on that. >> i just would like to say, i think this is a excellent overview. i think that showing how infact it is integrated within the totality of our programs-initially you start within house and look at the senior ranking officers and start from there and filter and go across and be more inclusive and then directly you work with the community health centers and the programs so you are are covering the water front. you are not only looking at it across board, you are looking at it with tonight for the next generation after that as you have the comprehensive modual the work force development taking a look at now and in the future. it is great deal of thipg think and work and cretivety in this so we look

forward to presentations >> doctor shanchise can you speak up a little. it wasn't quite as loud. >> i just fete it was a excellent presentation and felt that you centered on the core hof the department qu worked with the senior folks first and training the initiatives and the new concept culturally humillty and equate with how that is presented and how it is implement within it con tenks of the institution and you go from there through the various academic initiatives and also through your various programs to the clinics and community and work force and then to the measured outcomes on the over all health of the future. the fact that you have been able to

chart this very well and have this ongoing dialogue, but more importantly a work force that is going to be up to speed pertaining to what the overall initiative was has been [inaudible] and now we are coming to a real operational model that can be used in other ways with the department as we take a look at other unique issues or communities also. it is a really well documented effort at this point and look forward to future hearings regarding the progress as we take a look at each one of these integrated models that reflect the diversity of our programs and the people within thdepartment of public health. >> thank you. >> i would like to ask whether we can ask whether the actual initiative under

collective impact can be heard and reviewed at the community and public health subcommittee. i know you just finish td year one about how you measure results. i'm interested in the planning of the interventions that you are thinking about in order to get those results. i don't know if it is redhy for full commission >> the continued update would be at the committee level as we envision it and as it develops and it is ready for our next hearing then that would be where the committee would let us know that is-we are hoping to be able to continue to track our progress in a number of projects through the various committees and i appreciate your bringing that up as a attention because i was going to point out that i think in all these years we have not had

the clarity that your proposal-the departments initiative have shown now to say, there are areas that we will be focusing on and look for outcomes in regards to these and these will have measureable outcomes on the health of the people we are looking at and tagting. that is something we want to continue to follow. at this point in time that will be in our committee structure >> any further comment on this-it is a wonderful presentation to give the overall of what we will do. min millly at a years point we would like to hear this back if progress is moving, eeben better and the committee decide to inform us, but remember we'll review mitt committee

minutes as we go along >> just the fact that you brought the 2 parts together, 2 sides of the house together, i think this represents a way forward as we look at what really is integrated health down the road. i think we'll lurn a lot by your successs so looking forward to hearing about them >> thank you. if there are no further comments-our thanks to the group that worked very hard. it is a very long standing topic and looks like this time we have at least some goals that we are going to really be trying to impact and i think that is really important that we will be able to track this. thank you. >> thank you very much. our next item. >> to thank everyone for staying late because this is the last group of folks here.

item 11 is other business. >> commissioners, on this topic as we heard a number of subjects i asked staff to think of how the san francisco health network could or should be presented whether in parts or whether we want to divide segments. some of it will be related to our 2 major institutions and we already have during conference committees for that. at the same time, the public health committee heard a update on the progress of the integration of mental and physical health in the clinics. is it appropriate that we perhaps want to look at having segments of our network development in certain key committees that are more for example, maybe dh budget and financing or do we want to have

one committee to look at all the topics. i asked staff [inaudible] with the director and all to really consider potential recommendations as to how we track this. we can have another committee that can track the san francisco network. most would like to avoid too many more committees and see how they can ent great. our idea is to follow the progress, updates to know where the mile stones were and are we hitting them or not and develop a fuller picture that can dm to the full commission. we know we have quarterly updates from the san francisco health network, but there are specifics within those that merit i believe a tracking and understanding and assistance to our staff so that we can then

be a participant in how we are going be developing our network. does that make some sense coleen? >> i think you have this item before you at the planning session so we can work on that there >> this is sort of highlighting one of the topics we would like to take up at the planning session, part of the house keeping, so to speak, is what is the best way or sedgeed way and these can be trials, to see how they work out. i think we are beginning to get reports coming back now so it is important that we also can establish a structure so we can be helpful and careo out our responsibilities >> perhaps in relationship to our march 17 meeting where we will take up in full discussion, i look at it as

we-i hope we can approach that meeting with the understanding of what we collectively feem may be a oversight role and how do we want to implement that. imagine over site as cleaning your room. my son cleans the room and does the bed and under the table and does a little here and there just as he bumps into things and tries to clean it up and i come in and say why didn't you clean your room and he says i have been doing it all day. or you start in the corning and go from one end of the room to the other end. i use this as a model as our oversight as we take in the data and agree it is on track or not, how do we want to systematically go about this? some commissions worked out a animal plan and say this year we want to try to accomplish this as our working plan and hope that may be some of the

