>> open session reconvene in open session. vote whether to disclose any or all discussions held in closed session. this is an action item. >> commissioner wald. >> yes, i would like to move that we don't disclose the discussions that we just held in our closed session. >> can i get a second? >> second. >> commissioner king i believe. all in favor say aye. opposed no. motion carries. >> adjournment. 8:14 o'clock. >> thanks everybody. thank you..

>> good morning, everyone. welcome to the san francisco

budget & finance committee for january 28, 2015, my name is mark farrell i'm joined by supervisor avalos and joined moment will i lee by supervisor mar thank you to the staff for covering this. >> announcements? devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the february 3rd, 2015 board of agenda. >> thank you madam clerk item one. >> 30 years the general manager of the sfpuc to execute a master license for the tenant pole installation between the city and side mobility for the term of 12 years. >> well-being. >> thank you barbara for the sfpuc i'm here to ask to that you recommend the license

agreement to the full board this license agreement is the third we have brought you to many october of 2014 our commission approved this revenue generating license program which includes a master license agreement and authorization to 9 general manager to execute the m l a the master license agreements the two prior were approved in december and the master agreement has a 12 year term and may generate revenue in the amount of $12 million this agreement with mobility will show over others 12 year period between 10 and $15 million in revenue for the puc we ask that u the items before you be amended to be consistent that the action taken in december that that amendment specifically

will go add a resolve clause that will say further roasted in the amendment to have the fund for the street light program and be it further that addition were comfortable were made by supervisor wiener in december and approved in the board action in december and with that i'm available to answer questions mobility a has a representative here as well today. >> sorry to be clear you're asking for an additional amendment. >> one resolve clause that is in the prior action of the board we're proposing to be included. >> okay mr. rose our report thanks. >> mr. chair on the 12 year

term of the national lease agreement it is payable by mobility to the sfpuc from the street pole license fees from $9 million plus for two hundred street light polls to $14 million for nine hundred street light licenses in table four obtain page 6 of our report we have a recommendation on the bottom of page 7 top of page 8 recommended you propose to have a report for each resolution approving the installation to the distributed in the equipment that detail the number and locations of the existing street light licenses resulting under

the national licenses agreement approve as amended i'll comment on the recommendations now the legislation before you and on the various agreements gives that's an estimated number of pole installation building that the board of supervisors should be provided with the annual report and locations. >> thank you mr. and mrs. seeing no questions why not opening it up for public comment i have a couple of cards you have two minutes and if more speakers line up on the far side of the wall. >> good morning mr. chairman i'm the vice president and corporate council with mobility a little bit of background about mobility the largest pitifully held infrastructure in the country we work with the

provider providing the infrastructure for them and on their on behalf of aside is from the financial benefits this contract will bring to the city it will result in anymore reliable and more robust neblts here in the city that will benefit all of the citizenry and people of san francisco also the small cells were planning on providing is less intrusive attached to the poll they are self-contained and leave a small footprint just wanted to touch on the experience and expertise in this field we have diluted outdoor networks in manhattan and chicago at the time manhattan it

was the largest deployment we know how to work with the local jurisdictions to get this done in a mature beneficial manner and we are also in the middle of deploying small crewmen's e cells in the city of chicago now on behalf of sprint and in just summary you know we know how to do those types of employment we're more than willing to work in a manner that is beneficial to the city and at this point, i'll respectfully request you approve the agreement as presented. >> thanks very much any public comment on semi one seen none, public comment is closed. so we have two proposed amendments one by mr. rose and one by the puc can i have a

motion to approve those amendments and then the line items as amended can we take that without objection? madam clerk >> approving the enter public works to replace the power and the space heating and boiler distribution for the katrero not to exceed $425,000 arrest welcome back. >> i'm back so i'm before you to ask you approve the integer work this this is to respect the broiler and distribution at the housing not to exceed $425,000 i'm sure you're aware of the puc power enterprise is the electricity provider to the housing authority at katrero and the housing authority is responsible for the operation and maintenance all it's related

commit 9 space piping located were leaking go pro, if you will, at all times resulting in the loss of the buildings heating system the housing authority vacated the ground floor apartment and the second level apartment and each building was maintained until the boiling systems were installed the boiler and distribution piping posed o a treat because of the lack of heat and pollution and water damage from the leakage and electrical hazards the katrero it located in an vial neighborhood in addition to the health and safety of the tenants and employees that project will result in energy and water savings as well as reductions in green house gas emissions our

