>> and your reward is that your permanently banned and no short-term rentals for a week highly your away and you can only rent it the owner can't move into the unit that is true a guarantee that none of those will actually be built we're trying to strike the balance and make sure we're actually getting those built thank so the point to the trying to make sure their affordable i hear the argument of the seven hundred and 50 number is arbitrary whether it's worth thinking about a largest amount maybe the main thing to have the

monitoring recorded that comes back to tell us how the program is working. >> i'll be honest commissioners i don't have a view of the sequentially in castro i included seven hundred and 50 scombeet i thought supervisor kim and others made interesting points i don't have a strong view i don't have an answer. >> commissioner hillis. >> well, good to see you here i have a single-family home in the rh2 district i want to do a retrofit can i sell the the next do i day to tic. >> the board of supervisors banned the tics so if you and another person decide to own that that's our right of

property. >> the second question is on the short-term rentals goes through the same process they want occupancy issues what's my limits on i'm living in the house by myself. >> it's now an official living unit be he and be covered that can't be rent there has to be an occupant 9 months out of the year with the insurance company. >> everything. >> this makes sense. >> commissioner moore many say great legislation obviously the typography it's easy to see as soon as you're moving into other parts of the city other practical questions come up by example not specifically the size was low squealing heights is not workable partially

because the barkers were good in designing it requiring the center extra ceiling space in order to make the smallness which the unit work and airport you to think about that. >> other units with prior locations of the building and the windows and light on the other hand, having lived a while back in a rental unit the minimal amenities that comes with the buildings are sometimes a small storage locker and with the new bicycle rules a ruling to park your bike in our unit i hope people can carve out space are not infringing on those small amenity some of the rental

buildings offer to their tenants the last point is a condominium adding a unit i think that requires a new form of subdivision where the condo owner owns everything inside the unit but they own everything else in common so one consensus on the subdivision but easier done than said and other rights and rules come into play it's not as easy. >> i agree whether you have a condo there are rules. >> particularly in the rules of subdivision because other things come into play otherwise i'm supportive. >> councilmember sharp. >> yeah. supervisor its wonderful legislation i like the

idea opener is allowed and affordable by design because it is a small unit for someone that is looking to buy a plays might allow them and as far as square footage we don't need a cap because it's self-limiting it can only be so big and can't expand the envelope you're not going to do end up with issues down there i'm going to move to approve with staff recommendation. >> commissioners there is a motion and a second to adopt the recommendation with staff recommendations commissioner antonini commissioner hillis is commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and

places you on item 12 for case no. 1215 amendments to the small business priority progressing pilot program a program policy. >> it's challenging speaking after supervisor wiener dan with the planning department thank you for agenda dizzying this this is a refresher of a planning commission policy will two years old before we talk about that policy in particular a karaoke primer on what a commission policy is

commission policies are so on and so forth in a resolution as adopted by your majority vote and action by the board action by the mayor is not required resolution is not legislation so it can't eliminate a local requirement for example neighborhood notification or a need for conditional use authorization that a perspective realm not a policy realm is can change how the commission or department administers it's procedures how the areas in the planning code are silent on how these those are worked in the planning commission council expands only requirement within limits the policy we're talking about today commissioners is the subdividing 4 p the small business pilot program this was created and adapt by you in

april of 2013 following a series of conversations the whole thing members of the commission and the members of the small business commission the goal is to really find a way to help small businesses move through the land use feasts that's itself origin of sb 4 p a high-level of review i'm sorry this is repetitive it applies for conditional use applications really it does two main things the applications are guaranteed a hearing date at this commission within 90 days of the filing of the application in the bit faster than our one hundred and 20 day altercate commissioners given the applications we struggle to meet that timeline second thing that the sb 4 p does it guarantees an

application placement on the commission consent calendar which provides a level of certainty andes penscy when it comes into city hall excuse me. >> as you may recall commissioners the sb 4 p does all this through an approach that is particularly not able we do it by cutting away the excessive paperwork that we and the staff have fallen into the practice of conditional use matters by cutting away the paperwork we're able to process the application for quickly and this extending the solution the non sb don't suffer when the sb 4 p was adapted two

years ago it was acknowledged by this small business commission our practice of drafting robust lengthy draft motions in case of the exclusive summaries was not useful for the straightforward applications some of you saw the example on the slide i'll put it on the screen i like it on the left-hand side of the screen is a 17 page for a restaurant expansion and on the right hand is a 10 page commission approval for a 42 thousand seat basketball on the waterfront the point is we simply didn't believe there's an inherit application we believe that

practice may not be appropriate commissioners on the screen on the right hand is the approval document we use for the sb document it is a 2 page we a call it the project and motion it is concise and checks the approval document it saves time for us and we pass that on to the applicant that is the current policy before you today really for 3 reasons the first, the sb 4 p is a pilot program if we don't do anything it goes away the second is that our backlog doesn't have room in the current economic cycle we think that 2 impacts the program and we've learned a lot of things over the last two

years because the conversation is formula retail here's our first important lesson we've learned this is the package commissioners from our current scomb application packet it lists the criteria you don't have to read this we'll go on but the point commissioners there are a lot of criteria and in order to enroll in the program you literally have to check a number of boxed 0 it's difficult for the applicant to check we know the program is working and success we haven't let it flush the eligibility criteria is - so this is hopefully, a bit more legible and the highlight of the criteria are that we're having in the program those apply today. in just a second i'll advance the slide you'll see the red

line the proposed changes today and we recommend you investigate amending the program this is details 11 by 17 in your packet i have extra copies for the public if you're interested i'd like to do to give a quick run through of the changes and, of course feel free to jump if you have comments or questions the first criteria we're proposing to be removed relates to geography and good neighbor policy shouldn't be bound we're recommending the applicable ability be removed and the policy be moved citywide

the second bulletin is formula retail uses scott wiener we have a robust dialog and have new legislation online commissioners we're proposing to bring in new formula retail uses into the program between 12 but less than 20 other establishment for instance not many generally speaking their local furltz we suggest bringing in formula retail changes of eye as well as financial limited financial and personal serves not located on the ground floor story with respect to the last one commissioners that is being done to incentivize to incentivize them not to take up space that

frontsz the streets and the third criteria on your screen relates to last year footprint stores we're suggesting we focus this criteria not on the ray side of the space for example in a building but gear it towards the storefront consolidation we don't want to see that we prefer if you're merging two or more stores not be allowed to participate in the program skipping over the fourth one that remains the same this is the criteria we want to be left punitive towards the stores that provide off-street parking we ask you qualify those applications to provide more parking down to number 8 we're almost at the end of the sheet this relates to r