the report we note the products company provided a system modification intervention work estimated cost of 951887 on table 3 on this page 24 of the report and on page 24 if dpw had done the work the total estimate project system would be $4 million plus which is as the department has testified $2 million plus 44 powers more than the $200 million adjust for the project and he dp d to complete the system therefore on page 25 of the report we believe that the proposed ordinance to allow dpw to waiver the city's

policy with the products two company with a cost if there's reasonable we recommend you approve this recommendation. >> thank you, mr. rose colleagues, any questions for mr. rose okay open up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed colleagues can i have a motion to move this forward. >> we'll take that without objection. >> m call item 11. >> resolution approving the award of a services agreement to the research and development fathers-in-law for the board approval of 3, one year option to extend. >> hi, i'm the chief administrator and policy manager at the airport today, we're seeking our approval for a license and service agreement with an airport development foundation to license a tracking

and billing system this new technology allows for tracking the individual data and billing and auditing and enforcement of companies like uber and lift using the application based programs the airport selected this airport research foundation a 501 nonprofit subsidy of the american association of american executives one of the largest professional management in the world and proven track record in technological programs to manager this system last year in october they issued licenses to pick up and drop off passengers for a fixes or fixed fee of $3.85 for pickup and drop off in

order to collect the fees our airport in house it staff developed a technology tracking system we'll be the first in the country to use this program and we'll pay for the fee equal to 5 percent of the trips we collect the proposed agreement allows this stage service to other airport throughout the country and they'll pay a 5 percent fee in a separate transaction ar d f pays for the development of this which will think 25 percent of the 5 percent they're paying us and administrator service fee that compensates the airport in the city for use of this proprietary system we've created over the initial 2 greats term the airport spent to collect

$11.6 million in trip fees we anticipate paying administrator fees $290,000 to administrator the program i want to thank the budget analyst office they worked with us for petting putting together this report thank you. >> supervisor tang. >> i don't have questions thank you to the airport for spearheading this to take this on and actually benefit from other jurisdictions being able to benefit so really thank the airport for doing this. >> i'll echo supervisor tang's comments. >> supervisor mar. >> it's a greatly technology to help us manage the vehicles going to the airport and

hopefully many other cities will participate so thank you for your direct work. >> mr. rose can we go to our report. >> yes. mr. chairman an shown oppose table one of page 28 the estimated amount over the two year is $1100 million plus if the other airports licenses the airport transportation will collect an estimated 3525 hundred in the initial fees we do recommend you approve this legislation. >> thank you, mr. rose colleagues if not other questions any public comment on this item? please step forward. >> thank you, supervisors mark uber with the san francisco taxi

alliance i say first of all the airport decides to allow the p ncs to operate at the airport and here's a particularly despite two years of illegal operations in which at least a million violations of the criminal law took place despite the fact that massive insurance fraud is still governor and will continue to go on with the serviced despite the fact that the approval of those services has and will have an numerously nothing else effect on the taxi drivers now it turned out through this contract 9 airport has a profit motivate in the system which it is going to market and license through the ar p f through other airport why will the airport do this and

we have to say maybe because they see there is money in it et al of the problems continue to exist. >> i also by the way the $5.8 million a year they expect to collect i can't go through the numbers it breakdown to a loss of a third of the taxi business at the airport of the t nc this is devastating we saw a 15 percent decline in december the first full most of their illegal operations taxi are being driementd they're not given the same cease the taxi have to go through the taxi consumerism process and instead of going to the terminals

you know one other thing undoublg the drivers of the company are not paying the business registration foe that's being collected of other businesses in the city thank you. >> thank you very much anyone else wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues can i have a motion. >> i'd like to make a motion through the chair to forward to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. madam clerk item 9. >> ordinance extending the reduction off fees for the 7 percent for the effected date of the schedule and firmly the planning department determination under the environmental quality act. >> we have dbi.