things you are suggesting as we come at this. now that the city is producing a lot of good nrgz for us, i think we need to be responsive by coming windup a system attic way that we can digest it and provide the guiding oversight that is so essential. i hope that makes sense with the analogy >> the analogy is interesting, but i think this falls well within the fact that we have 2 year budget and 5 year budgets and different planning initiatives, we just seen the african american initiative and we have-i think you ampifyed on what we hope would be part of the discussion of the planning committee >> i am not saying we are doing it either way >> no. there is no road map

at the moment. we are all looking to see what is a acceptable road map. we take the let or right road or we can try something, but we need to have a road map so we can assist staff so they know how we can do this in a organized fashion and not duplicateive and be responsible and at what level for the oversight. i asked them to prepare several options so we can discuss it. nothing is fixed in stone and we can have several sessions to figure what is the best because this is a important topic on how we lead our obligations under both the public health and the system of delivery oover the next seberal years?

we are basically heading towards 5 year programs kwr plans and how do we monitor all that? this is a opportunity for other commissioners to also bring thoughts up for our staff so that they could take a look at that and if you haven't-one at the moment, but you suddenly think of something in the middle of the night, please let coleen or barbara know so we can put those in the mix. i'm looking for-we are looking for a consensus process that would be helpful for everyone. >> any other thoughts? any other items that you would like to bring to our attention at this point? i'll ask mark if you remind us of the date and inform us about what appears to

be our naird meeting >> march 17 you have planning session from 2-6 and on the calendar the topics noted are noted there so if you have others let me know and i can pass them along to the health commission leadership. that meeting is 25 van nes. april 7 you have your meeting thip migds to focus on mission related services and that is going be mission neighborhood service incornerated. i lost my memory there. i will remind you by e-mail of all these things >> anyone else have items for this topic? if not, then our next item is actually ajournment >> yes, i note for the record there is [inaudible] because there hasn't been a meeting and you combined 11 with other

business so i think you covered that and now we are at 14 >> motion for ajournment is in order >> so moved. second is heard. all in favor please say aye. all those opposed? this meeting is adjourned. thank you. >> ladies and gentlemen, the chair has called the meeting to order. can we please rise for the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice

for all. >> thank you. madam president, can i call roll? >> please do, inspector. >> president loftus, vice-president turman in route, commissioner marshall in route, commissioner dejesus, present, commissioner mazzucco is excused. commissioner hwang and commissioner melara. also with us is chief of police gregory peace. >> we have someone from the office of complaints. steve from occ. welcome. everyone to the southern redistricting special meeting. my name is

suzy loftus. i appreciate everyone coming out tonight. we are here out of the commission coming out into the community to talk specifically in this meeting about the proposed new lines for the southern police district and the city as a whole. we will hear from the folks who have taken data and looked at what the new map should look like and then really what tonight is about hearing from all of you and many people have already sent us letters and there is a great deal of thought that have gone into some various positions as to whether or not these lines are right or not. really this process is designed for us to hear from you and factor that in. we appreciate you taking the time, carefully looking at how this will impact your neighborhood and we are here to listen and i appreciate everyone. since this is a community meeting. i will take a moment to introduce ourselves. this is not a full time job. we have day jobs. i will ask my colleagues to

introduce themselves. commissioner dejesus? >> i'm petra dejesus, i have been on the commission for 6 years now. i look forward to this redistricting, we have never done this before. it's knew to all of us. they have these proposed boundaries and it's not set in stone so we are here to get your input. we are looking forward to hearing from you. i do have another meeting tonight, if i leave a little bit earlier, it's no in insult to you because i have to leave earlier. >> vice-president turman? >> good evening, everyone. i'm sorry, i just got off the plane and just got back. i am thrilled to be here tonight. i have read the e-mails and letters that have come in from the southern district and i appreciate that. my name is julius

turman, vice-president of the commission and i'm at the lawfirm of employment practices. as commissioner dejesus said, this redistricting mandate is certainly my first time doing it. i think probably everyone else as well. so your comments are not only important for us to hear but we really want folks to understand that there is nothing set in stone as of this moment. we want to hear what you think of the proposals and we certainly want to incorporate your thoughts into this process. thank you for having us here tonight. there are other issues other than redistricting. the police commission is here to hear those as well. >> thank you, commissioner melara. >> hi, i'm sonya melara, the executive director of the services at san francisco state hospital. i

was on the redistricting task force for this city so i'm looking forward to hearing your input for this particular process because it's really important to us. thank you. >> commissioner hwang? >> good evening, time deputy director of legal outreach, a non-profit legal services agency. we are the largest provider of free legal service in the areas of domestic violence, human trafficking, civil rights and i -- immigrant rights. >> to tell you what i do during the day, i work at the california department of justice. before that i was a prosecutor here? -- in san francisco and i'm raising my family in the outer sunset. we are going to get started. the process after this is we are really here to listen and

