to take public comment. >> oh, roll call vote we'll go to public comment first but supervisor kim has a question. >> is that on ab 40 although i appreciate and support that measure i want to go back to the traffic endorsement camera i wanted clarity to legislations that you've talked about today, the first is the assemblyman chiu's ab state and federal 87 i'm curious what type of enforcements on parking it is the effort what specifically are we enforcing through the cameras and proposals on this legislation. >> well what kind of parking violations. >> i don't know. >> that's what i was assuming i can't answer that. >> supervisor kim currently we

have the authority to enforce double parking but not moving violations is to the continued moving violation it is a traffic violation or a point on the record but administratively determined enforcement actions. >> what is a forward facing cameras those are cameras on the sfmta park control. >> no on the buses. >> oh okay. >> specifically for the busses. >> yeah. so sorry about that >> this is for the busses. >> for the busses what in their double parking in the bus lane and second for high occupancy lanes this didn't currently exist. >> no, but it is for i've it is not for the high occupancy on

the bridge. >> is this a trader for san francisco. >> yes. >> we currently don't do this type of enforcement. >> we have the curiosity authority for the double parking but not the moving violations if a car is in the bus lane we don't have the authority to fin them. >> only if their double-parked how do you approve that if you take a photo of a car parked in front of you how would you demonstrate it car is doubled parked i'm imaging kind of the conflict that will cause that. >> i don't think that's been a problem to date but we can find out. >> we can find out today. >> yeah. the moving violation tickets i don't know if anyone from mta is here. >> i know it's not within our department i'm curious i've not

heard of one getting a ticket i think we should i support this legislation and think i know that state came up in conversations with the mta i'm surprised we've been able to not hear much about it i'm curious how effective it is i do think this is important to enforce and make sure that is the transit lane but i wanted to make sure it is being realized and the section which the abdomen an 1160 pro bono automateed traffic signals when we're pro bono automated traffic signals. >> this includes all the red light cameras. >> so all 60 cameras that exist

today we'll pause and study every single one we currently have. >> that's correct. >> i definitely support proposing that (laughter). >> i'm curious how many and this is not a question how many cameras do we have in the city enforcement cameras. >> i don't know but the idea was to bring this to those the vision zero committee on thursday so okay. >> thank you. >> thank you, supervisor kim any other questions or comments on the matrix very good. >> one last comment a number of bills we've spoken about introduced on february 22nd not available until last wednesday morning so i'm sorry i was not one hundred percent familiar with but we have a good idea of what they are we'll be sharper

next time. >> i appreciate it i know i appreciate it. >> open up for public comment any member of the public wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed we'll have a motion from supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor campos on moving to support position for the image. >> ab 40 for the tolling of the bicyclists and pedestrians on the golden gate bridge so can we take that without objection? we'll need a roll call vote? >> on the motion to amend item 3 commissioner avalos supervisor campos supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor mar item is amended and okay. can we have a motion to approve the

underlying matrix of - >> so moved. >> a motion from supervisor campos and second by supervisor mar do we need a roll call vote same house, same call? the motion passes next item, please. >> item 4 recommended the fiscal year 2014-2015 to increase the revenues and decrease the xhuchz by $29 million plus or a total fund balance of $32 million plus this is an action item. >> good morning cynthia deputy of the directors as you recall you approved the fiscal year 2014-2015 original budget in june of 2014 and taking the stock on the new grant and

anticipated expenditures we've received the annual fiscal audit i can lead you to table one the summary of the changes we've making in the budget amendment and climate for the amended budget or the increase or decrease of the item there in climate 3 the total of what the original budget was and plus or minus the chance with the new total amount this budget boils down to 4 stems we're requesting in item two one is the sales tax revenue an increase of $7 million for the tax revenue and had a stronger than exterminate economy and have had new grants 4 new grants in the past months with a city combined project and assistant grant transit

passenger annihilation grant as well as a late night transportation grant requested by supervisor wiener within the federal grant we've increased them the car sharing and electric if i had car share it will be anticipating those purchase of the vehicles going to be anticipate will be in this year's budget i 80 the yerba buena grant we're anticipating a combination of $7.5 million decrease in the project and as we brought to you before many times we've had issues with unusual warm weather it detailed the tree removal to august to

