it can and i think if there's a will a way and that's what we're witnessing i wouldn't be more supportive and excited i guess i'm gufsh i'm in full support and admiration for the support this will be a national attention getter and how the rest of the world is landmarking to restruck industrial and the stories are different for each city, however this sets a strong benchmark of how we'll be doing that thank you. i'm in sub support of your project and if i may i make a motion. >> sectional. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much real where i can the first comment i want to acknowledge the public

commenter it was a very, very hard project but i said to acknowledge it was a verify point of view and a huge supporter of the project a comment this is a pilot project for new legislation or new edition to the planning code i hope we'll see more example in the eastern neighborhoods the pdr business plan that is a key innovative piece of the legislation not just the building type but what is in the building and what are they going to be doing i thought that was fantastic the only thing sf made is a top organization i know they are both industry 0r7bd and know the pdr space i know it is here now and also community

oriented and interested in local hires for middle skill workers i will say i saw there was a lot of objectives at&t park recruiting and around marketing for both the businesses and also inform that get employees but i didn't see much on the reporting of outcomes how will we know they hire people from the zip codes around the area and those people got jobs i didn't see anything around the reporting of outcomes it is very much like how the local hiring is the best efforts type of legislation this is the same vein because of the piloted project i'd like to see how that's going and if there's opportunity to strengthen that in the future i think that will be if anything the one with tweeting tweak go but i

definitely supportive it. >> commissioner richards. >> one of the speakers said it it the innovative and creative and will create a show case for a lot of the people in the state in not beyond the city of to see how to integrate the two the pdr just creates an eco he system i was talking to the project sponsor if i look at the transportation portion of the draft motion i've mentioned that i missed that i take 22 fillmore as a winemaker hopefully in the next generation of my life how do you 0 get to the site on a rainy day i know there's channel service do you only user downtown are there shuttles between the 8th and mission and

all those places. >> there is a shuttle the mission bay shuttle that stops at the site we'll opt two that system and the mission bay system and drop people off at the caltrain station depends upon traffic if you take the 22 you'll on your umbrella and walk a couple of belongs as people often sided in san francisco on that subject on the 22 line as augmented there will be buses every 6 minutes and they're looking at reducing travel times by 25 percent an easier proposition in the further. >> i'm fully in support. >> commissioner antonini. >> i'm also in totally e total

support superosupport i think the underground of the utility is wonderful once that happens you'll have the choice of street lamps and hopefully put t up historical ones and the ones that the cobra heads in the 50s and 60s make my neighborhood look unpleasant so that's i think you can do that hopefully number 2 i want to shout out to my colleague he coincide the pdr phrase if i'm not mistaken and for many years he was the spokesman for pdr for the discussions in the early part 69 1i7b9 and thirdly liam i'd like to compliment the legislators that put it together it's good legislation it created a synergy between office that makes the

pdr affordable and makes the pdr affordable indefinitely as long as the office is supported because you can afford to take a loss leader on the pdr if you have the office to carry the load also the other thing that was piloted was $16.5 million in fees that will help a lot of things to go with the pdr uses and the office use as was mentioned i hope that is a model for the future that can be used as well as further to the south the square there's a lot of potential and the other thing that's really important here is that the cash i can't that san francisco has i think historically companies even ones that are not here anymore like to make a point they were off

and on in san francisco and so the gardell chocolate and they're making a point of their organizational the banana republic say their founded in san francisco their american made and they must be cutting-edge because they were created in san francisco because people see us as innovative there's a great potential for developing in this regard. >> thank you i'm also supportive of the project i like especially how the pdr workshop building will be owned and operated or otherwise controlled by a nonprofit i think that building an commissioner johnson's comments

the what kind of pdr is it like high-end drone making or something lettuce that's about using our hands and making a bag that's part of the success commissioner richards. >> i want to say thank you to mr. towns reaching out and the commissioners before the project to see if we had questions i appreciate all the statistics asia it is great to hear from you. >> commissioner moore. >> i do believe it cca is the great retransaction builder and as we look at the future we need to look at mutually inspired

areas that have's still a few rough edges the critical mass of 24 architect and students spend a lot of time not getting paid i think that is all positive and makes this particular project more attractive. >> thank you commissioners, if there's nothing further there's a is there a motion and a second with conditions and authorize their office development allocation on that motion. >> commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis excuse me. commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero. >> commissioners that places you are under our discretionary review. >> there is a second part of the motion the allocation for the project under 10 b we didn't call the two together. >> we called them together.

