work with the city staff on the benefit fees and how to use the resources is not working well, it's not able to identify an issue like this and say that's table it that body didn't respond pass let me see to whatever is happening instead of proactively as what the community needs the real focus it's a problem here there's a lot of potential they'll be tremendous fees coming in with the development and eastern neighborhoods but there is a problem the community planning process is not functioning well and the fact that the chevrolet wasn't flagged today as a serious matter shows that i really urge i to think and the staff to think seriously how to make the system work better. >> thank you. next speaker.

>> good afternoon. my name is a dining martinez i represent the admission collaborative a quick thing about the report is i'm curious about whether there's anywhere in the report that touches on improvements and the impact only low income populations in those discussed areas especially, as 2 relates to the mission and the open space and recreational areas that's something that is very important that needs to be thought about when we continue those discussions thank you. >> thank you. is there any additional public comment? >> back again and i'm basically commenting as a observer of what's being discussed in the up and coming projects and the

beautifying of our communities i wanted to be acknowledged it seems like the city is going to have a reserve some of the lands for the original occupant of those areas because we're constantly being pushed out and priced out of the up and coming i was here maybe a few months back on rec and park speaking on behalf of the tech companies to reserve the open space and the park to play soccer or whatever they need to enjoy again, we have the people in the area who are the open spaces are supposed to be available for not being able to utilize it because

someone comes in and buys the spates that's not fair to us as natives of san francisco we make san francisco what itless we're a exists community that's turning into a place for wealthy or poor people 25i9s e that's not okay that's not a clear representation of what this nation stand for i want that to be considered you guys are citizens of this great nation as well you, your pretty privileged but at the end of the day your human and have the ability to have compassion towards the people you make the decisions for on the on behalf of us we're the public san francisco that you represent thank you. >> thank you is there any additional public comment?

seeing none, public comment is closed i wanted to ask staff about the question that the gentleman raised you alluded to the totality of the niece that covers thirty percent of the needs can you describe that assessment he is done >> the thirty percent number is when the plans were adapted but there's been a numerous efforts from the department and each implementing agency to better thinks the population needs as they grow there's a focus on childcare facilities in the public comment and there's two reports i think that will help he kind of update the 2008 the first is the citywide nexus and the niece and infrastructure standards analysis i presented to the commission a few months ago it takes a citywide look at our future childcare niece on

the chapter of childcare the existing deficits as well as needs and another agency s f a that has several committees that participated in the grow course of action evolved that looked at the childcare that that assessment and have t a few reports i think updating last year - this past year we'll find the exact date they've interrupted their childcare falls the enpick is a good model each the agencies come to us every year we come and say here's the resources basically, the resources they have for the demand for the park facilities needs we come together to create a strategy for each neighborhood that's mindful of the citywide strategy so i think there's something i can't avoid our

resources don't exactly match our needs we're having an vivifying understanding of the neighborhood as well as citywide needs and childcare sorry to ramp he will on its noting another piece of infrastructure but the childcare operates on a citywide basis people don't need those services like streetscapes or parks next to their home there was policy on a citywide level as well i readily e really enjoyed that around childcare. >> commissioner antonini. >> in regards to what you've presented and looking at it comprehensively so you're saying the programs are thirty percent covered and we need to cover the

other 70 percent. >> i misspoke when we understood human nature infrastructure we thought was appropriate to support the growth that's thirty percent of the revenue to one hundred percent of the needs, however the projects i've prevalent do i have preservations we've use some impact fee moving forward and found other funding or funded through impact money all the projects we believe in our paychecks for the next 5 years we we have secured the funding through the serious. >> those are funded specific in general terms some of the things that are desirable is infrastructure that are adjacent to many of the projects are the part we still need to find funding with the reference of the transit center they talk

about the extension and other things we need to identify or continue to work entertaining that. >> and for each infrastructure type sort of our total anticipated needs versus our fund there's a small gap as i was concluding we're working to understand the gap to come up with innovative tools as a city to fill the gap. >> thank you for your report. >> thank you so i believe that's the conclusion of the item the commission will take a 10 minute break. >> good afternoon and welcoming to the planning commission. january 8, 2015, like to remind members of the

audience the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind and to please silence all electronic devices that may sound off during this procedures we left on, on the regular calendar for c w p we might notice we've gone longer case numbers because of our transmission to the system you'll see several important zeros and several for letters but this is for the 2014 housing elements to initiate the elements to the san francisco general plan >> good afternoon director from the citywide planning i want to briefly introduce this item to set a context for your consideration of the 2014 housing element both in terms of policy and in

