the goal to come back on february 8th to the commission we - i had a chance to talk with the controller's office and it appears the fees we normally charge haven't been studied there's a round 2 work with the staff to come up with some time studies on certain fees that will have to be thrown in the mix i'll get an update probably next week they'll scheduled to come in on the 18th but not sure about the level of detail with not all the fees that needed to be included i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. >> commissioner. >> do we have a qualified list of fees. >> we do. >> we turned them over to the fee study people they missed some and yes.

>> so anymore questions one can't feel because this kind of you pointed out kind of few times represented what they approved last year so you can imagine this is what we're looking at this not going to be many adjustments at the board of supervisors are you hoping for that last year i think you had to do a lot of back and forth and i don't know much has changed really. >> yeah. so the hope we're not making changes this will be approved but, of course, the budget analyst will do his due diligence of looking at the current year spending of we get approved are we on track now we

have other information norman no changes in the base there shouldn't be that ma many adjustments to it. >> yeah. okay. >> commissioners any further questions on this? >> please explain to me the fund balances its sources and uses and what regulation is required to release what when and how. >> okay. so this is not working so we have fund balance in a variety - we have a variety of fund your basic funds are annual funds as the building inspection funds it the unappropriated balance that is money that is left over after we get our projects about

$36 million that's what we have no our unappropriated fund balance before when i said we have cut $9,000 in our projected reviews based on the 50 percent reduction we used $10 million in theory we have $20 million left in fund balance it probably will go up we say might have savings so it can be used for anything we normally use it for tied to the collection of our fees so inspections and plans that's what our money can be used to supplement our budget so even though we have projects the original funding once we move it into other project funding but the source it that so overall in total we have $39 million in

fund i fund balance so 0 the other ones in demolition funds has $4 million and the strong funds that is specific things to be used for seismic safety and the commission has thirty thoutdz thousand that's specific those two are state fees we collect and get to keep a little bit off the top so that's why we have those. >> thank you. >> thank you deputy i'm sorry commissioner walker. >> is there money in that fund balance on the projected real estate costs that are coming up with the new building that kind of thing tenant improvement money can we put that in there. >> for the current building we have money set audit aside and for instance i gave you the unappropriated fund ball but we

have a reserve that's not appropriated about $4 million we use about $8 million of it for that building as a loan we have a balance of $6 million but i didn't include that because basically go that's been put aside 24 is only money that has not been dedicated to my purpose. >> commissioner and you also mentioned a little bit of the fund for the special projects can you explain that a little bit. >> yes. >> what is it for and how - >> kur8 we have hope to continuing projects and money for an elevator update in 2015-2016 we know we're going to be moving to another building and anyone that is in the building knows the elevators have issues this is on the horizon for a while we're working with dpw they're trying

to get a contract out we've got plans to actually remodel the first floor to do it more customer friendly that is sloped to happen been the end of the fiscal year and improvements there are some issues with the - >> the air conditioning we have money set aside for the p p t s and money set aside in a separate for technology in general we have all the money set aside it is probably about $14 million or so might be about $16 million or so damaged for you'll those projects and so that's what i mean when i say we have money set aside those will take a couple of years but we have the money set aside.

>> okay i believe that is all commissioners questions thank you so much deputy for the update and good luck to the month of february on this thank you. >> thank you. >> we need to have a motion on the item. >> okay. >> any public comment on this item? seeing none okay. no comment so commissioner walker please. move to approve the budget as presented. >> second. >> there's a motion and second to approve the budget and that is a roll call vote vote commissioner mccarthy commissioner vice president mar commissioner president clinch commissioner lee commissioner mccray commissioner vice president melgar commissioner walker that motion passes unanimously

our next item is jrnlt is there are a monoxide to adjourn. >> yes. >> move to adjourn. >> second. >> all commissioner in favor any opposed we're adjourned it's 9:38 a.m. >> thank you

>> ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ we're here at sunset recreation center for the program. we want to get a chance to mix in some of the kids that don't know how to play basketball from the hosting of san francisco it's not a matter of the score but at the end of the day it's about having fun kids arelogies or winning their learning to become more open-minded about things. i grew up in playing in the rec and park department and it's good to grow up and now giving back it feels good i'm excited i love being a part of this

department especially the junior

>> we are going to get started soon we're going to get started soon if you could turn the overhead projector off sfgovtv all right. everyone ladies and gentlemen, please come in and take our assets i'm supervisor cohen chair the commissioner lee to my left is supervisor jane kim and to my right is supervisor wiener vice chair our clerk today is miss andrea ashbury and i would like to take a moment and acknowledge as well as thank jessie larson and

jonathan that will be tifgz this broadcast on sfgovtv. >> announcements? electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the february 10, 2015, board of supervisors agenda unless always state and madam clerk item one. >> a resolution for is zoning control for 8 most period west of octavia blue shield. >> all right. ladies and gentlemen, supervisor wiener will present this as well as the discussion. >> thank you very much madam chair and colleagues this resolution will enclose interim zoning controls for the parcels mc 19403 that are facing market street west of octavia billboard

specifically requires that certain office uses business and professional services and limited services requires a conditional use before going in colleagues you'll recall i trootsdz the interim zoning controls for the rest of upper market and 24th street and noah we're moving towards the controls for the castro commercial district as well as 24th and noah valley to require a conditional use for those types of office uses i think we all know a vibrant and successful commercial corridor requires active retail it requires retail and eating and drinking establishments and

diversity of uses that are active during the day and night and during the weekends when a commercial corridor has too much uses phenomenal the ground floor whether real estate or title companies or banks other kinds of office uses it can negatively impact the vibrancy of a commercial corridor not to say those offices are not appropriate every healthy commercial corridor will is a mix of various kinds of uses but we've seen an over proliferation of too many types of uses on the ground floor and it negatively impacts the vibrancy of the commercial corridor we're extending the interim controls and working toward a permanent set of controls for those 3 commercial corridors i ask you're our your support.

>> we'll any public comment? public comment is there any public testimony on item one seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues any additional comments seeing none, okay. >> make may i'll make a motion to forward item one to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> seeing no objection that motions passes unanimously madam clerk call item 2. >> item 2 a resolution supporting the california assembly bill prohibiting the sell of - and supervisor wiener is the author. >> thank you, madam chair colleagues a resolution that puts san francisco on record in support of assembly bill 96 which will close the combineic will that that allows us to

crack down on the illegal sale of i've very and horns in california it is supported by tony altering kins and laurie want to thank for co-sponsor that we have a significant problem in san francisco 2, 3, 4 particular but elsewhere in the u.s. we have a market for illegal ivory that is leptin to fuel the extermination of rhinos and outlet overview infant they're going be to be extinct if we don't act in california and the world to put an end to the dispebble trade where overview infants and rhinos are

killed and mutt lasted for horns this poaching is a growing problem 96 emancipation proclamation e elephants are killed in african and central african elephants maybe extinct by the year 2025 more 5 thousand of the 29 thousand remaining were killed and poached in 2014 rhino poaching has increased within the u.s. san francisco has ranged among the top market for illegal rhino trade this is helping to fuel the poaching and the killing of elephants and rhino we have an obligation in san francisco given the size of the market to be firm in our support for this legislation to

end poaching and poaching is not just limited to elephants and relationship nos we've seen it was recorded in the new york times the porchs are poisoning eventuality what is your it is one way the authenticities can tell where the poaching is occurring and that is event ab 96 was introduced in the state legislation it is your to prohibit folks from offering for sale and intents to sell ivory and another horns with exemptions to the educational scientific research with the passage of ab 96 california joins new jersey and new york it

is the asian pacific islander affairs voted in support of ab 96 so it was exploded this resolution puts up i us with the record colleagues, i ask for your support we have a few brief presentations followed by public comment so madam chair i'd like to ask randy from the san francisco spca who is here on behalf of spca and the human society she'll be followed by another classes from the office of rhinos and elephants. >> hi good afternoon. thank you for the opportunity i'm brandy the could you recall and director of the san francisco spca i'm here on behalf of the spca as well as the human society of the united states and

the human society subtitling and the improvement on the banning of sale of i've very and horns we have the natural research council and the aquarium and the oakland zoo ab 96 enjoys the support of conservatism and be environmental organization and as supervisor wiener said was recently enforced by the asian pacific islander affairs commission supports the global pacific islander movement and the illegal trafficking and it is the chinese government who have confiscated ivory and other

major chinese markets have ended ab is co-sponsored by speaker atkins and chair laura and leon no and assembly members i got wrong we thank supervisor wiener and commissioner chan for their leadership and san francisco's important support nor ab 9 of and protecting rhinos and elephants it is an clooit which i say the government has identified as an international contra costa choice and new york is been identified and by clarifying the i've very that will help to