2016 nothing to be concerned about we have a change in the fulsome ramps we would have received a request of an additional 6 hundred thousands of work from ocii this was increased construction costs as stated we have also additional information we received last thursday as in the forum past committee meetings some contaminated dirt and ways to work with caltrain and ocii to identify what the proper protocol it was identified it will cost $1.2 million to remove the dirt ms. an emergency type of expenditure need we'll be bringing this request this $1.2 million revenues and expenditures directly to this

month board meeting this will go to the ocii on the 17 and bringing this before the board this is an additional board amendment and lastly in terms of major changes to the budget we're addressing $1.4 million to presidio parkway this is toll money expenditures that haven't been properly supported by caltrain yet before we pay the charges we're requesting additional support from caltrain and moving down the line the third item in the budget amendment the expenditures the capital project expenditures $25 million decrease for the radio replacement and central control communication projects mta is over seeing the projects and the projects have not

accrued costs as quickly in the schedule further below coordinating expenditures with the grant designation and for the fourth financial item we're increasing personnel costs by $345,000 this is related to the reorganization back in march 2014 that the board approved adding new positions for the 3 positions we have currently staffed 5 of the 8 positions those positions will not be staffed until we have the funding to be able to pay for those positions and towards the end of the memo an attachment a and b, a is a consolidation of a level of what the changes are and the proposed apartments and b listed the

revenues grants and detailed expenditures and on february 25th this item was brought before the committee the committee voted for the item unanimously in terms of fiscal impacts increasing the revenues and decreasing the revenues by $30 million this is no depth for the transportation authority total budget with that i'd like to open up for questions you might have. >> supervisor campos. >> thank you mr. chairman and the presentation i do want to follow up on the fulsome street off-ramp so who is responsible for cleaning up the contamination that was found. >> actually tilly chang our executive director. >> we on behalf of ocii are the

project sponsors we're responsible inform facilitate the movement of materials but the owner of the material caltrain is forever the owner of the materials the city may need to sign a manifest as the project sponsor to have some ability to track you know how the project is initiated by the city but caltrain it the owner of the material and the city has to sign a mapping festive we transport to the location. >> so caltrain may get to reinforce the caltrain authority. >> we had some hope we'll be able to partner with them for the total of it because they laid material there 5 or 10 years ago and in the ends they feel like that project is

independent of f this is the city's responsibility because we're disturbing the material in order to build the ramp even though officially that's their ramp we're the ones causing the ramp to be rebuilt and the materiality to be disturbed so on behalf of ocii we're going to need to dispose of it not caltrain. >> i said what caltrain is saying that's net necessarily the right thing to do are we giving up anything. >> we asked the same questions and brought it up to the caltrain and they felt that because the material you know reflects some of the contamination in the other parts of site this cough happened as part of the approach but when

they completed the project at the ended their relationship when we came back to try to reopen the project that's a new project that they don't have the responsibility for the new project. >> okay. thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you and thank you for your presentation a question i have and with me is the next fiscal year budget 2015-2016 not before us but looking at the sales tax how do you intend to budget it for the next fiscal year for the sales tax. >> we've actually worked with beacon they're projecting about 3 percent increase instead increase we have reviewed this

ever two years in addition to working with the controller's office in terms of how we are going to budget for this we're in the process of it we're going to be bringing this with a financial look in june. >> do we have the final projection for sales tax. >> we tried to stay online that's why i contacted them why they have that number this is how- what we have on our boxes we try to reconcile to a number that's close in the last year's we've pretty much taken the last number. >> the biggest change for the budget is $25 million for the mta's installment. >> yes. that's the capital

expenditure budget yes that's correct. >> do you speed up that the costs we're not concurring this year will roll over to the next year. >> yes. >> okay seeing no other comments from the committee we can opening it up for public comment any member of the public like to comment come forward seeing none, public comment is closed so like to thank ms. katie tang for her presentation colleagues, can we have a motion to approve by supervisor cohen and seconded by supervisor campos we'll stack that colleagues, same house, same call? the motion passes and let's go on to our next item. >> item 5 construction of new items colleagues, any new items or issues we can look at as a committee seeing none we'll opening it up for public comment

any member of the public comment wish to comment public comment is closed our next item. >> item 67 public comment. >> our next item is general public comment and since we don't have any public commenters we'll go on to our last item. >> adjournment. >> colleagues we're adjourned thank you

>> >> >> i call this meeting. >> the trans baybay joint powers meeting to