terms of timing if i may recall the 2009 housing element update was a set of policy robust discussion on the substantive changes to the hours element of the general plan whereas the current proposal in front of you we'll hope our adapt it is really a set of fairly selective and he relatively minor updates to the housing element that that being said the schedule is somewhat con praind trained in the sequence on the other hand sense the court resolute over the holiday on december 22nd up holding the sequa process and decision with regards to the last housing element update

we were resistant in some ways from bringing the new element to you because of the update rests on the large part of the update and the findings including the sequa finding that was nice to see between the 2004 and 2009 updates the courts ended 10 years of sequa litigation on that topic i would note on the other end of the process that baskets our timeline the state requires adapts of 2014 element it is due at the end of this month we have a grace period it goes to the board of supervisors so keeping to a are you retailing tight schedule on a fairly selective update is important to keep in mind

importance, of course, of meeting the deadline we need to have an element it is in con forms with the state law to receive the affordable housing infrastructure funding so it's important for that regard i want to note i wanted to feinstein thank our team we have a capable stapling staff team who provided the impact report who has many talents who the manager magnifying vin she's done a great job and helped by other staff who will be making today's presentation thank you for your time. >> thank you.

>> good afternoon, commissioners i'm here to request an in violation of the adaptation proceedings foresee 2014 element please know i'm talking about the 2009 element i'm going to call it existing the housing elements a required part of the general plan and guides the city's policies and as overview overview guiding document it provides the offer arching provision for the stream the futuristic policy will be adaptation of the element does in the itself change the city lay of practice in the past year housing in san francisco has been the forefront of articles and legislation in the city the city staff is addressing the housing through initiate and all of it is sports

by itself existing housing element to address the housing affordability the working group looked at the fees in san francisco and this commission was updated on the process in november of 2014 additionally several pieces of legislation targeting the will 125ib89 has been passed 2014 housing element is required by state law and many state funds for community development is tied to the development as stayed before it provides the envision for housing in san francisco the element is breakdown into 2 you primary parts part one the data needs analyze it contains on analysis of the san francisco population and householder as well as an assessment of the existing characteristics and part two is our objectives and policies that

0 begins defines the policies and goals it includes the prelims of the measures that relating result in prelims of the housing related objectives in the policies note in our case packet you'll have strike to tell us those changes represent the housing element to the 2014 housing element, i.e., the iowa's way it was and will be the housing element was yimentd through the hard work of any staff groups including a community advisors board and thirty community workshops and in draft the element the staff began with stakeholder in drafting the last element in 2013 noting the outreach they agreed the housing element addresses current and futuristic

goals for the city with this in mind the city focused on the needs and the data to make sure we have the most current data for the policies and audrey will be highlighting those from part one. >> good afternoon commissioner my name is audrey i'll be going on o doing over some of the highlights from parts one the deeds and analysis part of the analysis i mean 70s san francisco a growing and will continue to grow today some 8 hundred and 18 thousand people can this home the association projects the san franciscans will be over one million by 2040 this is an increase in 2 hundred and 70 thousand people needing

housing in the next 25 years they forecast an increase inform seven hundred and 67 jobs most of the jobs will be increased 2 3, 4 construction and professional and health and educational services householder growth an approximate of the growth indicates the needs for over one hundred thousand units over the next 25 units for the population growth based on those needs the state department of the housing and community development along with the allocations are the target for housing production in the county 60 percent of those are to be affordable for varying incomes between 2007 and 2014

over 9 thousand net units have been produced produced in the unit as shown in the pie charts in the presentation as you 2013 san francisco was ranked third among the 9 county in the bayer in meeting our affordable housing targets this shouz shows how they accomplished their targets recently a bag has released the housing needs for the period covering 2015 to 2022 the new target 38 thousand entitled units in the pipeline the city may not be to reach the target the 34 thousand that includes nearly 24 thousand net units for major and title development in hunters point and treasure

island while the current zoning will more than donate the projected how's needs we need nor housing and implementation measures to achieve the affordable housing goals of the city and also to insure we meet the target by a bag and the city thank you. >> as audrey stayed we'll have enough policy framework that guide the work to achieve the affordable housing goals the 8 issues based on provide a strong pharynx that continues to provide the extort from accurate sites to increasing the affordable housing those issues direct a number of issues making a robust vision for san francisco a number of housing especially

