it was made in the treasurers office we have to comply with the office when a lot is a number of years in default we had to auction we didn't hadn't hit that last year so we held over to this year. >> colleagues seeing none more questions anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> move the amendment recommended by staff. >> okay. so it motion to accept the motion as as is accept the line item we'll take that without objection. >> thank you very much madam clerk call item 6. >> item 6 a resolution declaring the intent of the area to reinforce are certainly expenditures authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to submittal a

police station with the allocation committee to permit the ownerships of the revenue bond needing 2 hundred millions. >> thank you very much we have the mayor's office of housing and joined by supervisor cohen. >> thank you very much i appreciate it it colleagues i have a few things i want to talk with you about item 6 thank you for allowing me to join this committee this morning the project that is proposed for 1601 mariposa street is controversial and almost two years been working on this project with the neighbors to dpaem in a dialog how to shape this project so that state benefits the community i've articulated some things to city staff and have that i have with moving this project forward with the attorney fee are a

actions related to this project i was speaking with the mayor's office as well as the project sponsor this is a project that is currently 200 undergoing an environmental review and the draft eir was issued in december and public comment was taken at the planning commission in late january project has many months of entitlements and community discussion ahead of it i don't know what the end project is going to look like once it's the process has come to completion but typically attorney fee are a action come before us after a project is tiled or after ceqa clearance has been issued this is not the case here so what i'm doing is quite a few calling a red flag on the process and issues i've got concerns this action by the board of supervisors to apply for bond

financing sends the wrong message to the public we're prejew the merits of this project and by passing the tire ceqa project i know you identify with any concerns at this time i want to ask the city attorney to share wasn't you've told me mr. gibner. >> sure john gibner deputy city attorney under the stalling the city must complete whatever level of review required under ceqa before committing the city to a type of that action this particular resolution is not requiring the environmental review it will be completed before the board or so any other city body takes that kind of approval action so you are not committing the city to this

project you're only approving the first step of laughing the financing to move forward with the first steps of bond and the environmental review will be before the project comes back to you for approval action. >> a little bit out of sync he's basically saying that's legal if i can translate that i've had a few conversations with the project sponsor about how serious they're in pursuing a project that has 20 percent of affordable housing on site proposal they've insured me they're absolutely complete to 20 percent on site and given little crisis that we're in for housing this is softened any position if this project is we don't know if

it will be or what density i'd like to see i want to see as much of affordable housing as possible not only on this particular project site but a future one i've stated to the mayor's office of housing but i want to publicly reiterate i don't think it is appropriate for us to be taking acts prior to the at this time or ceqa coverage i don't know if the mayor's office of housing oh, they have a representative i'm going to speak to you for a moment in the future if missouri is going to consider approaching this deal maybe mow and the project sponsor can do a better job of thinking out loud the timeline for those bonds emancipation proclamation documents because i'm insure this is not the last time you will encounter this this sends a message to the

public it is important to be respectful of the people we serve because on the south eastern corridor the pressure of all the development all at once is hard to pear bear i want to make sure we have integrity with the process to continue to work on fire chief projects so colleagues i don't know yet if i'll be able to support this if it comes to the full board of supervisors but it's important to consider those suggestions i've raised and understand the issues i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. and andrea is my person you can reach out for more insight i ask if this passed out of committee without a recommendation. >> thank you supervisor cowen why don't we turn it over to the

mayor's office of housing. >> thank you. good morning supervisors and chairman farrell john senior project sponsor with the mayor's office of housing the resolution before you will authorize the application to the california debt allocation committee for bond procedures to pay for the demonstration cost of a new construction of approximately 3 hundred and 20 units of multi fascinates at 16801 mariposa the demonstration sponsor a subsidy of national companies with affordable and market rate housing the general partner and managing entity has not been selected and will be reviewed and approved by the mayor's office of housing and committee development as part of the city's due diligence process proposed project will have

approximately 3 hundred and 20 housing unit with 50 percent of area medium income of the city's limit those transmissions are conduit financing that don't require the city to pledge re repayment of the bonds we will first quarter if awarded an allocation we'll return to the board of supervisors to get approval to issue sometime in the spring of 2016 here with me today is susan smart of related california and she is available to answer any questions you motive have we appreciated our support and this ends staffs presentation i'm available if you have additional questions. >> thank you very much colleagues any questions at this

point in time okay. we'll open this up to public comment anybody wishes to comment on item number 6 seeing none, public comment is closed i want to thank the mayor's office of housing and supervisor cowen's comments we have a sympathetic disinjunctive of the nature compared to the 0 neighborhood paralyze if needs to get out of committee today we are going to maintain our state funding here so supervisor mar if you have comments but with supervisor cowen's comments if we can send this out of committee and that's any suggestion. >> supervisor mar. >> i'm supportive of the suggestions from our colleagues supervisor cowen but i did want to emphasize the importance of project and the 64 units that are blow 50 percent ami it