>> we did. >> and i thought i as i read in the motion i included the office others. >> i'm sorry, i didn't hear it thank you very much. >> xhifrgsdz that places you under our discretionary review randell street those are kwefdz on one project there are 3 separate discretionary review each dr requester gets minutes. >> first staff good afternoon the subject property is on ralph dell street this is to constrict a one story

vertical edition with a penthouse this is in the rear yard from one hundred thousand 2 hundred to 13 thousand square feet e square feet under the influence it measures 8 hundred and 37 square feet it needs to variances that measures 23 by one hundred it faces a consistent pattern that are 3 stories below the garage 3 spate drs are filed one by the adjacent neighbor to the east and two from across the street the drs concerns this my adhere

to the scale it will be excessly huge it should be brought into the neighborhood character and did not respect the neighborhood it is context all the design team requested the set back of the verbatim rear edition be south set back by the rear property line 5 feet and the that stair penthouse includes the slope to minimize the building the rdt took a further have you and the second and third floors be set back from the west side property line in response to project sponsor set back the rear edition 6 inches

from the property line subsequent r0i78d design team review meetings they've determined the project is suitable and creates no circumstances that concludes my presentation. >> first dr requester. >> i have some overhead i'm barbara thank you for hearing my dr mime husband eye will next door to the project we've praise inform taught we're not surprised the small house next door is being enlarged hopefully not to big when it was presented to our neighborhood it of the is a a concern about such a large house besides what an individual may want are the prices in the

first meeting we were told it could have been bigger we live in a 1909 victorian house next to the project and you know it's obviously it's a story up with a pitched roof it as 16 hundred square feet and we're next door to another victorian our third story a set back 5 feet from the walk with a balcony and our lots are down sloping from the sidewalk to the backyard is 10 feet our yard is 10 feet lower than their yard so the impact is big the new how's house will reach half a length and an additional story on the dlaenld

we'll lose the shade now those are pictures of how far the shade reaches that's past the house and two yards down in the winter. >> our precious morning light in the upstairs of our row house had been blocked by the penthouse and dribble across from our only skylight window clearly we don't need to turn on a light but if not bloblgd we've certainly no longer see sky and they'll have now skylights according another guidelines an attempt should be made to blend in with the neighborhood we asked for a set back from our fence that is allowed i was

asked to sign a paper saying i won't further implement the process and ask for a further set back on the north side of 5 feet thoughts of deemed bargaining in bad faith and the fence line was resented and the plans were filed like that. >> once again 9 planned went through we said we'll file a dir the set back was the offered a second time the western rear is 1 pointed 5 feet from the events for the first floors and i believe this concession was going to be required by the commission now we're looking at a block of a building we asked for the 5 foot set back on the north side to be

comparable to the guidelines in the residential guidelines where people made modifications to lessen the effect of the rear extension we understand that 3 bedrooms on the third floor are desired we have this we understand that and set back would yield a third floor blatantly with a stunning view of downtown and remove the view as expected also just want to say we were told by the owner not to waste our time filing the dr we wouldn't win without a lawyer ever consonant i watched a planning hamburger and watched you there were not able

reductions in the height of the building to blend into the neighborhood i feel like those provisions have not been done here and real quick wanted to show that the owners have done other houses they've made those beautiful accommodations so i hope that you can vote to down scale it and retain our neighborhood and character. >> second dr requester. >> hi, i'm doug my wife and i have lived in our home for 10 years it's not a surprise for the project to come up across the street to build up i found

in the plans though it looks like the property becomes incompatible with the surrounding buildings in terms of the scale you know if you look at in mile - it can be easily seen once you add from our prospective on the other side of the street when the house builds up it will be 3 levels we have a 3 level house this is appropriate to me as you can see it comes to the peak of charley and barry raze house and then what is added on top is the roof deck and penthouse so we went to the owners and architect and said hey that penthouse is add another story so and that seems impeach an

impact on light and impact on the character of the surrounding property it is at all at this point and that thing is 8 feet wide so we talked about a couple of options one to do a hatch instead of a penthouse and that was rejected address hey, we, shave some off the power point would that be enough i then filed the dr because we were not going to get anywhere if the penthouse were removed and hatch on top to get up to the roof that would make a big difference in the property if that's not acceptable it if seem like a roof deck a great idea for that neighborhood. >> and that's pretty much the

