education and tloo introduce those kids to what the environmental stewardship was you'll those kids have moved ton to applying to other city jobs this year and four of them have been hired to rec and park as well as the sfpuc summary program i really want to appreciate the effort to make sure we educate our young folks and prepare them for the future those are two can we paths they'll find as we get more experienced much appreciate. >> thank you for you will you do any other speakers seeing none, public comment is closed. >> commissioners any comments. >> commissioner brandon. >> thank you such a wonderful presentation i'm really happy to see so many wonderful groups coming together

to work on this project just have a question about how the 75, 20 percent came about. >> 75, 20 split when we had the subcontractors that were working with sf cc sf cc escorted higher the 25 percent starting bid with hunters point family hoped to increase that later. >> so we're learning the rfp was it going to be 75 percent for the privilege and 85 for the sub and then how much of 75 percent is going to work in a filling randolph. >> thirty percent told is going to the subcontractors and it is

i believe a 20 10 split with the loosening street youth. >> okay. so the thirty, 24, 45 percent that's left where do most of those kids come from all over san francisco bay area or just - >> you want to address that. >> i will say those are rough numbers but so 40 percent of population comes from bayview hunters point the next tier is western edition after that tenderloin public school the mission district and just a combination of other. >> okay. >> i just want to add that

because of the conservation core works that the 18 and old they were to serve the youth so we have 15 and 16-year-old plants that participate in the program the budget was not huge we served a number of kids to introduce them to the work so conservation core could be another step but after programs they were working with the city. >> i guess my concern has always been the money that goes directly to the kids and giving that money to the kids i know there are a lot of administration fees and they have to supervisors and instructors i want most of the money to go to the youth

it seems like in hunters point family is paying 14 or $15 an hour or 12 or what an hour to me i don't know why? to give the larger contract to people that are paying less to the kids. >> for the administration of the larger contract singularly. >> so if hunters point family got more of the contract they've not been able to pay the kids 1350 and i don't know if it is that much of a decrease. >> that's my point my point i always want to see more money going towards the kids than administration costs if possible i personally feel i'll be more fair i've not heard good

reasoning for 75, 25 when we have two organizations that apply for the contract they both qualified and working with the you know same youth noticing percent in the bay area you i personally want to see if the conservation puts a raise what they're paying the kids i want to continue to give them 75 percent of the contract or go 50/50 or give more towards hunters point families. >> i guess my question maybe relates to that but i guess in terms of the conservation core i agree with commissioner brandon we went through that last time in the whole conversation about how much money is going to the youth versus the administration over head my question is the 4

percent increase how do that is that what wear paying for neither pay attention focuses on how many youth are being served by the program that will be important for us to understand how many kids are getting the benefits of the program i don't know what the population is. >> we're talking about potentially $4 million is a lot of money so how many kids are effected by this. >> i'll share with you we were originally the last fiscal year to serve 41 we served one hundred and thirty plants we're looking at maybe a hundred people or are served from all 3 agencies i could go ahead and explore the possibility of

paying 1350 an hour that causes potentially other issues within my programs because san francisco minimum wage is increasing up to 1225 an hour that is the base rate so i can go ahead and explore what that means i want to go ahead and point out there are other matrix or performance manufacturer we're required but the port is not paying for like the high school diploma program okay our criteria development and job placement services so a lot of added services we goading go ahead and perform as a total package in addition, we're a precertified program solos within the rfp it has language in this or there to make sure we're in compliance with the safety regulations in order for

us to use power tools for this project i want to go ahead and shoot it out there. >> it's interesting all the things you've added were those part of our rfp requirement. >> yes. those are performance manufacturer that were presented we need to go ahead and be in compliance so the entities binge those to the table as well. >> okay. any other questions. >> i'm wondering in the hunters point family provides those services i don't know yet. >> we do also provide the services probably no to the tent of conservation core we work with them but we have contractor as part of the contracts kind of

the name of everyone's gain how to you the evidence will then show the best outcomes to it me the outcomes are requiredy the port rfp 90 percent born and raised live in biophysicist so every time we look at the contract we have a lien budget in the community-based organizations we're always trying to look and put as much money in the pockets of young people we serve so we've kind of made it an art over the years to operate know on as little fat as possible to make sure we put the money in the pockets of the young people so we also provide the you know apprenticeship services particularly for environmentalists we have an epa contract we partner with the

ymca and other partnership programs and the embedding high school programs and the job replacement and recruitment through oewd we have contracts as well. >> thank you commissioner adams. >> yeah. i want to thank everyone for coming out and putting in and i understand cams concerns i don't know what we do to equalize the money and the commissioner is right i don't know maybe the commission is not clear i don't know what we do or if commissioner brandon wants to be involved we've come to this and she seems to be unhappy the money is not distributed equally but we have a process and people are listed in the process i don't know what we do a first and second or i don't know what

