>> okay. [gavel] >> so they are saying -- okay. back in open session. isn't there a motion to keep confidential the matters discussed in closed session except for an announcement? >> some of >> seconded >> all in favor aye. opposed?

hearing on that passes. mr. st. croix can you give the bush >> as regular meeting january 26, 2050 and a method of ethics complaint number 19 13115 the ethics commission made a determination that there is probable cause to believe the following violations of california governmental code and san francisco campaigning governmental conduct code and that respondents [inaudible] 2010 committed seven violations of california government code, section 84 200 for failing to file campaign statement for 60s by seven different required deadlines. one violation of california government conduct code section 84104 for failing to maintain campaign records for $61,791.33 expenditures and for 8007 or $50 in contributions. one violation of

san francisco campaigning governmental can't code section 1.118 for failing to pay an expense in full with 180 days of the invoice and one violation of san francisco campaign and governmental conduct code days of the invoice and one violation of san francisco campaign and governmental conduct code section 11118 for failing to expensive in full within 180 days of english that each commissioner will participate in a decision to certify the record that he or she personally heard or read the testimony reviewed the evidence or otherwise review the entire record of the proceedings. >> vice chair >>

>> i found out after the report had been written that under the status of the [inaudible] number two the pdr has obtained a judgment in favor of the city in that case. >>

>> comments >> i only had one question. sorry. mr. st. croix, i wonder what happens. i was thinking about the commissioner king mentioned the anticipated cost of a particular expenditure that was converting our language conversion for all of our documents. >> it's exciting to see that our actual revenues are outpacing our budgeted revenues and for this one at this point it's about $15,000. would we do that? what are the typical expenditures that we spend? >> we don't -- we turn that money over to the city and it goes into the general fund. to check >> we can have a picnic? >> okay.

>> thank you. >> any other questions or comments on the ethics violation? item 54 meetings, comments is there a motion to adjourn? >> some of >> second >> all in favor aye oppose? hearing on, meeting is adjourned. [gavel] to

be. >> hi, i'm average i'm a personal analyst that the human resources examining and recruitment unit and suffix i started my career as a san francisco state university and got my bachelors in psyched and

orientational psyche if they had we have a great relationship that the san francisco unified school district i exploded for american people interim shopping mall and become eligible for a permeate job. >> okay. perfect. >> i love working for our human resources services because of the agriculture we're laid-back with a professional mindset although human resources is a challenge we're light a hearted started as a intern guided through the process eventually one day a a deputy director or staying with the puc is where i love it.

>> good afternoon and welcome to the san francisco land use & economic development committee i'm scott wiener the chair of the committee to my left is supervisor cohen our vice chair jane kim will not be joining us today she's been called into jury duty your clerk is andrea ashbury and i want to thank sfgovtv for broadcasting today's hearing jonathan and the others. >> madam clerk, any announcements? >> all electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the february 2nd, 2015 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> call item one.

>> on ordinance to define homeless shelters. >> the mayor is the sponsor we have the planning department to present following by mr. duffy. >> good afternoon. supervisors i'm kim the planner with the san francisco planning department today is an ordinance amending the controlling for homeless shelters it was unanimously recommended approval by the planning commission on december 18th this ordinance will bring san francisco planning code into experience with the state law regarding the homeless shelter controls to allow the emergency of homeless shelter as a right meaning without required public hearing in a place one zoning district this legislation is a part of the housing element that will be up in a few weeks currently the

planning code didn't exclude a defines for the homeless shelter it is interpretations of the cod to define the use cargo of the proposals that are monthly group housing or hotel uses human resources hotel uses are a variety of zoning in front a few cases are interpreted as hotel use san francisco out of compliance with the state law the proposed ordinance will bring the planning code into compliance with the homeless shelter and create a definition for the planning code this new depiction is enhanced the more currently trend of shelter partition and allows rights in zoning jikt with continental approval there that rebuttals the zoning controls existing in the codes that will exempt the homeless shelter from open space

car and bike parking and fee requirements and feinstein apply got policies federal or state to the homeless shelter in the magnificent code includes the relationships with neighborhoods like the hours of operation and the sidewalk maintenance and plan signage and 0i7b9 management the planning commission again unanimously recommended approval of the legislation and the commission found this legislation will streamline review and approval process for homeless shelters we suggested you recommend approval of this legislation bev and dusty from the mayors office of hope is here to talk about that. >> thank you very much mr. duffy. >> thank you, supervisors