>> i'm with the deniable originally the legislation the first 11 percent in sexual of 2014 became effective in september and the the goal was to allow the department to have a chance to do the complete fee study and update the fee schedule for a new fee schedule the fee study has taken longer we want to extend it to have the study to update the fee schedules so we can move into the new feeds this will provide ways that will extend the ruktsz until we're able to go to a new fee schedule we'll not have to changed the forms to collect the fees and we have questioned requested it be retroactive it

ended on march first and to keep it going i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. >> supervisor mar. >> that's correct supervisor farrell why it the study taking longer expected. >> the controller's office managing the fee study we've been work closely with the consulted a couple of questions about the methodology we noticed that a couple fees were left out so i think we're close but the controller's office is going to be submitting things but it took longer than than anticipated. >> thank you supervisor tang >> thank you two questions if you agree with the budget analysts recommendations to have this end on other 31st 2015. >> we were initially requesting our staffing didn't include an

end date we assume that will be gone in time but we're hoping toe levy leave it open-ended not come back to see if we need more time we'll prefer to have it whatever the original legislation but we're on to what the committee approvals. >> i understand one of my concerns not a strange gap between the studies this is requiring through on the other hand i understand that setting a date we'll hopefully get it down if not approve another piece of legislation it with about chaotic i'll prefer defer to my colleagues and in general is there a requirement from our city when a fee studies need to be done on a yearly basis or any

sort of requirement maybe to our staff over there. >> i'm not aware of any requirement i'll defer to the controller's office. >> controller's office mitchell no requirement this is i don't expect you think that the state law tells us we can't over recover our fees we have to have a reasonable way of some regular schedule or understanding our recovering cost and it would be different for different fees 3 to 5 years is very reasonable. >> no rigid kind of schedule and when a when he thinks the

last time. >> 2008 or 9 a the only reason i'm asking you understand we're in an up cycle in terms of the economy hence we need to adjust the fees what we're allowed to charge people and keeping in mind the kindly hits the bottom what that means in terms of us being to fully recover the foes. >> thank you. >> okay that's correct very much mr. rose our report. >> yes. mr. chairman and members on page 18 the report of the extending 7 percent temporary fee reduction based on information provided by dbi the budget analyst estimates 3 hundred thousand plus for the period of march 2015 to october 31st, 2015, hone in table 18 supervisors the reason

why we're recommending and continuing to recommend an end date the board of supervisors established requested this fee extension on july 15, 2014 and as the committee asked it is still not done. >> our recommendation b will provide an additional 8 months we think this is reasonable if it didn't happy not done by that time the department should come back and advise the board why it's not done that's the purpose of this he said date we recommend you recommending not the note have an end date and if the department said it will be more reasonable dose 31st that's fine but some report back to the board of supervisors. >> okay. thank you, mr. rose. >> i appreciate that dialog back and forth but it maidens and if we need to come back

we'll entertain that at this point open up for public comment seeing no one else in the chambers we'll close it colleagues we'll accept the recommendation and approve the item as amended any discussion a motion through the chair a motion to accept the amendment to propose angle end date and pass it out to the phone number with a positive recommendation. >> by supervisor tang we'll take that without objection. madam clerk, any other business before this committee? >> no, mr. chair. >> thanks everyone we're adjourned.

>> golden state good evening, everyone welcome to the january 20, 2015, of the entertainment commission my name is bryan at an the president of commission we're going to actually before we do roll call please turn off your cell phones not to disturb our meeting we have speaker cards we'd like you to fill out hand

that to our staff and state your name and feinstein thank you to sfgovtv and media services for the slides to this public every time we meet okay. we're going to start with a roll call. >> commissioner frost commissioner lee commissioner moshoyannis commissioner perez commissioner tan we have quorum and commissioner joseph will be absent this evening the first item of business is public comment on any item that pertains to the business of the commission but is not to the public that are within the jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. decided any public comment? i don't see any public comment item 2 review and approval of the minutes from january 6th public utilities i wasn't here i can't vote on it but anyone want

to make a motion >> i'd like to make a motion to approve the minutes. >> i'll second. >> a motion and second vote. >> commissioner perez commissioner moshoyannis abstain. >> well, then there's no quorum. >> i was absent we're going to need a motion to continue. >> i'll change my motion to have the approval of the minutes. >> i'll second. >> on that motion. >> commissioner perez commissioner moshoyannis commissioner lee commissioner frost commissioner tan. >> the motion is continued until our next meeting item number 3 is the report from the executive order and our staff so you can take it away. >> good evening commissioners let's see how brief i can be i did executive director's report

memo you've gotten your hands on it briefly an update on the a.m. transit working group we planned february 4th as our last meeting of the task force i'm not sure if commissioner tan will be available that's the last one to review the items that we'll be highlighting at the board of supervisors the board committee is scheduled for february 23rd as the land use committee to do a short press conference prior to the hearing and then the working group was planned to brief this commission as well as mta and other transportation agencies for the road show in and amongst that february date so that's called out we won't coupling