ask you recommend this item to the full board so that the critical repairs can be fully funded and repaired i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. thank you. >> okay. thank you colleagues any questions okay mr. rose our report for item 2. >> yes. mr. chair and supervisor avalos we note the total emergency work cost now is $403,000 hundreds plus in table one on page 12 we recommend you approve this resolution. >> thank you, mr. rose no other comes on up public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. we'll do this we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 3 please. item 3 a resolution authorizing the rec and park department to

accept and accept a grant for the museum for the inhabit to the rehabilitation project for the term of december 2015 to 2016. >> that's correct we have rec and park on this item. >> good morning. i'm with the san francisco rec and park department i'm here to talk about this accept and expend grant for the museum as you are aware the random museum is a small free on to anyone museum in district 8 and the random museum with the rec and park department secured a $5.4 million grant from the state of california accepted by the board in 2013 during the planning process the random museum demonstrated the fund are sdrienl it is the chance to go

big and make a major improvements to the museum so the random museum friends are proposed to raise money to enhance the budget and the entrance the renovation project to make sure it's consistent with the state sgrant and to inspire the curiosity for the natural world for the world of arts and science rec and park didn't have additional money we're looking forward to see what the friends what do and raise this is sort of they're big dream i'm here today to represent this grant i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you very much seeing no questions anyone wish to comment on item 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. we have a motion to approve we'll take that without

objection. madam clerk call item 4. >> item 4 is the recommendations authorizing rec and park department to accept and expelled a guatemala up to $500000 for a construction in the budget for the children's play area in the plagiarized. >> thanks this is encephalitis and k3i7bd grant for sponsoring to the friends of joe deanyone else mrarlgd this is a safe parks bond and the playground will be fully funded by the bond, however, during the planning process the friends of joe demammal there's opportunity to enhance the bunt i budget for a specific items actually today this playground is splaitd

slated to go under construction we hope to provide the contractor with updates as to whether or not they can make some enhancements to the budget for example, flopping autopsy chain link fences and ornamental fevenz and exercise equipment for adults and a few other items that make the playground the best it can be if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them thank you. >> seeing no questions we'll on this up for public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. can i have a motion. >> we have a motion we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk item 5 and the resolution 30 years the general manager of the sfpuc to enter into an agreement with sfpuc to

continue with an agreement. >> welcome back barbara. >> bay by a way of the background the provider is for pier one the long term lease holder at pier one as a has a 2 hundred kilowatt system on the roof of the building in the past we requested our approval for the facilities like this that we have owned on city properties for example we were here for the north beach library solar facility and at hall facilities on city properties both properties owned by puc because this system enter contexts with the puc system we is to execute an energy connection agreement that puc and the connection owner needs to also participate

in the past we've been the owner as we will now we have a third party owner this is a similar agreement to the one you've approved but because of that difference in ownership that we have this additional agreement a generate agreement this is a no cost jaerment and will last in perpetuity we ask you recommend this item to the full board so that the solar project can be enter connected to the grade i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. thank you colleagues any questions okay we'll on this up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. motion to send this item our forward with with recommendation we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk 6. >> a resolution paufl u approving the agreements for long term mental health services

for the facilities between the department of puncturing and the behavorial health services to r68. >> great we have dph. >> those are two contract that they're called long term contract for the services of our highest needs clients that they don't they're the highest need in a location facility we rely them on the care and this proposal will continue the contract with the full term that the rfp allows and also increase the funding to reflect the actual usage today. >> okay. colleagues any questions okay mr. rose can we go to our report. >> and we agree with the

recommendations. >> yes. mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 17 shown in table 3 which is on page 18 the actual needed contract amount for the contact is $83 million plus or a million dollar less than requested from the amount and the actual needed amount for the contract is $28 million plus at $3 million plus less than requested of $31 million plus so based on that our recommendations are shown on page 19 we recommend you recommend did proposed activity to reflect the commemorate date and recommend you overwhelmed the crest contract not to exceed by one million dollars plus from

$86 million to $84 million plus reduce the champion manner contract needing from $31 million plus to $28 million plus and the combined crest wood contract manner of contract not to exceed should be reduced by $4 million plus from $100 million plus to $107 million plus and recommend you approve the proposed resolution as amended. >> thank you very much mr. rose any questions seeing none we'll on up to public comment censured colleagues, we have a number of recommendations by a bunch of analyze can i have a motion to accept a motion that i supervisor avalos we'll take that without objection. okay madam clerk can you call item