initiated i've mentioned supported by the 20142, 3, 4 particular the mayor's office of housing was ridiculously in preserving affordability in our neighborhood and direct the construction for affordable housing and enable housing to be beneficial and exclusively not housing. >> outline e you'll have those recommendations are in the policies objectives and numerous identifiable housing element in the 2014 report for example the recommendations to achieve new development is mentioned in the directing elements pole 2.3 to identify points for permanent housing helps with the land for affordable housing staff recognizes a need to update the policies where

appropriate in our case packet we've outlined the cases for homelessness and we've identified the bonus work and the newly approved prop k department has been working closely with the california housing and community development for a timing adaptation additionally staff created a website at the end of the august and releases a video to highlight the key components the video directed yourselves 0 user to the draft and has worked with individual to incorporate changes such possible while maintain the policy and framework going forward we ask the commission schedule a adaptation hearing for february 5th

note this is different then in a the case packet on the 29th of june we want to have an adaptation element this allows 4 weeks to respond to public comments between the adaptation hearing we does the commission adopt the housing element update and schedule a adaptation hearing for february 5th staff is available for questions. >> thank you opening it up for public comment (calling names). >> i'm bob plant hold regarding our february 5th date i wanted to suggest that in the future when you have hearings that have

a lot of information that is very bulky and detention i'm told this might be one hundred and 50 packages have a special outreach to community to agency to constituencies that don't read print notice how seldom you see people in here with guide dogs or white detains i canes anyone that used screen reader software is takes a long time it's easier to read the material with their eyes than material read to you people about disabilities are sub assumed into categories like next door and moderate income it was was cancelled the committee it cancelled our subcommittee on access to housing a part of the

necessary work of the consolidated plan we we were really at odds sometimes with staff and sometimes with the nonprofit agencies for not providing enough housing for people with disability and making it available your times and situation where a nonprofit has to rent a unit to whoever is next on the list even though they don't have a disability so their assessable unit not going to us theirs not enough units we're the most under employed cohort in the country bar then and yet there isn't enough housing built for us that's what constituency and involvement and interest comes in yes the may i have office of sdalt the council but when we were running our subcommittee own nexus to

housing we represented this from an independent research center from the house important the blind and a variety from the art a variety of agencies serving people to hear under the dmutcy i will try to alert those are agencies about the barney plan to sequa conforms of what we see as our under met needs thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> dr. espanola jackson here i'm going to put this here for you to see and this is was a court aforementioned that was done and what you need to do it make sure that you go online for

superiority of california the case no. c p f as a fwrang dash can 510670 it's 37 packages and the ruling the climaxing conclusion of the judge at that time the court found the eir for the c p dash h p to the redevelopment project can't be a basis for early transfer of approval for the shipyard the court ordered that the shipyard may not receive a kick last year process until complete as safe to have development a petition is ordered to prepare a writ of mandate with the courts ruling this is dated

july 8th, 2011 when the gentleman was speaking when i hear people talking about low income housing affordable housing it z do not mean housing for those who live here in san francisco who put this together m i a i rates it question by the board of supervisors because those of us who do not make or $100,000 a year but willie brown when he was mayor, i stayed if you don't make $100,000 a year you don't need to be 2, 3, 4 san francisco where everybody is going there's no square feet it was stated in the newspaper now you need to be make sure that this housing element that was done i brought a copy i said i'm not going to get you no more

information i know that some of you older commissions out to my community to understand and know my community and know how you could be voted do not vote on this until you make sure that the circle last year has been done nobody in my community has seen it thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hello, i'm nancy represent my neighborhood association and i want to point out to you in the revision at 2014 of the housing element neighborhood associations were not part of the key stakeholders one of your stated objectives it to consider the diversity of neighborhood and who better to know it than we i want to make

this comment and concern and also i understand that there's an expedientcy to get this done we want to be informed and part of the process thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon. i'm diane martinez representing plaza 16 and the mission sro claufkz we know that item 4 discuses the updates on the housing elements he know with the mayor says we need nor condos to address the housing crisis we don't need unaffordable housing we must preserve affordable housing in the city and county of san francisco we saw the video

released by the planning department advocating for luxury condos this will not benefit the community in order to meet the needs of the community the planning commission must insure that we respect pole 4.5 that insures that new permanently affordable housing is located in all of the city's neighborhood with the diversity of unit types provided at a range of income levels construction of luxury condos didn't meet that e this for wait a second families that prevents this and we must respect this we demand that the san francisco planning department abide by the community planning and land use process you outlined in plan popper