we do maybe kip has a better understanding i really appreciate those programs for the kids because i understand that i see all the young kids getting killed in the streets and dropping out of school those programs are so important we have a social responsibility to help out i don't know how to get more money i go to kip a lot of the money get catch up in the bureaucracy but it needs to go to the kids they'll be less likely to go out and do something bad and get them on the path to something positive in life i mean, we can't pat ourselves on the back they always say if i do the same thing repeating it is constant we've got to figure out this is right so i don't know maybe

commissioner moore or commissioner brandon to work i know that commissioner woo ho are the numbers people i'm just the union guy but they're more experts in this fold of money and economics so maybe they can fought something thank you. >> and i'll echo the comments of my colleagues, we're appreciative of the programs we're on the on the same page and reaching for the same thing to work with the youth with are needing the opportunity and training thank you all the organizations and turn to you to see if this year's thoughts on ways we know improve on you know you're working with you to make sure that we maximum misses funding going to the youth and really doing as much as we

possibly canning can it's your goal and ours as we struggle with the life inform san francisco is so terribly terrible expensive we want to create opportunities for people let's give them a minute to put their heads together i want to take a moment to pause and say we've had this program for 9 years and 7 of the 9 years are someplace we've had the conservation core they helped us to develop our program we remember lucky to add looking like street they've been consist with us i believe last year we were lucky to get apr ii loved what was said they'll graduated into the core but 0 actually

graduate into government congratulation that's huge i love seeing len in a wiener here we're working together many, many years ago and pregnancies ago it is fabulous to see her here i know she'll do great things whatever the outcome and we have a good partner and i'm sure they'll help us they have real costs and working hard in an expensive city we're getting as far as we know tell the most money to the kids that of anyone so for and we understand your frustration that it isn't the split you'd like to see but i think we're still getting great results. >> what in their doing to get people into permanent job is

fanatic i want to celebrate that did you come up with something i bathe you a lot of time there (laughter). >> i'm megan the ports manager i've been watching rfp and supporting it from the sidelines i don't have a solution turning back to you in terms of process like continuing the item or excusing to negotiate under guidelines but i want to just reiterate s a couple of points chart that shows how the different organizations scored showed the conservation core scored higher because of their lbe points that is a priority we set over you know as part of our identifying which partnership we'll want to make we recognize

the subcontractor that are lbe's that raises them higher-up and the 25 75 percent was driven the lbe escorted higher and get a largely portion the contract the salaries received by youth under the different proposals those are not set in the rfp so moving forward it will be helpful to have a salary that the commission thinks is reasonable is minimum wage enough would be one question if not what is a good amount another piece recognizing if youth gets higher salaries maybe fewer youth are served by the organizations we don't know so. >> maybe that should be part of the presentation maybe the presentation should have how

many each group is going to serve and the costs braked. >> i think we clearly heard all of the comments and appreciate those comments but i know that everything is not just one fork it is not who is done this the longest or who scored the highest is the youth it is the youth and what's being done with the youth i want to agree with monique we have great partners san francisco conservation core is like the ultimate youth organization and loosening street and aids filipino randolph is a wonderful organizations i can't see from this report why it's 75 25 and less entering the organization is getting more if you can show me something that states that

i'll be happy - >> i mean, i think that my suggestion is that maybe continue the item a little bit give the chance for the staff and the organizations to put their heads together and in terms of of the conservation core they've been around longer and the programs developed in some of the features their costs are higher i don't know the answer we're all wondering why the different delineation but more in depth discussions we're not going to solve it here we're dedicated and have a passion around if it self-timeline wise to continue it and get more in depth answers and sexuality evaluating it you, you know talk about having a high school diploma to have people go through a through b or m those

are the differences we don't know the answer we don't want to debate that so said what the costs are and the what this differential we'll need to think about obviously we want most of the money to say go to the youth how many youth do you want to serve those are balances. >> i hope my comments were taken we were tremendously supportive of project and the time the commissioners focus on the contract are reflecting of our passion and the importance we put to providing the training to the youth, of course i'm proud of what the port has done i'll reframe it different to our partners is there something we are pitting in the rfp that might put added onerous on the

organizations that causes further administrative costs that may not be necessary that you know if we're to look at it a different way could we have more money going to the youth as opposed to we're he and she complaints government does potentially too much on our partners in terms of the pieshgs are there other things to streamline it or to chief the same results the bottom line as fiscal as we possible can. >> commissioner given the late item we'll continue. >> is there something and that maybe too late for the rfp but something we should look at so it keeps come back we can understand and one thing that concerns most of we started that

as a grant that ran afoul as a city entrapment so we converted it to a contract we had to look at measuring the services and all the normal criteria we used to measure the quality of the stifrdz so we're not measuring the benefit to the youth and so maybe it's time to revisit with council that won't effect the solicitation but that is why the disconnect happened again we'll have to explore with council what flexibility neiman we'll explore with our service requirement to see if we need to be buying that level of service. >> you see it differently than i. >> if we can continue this to those the next meeting. >> certainly.