78. >> a resolution 30 years the lease golf street, llc for the second floordz for 41 thousand for the competition of the tenant par for the remind of the 2014-2015 years for 250 thousands and the tenant improvements at a estimated cost of $611,000. >> thank you. >> good morning assistant director of real estate this is a new lease for the first story and second-story on the human agencies department of the aging and adult services that serves the search and seizure and the folks with disability about a block away sf h a is going to have a 5 year lease with a 5

year option to renew for 13 thousand 98 square feet and monthly represent is $2 and $42 per foot for the improvements of annual based rent is $47,000 or conditional to $35 a square foot with a base rent to the initial term and then 95 percent of the fair market value $95 is below the fair market value range for the rentals in the area the tenant improvements are needed in an amount $27,000 one hundred and 17 thousand tuesday plus will be covered and $695 will be

paid by h s f a it including includes the improvements total for the fiscal year remaining $854,000 plus okay. thank you very much colleagues any questions mr. rose your report. >> classroom and members of the committee on page 22 table 2 that reflects the tenant copies improvements of $727,000 plus and as we report the 94 amount to be paid by the city $117,000 plus covered by the landlord allowance and the rest to be paid by the city on page 23 of our report we

report that excluding tenant improvements an page 23 in the table the cost of a 5 year leasing is $29 million we recommend you approve this resolution. >> okay. thank you, mr. rose colleagues any questions we'll move on to public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. we have a motion to send this item forward we'll take that without objection. madam clerk can we call item 8. >> a resolution retroactively to extend the 2014 a s index fund in approximately $23,000 for the department for the security of september 1st, 2014, to may 31st, 2016. >> great hello, welcome back. >> i'm with the department of

emergency management the item is to extend $22,000 for the security initiative grant echls this supports the planning and exercises and the public safety throughout the area the city of san francisco acts as a fiscal agents and the board has previously accepted $22 million from the department of homeland security for this grant through the by departments budget this is how how to process it we have 0 estimate it before it is awarded and happily the department gave us an extra $32,000 because the increase in the grant over $100,000 we have

to come back and expend the difference most of the money awarded to the northern california regional for the security analysts they have and for the management and administrative cost no matching fund required from the fund i don't believe there's an budget analyst report and happen to answer questions. >> thank you, colleagues any questions supervisor mar. >> ms. alden can you explain a little bit about the northern regional where that is located and also for the regional grant how much roughly of a percentage comes to san francisco out of curiosity. >> absolutely so the northern intelligence center they're a federal agency located in the federal building on golden gate avenue and it's also known and a

as a fusion center it is a way for law enforcement agencies to work in one room and share information so san francisco pd has representatives there and the sheriff's department and the fbi and the high density so it's a high combination of state and local agencies that can collaborate and the side of security is one of the priority this is a regional grant san francisco as the you know highest density uranium i urban area that has been recognized as the highest number of threats fiscal assets where the center of the west coast, etc. our county received the largest pleasure outlet of the funding the grant go to at different times in all 9 bayer u bay area

county like san francisco and santa fe we get the largest portion of it. >> thanks very much questions is there any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. motion to send this item forward. >> i move with a positive recommendation we'll we'll take that without objection. >> all right. madam clerk call item 8 of 9. >> a resolution retroactively for the vice president of environment to expend a grant from the puc through pg&e to continue with the reduction of energy reduction project for a term of 2015 to 2016. >> welcome mr. rodriguez. >> supervisors thank you, mr. rodriguez the department of management i'm here with my colleague seeking the committees endorsement of our accept and

expend grant for our energy efficiency program the city knows you've been here before this is one of our largest portfolios inic with small businesses in san francisco and helping businesses in multi unit building to reduce they're overall energy use since we've started the program in 2001 and most recently with respect to funding with the department of public works with the pacific gas and electric company can i have the overhead in terms of the issues but the distributions of the program throughout the city we're looking at all the major you know busy corridor we've knocked on doors and done major energy updates as well as

multi families this helps the effort and constantly take into account new community are in order to get success and then briefly the success today so the work that the department has done with our small businesses and multi family buildings has ruled in $42 million that those businesses and multi family buildings are saving they're paying $42 million less to pummeling and keeping that we think this is a valuable model and program we've presented over $21 million incentives cash incentives going to the business owners and the owners of the multi buildings and over 10 thousand businesses in san francisco and over 4 thousand multi family it is a successful