come to you after the last february figure out if we can do if it before february 23rd if it works we'll cancel one of our meetings in february we'll have a tough meeting but those are long term outcomes and discussions so it's not you know all that important when it comes to you, we can have a robust discussion either way and wanted to update you it's been a conversation point at this commission awhile commissioner hyde was a commissioner around place where limited live performance is allowed and follow-up to december 2nd which was what meeting in which we had supervisor kim's office here was a request to change i think

per this commission direction to allow llps in two areas of the western selma w m g and the r.c. d that request went back to supervisor jane kim's office we haven't heard about the drafting we're waiting and let you know when this moves forward we that was the g s a i wanted to keep the commission informed the city manager's office is important we pay them to do payroll personnel work and budget and so we have to update the city administrator and her budget stapling staff on a regular basis we did that last week and it is something we did

to keep everyone on the same page making sure if roadblocks pop up they help us if possible that as well as on january 9th we me i went on a last day night bus ride to oakland and i have attached behind our memo here a flier and there's plenty for the public here on the podium if anyone is interested for this pilot project that i know i've talked about before that ac transit and bart are doing to approve the bayview it is important this pilot which is supposed to run i believe from a full year is successful it's being going since around this holidays i'm

not sure people know about it the success is in large part how much people know about it we'll get the month a so me and supervisor wiener and two of the people on the bart board and couple of reports and others went and benefit is somewhere out there and stated late the virtual sea room and got on a bus and went across the bay and turned around and came back what resulted was a couple of articles and hopefully continued conversation and your request to you as folks that have your own networks of people to go out and prompting this service if it doesn't become successful in whatever term bart decides is success there is no reason for

them to pursue later bart hours than that would be a shame didn't there's a flier attached with the colored ones we can send to you to help promote it's important why really go there a lot i came back in one piece. >> ms. johnson it says is darts at 256 and other times is that it. >> no. your better at this where you are it was this is additional service that was already provided go ahead. >> it's both. >> who are you. >> benefit sorry it's he additional service on the 8

hundred line to the east bay as well as the additional bus route the a-22 runs 3 times roughly between one and two but in addition the 8 that hundred service that exists the head ways from 20 to to minutes reduction so you have a lot more bus service. >> those are leaving from 16th and mission and 24th this is along the market street back so this hopefully also will tag into where people have begun since they've started the 8 hundred service arrest on the east side bay side between various city's there's additional. >> i think that's helpful it comes every 20 minutes or half an hour so great thanks. >> jocelyn. >> when you guys took the bus

obviously nobody knows did you have people on the bus. >> if you want to take home any article behind you you'll see in this case because we had bart board members bart was somewhat concerned something got tweeted out and folks were activated to the bart shut down the punishment i guess is considered the financial punishment the fact that was an opportunity for the task what is they going to do that was politicalized there were bart police as well i can't speak to i mean - yeah. unless i take is again without

the entunneling it's important this task force to also remind everyone and ourselves that the folks that take this kind of service often this is our lifeline service this is the only way they get around just because the only criteria for success ought not to be how many people are riding that's one thing yes, but this is a vital service to the people in particular there are other things that weigh more than just simply - >> once we get the network we've got this people don't know they can pickup at those stops once again once again we get the word out. >> yeah. get the word out but 24 flier didn't say it the bus

is really well lit and clean obviously i can't speak for everyone i didn't feel unsafe doesn't we were with a lot of people but. >> questions. >> bad experience. >> how much does it cost. >> you know i have a clipper so that's a good question there's a clipper does that ride like to muni. >> it is 420. >> thank you 420 oh. >> it it doesn't matter you it's a one flat rate. >> it's not like when you get on they don't charge you when you get off like bart. >> commissioner frost. >> did you talk to my of the 0 people on the bus and asked them why they're taking the bus. >> i didn't we were in the

abscond center yeah. i do not i think maybe this article - benefit did you. >> i'm sorry it was really late and i didn't i know that one of the things that bart is going to be doing evaluating and monitoring the success of the pilot we're going to be interested in keeping an eye on before it's up so we know how things are going over the course of the year. >> can i ask one final question besides this lovely event whatever events bart doing to let the riders know about this. >> i know that i've spoken with bart's marketing folks they given feedback from the working

group brown about developing the marketing plan so i think it's an ongoing development right now but certainly additional interest in not just launch it out there and letting it - >> die right. >> yes. and certainly on our end we should and can continue to work especially local businesses that are on at night for workers and patrons this is a good thing. >> yeah. i know when muni has a good line they'll post adds and whatnot on that line i've not seen anything for bart. >> there are banners in the bart station. >> there are. >> and signage at the entrances as well but certainly more we can do it get the word out. >> great thank you. do you want to