>> march 24th. >> yes. thank you. >> call the next item item 11 informational presentation and reports open the contracting for the first and second quarters of 2014. >> actually - do we are we're going to lose a quorum. >> so commissioners given the late hour it's a great report you can take it under advertiser advisement it's a great report and we'll move on or whatever you deserve but i don't want to lose our quorum we have speedy items. >> can we continue it. >> i don't think any. >> i think it is late we have two major items to go through here can we continue this to

those our next meeting. >> how about we disagree to continue it. >> it is too important to get lost and running through it quick. >> i'm sure yeah i'm sure that's all right. with the audience what's left. >> i apologize to our staff that geared up to presenting this evening. >> does that. >> megan. >> all right. were you trying to take a short break. >> i was going to concur. >> we'll - item 11 a and the results if the contracting are stellar i don't want them to get short human resources if didn't ended e.r. end up being at the end of the night again.

>> item informational presentation for the city mixed use development plan for the pier 70 site boarded by twovth go michigan and 22nd street and the special use district. >> good evening, commissioners i'm brad benson with pier 70 team binding red diane and david ricky and sarah dennis with the office of economic workforce development we're joined by jack and kelly from forest city i'm going to make my introduction to this item very, very brief we have been working with forest city since 2011 to plan development of the waterfront site at 20 ieshg acre site within pier 70 they enforced a sheet in intuitively we are that well on the way to developing a

land use plan consistent with the land sheet and the voter weighed ♪ prop b in 2013 at the staff level we're impressed how quickly reacted to that and adapt to the new reality to voters needing need to approve the height limit for the development along the port they did outreach and got consensus around the proposition f on the november ballot increasing heights for the waterfront site from 40 to 90 feet effective when the commission and if the commission approvals a project consistent with that that proposition f offset a number of policies statements related to the development of the waterfront site i'm sure jack will get into and impressed with how quickly the city after

the approval the 73 percent vote has assembled a team and working hard to refine the land use plan and head towards environmental review that is also required by proposition f and where we're working with them to develop the materials that will be needed for a notice of appropriations for the environmental review expected in april tonight we want to offer an opportunity to let them present with that i'm going to turn it over to jack >> thank you brad hello commissioners president and vice president we thank you for the opportunity to come to you it's been alter while as brad mentioned last year was an active year one of

the things that we did was continue the community outreach we've been doing in partnership with you all that included the ability to have community events and tours at building 12 that facilitated that was the foundation for getting folks out to the site to see the stunt we have to create something great we as brad said as the election was getting closer we basically set up our design teams and the team we have with the planning department to initiate the environmental review i think that was two days after the election we submitted our paperwork we needed with the planning department to start the ceqa process so in what is up on the screen right now you see we've been now at that coming up

on 4 years as brad mentioned the term sheet in the middle of 2013 set the land use plan that i would say 95 percent of which you'll see remains true with the prop f step last year we think of advancing two years ahead of schedule the community outreach we'll need for a project approval we're not moving into the design and planning we'll talk about the pieces the eir drives the process we're some more in the range of 21, 22 eir process that is driven by the time infractions framed that the planning department we'll work as hard as we can to make that

process quickly than the 22 months because time is money and an concurrent basis we'll be working on the specific plans that inform the ceqa analysis and really are part of the package materials that we would ultimately bring to you asking for your support that include the design guidelines to implicitly when small business ultimate is building and designing the building the design guidelines operated within this is what has been done at treasure island and shipyard and the mission bay people are focused on the infrastructure plans and the sustainability plan and the spoon plan we're working on those a particularly path with the eir and we'll be happy to come and present at the appraisement time. i'd like to have kelly who works with the forest city

quickly walk you through the land use plan and the program that is associated with the eir and again most of it will look familiar and we're happy to answer questions as we go through it at the end >> hi good evening, members of the commission i'm kelly happy to walk you through the land use plan for pier 70 that is westward towards did east we'll start with the illinois parcel we'll remember in the 2013 term sheet it was contemplated by request of the city and the port that included in the 28 acre sites they will be a port owned property on illinois outlined in pink was the pg&e