sounds like that will help to house mesopeople that need it especially in this time we're challenged to build the thirty thousand units of housing but so few are not close to the 60 percent of below market rate we're shooting for but especially for some of the most vulnerable and low income people in the city i know the architect david backer has concerned the issues from the live oak school it is an important project given the blow market rate units for especially low income people and the rental unit i'll support supervisor cowen's suggests it is a very good project i hope that supervisor cowen and the project developer and others work together to make it a

successful project. >> thank you can i have a motion to send this item forward with a positive recommendation we'll take that without objection. >> item 7 a a hearing the adaptation of the draft budget 2015-2016 and 2012 for the board of supervisors office the board. >> okay. thank you madam clerk. >> we have this item continued last time. >> thank you supervisor farrell i'm the clerk of the board here with the departments microwave active finance manager in addition to rick our finance deputy and to finalize the gowns and direction for the proposed 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 budgets at the budget and finance committee held on january 28th

many jones ably presented our recommended investment and identified two outstanding tomatoes items which we'd a lot to have the committees direction today. >> on slide 2 here is just a summary table of the costs we've presented associated with each of the proposed budget adjustment today, i'm seeking direction on whether to include those with the budget analyst slide 3 the the additional information for la jolla co-there were a question of questions and we wanted to provide a historical general fund sport and jason ready as the executive director is here

in the audience to answer further questions on slide 3 laughing co-has used the prior year general funds dollars to support the aggregation eligible operations a deeper look on slide 4 takes a look at at the general fund carried forward as you can see laughing co-was looked at $300,000 for several years and developed a notable balance in 2008 la jolla co-has been using this general fund for seven years to support it's 0 non-cpa they estimates the year-end of approximately one hundred and 16 for 2014-2015 will will be carried forward in

2015-2016 on slide 5 the 2015-2016 budget as you can see la jolla 'coz executive director anticipates 20th century $265,000 for the support of 2015-2016 to support it's non-cca expenditures the $900000 plus is the shortfall between the carried forward balance and total estimated expenditures madam clerk just a quick question and mr. freed has volunteered to talk with me this 265 is a non-cca budget. >> that's correct. >> okay. mr. freed if we lived talk about what are the non-cca projects and in 2015-2016 we

anticipate them getting launched they've been step up to the plate e spending the time it depreciates shifted back to two projects we have inform supervisor tang brought us a project looking at the underground facilities there's a project that came to us from supervisor wiener's office to the board of supervisors to look at the elections and those are the two official ones there's other supervisors that talked about other projects we have not come to those conclusions whether to do additional project. >> supervisor tang. >> just adding on given this is specifically just a general fund allocation i do know you mention two projects outside of cc organization, however, i guess my question is we are under the understanding that first and foremost our work is with cca,

however, this general fund allocation it quite significant and so in terms of how you prioritize our work and again, we do know that one of the main components is cca but giving the large projects i want to better understand how it is that you all indicate our work. >> 70 percent of my time is on the cca and the rest at the non-cc s the second half of this year spent on less non-cc organization and trying to figure out how to get that to sync together we've spent a lot

more time on crackers cca if we didn't have that huge report first, the cca and the commission gives other projects two projects currently in the incredibly and others projects that the offices want to have future discussions but not as far as la jolla could will talk about i have ideas this is something that la jolla could can work on but heres other things before you may look at before la jolla could but that is within the la jolla could special studies. >> any other question a 55 thousand dollars allocation for outside xhoultsz can you speak about that. >> la jolla come in 2011 we did a special studies on refugee collection in the city that was

brought mid financial cycle and it was needing to be done quickly it was outside of any action and outside of any workload so we hired an outside consultant to have a quick turn around around the waste management contract they needed to have a quick turn around what i'm trying to do to get our budget in a proper managing way we're independent of the city and county of san francisco we're not part of the city's bucket process once the money is allocated we can't come back and do a midterm fix 24 this is beyond the scope but i have to get the opportunity to do the work since we've been giving back and i will slightly disagree with the way the city

is looking at how we do the budget we in my opinion have accepted the full budget amount and render return that back to the city because there recent a legal way that funding works in order to keep us safe we said we're accepting the full amount and know the city has financial issues this is the first year we've spent gown user down the whole reserve but this allocation especially most focused i should note la jolla co-could has not gone through the process we start in the spring that is more me having a discussion is supervisor avalos and others on the commission to figure out what is the exact

