there a reilly reason we're seeing this. >> this legislation was passed we don't see 7 to 12 and that's not allowed. >> i guess one other question to the project sponsor is there a clause in the cc&rs for the condominiums there are conditions on short-term rentals or not. >> on this particular property we haven't gotten the cc&rs yet. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioners there is a motion and second to approve item 6 commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner president wu commissioner fong. >> so moved, commissioners,

that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and the work program an informational presentation. >> commissioner, i building you've met kelly our director of planning gil has been here about seven months and has been working with the citywide managers on a 5 year work plan i think that president fong and vice president wu has is been looking at the longer than term prospective on the longs range planning and gil has prepared this and this is also in preparation for the budget hearings which will start next week as well and you'll see in the budget proposal you'll see next week you'll see some of the work reflected in that proposal

as well dwindling it prepared to go over the report audience good afternoon again gil kelly director of the citywide essentially the upper design unit i didn't bring any try corner with me as prior speakers nevertheless, i hope to not entertain you peek our interests on some of the ideas keep our attention and keep the roar the crowd down today, this is a little bit unusual in terms of the workload and the items you typically see that tend to get focused on the project or site level sometimes in a district or corridor level this is an opportunity to stand back and look at the long-term future of san francisco through the lens we've developed i want to begin

by acknowledging a capable program management staff in the citywide division their seat behind me ask them to stand a moment to be acknowledged i've been really, really fortunate to inherit this bright dedicated group of planners in the distribution i want so is we've k4r5ubd as a groip group we've having had to think about the work we do and be aware of the voices in the community that are not represent in the planning discussion and find a place in the long term as well as invoke that resident response in anyone we talk to what we believe ♪ their hearts in the future of the city it's through that lens we've duplicate that we've engaged the entire citywide

staff through the series i myself have had a number of the conversations throughout the community justify and embellish the work program with that in mind you have materials in our packet we've amended those slithering i'll point out the changes i have extra copies for the public if you want to see those posted on our website director ram mentions we're not here to discuss the budget but the ideas that shape the budget request as part of our hearing so i'll drive this machine at the same time, we have a year of 200 vod and back tans what's the future we want to see in san

francisco 2050 is the question and stepping back what can we do to we lay the foundation this is that one generational crisis for the years by the time we get through this in 2020 that is to share or insure that the next generation of san franciscans we want to be socially and economically so this is a quick outlines we're depositing four key challenges that drive this i'll audible u talk about the elements in tour core we'll respond to the derivatives and deposit a set of 5 initiative ways in which he think challenges and issues can be addressed closer to the ground but the first question

we've asked ourselves and possessed to od's others why plan for the longer and why do it now there are several compelling reasons? a 4i8gd part san francisco dna to take a long look at we take a block by block fabric but there are moments in time i think where it's needed to step back and really look at it and we know we're really at ta a moment in history the challenges restraining order great the potential challenges to the soul of the communities are profound and development is happening and changes we want a longer-term look we have to be strategic in what we take on and

how we look at issues and as well as imaginative in the kinds of solutions and engagements we precede with as is making restraining order level we saw those 6 trends that effect many cities throughout the glob but landing hard on san francisco one the organizations transit out in the bay area there's more and more interest in jobs and housing in the closer e core of the region that's only represented by the fact that the plan bay area of the 2040 project numbers are in the first four years we've hit 40 percent of the job growth it's happening faster than in the plans that are anticipated san francisco is lucky and

behind we're seeing no north america talent and capital clustered in the major centers and san francisco is one of those probably honey gold era or new york is a major cluster and capital hill we think with the university spelling the last name system and the collection of people there's a lot of talent and permission to obtain internal we see that regardless of temporary krblz and climate change a a global phenomena and driver we have been built into our consciousness of how we design the city that also scientists have set 2050 as a critical year of bend the curve on climate change

we also see social and demographic changes like immigration to the bay area and san francisco but the silent trend are the millennial and the baby boomers are the trends in the population they have the particular set of needs and preferences for how they live and what they do it's important to pay attention to that the other thing the boundary we think about your future no longer property owner no city is alone anymore and to think regionally how the housing market function and our systems like transportation it is as important lens to look through and finally health brothers from individuals and public level is something else that we think is