take your input. we have another meeting next week in the bayview and then there is another meeting after that i think it's park station and then we'll have a few meetings and we'll talk about and we'll share decisions after that. please call the next line item. >> i would like to introduce the chief of police. >> the commissioner, representative of the public. the reason we are here tonight this is the third meeting to get public input which is prescribed in the charter as part of the 10-year requirement that we look at police district and account for many things that will be spoken to buy the consultant. changes in population, new neighborhood and the head quarter that

starts off in the district and on and on. 30,000 foot foot of how some of them affect the southern police district. the new police headquarters building, public safety building down from china to third street would currently reside in the bayview district. obviously you can't have a police station station in a district that they are not policing. for immediate mandate, this talk probably won't go into effect until closer to the summer once all parties will be heard. we will be annexing the building so when it opens sometime in april and because under every circumstance, that same parcelling would be in the new southern

district. that said, some of the proposals that are in play, we've had very robust meetings in the tenderloin district and the northern district. a lot of discussion and good crowd like tonight. the tenderloin district would come across market street and down to mission street, but not take mission street. so the streets that run north and south currently proposed from third to van ness avenue would stop just shy of the northern side of mission. both sides of mission street would remain in the southern police district. the remainder of the southern police district as currently as 16th street that there has been substantial public input to both captain flippo and a large

portion of that area would like to see down to mariposa. it wasn't mentioned in the final map, it's just not in the draft. i don't know why there is any particular reason why that couldn't happen. for folks that believe it's a foregone conclusion, the mayor, the captain and i have heard you. that doesn't not make sense. so we will look forward to your commentary in that area. so with that i'm going to introduce captain deflippo and the four corners district. >> colleagues we are going to move down to watch the powerpoint.

>> thank you, chief, commission thank you. i want to thank rhodes from the rec's center who sponsored us tonight. i appreciate it. the 2 points of introduction about the move to the southern station and the need to change the district. so a little bit of quick history, back in 2013 the department and the office located the boundaries to the districts. it was data driven. we got the data, the calls from service. the district. we also looked at the population growth, potential population growth from each district and in the case of southern station moving to a new location at

1251 third street in the bayview district. the proposed boundaries. so there we have the boundaries. as we see currently, the southern district goes from market to embarcadero to channel up channel to 16th or 7th. and a little jog around 16, vermont and back up division 13 and connects again with market street. those were the boundaries for many years. the southern changed for many years. it didn't have the ballpark years ago. there were warehouses, vacant lots and now we have multilevel residential growings and it's daytime business area around-the-clock

residential. this has also grown in population, more vehicles, more pedestrians, bicycles and want to challenge the traffic and it's been a challenge. it's grown. so proposed changes we start at we go south to mission and straight down mission continue on both sides as the chief said to embarcadero. come back to embarcadero continue on the long pass and incorporating 48 and 50 and currently on the map to 16th street to vermont and back around to the northern end or western end as previous. a lot of consideration went into this. this made sense to us and losing market street down to tend erloin

and central which are great resources with the southern station to deal with the population growth, pedestrians, bicycles and continuous growth of southern. we have the stadium in the near future which is even bigger. so, the change makes accepts. -- sense. i spoke to the committee and their concerns and their points. thanks for that. i think i will turn it over now. thank you. >> thank you, captain. good evening, everyone. my name is randy mcclure, the project manager at the office. we have embarked as the captain said in a project for the last year with the police department working on the data driven analysis of

redistricting options. just to give a brief background of how we got to the proposed background. the drivers of the station with population growth in the city, work flow differences between the 10 districts around the city and legislation that requires this to be done every 10 years. we hired a consultant who specializes in services and building research for public safety strategies group to compile the information that the police department had available and worked with the command staff here with the police department in san francisco to develop a series of maps. those maps have been whittled down to different options. they considered a number of different data points and observation throughout the decision making process that then lend us to

presenting that final option of december of 2014. currently we are in the 90-day public hearing period and we certainly want to hear from everyone. a brief background, the city, the controllers office, representative as well as the police department and captain. the consultant did focus with 80 different stakeholders in the city. the workgroup considered information from the stakeholder meetings and as i said developed a number of map options which led to a presentation of the final map to the steering committee. the steering committee, the chief, the controller and representative of the department of the emergency management. project timeline. it's been about a year since we started this process. i won't go through everything

but we started early in march since the bulk of the summer working through various option side of the proposed map redistricting boundaries. some of the objectives that we considered and working very seriously throughout were to achieve greater parity among police around & minimize response times, natural boundaries and adjust for possible consideration and provide more logical alignment >> it led