allison park beacon hill duh the director with the engagements and partnerships i wanted to thank the mayor for sponsoring this measure this is extremely important we come into compliance into the ordinances to establish the ordinance of the right of shelters to be on truthfully the city is not going to be opening many shelters on the focus is on housing but you have taken the time to visit the application center we have tools we'll need to respond to the endisplacements and other abilities to open the facility i hope this legislation helps to keep the people in part of san francisco they feel services are slight in their district we've circulated maps and met with the industrial members of the board

it causes them to think about down the roads the services they might consider a small shelter or program help to be responsive i want to point out increase quite a few a number of providers some outstanding providers and clients and staff and w07bd if i can can the individual from the different organizations in support of this legislation to stand for a moment so i say that to say the providers represent a cross section and serve the diversity of the city in terms of the be 4rsh9 community and seniors and we are so grateful i want to acknowledge and commend ca me and the fact she and the colleagues took the time to visit the facilities and there are times they took to look at

the neighbors neighborhood and the element of the district in san francisco and recognizing we want the facility serving those to have access to transit and other shops we take for granted i appreciate our consideration. >> thank you very much mr. duffy and your work on this. >> okay. we will now on opening it up for public comment i have a few public comment cards (calling names) come on up public comment is 2 minutes. >> good afternoon, supervisors and general public i'm daily receptionist the homeless board c-2 this is a great piece of legislation that needs to be done and i'm aware of some of

our supervisors feel their district is un235ish8 burdened by the services for the homeless folks i myself for the people in the avenues and the parts of the city that don't have a lot of homeless shelters they feel why put a shelter in my neighborhood because you you have homeless there i go to the far avenues and the oceans interests quite a few of the unhoused folks we need to have our services citywide this is not a option it's affordable unit a net not a privilege a right for people to be housed so i commend the mayor and your body here for trying to move this along and bev and duffey and i was so surprised to see not more people to stand up i can't imagine why not this is something we should pass and get

on and try to work towards permanent housing i appreciate all you can do. >> thank you very much. >> good afternoon, supervisors just wanted to you work jeff with hampton family center we operate the largest shelter in san francisco i want to commend the mayor and at planning department and bev and duffey it will go along ways to help to place shelters in neighborhoods in a clear and transparent way i wanted to point out that mary go from dpw and scott walton are here they have a lot of information and background u background this in particular issue thank you very much for your support. >> thank you, sir. >> good morning tom executive director of liveable city i'm very much in support of this

this is is an important piece of solving our homeless problem a small part putting people in homes rather than shelters i'm here to talk about a code the second agenda item the clean up of article two, that clean up months the defines in section 102.1 and 7 so this will for the purpose those other depictions so you might look at today, i is ask the city attorney's office just to sync those ordinances it has a definition of homeless shelters and adding section 1022 will be smart to make sure that the definition lands in the right place in the code as we organize it from this time forward and the definitions to the subsequent parts of code use

102 and i believe this can be done in the morning as well as striking up the .8 and lying that as 102 we're trying to clean up the code and not be messaging it up simultaneously. >> mr. gibner. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney the gentleman is correct this ordinance breathes a new 10.8 and refers to that the second item on the agenda modifies section 102 and puts the definition of homeless shelter in under we can by tomorrow morning go through and. >> or so how to think up the first piece to make sure there's the references for 102 i suggest you not make the amendment amendment today but tomorrow

>> great. thank you very much mr. gibner is there any additional public comment on item 1 seeing none, public comment is closed so first, i want to thank even that participate in making this project and moving forward happening i had an opportunity to go with mr. duffy and the gentleman to visit the site it seems like an exciting project to me and i hope it after it is mod it defines a permanent home it should be successful i hope it end up being a model for not only san francisco but another places we for too long we've had a disjoined approach to certain populations of homeless people and this seems like a pro tem

way for them to bring everything together for certain populations that are very difficult to reach and to help in a systematic way it is exciting and i'm glad it's moving forward i discussed with mr. duffy and my predecessor, of course the importance of including the castro in the outreach to help the castro for the shambles the folks are not here as well as the other areas we have a population that needs the outreach and i think sometimes because of the very, very significant challenges in other parts of the city we don't get the same level of focus it's not a criticism only a reality i'm happen to support this today so with that, moaning can i have a motion to forward this to the full board reception.

>> as a committee report? i'd like to make a motion to move this forward with a positive recommendation >> we'll take that without objection. that will be the order thank you madam clerk call item number 4. >> item 4 an ordinance mit the general plan. >> why not wait - >> sure. >> here i have a whole box. >> thank