an issue coming into clear focus we'll be driving your planning consciousness and portions of our work >> let me know if i'm going two fast or slow the first of the clajz champs and the commission vice president allude to this role the top clajz changes are remaining in the city and this goes to a number of aspects of that including affordable housing, of course, but also things like job based offers and employment making whole community that work for families and kids and so on that's a huge driver of the work we do next we deposit assess and 340eb89 personally i think san francisco is at the tipping

point we're growing into our adolescent years we need to be very, very aggressive including more and more choices will mobility and about the services that are close to us where we live and work and business trips as well resiliency and long term stunt reflecting back to the climate change will need to drive a lot of our responses here's the image of the seawall that is over topping during storm events the consensus on the 2050 or 20/2050 another 3 six the storms will building more spins and more severe we need to plan and there are many areas which

will be inundated by floods if we don't respond that's one aspect of sustainability that is a critical one and finally did fourth big driver we see as we become more urban population and much more attuned to europe live and walkable neighborhood we need to pay attention on making great places in every neighborhood its not a matter of building disdain but thinking about the pab public as you our living potential we're not adding more and more streets larger parcels to be vechtd how do we rethink the public right of ways we have in a way that promotes 21st century living so there are some core work programs activity that are citywide we're 4r507b89d i won't

go into all of them before you affordable work that needs to be implemented we have one in front of you we hope that is adapted so we can return to the resolving work in the affordable housing needs currently we're engaged in addition protections space and we're keeping the pdr distribution with the fair space and we've embarked on a joint mission that 9 pool systems this being a place for families their seeing a growth in enrollment that's interesting and with access and mobility we do want to update the city's transportation that's the guiding principle for the city and the big picture of the mobility objectives we'll be noifsh that this year and that

will last ore over the next couple of years particularly we'll be updating the regional transportation plan, of course, with our other agency partners and, of course, much the street design work and the project noshgsdz we do helps us keep an eye towards the mixed use development and making sure that the access to transit and that the fees offsetting impacts are driekd in the right ways the resilience of sustainability we're dealing with the urban forest and this is on a citywide basis and the planning we'll talk about this is a phenomena and on the

public place making piece again this is really a combination of being opportunityic there are street reconfigurations possibly to make a more complete street and taking a forward look at the parks and plaza and then doing making sure we're paying attention to the projects development project reviews to a qualify their contributing to those are ongoing core activities we need to do in addition we staff our commission we staff the directors working group a collection of the agency heads that meets monthly we're trying to formula lists that group and have a number of referrals we deal with amendment as well as requests for information and graphic and so on and so forth 80 so we're busy with that work

we have claefrd off half of our work capacity to deal with we're calling 5 basis initiatives 5 years and your materials they have projects society with each one i won't go through them but happy to answer questions first the heart of san francisco which is again to look at the greater market mission corridor and the public plaza and public spaces that hang off the transportation system on top and underneath them and the corrections this serves to the adjoining neighborhoods like the south of market the financial district how it is how can this become a center of the town you're in a central spine of our city which

home has been go forward nor quite a bit of time so we'll we need to get ahead of the curve tloo here the goals we want this to be a welcoming space for all users a place to have fun and discovery and have those wow. moments in the city there is american people outline of the some of the district and some of the projects that are affiliated each of those have a timeline each one we're not trying to take own everything all at once how to capture the larger spriektsdz you can segment the work and stage it that makes sense in terms of our capacity and i mentioned the waterfront notation i love this picture and

it shows the variety of ways we think about and use the waterfront here again, there's an opportunity to create whole neighborhoods but the net how the short line and the sea level rise and in light of the center of the golden gate park the city's open space and to have public assess those are the different geographies this is not a monolithic waterfront but distinct to that locals this will take a comprehensive nuance to this type of work the thirsted one is an important 75 percent of jobs and hoursz growth is expecting in the greater southeast quadrant of

san francisco so in many ways we're building the next of san francisco those jobs and housing unit you've stated 75 and one hundred thousand maybe a little bit low in the year 2050 there's been work in the hard faith work in the eastern neighborhood this is not meant to undo the work but simply to 4r506k9 the larger system through the lens of those neighborhoods browned for example, the adequacy of transportation we all know poor in terms of serving it is poor now and certainly not adequate to serve the levels we're anticipating similarly the open space open space and an under

