a motion?

>> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? >> aye. >> we stand adjourned. >> happy holidays. >> happy holidays

>> we have a wonderful adult ceramic class. we offer over 10 adult classes in morning and evening. it accommodates people who work in the day, people who work in the evening, people who are day people and night people. we

try to cater to the whole group. it's beyond just a clay lesson. it's really a lifeless on. when you meet people you never know what's underneath. sometimes they show you what they want to. and you kind of expect that it's just going to be that. but it's never really what's on the surface. it's really what's underneath the surface . that's what i try to get at when i do my clay. the camaraderie that we have here. we have students that have been for for many many years. we have students here for the first time. we share our skills, our formulas. this is how we learn. how did you do that? let me show you. that's the attitude that the students and the teachers have here. it's a really wonderful

nurturing place. test. >> good afternoon, everyone. i'd like to call to order the san francisco public utilities commission meeting today's is december 9, 2014, roll call please. commissioner president caen commissioner vietor commissioner moran commissioner courtney is on his way we have quorum. >> commissioners i have the minutes of november 12th any additions or corrections seeing none. >> i'll move any further discussion