the right way to do environmental review and a in a city in an urban environment this is all the things we're pushing hard to overcome the project delivery and in this urban community last year this is what is beginning to change in the project overall. >> thank you. i really appreciate the slide i know the last two subcommittees they were asking a lot of questions of the challenges and this is incredible important to have this discussion it is good to hear the values amongst the department when we have multiple agencies working on the same project it will sometimes include planning they have to go through the department if there

is a conflict you you know understanding we're prioritizing the pedestrian safety and it is the highest mode we looked at whether there is a chflt or disagreement that's i what's the progress we're going to work that through. >> well, for - >> is there someone with a final say each department has a different head. >> transportation department mta has the final say but the way we get to a point of consensus to get to a yes rather than force the issue is the principle level workshops having the senior staff at dph and mta getting together and hashing things out with the new line the vision.

>> hi my name is jason jones a xaefrp and communication capture at the san francisco water department i hnlt a high volume of calls and radio communications i enjoy com.

>> hi i'm brandon the mist at sfpuc my role to support the employees between our yosemite location to san francisco and the typical things we deal with are puc recommended and network relate an telecom i like my role it varies day to day it is a unique challenge from providing in that

user conclusions i solutions on their computer or a the president on a task they're trying to complete the training is very important there are many things to stay up to date my manager has helped me making sure any skills are up to date with the skilled in my field it is about right time of day and about you know the percentage of resagsz for water and power are posh to the citizens of san francisco and keeping those systems up and running for this is one of the challenge to progress within the organization and commit count i commit to the local government is where i want

. >> good afternoon, everyone, welcome to the city and county of san francisco neighborhood and safety committee. my name is david camp camp, i am chair of the committee, we are joined today by committee member supervisor norman yee, eric mar will be excused. clerk of the committee is derrick evans and we want to thank mark bunch, mr. clerk, do we have any announcements? >> thank you, mr. chair. please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. speaker cards and copies of documents to be included in the file should be handed to the clerk. >> this is the first meeting of this committee in the new year, so happy new year, everyone. before we go on to our items can we have a motion to excuse supervisor mar? so we have a motion by supervisor yee

without objection, supervisor mar is excused. mr. clerk, if you can please call item 1. >> item 1 is a hearing on proposed hearing shelter rules including but not limited to the reasons necessitating the promulgation of such rules and the imposition of uniform rules and requesting that the human services agency and department of public health and mayor's office on disability report. >> this is a very important item introduced by supervisor jane kim. supervisor kim has asked that we continue this item to the call of the chair and we will make sure whether we remain chair or not that it's put on the next agenda. before we act on that, if we can open it up to public comment, even though the item will be continued any member of the public who would like to speak on this item you have an opportunity to speak. you have up to 3 minutes. if you'd like please come on up.

>> yes, i am here regarding this issue. i guess i just am very concerned in that it seems like the shelters are creating all these rules and being willing to say things like who they were and were not going to allow into the shelter system based on ability or disability. so i guess i'm just very, i guess i'm just very angry and concerned in that they are going to exclude people from these shelters on ability or disability and then they are going to come back to the board of supervisors and the city and county of san francisco and then start to ask for more money later. and then the other parts of it was they are talking about tape recordings and different things

like this and it's very concerning in that they are going to set up all the rules and regulations regarding what's going to happen in the shelter systems. and on average the people who live in these shelters don't have a voice. and then if they do come to the meeting they might get retaliated against or they are so overran by service providers that what they have to say is going to be negated. so these are some of my main concerns and i think for me the other part of the situation is how do we get to more of a transparency regarding holding the service providers accountable for improprieties? so if you understand their history there's been some major criminal activities that have happened in the shelter systems

and i'm wondering if there's any real safeguards for any of those people who have done major criminal activities in the shelters from reapplying to another shelter system or to that shelter system after the people who have fired them move on to somewhere else. so i think we need some more teeth and somebody that will be more transparent to the public. i don't think that body is the department of human services. their staff, no faith in them holding their service providers accountable. thank you. >> thank you, sir. seeing no other member of the

public to speak on this item, public comment is closed. if we could have a motion to continue this item to the doll of the chair? motion by supervisor yee. if we can take that without objection. without objection, this item will be continued to the call of the chair. mr. clerk. >> item 2 is the transfer of a transfer beer and wine public premises license from 638 4th street to 855harrison street for todd zucker for bbck enterprises, d.b.a. k & l wine merchants. >> we have heard from our police department who has requested this item be filed. there was a misunderstanding concerning whether or not this type of review was needed but before we take action on that request i'd like to open it up to public comment. any member of the public who would like to speak on this item? seeing none public comment is closed.

i don't know if our alu would like to say anything beyond that. great. so if we could have a motion to file this item, motion by supervisor yee, we'll take that without objection. thank you. mr. clerk, if you can call item no. 3. >> item no. 3 is a hearing to consider the transfer of a type 48 on sale public premises license for expansion of premises located at 101 6th street the to tadd cortell dooing business as monarch. >> if we can begin by asking the applicant to come and speak. good afternoon, welcome to the neighborhood services committee. >> it's pretty much what derek mentioned. >> if you can identify yourself. >> tadd cortell from electric resistance society. we operate under the name of monarch. we

expanded into a location next door to our current location where we have been the past 3 years. we operate a nightclub and cocktail lounge. we expanded the cocktail lounge portion upstairs into the property next door and the abc required that we get a pcn approval. that is why we're here this afternoon. >> can you talk a little bit about your interaction with the community, discussions with the district supervisor? >> we've been in contact with sunny at jane kim's office, who is our supervisor at district 6. she has been following the progress and we have been keeping her abreast what is going on. it took a while but we got copies of approval letters. we let the neighborhood noi if there was any concerns or protests we would address them when we were made aware of them, and there were none. >> i know supervisor kim and her office are in support of

this application. colleagues, any questions of the applicant? great. thank you very much, sir. why don't we now hear from our police department. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. >>. >> good afternoon, supervisors, my name is al dwarte mr. tadd cortell has applied for a type 48 on sale general public premises license for the expansion of the premises located at 101 6th street. monarch is adding approximately 400 feet to an adjacent space that became available to their premises. monarch is currently conditioned by pcn file 100834, passed by resolution 447-10 dated september 21, 2010. none of the current operating conditions will change or be

removed. the police and calls for service as well as the reports are pretty minimal. there was one police call for the year of march 2013 when the process started for the licensing of the premises till march twebt 14. five police reports were reported for that and they were merely lost or stolen items. the plot is 222 and there are approximately 408 reported incidents for 2013, which places it in a high crime area. the census track itself is 176.01 with a population of 7,630 people, which allows for 26 licenses for on sale restaurant or bar but are or show active of 74 licenses. there were no letters of protest, no letters filed with our office and therefore the alu recommends an approval.

>> thank you very much, lieutenant. colleagues, any questions? thank you. >> thank you. >> why don't we now open it up for public comment. any member of the public who likes to speak on this item, please come forward. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor yee. >> so i don't see any reason for not supporting this. seems like the owners have been good neighbors and as you already mentioned, supervisor kim is supporting this so i make a motion to pass it out with a positive recommendation. >> so we have a motion to move this forward with a positive recommendation. if we can take that without objection, without objection, congratulations. thank you very much for your work with the community. mr. clerk, do we have any other business before this committee? >> there is no more business, mr. chair. >> thank you very much, meeting adjourned. (meeting adjourned). .