fund now we're done with the spending down our reserve we need to have a proper budget accept for ourselves. >> the outside consultants is a place holder. >> if we didn't spend any of the money in 2015-2016 that is something you'll not be seeing for a line item we don't use it every year but it at the end to come as a point not in the budget cycle so we have a refund it or not do the report at this point. >> thank you. >> i guess my question is kind of centering around outdoors consultant to be frank i don't know until engine. >> did the discussion on glad

grounding that la jolla could did anything so i've not seen anything to have a $600,500,000 budget including this consultant to say we know exactly what our department is doing and thing they're going to work on but we pay our budget analyst $2 million a that year to do the consultant and the budget analyst so i'm curious about this is it is one thing to hire things you've done a great job but your hiring outside consultants it is questionable how we do things at the board

this is not something i can wrap my head around >> supervisor mar. >> i hope mr. freed can talk about the others projects i know from supervisor breed and supervisor avalos and supervisor campos there's been a number of studies done perhaps they can be shared more broadly with other colleagues and also mr. freed and his colleague went to the history of the general fund support for la jollafco just how to say in some ways a continuation of the funding through the general fund support beginning in 2006. >> sure one of the things that we've done this is partly before

my time working for lafco so i'm going be looking other personnel decisions the city and county we get a certain amount lafco was not using the money they're creating a full power system or a cca once those rules come into plays at this point in time the city hit an economic hardship they hit the other reserve we accepted the money and spent down what we had a good portion of the money that was spent down i don't know in lafco w did clerk's office but most of the money that got paid back to the

clerk's office was for a apartment clerk for our h.r. and all the other things it and so a lot of that money has been paid bags back to the clerk's office for lafco, lafco has the ability to work on other projects i've mentioned in all the reports are located on this website and the bigger one the russian hill study how elected officials get represented in other jurisdictions a study on the registering that was done a lot of projects it's been hard for lafco because we've when i was first hired it was solely for cca that's my focus and as a cost sooifk measure we need to have the executive director and having the interims executive

director just become legal council we've seen the savings for that reason and the outside consultant is not anticipating we're to use a lot but we need to have the money for technical things outside of our ability to we need to find american people stewart expert it's a line item ii hope t is not used but lafco we need to have our money set aside separately than other departments. >> when you talk about those outside studies how do we delineate delineate. >> there's a slither 2k4r5e67b8 how we approach the study and jurisdictions there's been time people approached me they've done a report and they've done the report i don't need to do

the record they're doing a section of that report but a lot of discussions outside of that i don't know where they draw their lines what they will and not do but in the utility of underground network interests things we are able to do so i'm piggy backing off that without getting and having them not sitting down and talking what in their perimeters are but it is a perimeter we're outside we can do stuff they don't do. >> it will be helpful to have this discussion quite frankly until supervisor tang did the police gown thing i don't know that lafco did anything forcing

for us as supervisors i'm here and again, you've g done great work on cc organization but that's terrific but a healthy amount there's other consolidates and layer on layer of things stuff i wasn't aware of so it will be helpful during the budget season so everyone is clear. >> commissioner chan. >> along that same line i didn't know about the other outside cca until i saw the work done around vacancies and the country that's when i learned there was something else we can ask for so we don't have to answer this now but i'll suggest the budget analyst office they have a request from various board men's to report they do

may want to work on perhaps a progress that lafco may want to look for other cca work. >> that makes sense and so in addition to the in depth look we want to give you an in debt for the fund that the cca has granted slide 6 show us the lafco figures for 2015-2016 lafco as spent approximately $1.6 million of the initial 2 point plus million dollars priority by the sfpuc and has a remaining balance of 4 hundred and 89 thousand the relationship authorizing the continued work order was set to exterior on

june 2015 bus was extended to 2016-2017 unless the committee has follow-up questions on the lafco matter i'll move to the budget analyst request. >> thanks for the discussion i want to have it discussion around all of this and again if it's another resource of the board it's great i have no problem but have clear lines defined and also to make sense with the budget and also, if it's the case i'd a lot to if there were a more practical approach hey, we're approving a $200000 specifically for the cca what would you like to have i guarantee a lot of my colleagues don't know that's it.

>> thank you supervisor farrell. >> i have 3 more quick slides slide 7 is the final outstanding item a formal request if the budget analyst for the fiscal year 2015-2016 contract i have asked mr. rose and beven to be in the audience in case there's questions the committee will recall on september 16th the board of supervisors approved the bust services on 2014 resulting from a in a 2.2 percent increase to the contract in 2015-2016 which is set to be unanimous listed 3 percent in 2015-2016 on november 15, 2014, the budget analyst joined. >> the have you ever known