contestants of my dr. >> thank you. >> hi i have brought new material to the meeting they rejected ♪ december i have a new packet you guys want to now or after now or after oh it's already started >> you can have the commission secretary pass it out to us. >> okay. i'll do that there you go. >> thank you i'm jan i live directly across the street from 130 ram street been there thirty years and i'm here today to ask for a front set back of the verizon position

and asking for no use of wood on the third floor of the exterior and wish to support any neighbors request the set back vertical editions are used no noah valley because developers are squeezing larger homes by reducing the scale and even though set back leaves a less of an impact so here there's a - the standard street width is 50 feet and glancing glen mark is known for it's windy street we have curve to curve thirty feet the minimal a 36 i'm trying to - fittings this is a narrow narrow street if you've been to glen park and

i just wanted to also the sidewalks meet the minimum requirement so on and so forth by the city when or which are 10 feet a few views of the neighborhood you can look at that also set to the point our house is really close to basically 409 feet away not like there's a you know 40 feet difference the new development will be directly across the street the residential guidelines recommended 15 foot set back if the front wall to the view and 15 foot set back will definitely take away disable of the new edition but i will not ask for that i thought about it but didn't what i'm asking for here is i went to an architect and here we

go sorry this is the view right now and i went to him saying could we had a 5 foot set back here's the 5 foot set back it's coming up from herpes street not a significant set back 5 feet so then this architect suggested that why sorry that was the original project here's the 5 feet this is the set back here and then this is the existing again and here he proposed a modified 8 feet that gives a better view for the city if you looking for the people cocking up the street if you're coming up henry you can see barbara and charles house the subpoena t is coming and the light that barbara's referring to allow

that into her house this also this 8 foot set back is going to help united states in our house because you know we're losing our light and air we've had for 15 years below our house we understand the city is growing we need editions and need to fit more families but i want to have the 8 foot cigarette for privacy in our home as well as the use of materials if you take away the wood it allows the reflective light into our home we're missing from across the street i know the equities a looking at all kinds of concrete suggestions and when i went to the architect he suggested that christian will do a great job of

reconfiguring the house but it made me think about our friend's house so i do in our packet you'll see i have 13 examples of set back this are uses throughout the neighborhood you ac take a moment you'll see what i'm asking for the consistent with our neighborhood. >> thank you. i appreciate my time. >> are there members of the public who want to speak in support of the dr requesters. >> please come forward. >> hi good afternoon. i'm defshg i live with my partner defense attorney less than purchased the home in 1983 and lived in noah valley since 19981 we see the north and west side

of the property during our meeting and the writing to the architect i asked for respect and we'll be lookinging a 40 foot wall great the ground floor to the area we asked for articulation a set back something to break up the monolithic north side wall into the backyard thirty feats the owners said they went to extent to have an attractive articulation of the home unquote not a stucco box my one meeting that the evict and owner was sdoirpt and frustrating the plans confirmed the owners had not addressed our concerns about this thirty foot north wall

their response thirty to my meeting quote we would have built a figured out wall and explicit by two or three feet but had to speak to the contractor about the change we didn't hear if the architecture owners about lowering that e.r. the design changes addressing our concerns this is a quote from the owners we certainly have no desire whichever to create an uninteresting box stucco like that you see in the outer sunset the stucco box with windows is decade what you'll side from our backyard i ask the commission to look at this project close and grant our and our neighbors request for the modifications thank you for your time. >> thank you

>> next speaker. >> just but that right there. >> hi good afternoon. i'm laurie i live on randell been there 4:30 years this week and i come today first of all peppering my vegetation garden is toast in randell is approved my backyard is low and as was talked about i will be facing no sun for the whole time i've attended and watched several hearings i know weeping we'll hear if the hired hands of people that confuse real estate one with the need we have 15 hundred sdweet my my husband and i raised our kids in 12 hundred

square feet let me point out should find confusion the developers and my confusion and some of the developers implication misrepresentation in the passage page one 12 hundred square feet the records say 8 hundred and 37 are the numbers quadrupling page 2 the person we've been dealing with in planning notes there's 8 letters 0 no mention of the correspondents the professional 86 and 91 and 93 their deceptive page 77 complains there would be an extremely modest impact an charles and barbaras how is it seems not