enrollment on the north side you that of school facilities that make up the fabric to this quadrant of san francisco which will be a mature city by the end of the horizon period has the same level of quality as san francisco here again are some of the goals some of the projects much the transportation conversation land in this geography here fourth initiative we're labeling the city of neighborhoods this is a variety of distinction neighborhoods this is an opportunity to reinvent how we do planning and perhaps we've been rightly or wrongly as known as the department that the up zoning here's an opportunity to engage people how to make their

neighborhoods the best this is an area we want to reinvent and on our discussions with the neighborhood how we can help them improve in their neighborhood rather than making a list to accommodate the parallel rezoning this is a different type of contestants how to get more affordable housing or more mix of housing and how to create community capacity around resigns and emergency response how to make active places reusable without going through big expensive kind of things and here a footnote you'll see in the budget request next week that we've requested two community development positions so see so other than

having the policy and decision makers we'll want to go out and talk to the community development engagement prospective sow we've asked for two additional position that may be helpful in the midst district in the tenderloin and others we need the community development this is a very, very rich area of endeavor for us promoting this enhancements to urban life one of the roots of this is the notation of the 20 minute neighborhood or the 10 minute neighborhoods people are able to get what we need on a daily or weekly basis within their geography one not only to oneself have climate change but also to increase sociability

with our neighbors and the final of the initiatives we're calling bridging the bay and that's because getting back to the regional plan do we have one would a bag and transportation body we think that it is for the united states to engage in a direct conversation with oakland and inner east bay and san mateo city to get at a number of issues we hope to form a common agenda like housing the housing problem can't be address in san francisco alone we need regional conversation within a short shed similarly with jobs applying for jobs and exploiting jobs the notation of the sea level rise protection were we not an island

most cities are extreme vulnerable likes oakland we're in a good place to share the knowledge between ourselves and pursue funding frankly for sea level rise mitigates and for things like transportation funding if we're vetted together and the linkages that are mason or underground that could be helped to the conversation like the arts community and certainly things around inhabitant communities here's thing on the maps like the future of the second parks to make and unclog the closing in the commute pattern and so forth so audio want to end those are the things we need to do but in the way we

do them is equally important the way we gave me 9 community p is really re important to get those to happening happen we're in a place and onness and engagement so that's one and do a pretty good job of partnerships we need to form boarder partnerships and that's just another piece what we do those are not governmental they involve the sector and the foundations and arts institutions and so forth we have to call on ourselves not only to be did detectives but the facilitators of the solutions that's the important skill set e set we believe we need to develop but we have an

aptitude for and an opening to exercise this is mr. taylor important for you the agencies around the common goals and plays out in workshops and so forth to being the most effective in getting everyone to create and buy into the solutions and finally vaetd and following up how did that work and what did we learn i've are heard the commissioners allude it it that in my short tenure and it's important this work program we're interested in hearing our comments we wanted to come back and here's what we found and was do you think thank you that's the conclusion of the

presentation i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. as well as have staff answer questions. >> thanks. >> thank you mr. kelly and kansas city public improvement advisory committee. >> seating basically foulingllowing up we need to know the stakdz and what is going on i understand i read a lot there are 3 big cities that are attracting capital people putting their money in there to be in a safe place across the world one of them is london another one is manhattan third one is san francisco it drives housing prices it also drives produce housing that

isn't occupied there are vast areas of maufrl manhattan and in lorpd and increasing so in san francisco where housing it built numerous source that casts shadows on central park in new york from 57 towers and takes away the living ability of residents there is no longer than that that in it is san francisco the water front when you said whether people are going to live in the housing your approving and taking a consensus every 6 months are people there they're not going to buildism displacing low and

moderate income people in the city the waterfront is now i've been watching it every big proposal that comes through was really high-end and is really high-end when i say that, i mean millions of dollars people can hide money here and get vies by buying property here the same it the case in london there are aviated areas of london having no one living there i go to loped i have friends there i am familiar with the changes in new york you can't build our way out of it there is a lot of capital we need a lot of jobs and mixed income people are you represent

hotel workers are tell me supposed to live in the central valley i want to see this map and convene and looked at who's here it's all men and they're all white i'm shocked if you're going to convene men. >> thank you yourself time is up. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> the following is a splice between 2.3 molester and not revolutionary a brief return to our business analog the business can ignore the complaint or address why the service isn't working additional services to customers we